I am attempting to use the module Search Autocomplete 7.x-4.0-alpha2.
I have added a form in the "search_autocomplete" configuration section.
It is enabled.
I created a view that returns taxonomy in json format.
Here is an example of the json output from the json view
[{
"value": "aquaculture",
"fields": {
"name_i18n": "aquaculture"
},
"group": {
"group_id": "aquaculture",
"group_name": "aquaculture"
}
}, {
"value": "climate change",
"fields": {
"name_i18n": "climate change"
},
"group": {
"group_id": "climatechange",
"group_name": "climate change"
}
}, {
"value": "coastal development",
"fields": {
"name_i18n": "coastal development"
},
"group": {
"group_id": "coastaldevelopment",
"group_name": "coastal development"
}
}, {
"value": "deforestation",
"fields": {
"name_i18n": "deforestation"
},
"group": {
"group_id": "deforestation",
"group_name": "deforestation"
}
}, {
"value": "extinction",
"fields": {
"name_i18n": "extinction"
},
"group": {
"group_id": "extinction",
"group_name": "extinction"
}
}]
I set the Suggestion Source to be the view. I used the autocomplete feature of it so I know that my "search autocomplete" suggestion source is configured right. The id selector of a form in a different view (not the json taxonomy one) is used. The permissions for the module are correct.
Now, when I load my view that has the search api form I see a little blue circle icon that is circling to the right of the search api form field. It is circling the whole time and no suggestions are ever populated in the search text box.
I know I have the right form configured because if I set a different form id for the "searchautocomplete" configuration and reload the view page, the circling blue circle is missing.
Does anyone have any idea what might be wrong?
UPDATE: I was going to my modules page and saw this error (i wasn't changing anything on the modules page, just going there) and saw the error on the top of the modules page regarding the Search Autocomplete module
Update: I changed the Search Autocomplete configuration section to not point to my json view but point to an outside url, http://google.com. Of course this is not a valid json endpoint, but I wanted to see if I could see it at least attempt to get it's json data from google.com. Watching through firebug has shown that it doesn't even attempt to go to google.com for it's json data. I think something similar is happening with my json views (it's just not even going there for the data).
That was probably due to a bug in the alpha-version? When you configure the JSON Endpoint by using the Views UI, you should see a list of items in the "preview"-section underneath. The items that are listed there should be the ones that appear as suggestions in the search.
Related
I'm having problem with loading $schema in SPFx within my new web part for SP. Web part is working on benchmark.aspx but my whole manifest is not being processed so I can't set preconfiguredEntries and it's big problem for me.
error is:
Problems loading reference 'https://developer.microsoft.com/json-schemas/spfx/client-side-manifest-base.schema.json': Request vscode/content failed unexpectedly without providing any details.(768)
Any idea on this issue please?
{
"$schema": "https://developer.microsoft.com/json-schemas/spfx/client-side-web-part-manifest.schema.json",
"id": "56dab116-67ba-453f-883d-b7a11690e965",
"alias": "ReadListWebPart",
"supportedHosts": ["SharePointWebPart"],
"componentType": "Webpart",
"version": "1.0",
"manifestVersion": "2",
"requiresCustomScript": false,
"preconfiguredEntries": [{
"groupId": "5c03119e-3074-46fd-976b-c60198311f70",
"group": { "default": "Other" },
"title": { "default": "read-list" },
"description": { "default": "popis web party" },
"officeFabricIconFontName": "Page",
"properties": {
"vedouci_velke_foto": true,
"asistenti_pod_vedoucim": false,
"nazev_web_party": "To jsme my"
}
}]
}
I checked the manifest.json, will be the same as yours, have the following waring:
Then tested to access "https://developer.microsoft.com/json-schemas/spfx/client-side-web-part-manifest.schema.json" in my local, no problem, still can be accessed.
After this, I tested to output the preconfigured properties in React SPFX Web Part like this:
Props.ts
WebPart.ts
.tsx
Still able to output properties:
In conclusion, you can just igore this issue, it's still able to read preconfiguredEntries.
