What is the best practice for resizing say an Ellipse or Rectangle on another SVG element?
If I check for the onMouseMove event on the ellipse when I am out of it, the resizing stops. I was thinking to implement the listener on the svg element as well and pass the information to the ellipse I started the resizing on. This means having a generic Resize() method on the svg element that passes to the Resize() of the selected ellipse.
Isn't there an easier way?
I'm currently doing it with Dart, but it should be the same with javascript.
An example is an <svg> element with a <g> containing <rect> and an <ellipse>. If I start to resize the rectangle on a rectangle.onMouseMove, the moment I'm outside it, it stops resizing. To avoid this, I have to use the svg.onMouseMove, and use a resize method that resizes the rectangle. To know that it's the rectangle to be resized, I check for onMouseDown and again check the target (MouseEvent.target on Dart. Not sure how to detect what I'm touching without doing a cumbersome check on id maybe). Note that what I am trying to accomplish is to use the rectangle to resize the ellipse. I'm showing the rectangle only when resizing.
The following code will create a circle and resize when you start dragging.
It also works when the mouse gets outside the circle.
Maybe you can modify this to your liking.
Oh, and my Dart-code might not be the best, as I just recently started learning Dart.
Any improvements are welcome.
import 'dart:html';
import 'dart:svg';
import 'dart:math' as math;
void main() {
// add new svg
var svg = new SvgSvgElement();
svg.style.width = '400px';
svg.style.height = '400px';
svg.style.border = '1px solid black';
var body = document.querySelector('body');
body.append(svg);
// add group
var g = new SvgElement.tag('g');
svg.append(g);
// center of circle
var center = new math.Point(200, 200);
var startR = 70;
var newR = 70;
// add circle
var circle = new CircleElement();
circle.setAttribute('cx', center.x.toString());
circle.setAttribute('cy', center.y.toString());
circle.setAttribute('r', startR.toString());
circle.setAttribute('fill', 'green');
g.append(circle);
circle.onMouseDown.listen((MouseEvent E) {
var startOffset = E.offset;
var startDistance = startOffset.distanceTo(center);
math.Point offset = E.offset;
// now start listening for document movements so we don't need to stay on the circle
var move = document.onMouseMove.listen((MouseEvent E) {
// calculate new position
var movement = E.movement;
offset = new math.Point(
// multiply with 0.5 to make the mouse move faster than the circle grows
// that way we show that the mouse movement also works outside the circle element
offset.x + movement.x * 0.5,
offset.y + movement.y * 0.5
);
// calculate new distance from center
var distance = offset.distanceTo(center);
// calculate new radius for circle
newR = distance / startDistance * startR;
// resize circle
circle.setAttribute('r', newR.toString());
});
// and stop all listening on mouseup
var up = document.onMouseUp.listen(null);
up.onData((MouseEvent E) {
move.cancel();
up.cancel();
startR = newR;
});
});
}
Hope this helps,
Kind regards,
Hendrik Jan
Related
I've been looking everywhere but I can't find a way to animate a line in Pixi.js.
Given this code:
var line = new PIXI.Graphics();
line.lineStyle(1, 0xff0000);
line.moveTo(0,window.innerHeight/2);
line.lineTo(window.innerWidth/2, 0);
line.lineTo(window.innerWidth, window.innerHeight/2);
app.stage.addChild(line);
which draws this magnificient jsfiddle
I'd like to achieve this very simple line animation:
Step 1
Step 2
Of course I'm guessing this should not be complicated, but I've no idea what I'm missing...
Any help will be appreciated!
Drawing inside a graphics object is very similar in API terms to drawing to a Canvas without Pixi.
A render loop is needed where the canvas is cleared and redrawn on every loop.
Pixi provides a useful Ticker that can be used to run functions on a loop.
Here's an example (in this case an infinite animation) and a jsfiddle sample:
var line = new PIXI.Graphics(),
centerY = 0,
increment = 2;
app.stage.addChild(line);
app.ticker.add(() => {
// clear the graphics object ('wipe the blackboard')
line.clear();
// redraw a new line
drawLine(centerY);
// calculate the next position
centerY = (centerY < window.innerHeight) ? centerY = centerY + increment : 0;
});
function drawLine(centerY) {
line.lineStyle(1, 0xff0000);
line.moveTo(0,window.innerHeight/2);
line.lineTo(window.innerWidth/2, centerY);
line.lineTo(window.innerWidth, window.innerHeight/2);
}
For a project I'm trying to draw a moving line in Phaser. I initially drew it using game.debug.geom(line), but that is not really the right way to do it, since it doesn't allow for styling, and because the debugger takes a toll in performance.
