This is how my configuration looks like
<int-file:inbound-channel-adapter id="files" directory="${lz.dir.${ft}}">
<int:poller fixed-delay="3000" max-messages-per-poll="3" />
</int-file:inbound-channel-adapter>
<int:bridge input-channel="files" output-channel="sourceFiles" />
<int:channel id="sourceFiles">
<int:dispatcher task-executor="executor" />
</int:channel>
<int:service-activator input-channel="sourceFiles"
ref="moveToSource"
method="move" />
<int:aggregator id="filesBuffered"
input-channel="sourceFiles"
output-channel="stagedFiles"
release-strategy-expression="size() == 10"
correlation-strategy-expression="'mes-group'"
expire-groups-upon-completion="true"
/>
<int:channel id="stagedFiles" />
<int:service-activator input-channel="stagedFiles"
ref="moveToStage"
method="move" />
<task:executor id="executor" pool-size="5" queue-capacity="0" rejection-policy="CALLER_RUNS" />
The idea is to poll a directory every 3 second and emit 3 messages per poll to a dispatcher based on channel to allow asynchronous execution. Messages are then aggregated based on number of messages and then emitted to next service activator. The first service activator places files in source directory and second service activator which gets the aggregated list to move those files to staging directory.
What seems to be happening is that source folder skips some files but the staging folder does gets all the files. My guess is that poller sends the messages to the dispatcher channel but when its thread pool gets full it simply ignores the files but somehow the aggregator still gets all the files. Almost like dispatcher channel skips the first service activator step for files it receives after the thread pool limit has reached but those files are still passed to next channel and thats how they still end up getting processed by the second service activator.
What I would like to do is have the poller resend the files that were rejected by the dispatcher. Any ideas would be appreciated.
Thanks
Sorry, I don't understand what you describe, but by your configuration it looks like:
sourceFiles channel is point-to-point one. So, only one subscriber at a time can get message from that channel.
But you have two subscribers - service-activator and aggregator
By default dispatcher uses RoundRobinLoadBalancingStrategy. That means, that first message will be processed by first subscriber, the second one - by second subscriberб and so on, like relay.
So, if you want to have a sequential, there is need to subscribe aggregator to the outbound-channel of moveToSource service-activator and return from move method the same payload. In your case File.
If it isn't your case, so provide, please, correct config or explain your use-case.
Now it is confused, sorry.
HTH
Related
I have issue with reply-timeout property of StoredProcOutboundGateway in spring integration. I have gone through the documentation and it says reply-time out will not work in case of direct channel for the Gateway . But in case of external integration gateways ie StoredProcOutboundGateway it says
"when sending to a DirectChannel, the invocation will occur in the sender’s thread so the failing of the send operation may be caused by other components further downstream "
As per my design my StoredProcOutboundGateway reply is sending to a Direct channel.Will the StoredProcOutboundGateway throw exception after the reply-time out expiration ? .For re creating this scenario I have put a debug point and wait for configured reply time out in the first line of StoredProcOutboundGateway.handleRequestMessage method ,But it didn't thrown any exception and it returned successsful response even after configured time .
<int:gateway id="idGateway" service-interface="Gateway">
<int:method name="getStoreProcData" request-channel="store.req.channel" reply-channel="store.reply.channel" />
</int:gateway>
<int-jdbc:stored-proc-outbound-gateway stored-procedure-name="GE_PKG.GET_PRC"
ignore-column-meta-data="true" reply-timeout="2000" request-channel="store.req.channel" reply-channel="store.reply.channel" is-function="false"
............other cursor config
</int-jdbc:stored-proc-outbound-gateway>enter code here
<int:channel id="store.req.channel" />
<int:channel id="store.reply.channel" />
Spring-Integration V4..1.2 DB oracle ojdbc6
The reply-timeout only applies if the reply-channel can block - such as a bounded QueueChannel that is full.
i.e. it is a timeout for the send to the reply-channel.
It will never occur with a DirectChannel.
I have the following workflow.
inbound-channel
splitter
task executor for split channels - all the threads execute the same workflow.
3.a. construct the request
3.b. service activator wrapper for a gateway message endpoint.
3.c. gateway wrapper over the http-outbound-gateway with the configuration of error-channel (to handle exceptions while invoking http-outbound-gateway)
3.d. http-outbound-gateway
aggregator
response out of spring integration workflow.
If an exception occurs in 3.d, the control goes to the service-activator configured for the gateway error channel.
