I want to use /dev/zero for storing lots of temporary data (32 GB or around that). I am doing this:
fd = open("/dev/zero", O_RDWR );
// <Exit on error>
vbase = (uint64_t*) mmap(NULL, MEMSIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, fd, 0);
// <Exit on error>
ftruncate(fd, (off_t) MEMSIZE);
I am changing MEMSIZE from 1GB to 32 GB (performing a memtest) to see if I can really access all that range. I am running out of memory at 1 GB.
Is there something I am missing ? Am I mmap'ing correctly ?
Or am I running into some system limit ? How can I check if this is happening ?
P.S: I run many programs that generate many gigs of data within a single file, so I dont know if there is an artificial upper limit, just that I seem to be running into something.
I have to admit I'm confused about what you're actually trying to do. Anyway, a couple of reason why what you do might not work:
From the mmap(2) manpage: "MAP_ANONYMOUS
The mapping is not backed by any file; its contents are initialized to zero. The fd and offset arguments are ignored;"
From the null(4) manpage: "Data written to a null or zero special file is discarded."
So anyway, before MAP_ANONYMOUS, mmap'ing /dev/zero was sometimes used to get anonymous (i.e. not backed by any file) memory. No need to do both. In either case, actually writing to all that memory implies that you need some kind of backing store for it, either physical memory or swap space. If you cannot guarantee that, maybe it's better to mmap() a real file on a filesystem with enough space?
Look into Linux kernel mmap implementation:
vm_mmap vm_mmap_pgoff do_mmap_pgoff mmap_region file->f_op->mmap(file, vma)
In the function do_mmap_pgoff, it checks the max_map_count
if (mm->map_count > sysctl_max_map_count)
return -ENOMEM;
root> sysctl -a | grep map_count
vm.max_map_count = 65530
In the function mmap_region, it checks the process virtual address limit (whether it is unlimited).
int may_expand_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long npages)
{
unsigned long cur = mm->total_vm; /* pages */
unsigned long lim;
lim = rlimit(RLIMIT_AS) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
if (cur + npages > lim)
return 0;
return 1;
}
root> ulimit -a | grep virtual
virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited
In linux kernel, init task has the rlimit setting by default.
[RLIMIT_AS] = { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \
#ifndef RLIM_INFINITY
# define RLIM_INFINITY (~0UL)
#endif
In order to prove it, use the test_mem program
tmp> ./test_mem
RLIMIT_AS limit got sucessfully:
soft_limit=4294967295, hard_limit=4294967295
RLIMIT_DATA limit got sucessfully:
soft_limit=4294967295, hard_limit=4294967295
struct rlimit rl;
int ret;
ret = getrlimit(RLIMIT_AS, &rl);
if (ret == 0) {
printf("RLIMIT_AS limit got sucessfully:\n");
printf("soft_limit=%lld, hard_limit=%lld\n", (long long)rl.rlim_cur, (long long)rl.rlim_max);
}
That means unlimited means 0xFFFFFFFF for 32bit app in the 64bit OS. Change the shell virtual address limit, it could reflect correctly.
root> ulimit -v 1024000
tmp> ./test_mem
RLIMIT_AS limit got sucessfully:
soft_limit=1048576000, hard_limit=1048576000
RLIMIT_DATA limit got sucessfully:
soft_limit=4294967295, hard_limit=4294967295
In mmap_region, there is an accountable check
accountable_mapping security_vm_enough_memory_mm cap_vm_enough_memory __vm_enough_memory overcommit/swap/admin and user reserve handling.
Please follow the three steps to check whether they can meet.
Related
I am trying to read /proc//pagemap in a kernel driver like this:
uint64_t page;
uint64_t va = 0x7FFD1BF46530;`
loff_t pos = va / PAGE_SIZE * sizeof(uint64_t);
struct file * filp = filp_open("/proc/19030/pagemap", O_RDONLY, 0);
ssize_t nread = kernel_read(filp, &page, sizeof(page), &pos);
I get error -22 in nread (EINVAL, invalid argument) and
"kernel read not supported for file /19030/pagemap (pid: 19030 comm: tester)" in dmesg.
0x7FFD1BF46530 is a virtual address in a user space process pid 19030 (tester). I assume that pos is the offset into the file like in lseek64.
Doing the precise same thing as sudo with same values in a user space process, i.e. reading /proc/19030/pagemap works fine and produces a correct physical address.
