Defalut XmlSiteMapProvider implementation cannot use SiteMap.FindSiteMapNode? - mvcsitemapprovider

I just upgrade MvcSiteMapProvider from v3 to v4.6.3.
I see the upgrade note indicate:
In general, any reference to System.Web.SiteMap.Provider will need to be updated to MvcSiteMapProvider.SiteMaps.Current
I am trying to get the sitemap node by using:
SiteMaps.Current.FindSiteMapNode(rawUrl)
But it always return null
I looked into the code. In the sitemap it's actually calling the function:
protected virtual ISiteMapNode FindSiteMapNodeFromUrlMatch(IUrlKey urlToMatch)
{
if (this.urlTable.ContainsKey(urlToMatch))
{
return this.urlTable[urlToMatch];
}
return null;
}
It's trying to find a match in the urlTable.
I am using Default implementation of XmlSiteMapProvider .
It define var url = node.GetAttributeValue("url");
siteMapNode.Url = url;
siteMapNode.UrlResolver = node.GetAttributeValue("urlResolver");
So if I did not define url or urlResolver attribute in the .sitemap file. These variables a set to empty string, when generate the node.
And when this nodes are passed to AddNode function in SiteMap.
When adding the node
bool isMvcUrl = string.IsNullOrEmpty(node.UnresolvedUrl) && this.UsesDefaultUrlResolver(node);
this code will check if there is url or urlResolver
// Only store URLs if they are clickable and are configured using the Url
// property or provided by a custom URL resolver.
if (!isMvcUrl && node.Clickable)
{
url = this.siteMapChildStateFactory.CreateUrlKey(node);
// Check for duplicates (including matching or empty host names).
if (this.urlTable
.Where(k => string.Equals(k.Key.RootRelativeUrl, url.RootRelativeUrl, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
.Where(k => string.IsNullOrEmpty(k.Key.HostName) || string.IsNullOrEmpty(url.HostName) || string.Equals(k.Key.HostName, url.HostName, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
.Count() > 0)
{
var absoluteUrl = this.urlPath.ResolveUrl(node.UnresolvedUrl, string.IsNullOrEmpty(node.Protocol) ? Uri.UriSchemeHttp : node.Protocol, node.HostName);
throw new InvalidOperationException(string.Format(Resources.Messages.MultipleNodesWithIdenticalUrl, absoluteUrl));
}
}
// Add the URL
if (url != null)
{
this.urlTable[url] = node;
}
Finally no url is add to the urlTable, which result in FindSiteMapNode cannot find anything.
I am not sure if there needs to be specific configuration. Or should I implement custom XmlSiteMapProvider just add the url.