Reading the docs, it seems to me that the way to do it would be with a Phaser.Graphics object, but I haven't been able to get it to work. As an example, I tried making a line move as the hand of a clock, with one end fixed and the other moving around it.
I thought it would be fine to create the Graphics object in the middle and then in update use reset to clear it and bring it back to the center, and then lineTo to make the rest of the line. But instead what I get is a line coming outwards from the centre, and then a ring.
Picture for sadness:
I made a pen with my attempts. The code is repeated below. What I would like to have is a line (lines?) coming from the center of the circle to the points in the circumference.
Is a Graphics object the best way to do that? How do I do it?
Demo.prototype = {
create: function() {
this.graphics = game.add.graphics(
game.world.centerX,
game.world.centerY
);
this.graphics.lineStyle(2, 0xffd900);
this.counter = 0;
this.step = Math.PI * 2 / 360;
this.radius = 80;
},
update: function() {
this.graphics.reset(
this.game.world.centerX,
this.game.world.centerY
);
var y = this.radius * Math.sin(this.counter);
var x = this.radius * Math.cos(this.counter);
this.graphics.lineTo(x, y);
this.counter += this.step;
}
};
You may want to check out this Phaser game called Cut It (not my game btw, found it here).
It also draws a variable length dotted line by cleverly using the Phaser.TileSprite, and then changing its width.
TileSprite draws a repeating pattern, and you can use this to draw a line by drawing one bitmap of a linepart segment, use that as background of the TileSprite and make the height of the TileSprite the same as the height of the bitmap.
You can take a look at the game's source code, it's compressed and minified but still somewhat readable. You can look for the variable called cut_line.
I finally understood that the coordinates taken by the Phaser.Graphics object are local, respective to the object's internal coordinate system. Using moveTo(0, 0) has the desired result of moving the object's drawing pointer back to its origin (and not, as I initially thought, to the origin of the game world). Using reset(0, 0), on the other hand, would have the effect of moving the object's origin to the world's origin.
As for deleting the previous lines, the only method I've found is to manually clear the object's graphicsData Array (short of calling destroy() and creating an entirely new object, which is probably not a very good idea).
Replacing the code in the original question with this does the trick:
Demo.prototype = {
create: function() {
this.graphics = game.add.graphics(
game.world.centerX,
game.world.centerY
);
this.graphics.lineStyle(2, 0xffd900);
this.counter = 0;
this.step = Math.PI * 2 / 360;
this.radius = 80;
},
update: function(){
// Erases the previous lines
this.graphics.graphicsData = [];
// Move back to the object's origin
// Coordinates are local!
this.graphics.moveTo( 0, 0 );
var y = this.radius * Math.sin(this.counter);
var x = this.radius * Math.cos(this.counter);
this.graphics.lineTo(x, y);
this.counter += this.step;
}
};
I've implemented the scaling of a paper and it works great.
I linked it to the scrolling of the mousewheel, but I still encounter one problem: In the API the scale function is defined as scale paper.scale(sx, sy, [ox, oy]) and I figured that ox and oy can center the zooming to a specific position. In my case this position should be the pointer. But although I hand over the coordinates (offsetX and offsetY of the mouse event), it has absolutly no effect.
Can someone give me an example of how to use ox and oy?
Don't forget to transform the mouse coordinates into the viewport coordinate system first.
function offsetToLocalPoint(offsetX, offsetY, paper) {
var svgPoint = paper.svg.createSVGPoint();
svgPoint.x = offsetX;
svgPoint.y = offsetY;
var offsetTransformed = svgPoint.matrixTransform(paper.viewport.getCTM().inverse());
return offsetTransformed
}
And reset the previous viewport translate transformation before you call paper.scale() with the origin [ox, oy] of scale transformation specified. You can see this in the mousewheel event handler example below.
function onMouseWheel(e) {
e.preventDefault();
e = e.originalEvent;
var delta = Math.max(-1, Math.min(1, e.wheelDelta)) / SPEED;
var newScale = V(paper.viewport).scale().sx + delta;
if (newScale > MIN_SCALE && newScale < MAX_SCALE) {
paper.setOrigin(0, 0); // reset the previous 'translate'
var p = offsetToLocalPoint(e.offsetX, e.offsetY);
paper.scale(newScale, newScale, p.x, p.y);
}
}
A cross-browser version fiddle here.