The actual thing I am trying to do here is to find the physical address of a user space virtual address. I need the physical address for a device DMA transfer operation and a user space app needs to access this memory. This app allocates 1GB DMA memory with anonymous mmap from THP (Transparent Huge Pages). And I am trying to avoid the need for sudo by reading /proc//pagemap in a kernel driver via ioctl instead.
I would be happy to allocate huge page DMA memory in the driver but don't know how to do that. dma_alloc_coherent is limited to max 4MB allocations. Is there a way to get those allocated as continuous physical memory? I need hundreds of MB or many GB of DMA memory.
Problem with anonymous mmap is that it can only allocate max 1GB huge page as physically continuous memory. Allocating more works but the memory is not physically continuous and unusable for DMA.
Any good ideas or alternative ways of allocating huge pages as DMA memory?
Tried reading file /proc//pagemap in a kernel driver. Expected same results as when reading the file in a user space application which works ok.
"kernel read not supported for file …"
Indeed, as we see in __kernel_read()
if (unlikely(!file->f_op->read_iter || file->f_op->read))
return warn_unsupported(file, "read");
it fails if f_op->read_iter isn't or f_op->read is wired up (implemented), which is both the case for a pagemap file.
You could try pagemap_read() instead. – not feasible for reasons in the comments
When I had the problem of getting the physical address for a virtual address in a driver, I included and copied some kernel code (not that I recommend this, but I saw no other solution); here's an extract.
static pte_t *huge_pte_offset(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr
, unsigned long sz)
{ return NULL; }
void p4d_clear_bad(p4d_t *p4d) { p4d_ERROR(*p4d); p4d_clear(p4d); }
#include "mm/pagewalk.c"
static int pte(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr
, unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk)
{
*(pte_t **)walk->private = pte;
return 1;
}
/* Scan the real Linux page tables and return a PTE pointer for
* a virtual address in a context.
* Returns true (1) if PTE was found, zero otherwise. The pointer to
* the PTE pointer is unmodified if PTE is not found.
*/
int
get_pteptr(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pte_t **ptep, pmd_t **pmdp)
{
struct mm_walk walk = { .pte_entry = pte, .mm = mm, .private = ptep };
return walk_page_range(addr, addr+PAGE_SIZE, &walk);
}
/* Find physical address for this virtual address. Normally used by
* I/O functions, but anyone can call it.
*/
static inline unsigned long iopa(unsigned long addr)
{
unsigned long pa;
/* I don't know why this won't work on PMacs or CHRP. It
* appears there is some bug, or there is some implicit
* mapping done not properly represented by BATs or in page
* tables.......I am actively working on resolving this, but
* can't hold up other stuff. -- Dan
*/
pte_t *pte;
struct mm_struct *mm;
#if 0
/* Check the BATs */
phys_addr_t v_mapped_by_bats(unsigned long va);
pa = v_mapped_by_bats(addr);
if (pa)
return pa;
#endif
/* Allow mapping of user addresses (within the thread)
* for DMA if necessary.
*/
if (addr < TASK_SIZE)
mm = current->mm;
else
mm = &init_mm;
ATTENTION: I needed the current address space.
You'd have to use mm = file->private_data instead.
pa = 0;
if (get_pteptr(mm, addr, &pte, NULL))
pa = (pte_val(*pte) & PAGE_MASK) | (addr & ~PAGE_MASK);
return(pa);
}
I am mapping DMA coherent memory from kernel to user space. At user level I use mmap() and in kernel driver I use dma_alloc_coherent() and afterwards remap_pfn_range() to remap the pages. This basically works as I can write data to the mapped area in my app and verify it in my kernel driver.
However, despite using dma_alloc_coherent (which should alloc uncached memory) and pgprot_noncached() the kernel informs me with this dmesg output:
map pfn ram range req uncached-minus for [mem 0xABC-0xCBA], got write-back
In my understanding, write-back is cached memory. But I need uncached memory for the DMA operation.
The Code (only showing the important parts):
User App
fd = open(dev_fn, O_RDWR | O_SYNC);
if (fd > 0)
{
mem = mmap ( NULL
, mmap_len
, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE
, MAP_SHARED
, fd
, 0
);
}
For testing purposes I used mmap_len = getpagesize(); Which is 4096.
