What I mean by this is:
I have a program. The end user is currently using it. I submit a new piece of source code and expect it to run as if it were always there?
I can't find an answer that specifically answers the point.
I'd like to be able to say, "extend" or add new features (rather than fix something that's already there on the fly) to the program without requiring a termination of the program (eg. Restart or exit).
Yes, you can definitely do that in python.
Although, it opens a security hole, so be very careful.
You can easily do this by setting up a "loader" class that can collect the source code you want it to use and then call the exec builtin function, just pass some python source code in and it will be evaluated.
Check the package
http://opensourcehacker.com/2011/11/08/sauna-reload-the-most-awesomely-named-python-package-ever/ . It allows to overcome certain raw edges of plain exec. Also it may be worth to check Dynamically reload a class definition in Python
Related
I would like to print location and function name of each function during a run.
It would help during debug to identify which function is called when multiple functions have the same name in different places.
It is possible but time costly to add by hand message such as:
println!("(function_name) file = {}, line = {}",file!(),line!());
Do you know such a solution? Have you suggestions to identify easily which function is called and who calls it?
The easiest option would probably be to use something like dtrace or ebpf: hook onto the "function entry" probe (not sure what it's called in linux / ebpf land but I'd think it exists) and just print the relevant information. You may want to add stack-based indentation though, and of course because of compiler optimisations you might have functions going missing. And you might get the mangled names which is not great, but de-mangling is a thing.
You might be able to do something similar by running your program in gdb and creating some sort of programmatic breakpoints which print and immediately continue?
Alternatively, a module-level attribute procedural macro could work: if you get a token stream for the entire module, it might be possible to automatically inject logging data into every function header.
This is a great package for Bayesian optimization of hyperparameters (especially mixed integer/continuous/categorical...and has shown to be better than Spearmint in benchmarks). However, clearly it is meant for Linux. What do I do...?
First you need to download swig.exe (the whole package) and unzip it. Then drop it somewhere and add the folder to path so that the installer for SMAC3 can call swig.exe.
Next, the Resource module is going to cause issues because that is only meant for Linux. That is specifically used by Pynisher. You'll need to comment out import pynisher in the execute_func.py module. Then, set use_pynisher:bool=False in the def __init__(self...) in the same module. The default is true.
Then, go down to the middle of the module where an if self.use_pynisher....else statement exists. Obviously our code now enters the else part, but it is not setup correctly. Change result = self.ta(config, **obj_kwargs) to result = self.ta(list(config.get_dictionary().values())). This part may need to be adjusted yet depending on what kind of inputs your function handles, but essentially you can see that this will enable the basic example shown in the included branin_fmin.py module. If doing the random forest example, don't change at all...etc.
I would like to know, how would I, in Python, be able to ignore certain/all keypresses by the user while a certain function in the program is executing? Cross platform solutions are preferred, but if that is not possible, then I need to know how to do this on Macintosh. Any help is greatly appreciated! :)
EDIT: Right now, I am processing keypresses through the turtle module's onkey() function since I did create a program using turtle. I hope this helps avoid any confusion, and again, any help is greatly appreciated! :)
You might want to modify your question to show how you're currently processing key-presses. For example is this a command-line program and you're using curses?
You could use os.uname to return the os information or sys.platform, if that isn't available. The Python documentation for sys.platform indicates that 'darwin' is returned for OSX apple machines.
If the platform is darwin then you could, in your code, ignore whatever key-presses you want to.
Edit (Update due to changed question):
If you want to ignore key-presses when a certain function is being called you could either use a lock to stop the key-press function call and your particular function being executed together.
Here is an example of using a lock, this may not run, but it should give you a rough idea of what's required.
import _thread
a_lock = _thread.allocate_lock()
def certainFunction():
with a_lock:
print("Here's the code that you don't want to execute at the same time as onSpecificKeyCall()")
def onSpecificKeyCall():
with a_lock:
print("Here's the code that you don't want to execute at the same time as certainFunction()")
Or, depending on the circumstances, when the function which you don't want interrupting with a key press is called, you could call onkey() again, with the specific key to ignore, to call to a function that doesn't do anything. When your particular function has finished, you could call onkey() again to bind the key press to the function that processes the input.
I found similar problems, maybe it will help you with your problem:
globally capture, ignore and send keyevents with python xlib, recognize fake input
How do I 'lock the keyboard' to prevent any more keypresses being sent on X11/Linux/Gnome?
https://askubuntu.com/questions/160522/python-gtk-event-ignore
Inside a GUI that I have made using GUIDE in Matlab. I run into a problem where upon using the Load() function to load a .MAT file all my handles change values. This means that if I had a button that I wanted to use on my GUI. My program will believe its handle is for example
handles.button1 =190.082
when in reality the only way I can access that button any more is through a different handle that is unknown. So if its unknown lets see what its new handle must be.
findobj('Tag','button1') = 227.0093
As you can see these numbers are completely different. Why the handles values get changed is beyond me. Since the handles change I can no longer use the set() function as I have written in previous sections of code. For example I have to change
set(handles.button1, 'Enable', 'off');
to
set(findobj('Tag','button1'),'Enable','off');
Does anyone have an explanation as to why this problem occurs when using Load()?
Is there a feasible solution instead of having to find the handle for an object every time you want to use it?
The .MAT file conveniently also had a handles variable in it which overwrote my current handles.
I am using visual studio 2008 and MFC. I accept arguments using a subclass of CCommandLineInfo and overriding ParseParam().
Now I want to pass these arguments to the application while running. For example "test.exe /start" and then to type in the console "test.exe /initialize" to be initialized again.
is there any way to do that?
Edit 1: Some clarifications. My program starts with "test.exe /start". I want to type "test.exe /initialize" and initialize the one and only running process (without closing/opening). And by initialize I mean to read a different XML file, to change some values of the interface and other things.
I cannot think of an easy way to accomplish what you're asking about.
However, you could develop your application to specifically receive commands, and given those commands take any actions you wanted based upon receiving them. Since you're already using MFC, you can do this rather easily. Create a Window (HWND) for your application and register it. It doesn't have to be visible (this won't necessarily make you application a GUI application). Implement a WndProc, and define specific messages that you will receive based on WM_USER + <xxx>.
First and obvious question is why you want to have threads, instead of processes.
You may use GetCommandLine and CommandLineToArgvW to get the fully formatted command line. Detect the arguments, and the call CreateProcess or ShellExecute passing /watever to spawn the process. You may also want to use GetModuleBaseName to get the name of your own EXE.