ISiteMapNodeProvider instances cannot use the FindSiteMapNode function for 2 reasons. The first you have already discovered is that finding by URL can only be done if you set the url attribute explicitly in the node configuration. The second reason is that the SiteMapBuilder doesn't add any of the nodes to the SiteMap until all of the ISiteMapNodeProvider instances have completed running, so it would be moot to add the URL to the URL table anyway.
It might help if you explain what you are trying to accomplish.
The ISiteMapNodeProvider classes have complete control over the data that is added to the SiteMapNode instances and they also have access to their parent SiteMapNode instance. This is generally all that is needed in order to populate the data. Looking up another SiteMapNode from the SiteMap object while populating the data is not supported. But as long as the node you are interested in is populated in the same ISiteMapNodeProvider instance, you can just get a reference to it later by storing it in a variable.
Update
Okay, I reread your question and your comment and it now just seems like you are looking in the wrong place. MvcSiteMapProvider v4 is no longer based on Microsoft's SiteMap provider model, so using XmlSiteMapProvider doesn't make sense, as it would sidestep the entire implementation. The only case where this might make sense is if you have a hybrid ASP.NET and ASP.NET MVC application that you want to keep a consitant menu structure between. See Upgrading from v3 to v4.
There are 2 stages to working with the data. The first stage (the ISiteMapBuilder and ISiteMapNodeProvider) loads the data from various sources (XML, .NET attributes, DynamicNodeProviders, and custom implementations of ISiteMapNodeProvider) and adds it to an object graph that starts at the SiteMap object. Much like Microsoft's model, this data is stored in a shared cache and only loaded when the cache expires. This is the stage you have been focusing on and it definitely doesn't make sense to lookup nodes here.
The second stage is when an individual request is made to access the data. This is where looking up data based on a URL might make sense, but there is already a built-in CurrentNode property that finds the node matching the current URL (or more likely the current route since we are dealing with MVC) which in most cases is the best approach to finding a node. Each node has a ParentNode and ChildNodes properties that can be used to walk up or down the tree from there.
In this second stage, you can access the SiteMap data at any point after the Application_Start event such as within a controller action, in one of the built in HTML helpers, an HTML helper template in the /Views/Shared/DisplayTemplates/ directory, or a custom HTML helper. This is the point in the application life cycle which you might call the lines SiteMaps.Current.FindSiteMapNode(rawUrl) or (more likely) SiteMaps.Current.CurrentNode to get an instance of the node so you can inspect its Attributes property (the custom attributes).
public ActionResult About()
{
ViewBag.Message = "Your app description page.";
var currentNode = MvcSiteMapProvider.SiteMaps.Current.CurrentNode;
string permission = currentNode.Attributes.ContainsKey("permission") ? currentNode.Attributes["permission"].ToString() : string.Empty;
string programs = currentNode.Attributes.ContainsKey("programs") ? currentNode.Attributes["programs"].ToString() : string.Empty;
string agencies = currentNode.Attributes.ContainsKey("agencies") ? currentNode.Attributes["agencies"].ToString() : string.Empty;
// Do something with the custom attributes of the About page here
return View();
}
The most common usage of custom attributes is to use them from within a custom HTML helper template. Here is a custom version of the /Views/Shared/DisplayTemplates/SiteMapNodeModel.cshtml template that displays the custom attributes. Note that this template is called recursively by the Menu, SiteMapPath, and SiteMap HTML helpers. Have a look at this answer for more help if HTML helper customization is what you intend to do.
#model MvcSiteMapProvider.Web.Html.Models.SiteMapNodeModel
#using System.Web.Mvc.Html
#using MvcSiteMapProvider.Web.Html.Models
#if (Model.IsCurrentNode && Model.SourceMetadata["HtmlHelper"].ToString() != "MvcSiteMapProvider.Web.Html.MenuHelper") {
<text>#Model.Title</text>
} else if (Model.IsClickable) {
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(Model.Description))
{
#Model.Title
}
else
{
#Model.Title
}
} else {
<text>#Model.Title</text>
}
#string permission = Model.Attributes.ContainsKey("permission") ? Model.Attributes["permission"].ToString() : string.Empty
#string programs = Model.Attributes.ContainsKey("programs") ? Model.Attributes["programs"].ToString() : string.Empty
#string agencies = Model.Attributes.ContainsKey("agencies") ? Model.Attributes["agencies"].ToString() : string.Empty
<div>#permission</div>
<div>#programs</div>
<div>#agencies</div>

