I'm trying to create a dependency between fields in orchard.
I need to create cascading dropdownList in Orchard.
e.g : Country and State (for each Country a couple of states must be displayed not all the content).
How can I do that with Orchard.
I think, that you need make a choice from two options:
Create content type for Country and other content type for State (or may be one content type for Country and State). Then use Container and Containable part to create hierarchy (May be you should also use List module). Then override your field editor (you can use any field type, but i suggest you to use content picker field).
Use Taxonomy Module to create country-state hierarchy. Then use Taxonomy Field and override editor for it.
Related
I have created a custom content type (via the admin UI) that consists mostly of text fields. I know how to position the fields using zones and Placement.info but for simplicity I would like to use a single view template and to just arrange the fields by name instead of having to use Placement.info. Is there a good way to reference the fields by name from the content item in my MVC view?
So for example, I have a template named Content-MyContentType-Detail.cshtml. Instead of the generic
#Display(Model.Content)
I would like to be able to do something like
#Display(...MyField...)
#Display(...MyOtherField...)
Is there a way to explicitly render a field by name that is associated with my content item?
You can use Shape Tracing module to view model properties and how to get access to content parts.
Then in your template you can use something like this:
<h3>#Model.ContentItem.TitlePart.Title - £#Model.ContentItem.Product.Fields[1].Value</h3>
<p>#Model.ContentItem.BodyPart.Text</p>
If you don't just want to access the field's properties, but rather would like its shape rendered in-place, but like it would be when using placement (i.e. using the existing template), then read this article, which describes how to do direct rendering without placement: http://weblogs.asp.net/bleroy/archive/2013/02/13/easy-content-templates-for-orchard-take-2.aspx
I'm trying to figure out the best way to handle a requirement I have for an Orchard module I'm building.
I have a ContentPart that has a few fields. One field is a ContentPicker that allows for multiple items to be associated to the part. The rest are descriptive information.
The issue I have is that I actually need to be able to include more than one of this ContentPart into a ContentType. I need to create a ContentType that has exactly 3 of this part.
Should I be making this into a field instead of a part? Is it even possible to have a ContentField that has other fields in it?
Or, should I somehow use all the same models and data structures, but somehow define it as 3 distinct parts?
Just wondering what the best practice to do something like this would be.
You can only have one part of each kind on a given type. You can't have fields that have other fields in it (instead - take an existing field and extend it with custom stuff).
As I understand, the actual problem is "how to make groups of fields with some metadata for each group", right? If so, there are a few approaches to solve the problem:
Create a custom field based on Content Picker (basically - take existing Content Picker and extend it with your metadata) and use this without the need for a separate part
Create one part to hold only the metadata for each field attached to it and attach 1 or more fields to it
Create 3 distinct parts. Parts should be thought of as extensions that add some unique features to an item. If you think it's logically ok to have 3 parts then go for it.
I can create custom form with Orchard Custom forms Module based on a Content Type.
Also i can add Enumerable field to the Content Type to show as combo box in created custom form.
But i can set list items of the enumerable field statically only.
How can i set this items based on result of a projection query or fill the combo box by any content items of a special content type dynamically?
You can't out of the box.
You could write your own module that provided a query driven combo field, but if you've not written a module before then you might want to start with writing a more simple field module first.
You might find the following useful:
Creating a custom field tutorial
I'd also look at the Orchard Source code for the projection module to see how they use queries.
Is it possible to add a custom control to the Document Type? Suppose i couldn't create a multiselect or just a simple textfield control. How could i create a custom one and use that from the Document Type page in Umbraco?
If this is possible, then what steps need to be taken? Because i can add all sorts of config information in the Document Type controls that currently exist in there. Like, when i add a textfield i can gvie it a name, an alias and a validation message (and it has some others options).
Do i have to build the custom Document Type control in a specific way? And how is it saved to the database? How does Umbraco handle that?
Any information on this matter is more than welcome!
Since adding custom document types is native to Umbraco, and judging by the description in your question, I'm going to assume that you are talking about adding custom data types with user controls.
If so, check some of the following links on the subject, it's actually fairly simple:
Creating custom datatypes using the umbraco usercontrol wrapper (I personally used this one)
Custom DataTypes in Umbraco
Creating a custom datatype using the usercontrol wrapper (Video tutorial)
I'm trying to make a custom property for a WebPart. The custom property should be a drop down with choices coming from a "choice" column from a content type. Is that even possible?
You have two options:
1) If your choices will never change then you can hardcode an enum with these values and use that as datatype for your custom property. SP will the automatically generate a drop down.
2) If you can't hardcode the values then you have to implement what is called an EditorPart where you can code the UI for handling entry of the custom property
You cannot data bind directly to a content type column as it does not exist as in a bindable form, only as an XML secification on the content type itself.
Better to specify the column as a lookup and databind to the list directly. However, that is not going to work well when you only want one lookup across multiple webs or site collections.
In that case create a list in a config site such as http://intranet/sites/config and code a lookup control to databind to that list. Then use the control in the webpart and in a custom field control on the content type.
A bit of work, but worth it if you require SharePoint edit control (versioning, security etc) access to the contents of the lookup and a single (changeable) source of data across the entire site.