I have download the chromium source code from code.google.com.
I am interested in understanding the receiver application source code.
But by looking at the 1.3GB code, I am not able to actually figure out, which part of the code belongs to receiver side.
Could you please give me some insight on the code structure.
Also the wiki section in code.google.com is empty. I was expecting some documentation there explaining the same.
The Chromium home page has lots of relevant information, especially the For Developers page.
Related
I'm a WordPress website designer. I'm not a programmer. I'm trying to fix some security/SEO issues with a website.
I ran a diagnostic test on a website and one of the things I'm trying to fix is a security issue on "protocol-relative resource links". This is how the program tells me to fix it: "Update any resource links to be absolute links including the scheme (HTTPS) to avoid security and performance issues."
I have googled everything I can think of and I think I have found a way to fix it, but it is going to mean going through 177 pages of the websites code and finding the specific links and fixing them each individually. That is because they are not image links or bigger links like that, but they are obscure links like font links. The only way I've been able to find them is through the source code (I think that's what it's called.) As far as I know they all unique links so I can't do search and replace and even if I could I don't know what links need to be replaced.
Here is the description of the problem that was given to me: "URLs that load resources such as images, JavaScript and CSS using protocol-relative links. A protocol-relative link is simply a link to a URL without specifying the scheme (for example, //screamingfrog.co.uk). It helps save developers time from having to specify the protocol and lets the browser determine it based upon the current connection to the resource. However, this technique is now an anti-pattern with HTTPS everywhere, and can expose some sites to 'man in the middle' compromises and performance issues"
I am self-taught and know basically no code or programming languages, so I need basic beginner help if possible. Links to tutorials are welcome. I'm trying to find a quicker way to solve this problem or at least have it confirmed that this is the way I'll have to do it. Thank you for any help you are able to give!
Thank you for giving me a piece of your time. This question really isn't a "how to", but more of a "is this possible or am I just insane?". I've recently looked at some portfolio pages and found a really great idea from https://flexdinesh.github.io/, but in the "portfolio" section instead of having just the characteristics of the project, is it possible to somehow use the Github API or some other equivalent to extract and present data like number of commits (or the table that github shows on your project page) and what project type it is (i.e. Java, Javascript, etc.) and maybe even some more related information. For background I am using React with Node.js. Again, this is probably useless to everyone out there, but I think it could be something cool if A) it actually exists, and B) it's not too much of a pain to implement. I've tried reading up on the documentation from Github, looking online, and looking at different source code, but no luck there. If anyone has any information or feedback I'm always open to help!
Thank you and have a good day
from what I understand, you want to display statistical information about the projects on your portfolio website.
Github provides an API that can get almost all the information you see on their website
so, to get all the languages being used in repository you can do a GET request on https://api.github.com/repos/:owner/:repo/languages,
To get the number of commits you can do a GET request on https://api.github.com/repos/:owner/:repo/commits
and so on
By default, these will get you the data of the public repositories, if you want to display info from your Private repositories, you need to provide an authentication token with each request.
You can read more about the API calls available here
let me know if you need any more help
So, I want to apologize ahead of time but I've been googling and stack overflowing for an answer to this question and I just can't find a satisfactory one.
I know that Facebook uses React and, although I don't know what software architecture they use (MVC, Client-Server etc.), I can't see any react files or react components in the dev tools sources tab on any browser.
I'll show you an example in my own react app using create-react-app that shows all my files:
Create-react-apps dev tools sources:
However, when I go to Facebook's page, I don't see anything like that. I see this:
Facebook's dev tools sources:
This isn't only true of react apps, but just node apps I've made as well. Now, I want to know where all of this information is on facebook's page.... Where are the components? Why can't I see them? Where are all the post and get requests being run? How can I put breakpoints in the code for debugging? I mean, I don't even see an HTML page besides the elements tab! And, most importantly, how do I do the same thing to hide my files?
It seems like it adds an extra layer of security that I would think is preferable on all public websites. Once again, thanks in advance and, as far as I know, the answer to this is nowhere near obvious.
I admit, this one little bit confusing when you are quite new on the web development.
You can see your files (source code) via devtool because you also upload your .map files which help map your bundled/minified code into the the original readable one.
However, this is super helpful on development environment, but quite dangerous on production. What you need to do just remove the .map files, as comment suggested.
I've developed my first addon using the WebExtension api.
Is it allowed to obfuscate my background and options javascript files? (for example removing all newlines and/or rename my descriptive variable names)
There is a little note in the "Signing and distributing your add-on" doc:
You should not obfuscate your code to bypass validation warnings. That practice can lead to your add-on being rejected and
potentially blacklisted.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/Distribution
But if i understand correctly this only regarding obfuscation to bypass warnings.
Yes, it is permitted to obfuscate or minimize your code. Mozilla's Review Policies are quite clear regarding Review Policies:Source Code Submission:
Listed and unlisted add-ons may contain binary, obfuscated and minified source code, but Mozilla must be allowed to review a copy of the human-readable source code upon request. In such cases, the author will receive a message from Mozilla asking for their assistance in the review. The submitted source code will be reviewed by an administrator and will not be redistributed in any way. The code will only be used for the purpose of reviewing the add-on.
Instructions for reproducing obfuscation are also required, please read the details of this guideline to ensure a swift review.
If your add-on contains code that you don't own or can't get the source code for, you may contact us for information on how to proceed.
There is, in fact, a page dedicated to describing Source Code Submission (linked in the quote above).
The basics of the requirements are that if you choose to minimize or obfuscate your code, then you need to:
Upload the unminimized and unobfuscated code as part of the submission to AMO (this version of the code is not distributed; it's only used for review).
Provide detailed instructions of how to produce the minimized/obfuscated code. They must be able to exactly reproduce the minimized/obfuscated code you have provided.
Providing minimized/obfuscated code will increase the amount of time required for your review. Your review will be an "admin" review which has a much smaller pool of reviewers, which is part of what makes it take longer.
I am very confused as to how the API of DocuSign works, I tried looking it up here:
https://www.docusign.com/p/RESTAPIGuide/RESTAPIGuide.htm
But that didn't help me much, especially not because I need to implement DocuSign into the open source version of Vtiger.
Does anybody here know a site where I can learn more about DocuSign and how I can combine it with Vtiger open source?
As for what I already tried that is nothing, I first need to make a functional design which is kind of hard to do when you don't even understand the basic API.
I would really appreciate it.
I have never worked with an API before, so this is all new for me.
Have you tried the API overview instead of the reference guide? Check this out:
https://www.docusign.com/developer-center/api-overview
You can also look at the API Recipes to see some starting examples of what you can do in any language. I believe VTiger is written in PHP so you can find the PHP code to copy and paste to get you started.