Related

Orchard CMS front-end all possible content filtering by user permissions

Good day!
In my Orchard, I have several content types all with my custom part attached. This part defines to what users this content is available. For each logged user there is external service, which defines what content user can or cannot access. Now I need access restriction to apply everywhere where orchard display content lists, this includes results by specific tag from a tag cloud, or results listed from Taxonomy term. I seems can’t find any good way to do it except modifying TaxonomyServices code as well as TagCloud services, to join also my part and filter by it. Is this indeed the only way to do it or there are other solutions? I would like to avoid doing changes to built-in modules if possible but cannot find other way.
Thanks in advance.
I'm currently bumbling around with the same issue. One way I'm currently looking at is to hook into the content manager.
[OrchardSuppressDependency("Orchard.ContentManagement.DefaultContentManager")]
public class ModContentManager : DefaultContentManager, IContentManager
{
//private readonly Lazy<IShapeFactory> _shapeFactory;
private readonly IModAuthContext _modAuthContext;
public ModContentManager(IComponentContext context,
IRepository<ContentTypeRecord> contentTypeRepository,
IRepository<ContentItemRecord> contentItemRepository,
IRepository<ContentItemVersionRecord> contentItemVersionRepository,
IContentDefinitionManager contentDefinitionManager,
ICacheManager cacheManager,
Func<IContentManagerSession> contentManagerSession,
Lazy<IContentDisplay> contentDisplay,
Lazy<ISessionLocator> sessionLocator,
Lazy<IEnumerable<IContentHandler>> handlers,
Lazy<IEnumerable<IIdentityResolverSelector>> identityResolverSelectors,
Lazy<IEnumerable<ISqlStatementProvider>> sqlStatementProviders,
ShellSettings shellSettings,
ISignals signals,
//Lazy<IShapeFactory> shapeFactory,
IModAuthContext modAuthContext)
: base(context,
contentTypeRepository,
contentItemRepository,
contentItemVersionRepository,
contentDefinitionManager,
cacheManager,
contentManagerSession,
contentDisplay,
sessionLocator,
handlers,
identityResolverSelectors,
sqlStatementProviders,
shellSettings,
signals) {
//_shapeFactory = shapeFactory;
_modAuthContext = modAuthContext;
}
public new dynamic BuildDisplay(IContent content, string displayType = "", string groupId = "") {
// So you could do something like...
// var myPart = content.As<MyAuthoPart>();
// if(!myPart.IsUserAuthorized)...
// then display something else or display nothing (I think returning null works for this but
//don't quote me on that. Can always return a random empty shape)
// else return base.BuildDisplay(content, displayType, groupId);
// ever want to display a shape based on the name...
//dynamic shapes = _shapeFactory.Value;
}
}
}
Could also hook into the IAuthorizationServiceEventHandler, which is activated before in the main ItemController and do a check to see if you are rendering a projection or taxonomy list set a value to tell your content manager to perform checks else just let them through. Might help :)

Check URL exists in ApplicationContentUriRules

I have an app that is loading URLs into a WebView (x-ms-webview). When the user makes the request, I would like to compare the URL they are trying to load with the "whitelisted" URLs in the ApplicationContentUriRules and warn them if it is not there. Any ideas how I might accomplish this?
There isn't a direct API for pulling information out of the manifest, but there are options.
First, you can just maintain an array of those same URIs in your code, because to change them you'd have to change the manifest and update your package anyway, so you would update the array to match. This would make it easy to check, but increase code maintenance.
Such an array would also let you create a UI in which the user can enter only URIs that will work, e.g. you can offer possibilities from a drop-down list instead of letting the user enter anything.
Second, you can read the manifest XML into a document directly and parse through it to get to the rules. Here's some code that will do that:
var uri = new Windows.Foundation.Uri("ms-appx:///appxmanifest.xml");
var doc;
Windows.Storage.StorageFile.getFileFromApplicationUriAsync(uri).then(function (file) {
return Windows.Storage.FileIO.readTextAsync(file);
}).done(function (text) {
doc = new Windows.Data.Xml.Dom.XmlDocument();
doc.loadXml(text);
var acur = doc.getElementsByTagName("ApplicationContentUriRules");
if (acur !== null) {
var rules = acur[0].getElementsByTagName("Rule");
for (var i = 0; i < rules.length; i++) {
console.log(rules[i].getAttribute("Match") + " - " + rules[i].getAttribute("Type"));
}
}
});
You could probably just get "Rule" tags directly from the root doc, because I don't think anything else in the manifest uses that kind of node, but to future-proof it's better to get the ApplicationContentUriRules first. As you can see, the "Match" attribute is what holds the URI for that rule, but you also need to make sure that "Type" is "include" and not "exclude".

How to make the cache to refresh when the XML is changed?