Kernel Driver
typedef struct
{
size_t mem_size;
dma_addr_t dma_addr;
void *cpu_addr;
} Dma_Priv;
fops_mmap()
{
dma_priv->mem_size = vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start;
dma_priv->cpu_addr = dma_alloc_coherent ( &gen_dev
, dma_priv->mem_size
, &dma_priv->dma_addr
, GFP_KERNEL
);
if (dma_priv->cpu_addr != NULL)
{
vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vma->vm_page_prot);
remap_pfn_range ( vma
, vma->vm_start
, virt_to_phys(dma_priv->cpu_addr)>>PAGE_SHIFT
, dma_priv->mem_size
, vma->vm_page_prot
)
}
}
Useful information I've found
PATting Linux:
Page 7 --> mmap with O_SYNC (uncached):
Applications can open /dev/mem with the O_SYNC flag and then do mmap
on it. With that, applications will be accessing that address with an
uncached memory type. mmap will succeed only if there is no other
conflicting mappings to the same region.
I used the flag, doesn't help.
Page 7 --> mmap without O_SYNC (uncached-minus):
mmap without O_SYNC, no existing mapping, and not a write-back region:
For an mmap that comes under this category, we use uncached-minus type
mapping. In the absence of any MTRR for this region, the effective
type will be uncached. But in cases where there is an MTRR, making
this region write-combine, then the effective type will be
write-combine.
pgprot_noncached()
In /arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h I found this:
#define pgprot_noncached(prot) \
((boot_cpu_data.x86 > 3) \
? (__pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | \
cachemode2protval(_PAGE_CACHE_MODE_UC_MINUS))) \
: (prot))
Is it possible that x86 always sets a noncached request to UC_MINUS, which results in combination with MTRR in a cached write-back?
I am using Ubuntu 16.04.1, Kernel: 4.10.0-40-generic.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/x86/pat.txt
Drivers wanting to export some pages to userspace do it by using mmap
interface and a combination of 1) pgprot_noncached() 2)
io_remap_pfn_range() or remap_pfn_range() or vmf_insert_pfn()
With PAT support, a new API pgprot_writecombine is being added. So,
drivers can continue to use the above sequence, with either
pgprot_noncached() or pgprot_writecombine() in step 1, followed by
step 2.
In addition, step 2 internally tracks the region as UC or WC in
memtype list in order to ensure no conflicting mapping.
Note that this set of APIs only works with IO (non RAM) regions. If
driver wants to export a RAM region, it has to do set_memory_uc() or
set_memory_wc() as step 0 above and also track the usage of those
pages and use set_memory_wb() before the page is freed to free pool.
I added set_memory_uc() before pgprot_noncached() and it did the thing.
if (dma_priv->cpu_addr != NULL)
{
set_memory_uc(dma_priv->cpu_addr, (dma_priv->mem_size/PAGE_SIZE));
vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vma->vm_page_prot);
remap_pfn_range ( vma
, vma->vm_start
, virt_to_phys(dma_priv->cpu_addr)>>PAGE_SHIFT
, dma_priv->mem_size
, vma->vm_page_prot
)
}
This answer was posted as an edit to the question Mmap DMA memory uncached: "map pfn ram range req uncached-minus got write-back" by the OP Gbo under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Of 192GB RAM installed on my computer, I have 188GB RAM above 4GB (at hardware address 0x100000000) reserved by the Linux kernel at boot time (mem=4G memmap=188G$4G). A data acquisition kernel modules accumulates data into this large area used as a ring buffer using DMA. A user space application mmap's this ring buffer into user space, then copies blocks from the ring buffer at the current location for processing once they are ready.
Copying these 16MB blocks from the mmap'ed area using memcpy does not perform as I expected. It appears that the performance depends on the size of the memory reserved at boot time (and later mmap'ed into user space). http://www.wurmsdobler.org/files/resmem.zip contains the source code for a kernel module which does implements the mmap file operation:
module_param(resmem_hwaddr, ulong, S_IRUSR);
module_param(resmem_length, ulong, S_IRUSR);
//...
