What user will Ansible run my commands as? - node.js

Background
My question seems simple, but it gets more complex really fast.
Basically, I got really tired of maintaining my servers manually (screams in background) and I decided it was time to find a way to make being a server admin much more liveable. That's when I found Ansible. Great huh? Sure beats making bash scripts (louder scream) for everything I wanted to automate.
What's the problem?
I'm having a lot of trouble figuring out what user my Ansible playbook will run certain things as. I also need the ability to specify what user certain tasks will run as. Here are some specific use cases:
Cloning a repo as another user:
My purpose with this is it run my node.js webapp from another user, who we'll call bill (that can only use sudo to run a script that I made that starts the node server, as opposed to root or my user that can use sudo for all commands). To do this, I need the ability to have Ansible's git module clone my git repo as bill. How would I do that?
Knowing how Ansible will gain root:
As far as I understand, you can set what user Ansible will connect to the server you're maintaining by defining 'user' and the beginning of the playbook file. Here's what I don't understand: if I tell it to connect via my username, joe, and ask it to update a package via the apt module, how will it gain root? Sudo usually prompts me for my password, and I'd prefer keeping it that way (for security).
Final request
I've scoured the Ansible docs, done some (what I thought was thorough) Googling, and generally just tried to figure it out on my own, but this information continues to elude me.
I am very new to Ansible, and while it's mostly straight-forwards, I would benefit greatly if I could understand exactly how Ansible runs, on which users it runs, and how/where I can specify what user to use at different times.
Thank you tons in advance

You may find it useful to read the Hosts and Users section on Ansible's documentation site:
http://docs.ansible.com/playbooks_intro.html#hosts-and-users
In summary, ansible will run all commands in a playbook as the user specified in the remote_user variable (assuming you're using ansible >= 1.4, user before that). You can specify this variable on a per-task basis as well, in case a task needs to run as a certain user.
Use sudo: true in any playbook/task to use sudo to run it. Use the sudo_user variable to specify a user to sudo to if you don't want to use root.
In practice, I've found it easiest to run my playbook as a deploy user that has sudo privileges. I set up my SSH keys so I can SSH into any host as deploy without using a password. This means that I can run my playbook without using a password and even use sudo if I need to.
I use this same user to do things like cloning git repos and starting/stopping services. If a service needs to run as a lower-privileged user, I let the init script take care of that. A quick Google search for a node.js init.d script revealed this one for CentOS:
https://gist.github.com/nariyu/1211413
Doing things this way helps to keep it simple, which I like.
Hope that helps.

My 2 cents:
Ansible uses your local user (eg Mike) to ssh to the remote machine. (That required Mike to be able to ssh to the machine)
From there it can change to a remote user if needed
It can also sudo if needed and if Mike is allowed. If no user is specified then root will be selected via your ~/.ansible.cfg on your local machine.
If you supply a remote_user with the sudo param then like no.3 it will not use root but that user.
You can specify different situations and different users or sudo via the playbooks.
Playbook's define which roles will be run into each machine that belongs to the inventory selected.
I suggest you read Ansible best practices for some explanation on how to setup your infrastructure.
Oh and btw since you are not referring to a specific module that ansible uses and your question is not related to python, then I don't find any use your question having the python tag.

Just a note that Ansible>=1.9 uses privilege escalation commands so you can execute tasks and create resources as that secondary user if need be:
- name: Install software
shell: "curl -s get.dangerous_software.install | sudo bash"
become_user: root
https://ansible-docs.readthedocs.io/zh/stable-2.0/rst/become.html