I copy just the following from the failed message to the new header to the header passed to the error channel.
a. correlationId
b. sequenceNumber
c. sequenceSize
But while aggregating the splitter response, the DefaultAggregatingMessageGroupProcessor.java removes the conflicting headers and by that it removes the error-channel and reply-channel before providing the control to aggregator.
So once the aggregator completes it's operation it is unable to find the reply or error channel and it results in an exception.
I'm using spring-integration-core version 2.2.1 and I'm not sure why the reply-channel and error-channel is being removed during header aggregation.
Any input on resolving this issue will be of great help.
Thank You :)
EDIT 1:
Thank You very much Gary for helping me out with this scenario. I'm sharing my current configuration
<!-- SPLITTER -->
<int:splitter id="dentalSplitter" ref="dentalServiceSplitter"
method="getDentalServiceList" input-channel="dentalServiceSplitterChannel"
output-channel="dentalSplitterTaskChannel" />
<int:channel id="dentalSplitterTaskChannel">
<int:dispatcher task-executor="dentalTaskExecutor" />
</int:channel>
<int:chain input-channel="dentalSplitterTaskChannel" output-channel="dentalGatewayChannel">
<int:header-enricher>
<int:header name="CHAIN_START_TIME" expression="T(System).currentTimeMillis()" overwrite="true" />
<int:object-to-json-transformer content-type="application/json"/>
</int:chain>
<int:service-activator input-channel="dentalGatewayChannel" ref="dentalGatewayWrapper" output-channel="dentalReplyChannel" />
<int:gateway id="dentalGatewayWrapper" default-request-channel="dentalCostEstimateRequestChannel" error-channel="dentalErrorChannel"/>
<int-http:outbound-gateway id="dentalGateway"
url-expression="#urlBuilder.build('${service.endpoint}')"
http-method="POST" request-factory="clientHttpRequestFactory"
request-channel="dentalCostEstimateRequestChannel" extract-request-payload="true"
expected-response-type="com.dental.test.DentalResponse">
<int-http:request-handler-advice-chain>
<ref bean="logChainTimeInterceptor" />
</int-http:request-handler-advice-chain>
</int-http:outbound-gateway>
<!-- EXCEPTION -->
<int:chain input-channel="dentalErrorChannel" output-channel="dentalAggregatorChannel">
<int:transformer ref="commonErrorTransformer" method="dentalGracefulReturn"/>
</int:chain>
<!-- SUCCESS -->
<int:chain input-channel="dentalReplyChannel" output-channel="dentalAggregatorChannel">
<int:filter discard-channel="dentalErrorChannel"
expression="T(com.dental.util.InvocationOutcomeHelper).isOutcomeSuccess(payload?.metadata?.outcome?.code,payload?.metadata?.outcome?.message)" />
</int:chain>
<!-- AGGREGATION -->
<int:chain input-channel="dentalAggregatorChannel" output-channel="wsDentalServiceOutputChannel" >
<int:aggregator ref="dentalServiceAggregator" />
<int:service-activator ref="dentalResponseServiceActivator" />
</int:chain>
What I noticed was this, every split channel when passing through the gateway creates a new temporary channel for error and reply and after getting the response back from the gateway, it retains the preserved (original inbound) error and reply channel header. And as you had mentioned, after the control gets to the error transformer that flow of retaining the preserved headers gets broken and the aggregating message group processor receives three different instances of temporary channel and hence removes them.
I was planning to have a custom message group processor and modify the conflict resolution strategy for aggregating the header and came up with this config.
<bean id="channelPreservingAggregatingMessageHandler" class="org.springframework.integration.aggregator.AggregatingMessageHandler">
<constructor-arg name="processor" ref="channelPreservingMessageGroupProcessor"/>
</bean>
I'm yet to test this out though. But based on this discussion, this does not look like a viable solution.
And looks like my configuration for error handling in gateway is incorrect.
However, I'm confused on this statement of yours "Instead of forwarding the message directly, simply handle the error on your error flow and return the result normally to the gateway "wrapper"". If I remove the error channel how will I get the control back when an exception occurs? May be I'm missing to understand something here. Can you elaborate more on this please?
When asking questions about scenarios such as this, you generally need to show your configuration. However, I suspect you are forwarding the message from the error flow directly to the aggregator.
This is like doing a GOTO in code and breaks the scoping.
It won't work because the replyChannel header in the error message is for the gateway "wrapper", not the original upstream inbound gateway. When the aggregator gets conflicting headers, it has no choice but to drop the headers (you will see a DEBUG log message to that effect).