static int resmem_mmap(struct file *filp, struct vm_area_struct *vma) {
remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start,
resmem_hwaddr >> PAGE_SHIFT,
resmem_length, vma->vm_page_prot);
return 0;
}
and a test application, which does in essence (with the checks removed):
#define BLOCKSIZE ((size_t)16*1024*1024)
int resMemFd = ::open(RESMEM_DEV, O_RDWR | O_SYNC);
unsigned long resMemLength = 0;
::ioctl(resMemFd, RESMEM_IOC_LENGTH, &resMemLength);
void* resMemBase = ::mmap(0, resMemLength, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, resMemFd, 4096);
char* source = ((char*)resMemBase) + RESMEM_HEADER_SIZE;
char* destination = new char[BLOCKSIZE];
struct timeval start, end;
gettimeofday(&start, NULL);
memcpy(destination, source, BLOCKSIZE);
gettimeofday(&end, NULL);
float time = (end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec)*1000.0f + (end.tv_usec - start.tv_usec)/1000.0f;
std::cout << "memcpy from mmap'ed to malloc'ed: " << time << "ms (" << BLOCKSIZE/1000.0f/time << "MB/s)" << std::endl;
I have carried out memcpy tests of a 16MB data block for the different sizes of reserved RAM (resmem_length) on Ubuntu 10.04.4, Linux 2.6.32, on a SuperMicro 1026GT-TF-FM109:
| | 1GB | 4GB | 16GB | 64GB | 128GB | 188GB
|run 1 | 9.274ms (1809.06MB/s) | 11.503ms (1458.51MB/s) | 11.333ms (1480.39MB/s) | 9.326ms (1798.97MB/s) | 213.892ms ( 78.43MB/s) | 206.476ms ( 81.25MB/s)
|run 2 | 4.255ms (3942.94MB/s) | 4.249ms (3948.51MB/s) | 4.257ms (3941.09MB/s) | 4.298ms (3903.49MB/s) | 208.269ms ( 80.55MB/s) | 200.627ms ( 83.62MB/s)
My observations are:
From the first to the second run, memcpy from mmap'ed to malloc'ed seems to benefit that the contents might already be cached somewhere.
There is a significant performance degradation from >64GB, which can be noticed both when using a memcpy.
I would like to understand why that so is. Perhaps somebody in the Linux kernel developers group thought: 64GB should be enough for anybody (does this ring a bell?)
Kind regards,
peter
Based on feedback from SuperMicro, the performance degradation is due to NUMA, non-uniform memory access. The SuperMicro 1026GT-TF-FM109 uses the X8DTG-DF motherboard with one Intel 5520 Tylersburg chipset at its heart, connected to two Intel Xeon E5620 CPUs, each of which has 96GB RAM attached.
If I lock my application to CPU0, I can observe different memcpy speeds depending on what memory area was reserved and consequently mmap'ed. If the reserved memory area is off-CPU, then mmap struggles for some time to do its work, and any subsequent memcpy to and from the "remote" area consumes more time (data block size = 16MB):
resmem=64G$4G (inside CPU0 realm): 3949MB/s
resmem=64G$96G (outside CPU0 realm): 82MB/s
resmem=64G$128G (outside CPU0 realm): 3948MB/s
resmem=92G$4G (inside CPU0 realm): 3966MB/s
resmem=92G$100G (outside CPU0 realm): 57MB/s
It nearly makes sense. Only the third case, 64G$128, which means the uppermost 64GB also yield good results. This contradicts somehow the theory.
Regards,
peter
Your CPU probably doesn't have enough cache to deal with it efficiently. Either use lower memory, or get a CPU with a bigger cache.
Is there any API for determining the physical address from virtual address in Linux operating system?
Kernel and user space work with virtual addresses (also called linear addresses) that are mapped to physical addresses by the memory management hardware. This mapping is defined by page tables, set up by the operating system.
DMA devices use bus addresses. On an i386 PC, bus addresses are the same as physical addresses, but other architectures may have special address mapping hardware to convert bus addresses to physical addresses.
In Linux, you can use these functions from asm/io.h:
virt_to_phys(virt_addr);
phys_to_virt(phys_addr);
virt_to_bus(virt_addr);
bus_to_virt(bus_addr);
All this is about accessing ordinary memory. There is also "shared memory" on the PCI or ISA bus. It can be mapped inside a 32-bit address space using ioremap(), and then used via the readb(), writeb() (etc.) functions.
Life is complicated by the fact that there are various caches around, so that different ways to access the same physical address need not give the same result.
Also, the real physical address behind virtual address can change. Even more than that - there could be no address associated with a virtual address until you access that memory.
As for the user-land API, there are none that I am aware of.
/proc/<pid>/pagemap userland minimal runnable example
virt_to_phys_user.c
#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 700
#include <fcntl.h> /* open */
#include <stdint.h> /* uint64_t */
#include <stdio.h> /* printf */
#include <stdlib.h> /* size_t */
#include <unistd.h> /* pread, sysconf */
typedef struct {
uint64_t pfn : 55;
unsigned int soft_dirty : 1;
unsigned int file_page : 1;
unsigned int swapped : 1;
unsigned int present : 1;
} PagemapEntry;
/* Parse the pagemap entry for the given virtual address.