I am using MvcSiteMapProvider 4.6.3, MVC 4. Using DI to config the Sitemap.
this.For<System.Runtime.Caching.ObjectCache>()
.Use(s => System.Runtime.Caching.MemoryCache.Default);
this.For(typeof (ICacheProvider<>)).Use(typeof (RuntimeCacheProvider<>));
var rootCacheDependency = this.For<ICacheDependency>().Use<RuntimeFileCacheDependency>()
.Ctor<string>("fileName").Is(rootFileName);
var rootCacheDetails = this.For<ICacheDetails>().Use<CacheDetails>()
.Ctor<TimeSpan>("absoluteCacheExpiration").Is(absoluteCacheExpiration)
.Ctor<TimeSpan>("slidingCacheExpiration").Is(TimeSpan.MinValue)
.Ctor<ICacheDependency>().Is(rootCacheDependency);
var cacheDetails = new List<SmartInstance<CacheDetails>>();
var xmlSources = new List<SmartInstance<FileXmlSource>>();
How to make it automatically update the cache when the Sitemap xml is updated?
I am upgrading MvcSitemapProvider from v3 to v4.
In version 3, it seems the sitemap is automatically refreshed.
I did set the cache expiration time to be 5 min, is this causing problem?
TimeSpan absoluteCacheExpiration = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(5);
var rootCacheDetails = this.For<ICacheDetails>().Use<CacheDetails>()
.Ctor<TimeSpan>("absoluteCacheExpiration").Is(absoluteCacheExpiration)
.Ctor<TimeSpan>("slidingCacheExpiration").Is(TimeSpan.MinValue)
.Ctor<ICacheDependency>().Is(rootCacheDependency);
UPDATE
When I change the sitemap xml file the cache is not updated till 5 min the cache expire.
I am using multiple sitemap xml files.
var sitmapPath = HostingEnvironment.MapPath("~/Sitemaps");
var sitemaps = new List<string>();
if (sitmapPath != null)
{
sitemaps.AddRange(Directory.GetFiles(sitmapPath, "*.sitemap"));
}
foreach (var sitemapFileName in sitemaps)
{
var cacheDependencie =
this.For<ICacheDependency>()
.Use<RuntimeFileCacheDependency>()
.Ctor<string>("fileName")
.Is(sitemapFileName);
cacheDetails.Add(this.For<ICacheDetails>().Use<CacheDetails>()
.Ctor<TimeSpan>("absoluteCacheExpiration").Is(absoluteCacheExpiration)
.Ctor<TimeSpan>("slidingCacheExpiration").Is(TimeSpan.MinValue)
.Ctor<ICacheDependency>().Is(cacheDependencie));
xmlSources.Add(this.For<IXmlSource>().Use<FileXmlSource>()
.Ctor<string>("fileName").Is(sitemapFileName));
}
Will this be the reason it's not working?
I don't see a problem with the code you posted. However, it is the RuntimeFileCacheDependency that will make it reload when the XML is changed.
The RuntimeFileCacheDependency expects the fileName argument to be an absolute path. So you must convert it using HostingEnvironment.MapPath before providing it to the RuntimeFileCacheDependency constructor.
var rootFileName = HostingEnvironment.MapPath("~/root.sitemap");
Response to Your Update
The purpose of the cacheDetails object is to specify the caching policy for a single SiteMapBuilderSet instance. If you look further down in the (original) DI module, notice that the variable is passed to the constructor of this class.
// Configure the builder sets
this.For<ISiteMapBuilderSetStrategy>().Use<SiteMapBuilderSetStrategy>()
.EnumerableOf<ISiteMapBuilderSet>().Contains(x =>
{
x.Type<SiteMapBuilderSet>()
.Ctor<string>("instanceName").Is("default")
.Ctor<bool>("securityTrimmingEnabled").Is(securityTrimmingEnabled)
.Ctor<bool>("enableLocalization").Is(enableLocalization)
.Ctor<bool>("visibilityAffectsDescendants").Is(visibilityAffectsDescendants)
.Ctor<bool>("useTitleIfDescriptionNotProvided").Is(useTitleIfDescriptionNotProvided)
.Ctor<ISiteMapBuilder>().Is(builder)
.Ctor<ICacheDetails>().Is(cacheDetails); // <- caching specified here explicitly.