Instead of forwarding the message directly, simply handle the error on your error flow and return the result normally to the gateway "wrapper" (simply omit the error channel on the last element on the error flow).
The gateway will then fix up the reply so it is consistent with other messages (good and bad) and forward it to the aggregator.
You don't need to mess with headers in your error flow, just return the value you want to be aggregated along with the good results.
You should really update to a current release, or at least the latest in the 2.2.x line (2.2.6).
I am planning to use a buffered queue channel backed by IBM MQ Queue. I would like the Spring message to be put into a MQ Queue so that each can be handled in a separate transaction and if the downstream webservice fails it can be re-tried and ultimately put in a backout queue. This way the messages will never be lost.
I see there are implementations for JDBC Message Store and others but I cannot find anything for MQ Queue. Can you please point me if I am missing
<si:service-activator id="eventHandler"
input-channel="channel1l" output-channel="amountDataChannel"
method="processEvent" ref="eventService" >
</si:service-activator>
<si:channel id="amountDataChannel">
<si:queue message-store="queueMessageStore ???"/>
</si:channel>
<si:chain id="dataChain1" input-channel="amountDataChannel" output-
channel="outputChannel">
<si:poller fixed-rate="10000" max-messages-per-poll="1" />
<si:transformer ref="transformer" method="transformEvent"/>
..Make webservice call
</si:chain>
Update
After reading through the documentation here is what I am doing though I have a question on transaction manger Should I be giving the transaction-manager which I declared or will it automatically participate using acknowldege attribute. If yes then what is the difference in both of them?
<jee:jndi-lookup id="amountQueue" jndi-name="jms/amountQueue" />
<si-jms:channel id="amountDataChannel" queue="amountQueue" connection-
factory="queueConnectionFactory" transaction-manager="txManager" />
Also for production ready is there any other attribute which needs to be given ?
Appreciate your help on this
Please refer to the JMS section of the documentation for JMS-backed Channels.
I have an integration application that mostly works, but noticed yesterday a message was lost. At the time, the service-activator endpoint was extremely busy processing a previous message.
Basically, my integration flow is:
jdbc:inbound-channel-adapter --> splitter -> aggregator (based on a type field) -> [pollable channel] --> service-activator
From the log, I can see a group of messages polled, split, aggregated, expired (via a message store reaper), and placed on the creation channel. There is a preSend and postSend event in the log for placing the message on the creationChannel, but that's the end of it. It never gets to my service-activator, there's no messages in the jdbc message store and I dont see any errors.
Could there an issue with how I have either the service-activator or poller configured (or a combination)?
Here is the configuration applicable to the issue.
<int:poller default="true" fixed-delay="1000" receive-timeout="0" />
<int-jdbc:message-store id="jdbc-messageStore" data-source="dataSource" />
<int:channel id="creationChannel" >
<int:queue message-store="jdbc-messageStore" />
</int:channel>
<!-- Endpoint responsible for creating Archive from List of Document objects -->
<bean id="archiveCreator" class="org.abc.ArchiveCreator"/>
<int:service-activator ref="archiveCreator" method="createArchive" input-channel="creationChannel" />
First of all you should mark your <poller> as <transactional>.
Another point switch on the org.springframework.integration DEBUG logging level and show here the log, when a message is lost.
One module sends messages to the message broker every N second. The other module receive the messages from the broker. The messages is built in a method sendMessage of the service activator. The plan was to use inbound channel adapter (as in the answer) but for some reasons this solution does not work and I keep receiving "Received no Message during the poll, returning 'false'". What is wrong with this configuration?
<int-jms:inbound-channel-adapter id="keepAlivePoller" channel="keepAliveChannel" destination="keepAlive" connection-factory="connectionFactory">
<si:poller id="sendPoller" fixed-rate="${keepalive.sendinterval}" max-messages-per-poll="1"></si:poller>
</int-jms:inbound-channel-adapter>
<si:service-activator input-channel="keepAliveChannel" method="sendMessage" ref="keepAliveSender"/>
<bean class="com.foo.KeepAliveSender"/>
<si:channel id="keepAliveChannel"/>
That will only send a message if there is a message in the "keepAlive" queue.
You can simply use...
<int:inbound-channel-adapter id="keepAlivePoller" channel="keepAliveChannel"
expression="'foo'">
<si:poller id="sendPoller" fixed-rate="${keepalive.sendinterval}" />
</int:inbound-channel-adapter>
... and not use JMS at all.