I notice current answers are a bit old and suffering from link rot.
Ansible will SSH as your current user, by default:
https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/user_guide/intro_getting_started.html#connecting-to-remote-nodes
Ansible communicates with remote machines over the SSH protocol. By default, Ansible uses native OpenSSH and connects to remote machines using your current user name, just as SSH does.
This can be overridden using:
passing the -u parameter at the command line
setting user information in your inventory file
setting user information in your configuration file
setting environment variables
But then you must ensure a route exists to SSH as that user. An approach to maintaining user-level ownership I see more often is become (root) and then to chown -R jdoe:jdoe /the/file/path.
In my 2.12 release of ansible I found the only way I could change the user was by specifying become: yes as an option at the play level. That way I am SSHing as the unprivileged, default, user. This user must have passwordless sudo enabled on the remote and is about the safest I could make my VPS. From this I could then switch to another user, with become_user, from an arbitrary command task.
Like this:
- name: Getting Started
gather_facts: false
hosts: all
become: yes # All tasks that follow will become root.
tasks:
- name: get the username running the deploy
command: echo $USER
become_user: trubuntu # From root we can switch to trubuntu.
If the user permitted SSH access to your remote is, say, victor, and not your current user, then remote_user: victor has a place at the play level, adjacent to become: yes.

Related

How do I add the local users to my docker container?

I want to know how I can add the local users of my server to a docker container. I don't need to import their files, I just need a username/password/privileges with new home directory in the docker container for every user in my system. For example, suppose my docker container contains the following users:
Host System:
admin: who has root access and rw access to all
bob: a regular non-sudo user
joe: another regular non-sudo user
Then the Docker Container must have users:
admin: who has root access and rw access to all
bob: a regular non-sudo user
joe: another regular non-sudo user
The Docker container and the system are both running linux, though the system is red hat and the container is ubuntu.
EDIT: I don't want to mount /etc/ files if possible, as this can create a two way security vulnerability as pointed out by #caveman
You would have to mount all relevant linux files using -v like /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, /ect/group, and /etc/sudoers. Though I can't recommend this due to the security risks, if anyone gets root access in the container they can add users on the host or change passwords since he mount works both ways.
The list of files is not exhaustive, for example, you have to also make sure the shell exacutables exist within the container. When testing this I had to make a symbolic link from /usr/bin/zsh to /bin/bash for example since my user has the zsh shell configured which was not present in the docker image.
If you want to use these users to interact with mounted files, you also have to make sure that user namespace remapping is disabled, or specify that you want to use the same user namespace as the host with the --userns=host flag. Again, not recommended since it is a security feature, so use with care.
Note: Once you have done all this you can use su - {username} to switch to all your existing users. The -u options doesn't work since docker checks the /etc/passwd file before mounting and will give an error.