});
This is what is used to expire the cache, but it is a completely separate mechanism from the part that specifies to use multiple files to build a SiteMap:
// Register the sitemap node providers
var siteMapNodeProvider = this.For<ISiteMapNodeProvider>().Use<CompositeSiteMapNodeProvider>()
.EnumerableOf<ISiteMapNodeProvider>().Contains(x =>
{
x.Type<XmlSiteMapNodeProvider>()
.Ctor<bool>("includeRootNode").Is(true)
.Ctor<bool>("useNestedDynamicNodeRecursion").Is(false)
.Ctor<IXmlSource>().Is(rootXmlSource);
// NOTE: Each additional XmlSiteMapNodeProvider instance for the same SiteMap instance must
// specify includeRootNode as "false"
x.Type<XmlSiteMapNodeProvider>()
.Ctor<bool>("includeRootNode").Is(false)
.Ctor<bool>("useNestedDynamicNodeRecursion").Is(false)
.Ctor<IXmlSource>().Is(childXmlSource1);
x.Type<XmlSiteMapNodeProvider>()
.Ctor<bool>("includeRootNode").Is(false)
.Ctor<bool>("useNestedDynamicNodeRecursion").Is(false)
.Ctor<IXmlSource>().Is(childXmlSource2);
// Add additional XmlSiteMapNodeProviders here (with includeRootNode as "false")...
// You only need this if you intend to use MvcSiteMapNodeAttribute in your application
x.Type<ReflectionSiteMapNodeProvider>()
.Ctor<IEnumerable<string>>("includeAssemblies").Is(includeAssembliesForScan)
.Ctor<IEnumerable<string>>("excludeAssemblies").Is(new string[0]);
});
// Register the sitemap builders
var builder = this.For<ISiteMapBuilder>().Use<SiteMapBuilder>()
.Ctor<ISiteMapNodeProvider>().Is(siteMapNodeProvider);
This is how to specify multiple XML files for a single SiteMap, but it is also possible to make each XML file into its own SiteMap instance by passing each instance of XmlSiteMapNodeProvider to a separate SiteMapBuilder and a separate SiteMapBuilderSet as described in Multiple SiteMaps in One Application.
IMPORTANT: For multiple XML files to work on a single SiteMap instance, you must specify the same key for the root node of each SiteMap as shown at the bottom of this answer. But you cannot specify a node representing the same controller action in more than one XML file (other than the root node).
If you need more flexibility than this, I would suggest implementing your own XmlSiteMapNodeProvider or abandoning the idea of using XML altogether, since using ISiteMapNodeProvider or IDynamicNodeProvider is much more flexible.
Now, back to the caching. If you are indeed using multiple XML files in the same SiteMap instance, you need to use a RuntimeCompositeCacheDependency so each of the files will be considered a dependency for the same cache, but you must use a single instance of CacheDetails.
var rootCacheDependency =
this.For<ICacheDependency>().Use<RuntimeFileCacheDependency>()
.Ctor<string>("fileName").Is(rootAbsoluteFileName);
var childCacheDependency1 =
this.For<ICacheDependency>().Use<RuntimeFileCacheDependency>()
.Ctor<string>("fileName").Is(childAbsoluteFileName1);
var childCacheDependency2 =
this.For<ICacheDependency>().Use<RuntimeFileCacheDependency>()
.Ctor<string>("fileName").Is(childAbsoluteFileName2);
var cacheDependency =
this.For<ICacheDependency>().Use<RuntimeCompositeCacheDependency>()
.Ctor<ICacheDependency[]>().Is(new ICacheDependency[]
{
(ICacheDependency)rootCacheDependency,
(ICacheDependency)childCacheDependency1,
(ICacheDependency)childCacheDependency2
});
var cacheDetails =
this.For<ICacheDetails>().Use<CacheDetails>()
.Ctor<TimeSpan>("absoluteCacheExpiration").Is(absoluteCacheExpiration)
.Ctor<TimeSpan>("slidingCacheExpiration").Is(TimeSpan.MinValue)
.Ctor<ICacheDependency>().Is(cacheDependency);