*
* #param[out] entry the parsed entry
* #param[in] pagemap_fd file descriptor to an open /proc/pid/pagemap file
* #param[in] vaddr virtual address to get entry for
* #return 0 for success, 1 for failure
*/
int pagemap_get_entry(PagemapEntry *entry, int pagemap_fd, uintptr_t vaddr)
{
size_t nread;
ssize_t ret;
uint64_t data;
uintptr_t vpn;
vpn = vaddr / sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE);
nread = 0;
while (nread < sizeof(data)) {
ret = pread(pagemap_fd, ((uint8_t*)&data) + nread, sizeof(data) - nread,
vpn * sizeof(data) + nread);
nread += ret;
if (ret <= 0) {
return 1;
}
}
entry->pfn = data & (((uint64_t)1 << 55) - 1);
entry->soft_dirty = (data >> 55) & 1;
entry->file_page = (data >> 61) & 1;
entry->swapped = (data >> 62) & 1;
entry->present = (data >> 63) & 1;
return 0;
}
/* Convert the given virtual address to physical using /proc/PID/pagemap.
*
* #param[out] paddr physical address
* #param[in] pid process to convert for
* #param[in] vaddr virtual address to get entry for
* #return 0 for success, 1 for failure
*/
int virt_to_phys_user(uintptr_t *paddr, pid_t pid, uintptr_t vaddr)
{
char pagemap_file[BUFSIZ];
int pagemap_fd;
snprintf(pagemap_file, sizeof(pagemap_file), "/proc/%ju/pagemap", (uintmax_t)pid);
pagemap_fd = open(pagemap_file, O_RDONLY);
if (pagemap_fd < 0) {
return 1;
}
PagemapEntry entry;
if (pagemap_get_entry(&entry, pagemap_fd, vaddr)) {
return 1;
}
close(pagemap_fd);
*paddr = (entry.pfn * sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE)) + (vaddr % sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE));
return 0;
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
pid_t pid;
uintptr_t vaddr, paddr = 0;
if (argc < 3) {
printf("Usage: %s pid vaddr\n", argv[0]);
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
pid = strtoull(argv[1], NULL, 0);
vaddr = strtoull(argv[2], NULL, 0);
if (virt_to_phys_user(&paddr, pid, vaddr)) {
fprintf(stderr, "error: virt_to_phys_user\n");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
};
printf("0x%jx\n", (uintmax_t)paddr);
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
GitHub upstream.
Usage:
sudo ./virt_to_phys_user.out <pid> <virtual-address>
sudo is required to read /proc/<pid>/pagemap even if you have file permissions as explained at: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/345915/how-to-change-permission-of-proc-self-pagemap-file/383838#383838
As mentioned at: https://stackoverflow.com/a/46247716/895245 Linux allocates page tables lazily, so make sure that you read and write a byte to that address from the test program before using virt_to_phys_user.
How to test it out
Test program:
#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 700
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
enum { I0 = 0x12345678 };
static volatile uint32_t i = I0;
int main(void) {
printf("vaddr %p\n", (void *)&i);
printf("pid %ju\n", (uintmax_t)getpid());
while (i == I0) {
sleep(1);
}
printf("i %jx\n", (uintmax_t)i);
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
The test program outputs the address of a variable it owns, and its PID, e.g.:
vaddr 0x600800
pid 110
and then you can pass convert the virtual address with:
sudo ./virt_to_phys_user.out 110 0x600800
Finally, the conversion can be tested by using /dev/mem to observe / modify the memory, but you can't do this on Ubuntu 17.04 without recompiling the kernel as it requires: CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM=n, see also: How to access physical addresses from user space in Linux? Buildroot is an easy way to overcome that however.
Alternatively, you can use a Virtual machine like QEMU monitor's xp command: How to decode /proc/pid/pagemap entries in Linux?
See this to dump all pages: How to decode /proc/pid/pagemap entries in Linux?
Userland subset of this question: How to find the physical address of a variable from user-space in Linux?
Dump all process pages with /proc/<pid>/maps
/proc/<pid>/maps lists all the addresses ranges of the process, so we can walk that to translate all pages: /proc/[pid]/pagemaps and /proc/[pid]/maps | linux
Kerneland virt_to_phys() only works for kmalloc() addresses
From a kernel module, virt_to_phys(), has been mentioned.