Running containerized application as non-root - Sanity check

I read this article about why you shouldn't run containerized applications as root user,
and I'd like someone to confirm my understanding:
Article brief
The article is basically saying that just as you won't run binaries on your machine
as root, but rather as a least-privileged-required user, you won't run containerized applications as root either.
The recommendation of the author is to create a user with a known uid in the Dockerfile
and run the process as that user.
The start of the dockerfile should look like
this:
FROM <base image>
RUN groupadd -g 999 appuser && \
useradd -r -u 999 -g appuser appuser
<br>USER appuser
... <rest of Dockerfile> ..
Validating my understanding, and some questions:
1. Why bother?
Ok, I understand that it's not good to run a container process as root,
just like it's not good to run any process as root.
That's why we should create a user in the Dockerfile and run the application process as that user.
But, if it's possible to run:
~$ docker run -u 0 some_docker_image
then why bother adding a user to my Dockerfile and switch to that user?
The question boils down to the question: What are we "afraid" of? What is the threat?
If the answer is that we're afraid of some untrusted user connected to the system (who is not a sudoer),
then this user can't even run docker containers, unless he is a member of the "docker" group,
in which case - again - he could run the container with -u 0?
So I guess that we're not concerned about the user. We're concerned about the binary itself.
In that case, two possible options exist:
a. The binary is of our creation. In that case: why are we concerned?
b. The binary is of someone else's creation. In that case i can understand why we would like to
switch user.
Am I missing something?
2. Why "Known uid"?
Why is that important to specify the uid of the newly created user, and not just name it something?
3. Why in the start of the Dockerfile?
Is it important to create+switch to the new user in the beginning of the Dockerfile?
Seemingly, this is an approach that's hard to implement, since usually during the docker build process
you need to run a lot of tasks that require root privileges, such as apt-get install etc.
4. What about adding a user and adding it to sudoers?
I have a case in which I need to create a docker image, which when the container runs,
it'll run a ssh server. In order to run the ssh server, you need root privileges.
Is there a point creating a user, adding it to sudoers, and then run the ssh server as root?
Running as root in Docker is dangerous for most of the same reasons as running as root directly on the host. The container has limited Linux privileges so there are some things it can't do (reconfigure the network, reboot the host), but it can do things like overwrite the application code inside the container.
Nobody's code is absolutely perfect, so one of the big reasons to run as non-root is to minimize the damage possible when a mistake does happen.
It doesn't matter what the user ID is, just that it's not 0. There's an argument to make it different from any uid the host might be using, but since your image could run on any host, it's just a guess.
You should create the user at the start of the Dockerfile, since that setup will change infrequently and Docker layer caching can skip it. But, you should use the USER directive and switch to the user at the end of the Dockerfile, after COPYing code in and RUNning the build. Do not RUN chown ... to make the non-root user own the code: you want most files to be owned by root, so that the non-root user can't overwrite them.
(In a compiled language, with a multi-stage build, you can consider the Dockerfile equivalent of the ./configure; make; sudo make install sequence, switching to a non-privileged user to do the build. I haven't seen this pattern in many Dockerfiles but I'd recognize it if I saw it.)
Do not add a user to /etc/sudoers. There are a couple of good reasons for this. The most basic one is that a container only runs a single process, and as already discussed we probably don't want it to be root. You can either configure it with no password (in which case you might as well be root) or hard-code a password in plain text in your Dockerfile (also a bad idea). You also usually don't want to run sudo inside a script (its behaviors of putting up random password prompts and hiding environment variables can cause trouble), and so correspondingly don't want to RUN sudo ... in a Dockerfile.
If you need to break into a container to debug it, you can always docker exec -u root ... to get a root shell there.

Does a SaltStack Master/Minion auto 'sudo' when running as a non root user?

When running a saltstack, for security reasons I don't want them to run as root. Although I would not mind creating a new 'salt' user with NOPASS sudo access to run the salt minion / master on.
My question is that even though the documentation says here: https://docs.saltstack.com/en/latest/ref/configuration/nonroot.html that we can configure salt to run as a non root user, does it append sudo to normal commands instead or looses that functionality entirely.
Additional Research: Both the master and the minion config files have an uption for setting the users to anything other than root but the minion config file has an option to setup a sudo-user which defaults to saltdev but I changed to root. Not sure if this implies that the minion should sudo and use the root account or not. If so, why is this not present on the master config file.
The direct answer to the title question is NO. As stated in the docs:
[...] running the minion as an unprivileged user will keep it from making changes to things like users, installed packages, etc. unless access controls (sudo, etc.) are setup on the minion to permit the non-root user to make the needed changes.
In order to setup sudo on the minion you should use the sudo_user config. After setting a user to this variable Salt will invoke the salt.module.sudo every time a command is issued to this minion.
This sudo option is only available on the minion because the execution of commands on hosts is intended to be made only by the minion. Even if you are managing your master with Salt, the minion inside the master is what runs the commands.

Run a command in remote server

What would be the best way to run commands in remote servers? I am thinking of using SSH, but is there a better way than that?
I used Red Hat Linux and I want to run the command in one of the servers, specify what other servers I want to have my command run, and it has to do the exact same thing in the servers specified. Puppet couldn't solely help, but I might be able to combine some other tool with Puppet to do the job for me.
It seems you are able to log on to the other servers without entering a password. I assume this is based on SSH keys, as described here: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Deployment_Guide/s2-ssh-configuration-keypairs.html
You say another script is producing a list of servers. You can now use the following simple script to loop over the list:
for server in `./server-list-script`; do
echo $server:
ssh username#$server mkdir /etc/dir/test123
done >logfile 2>&1
The file "logfile" will collect the output. I'm pretty sure Puppet is able to do this as well.
Your solution will almost definitely end up involving ssh in some capacity.
You may want something to help manage the execution of commands on multiple servers; ansible is a great choice for something like this.
For example, if I want to install libvirt on a bunch of servers and make sure libvirtd is running, I might pass a configuration like this to ansible-playbook:
- hosts: all
tasks:
- yum:
name: libvirt
state: installed
- service:
name: libvirtd
state: running
enabled: true
This would ssh to all of the servers in my "inventory" (a file -- or command -- that provides ansible with a list of servers), install the libvirt package, start libvirtd, and then arrange for the service to start automatically at boot.
Alternatively, if I want to run puppet apply on a bunch of servers, I could just use the ansible command to run an ad-hoc command without requiring a configuration file:
ansible all -m command -a 'puppet apply'