Can anyone please help me to include list view in Facebook Channel using Bot framework? I saw examples as shown here List template. I don't know whether this is the exact way in which we need to give the attachments. Also I didn't know the equivalent for sourceEvent method in Bot framework v4. Another useful link is as follows FB Messenger Message Template. See the image given below. I need to put the link for the image and once we click the link it should open another page also the image should be clickable image as in the example for C# Clickable HeroCard images using tap property. Both functionality should work. I tried using HeroCard (but the url that needs to open-up had CORS origin issue. I tried using Adaptive card but it is not supported in Facebook as of now. So, I thought to use List Template for Facebook. Is there anyway to achieve this?
You can send Facebook List Templates through the Microsoft BotFramework by adding the Facebook attachment to the activity's channel data. The list template type doesn't seem to be supported, but you can set the type to generic and add multiple elements to the attachment to get the same result. See the example below.
await turnContext.sendActivity({
channelData: {
"attachment": {
"type": "template",
"payload": {
"template_type": "generic",
"elements": [
{
"title": "Three Strategies for Finding Snow",
"subtitle": "How do you plan a ski trip to ensure the best conditions? You can think about a resort’s track record, or which have the best snow-making machines. Or you can gamble.",
"image_url": "https://static01.nyt.com/images/2019/02/10/travel/03update-snowfall2/03update-snowfall2-jumbo.jpg?quality=90&auto=webp",
"default_action": {
"type": "web_url",
"url": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/08/travel/ski-resort-snow-conditions.html",
"messenger_extensions": false,
"webview_height_ratio": "tall"
},
"buttons": [{
"type":"element_share"
}]
},
{
"title": "Viewing the Northern Lights: ‘It’s Almost Like Heavenly Visual Music’",
"subtitle": "Seeing the aurora borealis has become a must-do item for camera-toting tourists from Alaska to Greenland to Scandinavia. On a trip to northern Sweden, the sight proved elusive, if ultimately rewarding.",
"image_url": "https://static01.nyt.com/images/2019/02/17/travel/17Northern-Lights1/17Northern-Lights1-superJumbo.jpg?quality=90&auto=webp",
"default_action": {
"type": "web_url",
"url": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/11/travel/northern-lights-tourism-in-sweden.html",
"messenger_extensions": false,
"webview_height_ratio": "tall"
},
"buttons": [{
"type":"element_share"
}]
},
{
"title": "Five Places to Visit in New Orleans",
"subtitle": "Big Freedia’s rap music is a part of the ether of modern New Orleans. So what better authentic travel guide to the city that so many tourists love to visit?",
"image_url": "https://static01.nyt.com/images/2019/02/17/travel/17NewOrleans-5Places6/17NewOrleans-5Places6-jumbo.jpg?quality=90&auto=webp",
"default_action": {
"type": "web_url",
"url": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/12/travel/big-freedia-five-places-to-eat-and-visit-in-new-orleans.html",
"messenger_extensions": false,
"webview_height_ratio": "tall"
},
"buttons": [{
"type":"element_share"
}]
}]
}
}
}
});
Hope this helps!
I have setup my application to consume the content deliver API using the contentful SDK, its all hunky dory untill now when i realized the fieldType for each field in the content model is missing in the API response.
Am i missing something? I am providing more details about the API and its response below -
API response
The issue is if i dont know the the field type, i would have to ask the content writers to stick to a specific template and order of the fields instead of rendering the fields dynamically as you parse the response.
Please help!
You do not get the field types in the response, but you do get the content type id. It is expected that you already know what type of fields a specific content type contains.
The content type id can be found in the sys.contentType.sys.id property of each entry. With this information you could select which template to render.
If you still need to dynamically decide how to render based on the type of a field you would have to resort to the typeof operator to check what the type of each field is. You would lose out on the possibility to differentiate between specific Contentful properties though as they would all be returned as object.