However, it is import to highlight that it has this limitation.
E.g. it fails for module variables. arc/x86/include/asm/io.h documentation:
The returned physical address is the physical (CPU) mapping for
the memory address given. It is only valid to use this function on
addresses directly mapped or allocated via kmalloc().
Here is a kernel module that illustrates that together with an userland test.
So this is not a very general possibility. See: How to get the physical address from the logical one in a Linux kernel module? for kernel module methods exclusively.
As answered before, normal programs should not need to worry about physical addresses as they run in a virtual address space with all its conveniences. Furthermore, not every virtual address has a physical address, the may belong to mapped files or swapped pages. However, sometimes it may be interesting to see this mapping, even in userland.
For this purpose, the Linux kernel exposes its mapping to userland through a set of files in the /proc. The documentation can be found here. Short summary:
/proc/$pid/maps provides a list of mappings of virtual addresses together with additional information, such as the corresponding file for mapped files.
/proc/$pid/pagemap provides more information about each mapped page, including the physical address if it exists.
This website provides a C program that dumps the mappings of all running processes using this interface and an explanation of what it does.
The suggested C program above usually works, but it can return misleading results in (at least) two ways:
The page is not present (but the virtual addressed is mapped to a page!). This happens due to lazy mapping by the OS: it maps addresses only when they are actually accessed.
The returned PFN points to some possibly temporary physical page which could be changed soon after due to copy-on-write. For example: for memory mapped files, the PFN can point to the read-only copy. For anonymous mappings, the PFN of all pages in the mapping could be one specific read-only page full of 0s (from which all anonymous pages spawn when written to).
Bottom line is, to ensure a more reliable result: for read-only mappings, read from every page at least once before querying its PFN. For write-enabled pages, write into every page at least once before querying its PFN.
Of course, theoretically, even after obtaining a "stable" PFN, the mappings could always change arbitrarily at runtime (for example when moving pages into and out of swap) and should not be relied upon.
I wonder why there is no user-land API.
Because user land memory's physical address is unknown.
Linux uses demand paging for user land memory. Your user land object will not have physical memory until it is accessed. When the system is short of memory, your user land object may be swapped out and lose physical memory unless the page is locked for the process. When you access the object again, it is swapped in and given physical memory, but it is likely different physical memory from the previous one. You may take a snapshot of page mapping, but it is not guaranteed to be the same in the next moment.
So, looking for the physical address of a user land object is usually meaningless.
I'm trying to access physical memory directly for an embedded Linux project, but I'm not sure how I can best designate memory for my use.
If I boot my device regularly, and access /dev/mem, I can easily read and write to just about anywhere I want. However, in this, I'm accessing memory that can easily be allocated to any process; which I don't want to do
My code for /dev/mem is (all error checking, etc. removed):
mem_fd = open("/dev/mem", O_RDWR));
mem_p = malloc(SIZE + (PAGE_SIZE - 1));
if ((unsigned long) mem_p % PAGE_SIZE) {
mem_p += PAGE_SIZE - ((unsigned long) mem_p % PAGE_SIZE);
}
mem_p = (unsigned char *) mmap(mem_p, SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_FIXED, mem_fd, BASE_ADDRESS);
And this works. However, I'd like to be using memory that no one else will touch. I've tried limiting the amount of memory that the kernel sees by booting with mem=XXXm, and then setting BASE_ADDRESS to something above that (but below the physical memory), but it doesn't seem to be accessing the same memory consistently.
Based on what I've seen online, I suspect I may need a kernel module (which is OK) which uses either ioremap() or remap_pfn_range() (or both???), but I have absolutely no idea how; can anyone help?
EDIT:
What I want is a way to always access the same physical memory (say, 1.5MB worth), and set that memory aside so that the kernel will not allocate it to any other process.
I'm trying to reproduce a system we had in other OSes (with no memory management) whereby I could allocate a space in memory via the linker, and access it using something like
*(unsigned char *)0x12345678
EDIT2:
I guess I should provide some more detail. This memory space will be used for a RAM buffer for a high performance logging solution for an embedded application. In the systems we have, there's nothing that clears or scrambles physical memory during a soft reboot. Thus, if I write a bit to a physical address X, and reboot the system, the same bit will still be set after the reboot. This has been tested on the exact same hardware running VxWorks (this logic also works nicely in Nucleus RTOS and OS20 on different platforms, FWIW). My idea was to try the same thing in Linux by addressing physical memory directly; therefore, it's essential that I get the same addresses each boot.