How to reset Jenkins security settings from the command line?

Is there a way to reset all (or just disable the security settings) from the command line without a user/password as I have managed to completely lock myself out of Jenkins?
The simplest solution is to completely disable security - change true to false in /var/lib/jenkins/config.xml file.
<useSecurity>true</useSecurity>
A one-liner to achieve the same:
sed -i 's/<useSecurity>true<\/useSecurity>/<useSecurity>false<\/useSecurity>/g' /var/lib/jenkins/config.xml
Then just restart Jenkins:
sudo service jenkins restart
And then go to admin panel and set everything once again.
If you in case are running your Jenkins inside a Kubernetes pod and can not run service command, then you can just restart Jenkins by deleting the pod:
kubectl delete pod <jenkins-pod-name>
Once the command was issued, Kubernetes will terminate the old pod and start a new one.
One other way would be to manually edit the configuration file for your user (e.g. /var/lib/jenkins/users/username/config.xml) and update the contents of passwordHash:
<passwordHash>#jbcrypt:$2a$10$razd3L1aXndFfBNHO95aj.IVrFydsxkcQCcLmujmFQzll3hcUrY7S</passwordHash>
Once you have done this, just restart Jenkins and log in using this password:
test
The <passwordHash> element in users/<username>/config.xml will accept data of the format
salt:sha256("password{salt}")
So, if your salt is bar and your password is foo then you can produce the SHA256 like this:
echo -n 'foo{bar}' | sha256sum
You should get 7f128793bc057556756f4195fb72cdc5bd8c5a74dee655a6bfb59b4a4c4f4349 as the result. Take the hash and put it with the salt into <passwordHash>:
<passwordHash>bar:7f128793bc057556756f4195fb72cdc5bd8c5a74dee655a6bfb59b4a4c4f4349</passwordHash>
Restart Jenkins, then try logging in with password foo. Then reset your password to something else. (Jenkins uses bcrypt by default, and one round of SHA256 is not a secure way to store passwords. You'll get a bcrypt hash stored when you reset your password.)
I found the file in question located in /var/lib/jenkins called config.xml, modifying that fixed the issue.
In El-Capitan config.xml can not be found at
/var/lib/jenkins/
Its available in
~/.jenkins
then after that as other mentioned open the config.xml file and make the following changes
In this replace <useSecurity>true</useSecurity> with <useSecurity>false</useSecurity>
Remove <authorizationStrategy> and <securityRealm>
Save it and restart the jenkins(sudo service jenkins restart)
The answer on modifying was correct. Yet, I think it should be mentioned that /var/lib/jenkins/config.xml looks something like this if you have activated "Project-based Matrix Authorization Strategy". Deleting /var/lib/jenkins/config.xml and restarting jenkins also does the trick. I also deleted the users in /var/lib/jenkins/users to start from scratch.
<authorizationStrategy class="hudson.security.ProjectMatrixAuthorizationStrategy">
<permission>hudson.model.Computer.Configure:jenkins-admin</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Computer.Connect:jenkins-admin</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Computer.Create:jenkins-admin</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Computer.Delete:jenkins-admin</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Computer.Disconnect:jenkins-admin</permission>
<!-- if this is missing for your user and it is the only one, bad luck -->
<permission>hudson.model.Hudson.Administer:jenkins-admin</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Hudson.Read:jenkins-admin</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Hudson.RunScripts:jenkins-admin</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Item.Build:jenkins-admin</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Item.Cancel:jenkins-admin</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Item.Configure:jenkins-admin</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Item.Create:jenkins-admin</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Item.Delete:jenkins-admin</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Item.Discover:jenkins-admin</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Item.Read:jenkins-admin</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Item.Workspace:jenkins-admin</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.View.Configure:jenkins-admin</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.View.Create:jenkins-admin</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.View.Delete:jenkins-admin</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.View.Read:jenkins-admin</permission>