Implementing List.cshtml for Projection throws 'Orchard.ContentManagement.ContentItem' does not contain a definition for 'TagsPart'

I have implemented List.cshtml to provide a custom display for an image gallery. This is the first time I have tried to override a Projection with a Template and at first it seemed to work fine. Then I noticed that when I try to access the Projection on the backend Orchard 1.7 falls over with:
RuntimeBinderException 'Orchard.ContentManagement.ContentItem' does
not contain a definition for 'TagsPart'
Here is some code from the template List.cshtml:
List<TagRecord> uniqueTags = new List<TagRecord>();
List<dynamic> items = Model.Items;
if (items != null && items.Any())
{
foreach (var item in items)
{
if (item != null && item.ContentItem != null)
{
TagsPart part = item.ContentItem.TagsPart;
if (part != null && part.CurrentTags != null)
{
foreach (var t in part.CurrentTags)
{
if (!uniqueTags.Contains(t))
{
uniqueTags.Add(t);
}
}
}
}
}
I am ignorant on a couple of points, which I suspect may be causing the error:
How to specify a template for a Projection (more specific than 'List.cshtml'). Can I use Placement.info? How?
How should I test for the presence of a specific part in the ContentItem? Just assigning TagsPart part = item.ContentItem.TagsPart; throws the exception above.
UPDATE: I had implemented this as a Module; that is, the List.cshtml was in the Views folder of a simple Module. If I move List.cshtml to the Theme then the problem goes away. However, I would still prefer to use a module so that the layout is independent of the theme.
Orchard 1.7 includes a new query layout provider called 'Shape'. I simply used this provider, gave it a Shape Type of 'LightboxIsotope', and created a view called 'LightboxIsotope.cshtml'.
In a projection you can customize the html rendered for each property on the List. In order to acomplish this you need to go to your query, and add a new Layout, choose the properties you need, and set everything you want.
If the layouts provided in the Queries Module don´t fullfill your requirements, you can allways create your own layout provider, this blog post shows an example:
http://www.stevetaylor.me.uk/image-carousel-using-twitter-bootstrap-and-orchard-cms-projections

ServiceStack - Redirecting at root based on query params [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Create route for root path, '/', with ServiceStack
(3 answers)
Closed 3 years ago.
I've got a Fallback DTO that looks like the following:
[FallbackRoute("/{Path*}")]
public class Fallback
{
public string Path { get; set; }
}
Now, in my Service I would like to redirect to an HTML5 compliant URL, and this is what I've tried:
public object Get(Fallback fallback)
{
return this.Redirect("/#!/" + fallback.Path);
}
It is working all fine and dandy, except for the fact that query parameters are not passed along with the path. Using Request.QueryString does not work as no matter what I do it is empty. Here's what my current (non-working) solution looks like:
public object Get(Fallback fallback)
{
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder("?");
foreach (KeyValuePair<string, string> item in Request.QueryString)
{
sb.Append(item.Key).Append("=").Append(item.Value).Append("&");
}
var s = "/#!/" + fallback.Path + sb.ToString();
return this.Redirect(s);
}
TL;DR: I want to pass on query strings along with fallback path.
EDIT: It turns out I had two problems; now going to mysite.com/url/that/does/not/exist?random=param correctly redirects the request to mysite.com/#!/url/that/does/not/exist?random=param& after I changed the above loop to:
foreach (string key in Request.QueryString)
{
sb.Append(key).Append("=").Append(Request.QueryString[key]).Append("&");
}
But the fallback is still not being called at root, meaning mysite.com/?random=param won't trigger anything.
In essence, what I want to do is to have ServiceStack look for query strings at root, e.g., mysite.com/?key=value, apply some logic and then fire off a redirect. The purpose of this is in order for crawler bots to be able to query the site with a _escaped_fragment_ parameter and then be presented with an HTML snapshot prepared by a server. This is in order for the bots to be able to index single-page applications (more on this).
I'm thinking perhaps the FallbackRoute function won't cover this and I need to resort to overriding the CatchAllHandler.
I managed to find a solution thanks to this answer.
First create an EndpointHostConfig object in your AppHost:
var config = new EndpointHostConfig
{
...
};
Then, add a RawHttpHandler:
config.RawHttpHandlers.Add(r =>
{
var crawl = r.QueryString["_escaped_fragment_"];
if (crawl != null)
{
HttpContext.Current.RewritePath("/location_of_snapshots/" + crawl);
}
return null;
});
Going to mysite.com/?_escaped_fragment_=home?key=value will fire off a redirection to mysite.com/location_of_snapshots/home?key=value, which should satisfy the AJAX crawling bots.
N.B. It's possible some logic needs to be applied to the redirection to ensure that there won't be double forward slashes. I have yet to test that.

Resources