I should probably clarify that this is for kernel 2.6.12 and newer.
EDIT3:
Here's my code, first for the kernel module, then for the userspace application.
To use it, I boot with mem=95m, then insmod foo-module.ko, then mknod mknod /dev/foo c 32 0, then run foo-user , where it dies. Running under gdb shows that it dies at the assignment, although within gdb, I cannot dereference the address I get from mmap (although printf can)
foo-module.c
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/config.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#define VERSION_STR "1.0.0"
#define FOO_BUFFER_SIZE (1u*1024u*1024u)
#define FOO_BUFFER_OFFSET (95u*1024u*1024u)
#define FOO_MAJOR 32
#define FOO_NAME "foo"
static const char *foo_version = "#(#) foo Support version " VERSION_STR " " __DATE__ " " __TIME__;
static void *pt = NULL;
static int foo_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file);
static int foo_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file);
static int foo_mmap(struct file *filp, struct vm_area_struct *vma);
struct file_operations foo_fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.llseek = NULL,
.read = NULL,
.write = NULL,
.readdir = NULL,
.poll = NULL,
.ioctl = NULL,
.mmap = foo_mmap,
.open = foo_open,
.flush = NULL,
.release = foo_release,
.fsync = NULL,
.fasync = NULL,
.lock = NULL,
.readv = NULL,
.writev = NULL,
};
static int __init foo_init(void)
{
int i;
printk(KERN_NOTICE "Loading foo support module\n");
printk(KERN_INFO "Version %s\n", foo_version);
printk(KERN_INFO "Preparing device /dev/foo\n");
i = register_chrdev(FOO_MAJOR, FOO_NAME, &foo_fops);
if (i != 0) {
return -EIO;
printk(KERN_ERR "Device couldn't be registered!");
}
printk(KERN_NOTICE "Device ready.\n");
printk(KERN_NOTICE "Make sure to run mknod /dev/foo c %d 0\n", FOO_MAJOR);
printk(KERN_INFO "Allocating memory\n");
pt = ioremap(FOO_BUFFER_OFFSET, FOO_BUFFER_SIZE);
if (pt == NULL) {
printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to remap memory\n");
return 1;
}
printk(KERN_INFO "ioremap returned %p\n", pt);
return 0;
}
static void __exit foo_exit(void)
{
printk(KERN_NOTICE "Unloading foo support module\n");
unregister_chrdev(FOO_MAJOR, FOO_NAME);
if (pt != NULL) {
printk(KERN_INFO "Unmapping memory at %p\n", pt);
iounmap(pt);
} else {
printk(KERN_WARNING "No memory to unmap!\n");
}
return;
}
static int foo_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
printk("foo_open\n");
return 0;
}
static int foo_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
printk("foo_release\n");
return 0;
}
static int foo_mmap(struct file *filp, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
int ret;
if (pt == NULL) {
printk(KERN_ERR "Memory not mapped!\n");
return -EAGAIN;
}
if ((vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start) != FOO_BUFFER_SIZE) {
printk(KERN_ERR "Error: sizes don't match (buffer size = %d, requested size = %lu)\n", FOO_BUFFER_SIZE, vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start);
return -EAGAIN;
}
ret = remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start, (unsigned long) pt, vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start, PAGE_SHARED);
if (ret != 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "Error in calling remap_pfn_range: returned %d\n", ret);
return -EAGAIN;
}
return 0;
}
module_init(foo_init);
module_exit(foo_exit);
MODULE_AUTHOR("Mike Miller");
MODULE_LICENSE("NONE");
MODULE_VERSION(VERSION_STR);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Provides support for foo to access direct memory");
foo-user.c
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
int main(void)
{
int fd;
char *mptr;
fd = open("/dev/foo", O_RDWR | O_SYNC);
if (fd == -1) {
printf("open error...\n");
return 1;
}
mptr = mmap(0, 1 * 1024 * 1024, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_FILE | MAP_SHARED, fd, 4096);
printf("On start, mptr points to 0x%lX.\n",(unsigned long) mptr);
printf("mptr points to 0x%lX. *mptr = 0x%X\n", (unsigned long) mptr, *mptr);
mptr[0] = 'a';
mptr[1] = 'b';
printf("mptr points to 0x%lX. *mptr = 0x%X\n", (unsigned long) mptr, *mptr);
close(fd);
return 0;
}
I think you can find a lot of documentation about the kmalloc + mmap part.