</authorizationStrategy>
We can reset the password while leaving security on.
The config.xml file in /var/lib/Jenkins/users/admin/ acts sort of like the /etc/shadow file Linux or UNIX-like systems or the SAM file in Windows, in the sense that it stores the hash of the account's password.
If you need to reset the password without logging in, you can edit this file and replace the old hash with a new one generated from bcrypt:
$ pip install bcrypt
$ python
>>> import bcrypt
>>> bcrypt.hashpw("yourpassword", bcrypt.gensalt(rounds=10, prefix=b"2a"))
'YOUR_HASH'
This will output your hash, with prefix 2a, the correct prefix for Jenkins hashes.
Now, edit the config.xml file:
...
<passwordHash>#jbcrypt:REPLACE_THIS</passwordHash>
...
Once you insert the new hash, reset Jenkins:
(if you are on a system with systemd):
sudo systemctl restart Jenkins
You can now log in, and you didn't leave your system open for a second.
To disable Jenkins security in simple steps in Linux, run these commands:
sudo ex +g/useSecurity/d +g/authorizationStrategy/d -scwq /var/lib/jenkins/config.xml
sudo /etc/init.d/jenkins restart
It will remove useSecurity and authorizationStrategy lines from your config.xml root config file and restart your Jenkins.
See also: Disable security at Jenkins website
After gaining the access to Jenkins, you can re-enable security in your Configure Global Security page by choosing the Access Control/Security Realm. After than don't forget to create the admin user.
To reset it without disabling security if you're using matrix permissions (probably easily adaptable to other login methods):
In config.xml, set disableSignup to false.
Restart Jenkins.
Go to the Jenkins web page and sign up with a new user.
In config.xml, duplicate one of the <permission>hudson.model.Hudson.Administer:username</permission> lines and replace username with the new user.
If it's a private server, set disableSignup back to true in config.xml.
Restart Jenkins.
Go to the Jenkins web page and log in as the new user.
Reset the password of the original user.
Log in as the original user.
Optional cleanup:
Delete the new user.
Delete the temporary <permission> line in config.xml.
No securities were harmed during this answer.
On the offchance you accidentally lock yourself out of Jenkins due to a permission mistake, and you dont have server-side access to switch to the jenkins user or root... You can make a job in Jenkins and add this to the Shell Script:
sed -i 's/<useSecurity>true/<useSecurity>false/' ~/config.xml
Then click Build Now and restart Jenkins (or the server if you need to!)
\.jenkins\secrets\initialAdminPassword
Copy the password from the initialAdminPassword file and paste it into the Jenkins.
1 first check location if you install war or Linux or windows based on that
for example if war under Linux and for admin user
/home/"User_NAME"/.jenkins/users/admin/config.xml
go to this tag after #jbcrypt:
<passwordHash>#jbcrypt:$2a$10$3DzCGLQr2oYXtcot4o0rB.wYi5kth6e45tcPpRFsuYqzLZfn1pcWK</passwordHash>
change this password using use any website for bcrypt hash generator
https://www.dailycred.com/article/bcrypt-calculator
make sure it start with $2a cause this one jenkens uses
In order to remove the by default security for jenkins in Windows OS,
You can traverse through the file Config.xml created inside /users/{UserName}/.jenkins.
Inside this file you can change the code from
<useSecurity>true</useSecurity>
To,
<useSecurity>false</useSecurity>
step-1 : go to the directory cd .jenkins/secrets then you will get a 'initialAdminPassword'.
step-2 : nano initialAdminPassword
you will get a password
changing the <useSecurity>true</useSecurity> to <useSecurity>false</useSecurity> will not be enough, you should remove <authorizationStrategy> and <securityRealm> elements too and restart your jenkins server by doing sudo service jenkins restart .
remember this, set <usesecurity> to false only may cause a problem for you, since these instructions are mentioned in thier official documentation here.
Jenkins over KUBENETES and Docker
In case of Jenkins over a container managed by a Kubernetes POD is a bit more complex since: kubectl exec PODID --namespace=jenkins -it -- /bin/bash will you allow to access directly to the container running Jenkins, but you will not have root access, sudo, vi and many commands are not available and therefore a workaround is needed.