You could also call the content type endpoint to fetch the entire content model from the Contentful API. http://cdn.contentful.com/spaces/space-id/content_types/
This would give you a the field each content type contains and the type of each field in the following structure:
{
"sys": {
// sys properties
},
"displayField": "productName",
"name": "Product",
"description": null,
"fields": [
{
"id": "productName",
"name": "Product name",
"type": "Text",
"localized": true,
"required": true,
"disabled": false,
"omitted": false
},
{
"id": "slug",
"name": "Slug",
"type": "Symbol",
"localized": false,
"required": false,
"disabled": false,
"omitted": false
},
// further fields
]
}
It would result in multiple API calls to get the information you want though.
I'm attempting to utilize Contentful on a current project of mine and I'm trying to understand how to filter my query results based on a field in a linked object.
My top level object contains a Link defined as such:
"name": "Service_Description",
"fields": [
{
"name": "Header",
"id": "header",
"type": "Link",
"linkType": "Entry",
"required": true,
"validations": [
{
"linkContentType": [
"offerGeneral"
]
}
],
"localized": false,
"disabled": false,
"omitted": false
},
This "header" field links to another content type that has this definition:
"fields": [
{
"name": "General",
"id": "general",
"type": "Link",
"linkType": "Entry",
"required": true,
"validations": [
{
"linkContentType": [
"genericGeneral"
]
}
],
"localized": false,
"disabled": false,
"omitted": false
},
which then links to the lowest level:
"fields": [{
"name": "TagList",
"id": "tagList",
"type": "Array",
"items": {
"type": "Link",
"linkType": "Entry",
"validations": [
{
"linkContentType": [
"tag"
]
}
]
},
"validations": []
}
where tagList is an array of tags this piece of content may have.
I want to be able to run a query from the top level object that says get me X number of these "Service_Description" content entries where it contains a tag from a supplied list of tags.
In PostMan, I've been running with this:
https://cdn.contentful.com/spaces/{SPACE_ID}/entries?access_token={ACCESS_TOKEN}&content_type=serviceDescription&include=3
I'm trying to add a filter something like so:
fields.header.fields.general.fields.tagList.sys.id%5Bin%5D={TAG_SYS_ID}
This is clearly incorrect, but I've been struggling with how to walk this relationship to achieve my goal. Perusing the documentation this seems to have something to do with includes, but I'm unsure of how to rectify the problem.
Any direction on how to achieve my goal or if this is possible?
This is now possible, something I believe was solved for in the API based on requests for this functionality. You can see the thread here.
This gist of it is that you have to query on the entries that have linked entries and then include the contentType for those linked entries in the query like so:
contentfulClient.getEntries({
'content_type': 'location',
'fields.market.fields.marketName': 'New York',
'fields.market.sys.contentType.sys.id': 'marketRegion'
})
Unfortunately what you are requesting is not currently possible in Contentful.
We were facing a very similar issue with nested/referenced content types and support said it wasn't possible.
We ended up writing a very complicated system that allowed us to do what you want. Essentially doing a full text search for the referenced content and then querying all of the parents entries. We then matched the relationships by iterating over the parents to find the relationship.
Sorry it couldn't be easier. Hopefully the devs work on something that improve this complication. We have brought this to their attention.
I would like to add a static facet to my Liferay search portlet in order to filter out contents having a specific tag, i.e. I do not want to display the assets which are assigned this tag to. I tried several options, but had no success so far. Even I was not able to create a facet for displaying assets having a specific tag. I have another non-static facet for tags, could it be a problem?
This is my last try:
{
"displayStyle": "asset_entries",
"weight": 1.0,
"static": true,
"order": "OrderHitsDesc",
"data": {
"values": ["my-tag"],
"frequencyThreshold": 0
},
"label": "label",
"className": "com.liferay.portal.kernel.search.facet.AssetEntriesFacet",
"fieldName": "assetTagNames"
},
But I also tried displayStyle: asset_tags and MultiValueFacet as className.
Any ideas, how to configure this facet?