However, I am not sure that you can kmalloc so much memory in a contiguous way, and have it always at the same place. Sure, if everything is always the same, then you might get a constant address. However, each time you change the kernel code, you will get a different address, so I would not go with the kmalloc solution.
I think you should reserve some memory at boot time, ie reserve some physical memory so that is is not touched by the kernel. Then you can ioremap this memory which will give you
a kernel virtual address, and then you can mmap it and write a nice device driver.
This take us back to linux device drivers in PDF format. Have a look at chapter 15, it is describing this technique on page 443
Edit : ioremap and mmap.
I think this might be easier to debug doing things in two step : first get the ioremap
right, and test it using a character device operation, ie read/write. Once you know you can safely have access to the whole ioremapped memory using read / write, then you try to mmap the whole ioremapped range.
And if you get in trouble may be post another question about mmaping
Edit : remap_pfn_range
ioremap returns a virtual_adress, which you must convert to a pfn for remap_pfn_ranges.
Now, I don't understand exactly what a pfn (Page Frame Number) is, but I think you can get one calling
virt_to_phys(pt) >> PAGE_SHIFT
This probably is not the Right Way (tm) to do it, but you should try it
You should also check that FOO_MEM_OFFSET is the physical address of your RAM block. Ie before anything happens with the mmu, your memory is available at 0 in the memory map of your processor.
Sorry to answer but not quite answer, I noticed that you have already edited the question. Please note that SO does not notify us when you edit the question. I'm giving a generic answer here, when you update the question please leave a comment, then I'll edit my answer.
Yes, you're going to need to write a module. What it comes down to is the use of kmalloc() (allocating a region in kernel space) or vmalloc() (allocating a region in userspace).
Exposing the prior is easy, exposing the latter can be a pain in the rear with the kind of interface that you are describing as needed. You noted 1.5 MB is a rough estimate of how much you actually need to reserve, is that iron clad? I.e are you comfortable taking that from kernel space? Can you adequately deal with ENOMEM or EIO from userspace (or even disk sleep)? IOW, what's going into this region?
Also, is concurrency going to be an issue with this? If so, are you going to be using a futex? If the answer to either is 'yes' (especially the latter), its likely that you'll have to bite the bullet and go with vmalloc() (or risk kernel rot from within). Also, if you are even THINKING about an ioctl() interface to the char device (especially for some ad-hoc locking idea), you really want to go with vmalloc().
Also, have you read this? Plus we aren't even touching on what grsec / selinux is going to think of this (if in use).
/dev/mem is okay for simple register peeks and pokes, but once you cross into interrupts and DMA territory, you really should write a kernel-mode driver. What you did for your previous memory-management-less OSes simply doesn't graft well to an General Purpose OS like Linux.
You've already thought about the DMA buffer allocation issue. Now, think about the "DMA done" interrupt from your device. How are you going to install an Interrupt Service Routine?
Besides, /dev/mem is typically locked out for non-root users, so it's not very practical for general use. Sure, you could chmod it, but then you've opened a big security hole in the system.
If you are trying to keep the driver code base similar between the OSes, you should consider refactoring it into separate user & kernel mode layers with an IOCTL-like interface in-between. If you write the user-mode portion as a generic library of C code, it should be easy to port between Linux and other OSes. The OS-specific part is the kernel-mode code. (We use this kind of approach for our drivers.)
It seems like you have already concluded that it's time to write a kernel-driver, so you're on the right track. The only advice I can add is to read these books cover-to-cover.
Linux Device Drivers
Understanding the Linux Kernel
(Keep in mind that these books are circa-2005, so the information is a bit dated.)
I am by far no expert on these matters, so this will be a question to you rather than an answer. Is there any reason you can't just make a small ram disk partition and use it only for your application? Would that not give you guaranteed access to the same chunk of memory? I'm not sure of there would be any I/O performance issues, or additional overhead associated with doing that. This also assumes that you can tell the kernel to partition a specific address range in memory, not sure if that is possible.
I apologize for the newb question, but I found your question interesting, and am curious if ram disk could be used in such a way.
Have you looked at the 'memmap' kernel parameter? On i386 and X64_64, you can use the memmap parameter to define how the kernel will hand very specific blocks of memory (see the Linux kernel parameter documentation). In your case, you'd want to mark memory as 'reserved' so that Linux doesn't touch it at all. Then you can write your code to use that absolute address and size (woe be unto you if you step outside that space).