Use kubectl describe pod [...] to find the node running your Pod and the container ID (docker://...)
SSH into the node
run docker exec -ti -u root -- /bin/bash to access the container with Root privileges
apt-get update
sudo apt-get install vim
The second difference is that the Jenkins configuration file are placed in a different path that corresponds to the mounting point of the persistent volume, i.e. /var/jenkins_home, this location might change in the future, check it running df.
Then disable security - change true to false in /var/jenkins_home/jenkins/config.xml file.
<useSecurity>false</useSecurity>
Now it is enough to restart the Jenkins, action that will cause the container and the Pod to die, it will created again in some seconds with the configuration updated (and all the chance like vi, update erased) thanks to the persistent volume.
The whole solution has been tested on Google Kubernetes Engine.
UPDATE
Notice that you can as well run ps -aux the password in plain text is shown even without root access.
jenkins#jenkins-87c47bbb8-g87nw:/$ps -aux
[...]
jenkins [..] -jar /usr/share/jenkins/jenkins.war --argumentsRealm.passwd.jenkins=password --argumentsRealm.roles.jenkins=admin
[...]
Easy way out of this is to use the admin psw to login with your admin user:
Change to root user: sudo su -
Copy the password: xclip -sel clip < /var/lib/jenkins/secrets/initialAdminPassword
Login with admin and press ctrl + v on password input box.
Install xclip if you don't have it:
$ sudo apt-get install xclip
Using bcrypt you can solve this issue. Extending the #Reem answer for someone who is trying to automate the process using bash and python.
#!/bin/bash
pip install bcrypt
yum install -y https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-7.noarch.rpm
yum -y install xmlstarlet
cat > /tmp/jenkinsHash.py <<EOF
import bcrypt
import sys
if not sys.argv[1]:
sys.exit(10)
plaintext_pwd=sys.argv[1]
encrypted_pwd=bcrypt.hashpw(sys.argv[1], bcrypt.gensalt(rounds=10, prefix=b"2a"))
isCorrect=bcrypt.checkpw(plaintext_pwd, encrypted_pwd)
if not isCorrect:
sys.exit(20);
print "{}".format(encrypted_pwd)
EOF
chmod +x /tmp/jenkinsHash.py
cd /var/lib/jenkins/users/admin*
pwd
while (( 1 )); do
echo "Waiting for Jenkins to generate admin user's config file ..."
if [[ -f "./config.xml" ]]; then
break
fi
sleep 10
done
echo "Admin config file created"
admin_password=$(python /tmp/jenkinsHash.py password 2>&1)
# Repalcing the new passowrd
xmlstarlet -q ed --inplace -u "/user/properties/hudson.security.HudsonPrivateSecurityRealm_-Details/passwordHash" -v '#jbcrypt:'"$admin_password" config.xml
# Restart
systemctl restart jenkins
sleep 10
I have kept password hardcoded here but it can be a user input depending upon the requirement. Also make sure to add that sleep otherwise any other command revolving around Jenkins will fail.
To very simply disable both security and the startup wizard, use the JAVA property:
-Djenkins.install.runSetupWizard=false
The nice thing about this is that you can use it in a Docker image such that your container will always start up immediately with no login screen:
# Dockerfile
FROM jenkins/jenkins:lts
ENV JAVA_OPTS -Djenkins.install.runSetupWizard=false
Note that, as mentioned by others, the Jenkins config.xml is in /var/jenkins_home in the image, but using sed to modify it from the Dockerfile fails, because (presumably) the config.xml doesn't exist until the server starts.
I will add some improvements based on the solution:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/51255443/5322871
On my scenario it was deployed with Swarm cluster with nfs volume, in order to perform the password reset I did the following:
Attach to the pod:
$ docker exec -it <pod-name> bash
Generate the hash password with python (do not forget to specify the letter b outside of your quoted password, the method hashpw requires a parameter in bytes):
$ pip install bcrypt
$ python
>>> import bcrypt
>>> bcrypt.hashpw(b"yourpassword", bcrypt.gensalt(rounds=10, prefix=b"2a"))
'YOUR_HASH'
Once inside the container find all the config.xml files:
$ find /var/ -type f -iname "config.xml"
Once identified, modify value of the field ( on my case the config.xml was in another location):
$ vim /var/jenkins_home/users/admin_9482805162890262115/config.xml
...
<passwordHash>#jbcrypt:YOUR_HASH</passwordHash>
...
Restart the service:
docker service scale <service-name>=0
docker service scale <service-name>=1
Hope this can be helpful for anybody.
I had a similar issue, and following reply from ArtB,
I found that my user didn't have the proper configurations. so what I did:
Note: manually modifying such XML files is risky. Do it at your own risk. Since I was already locked out, I didn't have much to lose. AFAIK Worst case I would have deleted the ~/.jenkins/config.xml file as prev post mentioned.
**> 1. ssh to the jenkins machine
cd ~/.jenkins (I guess that some installations put it under /var/lib/jenkins/config.xml, but not in my case )
vi config.xml, and under authorizationStrategy xml tag, add the below section (just used my username instead of "put-your-username")
restart jenkins. in my case as root service tomcat7 stop; ; service tomcat7 start
Try to login again. (worked for me)**
under
add:
<permission>hudson.model.Computer.Build:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Computer.Configure:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Computer.Connect:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Computer.Create:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Computer.Delete:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Computer.Disconnect:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Hudson.Administer:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Hudson.ConfigureUpdateCenter:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Hudson.Read:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Hudson.RunScripts:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Hudson.UploadPlugins:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Item.Build:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Item.Cancel:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Item.Configure:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Item.Create:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Item.Delete:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Item.Discover:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Item.Read:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Item.Workspace:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Run.Delete:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.Run.Update:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.View.Configure:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.View.Create:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.View.Delete:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.model.View.Read:put-your-username</permission>
<permission>hudson.scm.SCM.Tag:put-your-username</permission>
Now, you can go to different directions. For example I had github oauth integration, so I could have tried to replace the authorizationStrategy with something like below:
Note:, It worked in my case because I had a specific github oauth plugin that was already configured. So it is more risky than the previous solution.
<authorizationStrategy class="org.jenkinsci.plugins.GithubAuthorizationStrategy" plugin="github-oauth#0.14">
<rootACL>
<organizationNameList class="linked-list">
<string></string>
</organizationNameList>
<adminUserNameList class="linked-list">
<string>put-your-username</string>
<string>username2</string>
<string>username3</string>
<string>username_4_etc_put_username_that_will_become_administrator</string>
</adminUserNameList>
<authenticatedUserReadPermission>true</authenticatedUserReadPermission>
<allowGithubWebHookPermission>false</allowGithubWebHookPermission>
<allowCcTrayPermission>false</allowCcTrayPermission>
<allowAnonymousReadPermission>false</allowAnonymousReadPermission>
</rootACL>
</authorizationStrategy>
Edit the file $JENKINS_HOME/config.xml and change de security configuration with this:
<authorizationStrategy class="hudson.security.AuthorizationStrategy$Unsecured"/>
After that restart Jenkins.
A lot of times you wont be having permissions to edit the config.xml file.
The simplest thing would be to take a back of config.xml and delete using sudo command.
Restart the jenkins using the command sudo /etc/init.d/jenkins restart
This will disable all the security in the Jenkins and the login option would disappear
For one who is using macOS, the new version just can be installed by homebrew. so for resting, this command line must be using:
brew services restart jenkins-lts
The directory where the file is located config.xml in windows
C:\Windows\System32\config\systemprofile\AppData\Local\Jenkins\.jenkins

Resources