Hello dear developers,
Im using xamarin (monotouch) i want to draw circle image view like google plus profile image or like otherones...
I was search on net but didnt find useful thing.
Somebody help me?
Thank you..
For your purposes you can use UIView or UIButton. With UIButton it is easier to handle touch events.
The basic idea is to create a UIButton with specific coordinates and size and set the CornerRadius property to be one half of the size of the UIButton (assuming you want to draw a circle, width and height will be the same).
Your code could look something like this (in ViewDidLoad of your UIViewController):
// define coordinates and size of the circular view
float x = 50;
float y = 50;
float width = 200;
float height = width;
// corner radius needs to be one half of the size of the view
float cornerRadius = width / 2;
RectangleF frame = new RectangleF(x, y, width, height);
// initialize button
UIButton circularView = new UIButton(frame);
// set corner radius
circularView.Layer.CornerRadius = cornerRadius;
// set background color, border color and width to see the circular view
circularView.BackgroundColor = UIColor.White;
circularView.Layer.CornerRadius = cornerRadius;
circularView.Layer.BorderColor = UIColor.Red.CGColor;
circularView.Layer.BorderWidth = 5;
// handle touch up inside event of the button
circularView.TouchUpInside += HandleCircularViewTouchUpInside;
// add button to view controller
this.View.Add(circularView);
At last implement the event handler (define this method somewhere in your UIViewController:
private void HandleCircularViewTouchUpInside(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// initialize random
Random rand = new Random(DateTime.Now.Millisecond);
// when the user 'clicks' on the circular view, randomly change the border color of the view
(sender as UIButton).Layer.BorderColor = UIColor.FromRGB(rand.Next(255), rand.Next(255), rand.Next(255)).CGColor;
}
Xamarin.iOS is a wrapper over Cocoa Touch on UI side,
https://developer.apple.com/technologies/ios/cocoa-touch.html
So to draw circle you need to use the Cocoa Touch API, aka CoreGraphics,
http://docs.xamarin.com/videos/ios/getting-started-coregraphics/
I created a Tree in D3.js based on Mike Bostock's Node-link Tree. The problem I have and that I also see in Mike's Tree is that the text label overlap/underlap the circle nodes when there isn't enough space rather than extend the links to leave some space.
As a new user I'm not allowed to upload images, so here is a link to Mike's Tree where you can see the labels of the preceding nodes overlapping the following nodes.
I tried various things to fix the problem by detecting the pixel length of the text with:
d3.select('.nodeText').node().getComputedTextLength();
However this only works after I rendered the page when I need the length of the longest text item before I render.
Getting the longest text item before I render with:
nodes = tree.nodes(root).reverse();
var longest = nodes.reduce(function (a, b) {
return a.label.length > b.label.length ? a : b;
});
node = vis.selectAll('g.node').data(nodes, function(d, i){
return d.id || (d.id = ++i);
});
nodes.forEach(function(d) {
d.y = (longest.label.length + 200);
});
only returns the string length, while using
d.y = (d.depth * 200);
makes every link a static length and doesn't resize as beautiful when new nodes get opened or closed.
Is there a way to avoid this overlapping? If so, what would be the best way to do this and to keep the dynamic structure of the tree?
There are 3 possible solutions that I can come up with but aren't that straightforward:
Detecting label length and using an ellipsis where it overruns child nodes. (which would make the labels less readable)
scaling the layout dynamically by detecting the label length and telling the links to adjust accordingly. (which would be best but seems really difficult
scale the svg element and use a scroll bar when the labels start to run over. (not sure this is possible as I have been working on the assumption that the SVG needs to have a set height and width).
So the following approach can give different levels of the layout different "heights". You have to take care that with a radial layout you risk not having enough spread for small circles to fan your text without overlaps, but let's ignore that for now.
The key is to realize that the tree layout simply maps things to an arbitrary space of width and height and that the diagonal projection maps width (x) to angle and height (y) to radius. Moreover the radius is a simple function of the depth of the tree.
So here is a way to reassign the depths based on the text lengths:
First of all, I use the following (jQuery) to compute maximum text sizes for:
var computeMaxTextSize = function(data, fontSize, fontName){
var maxH = 0, maxW = 0;
var div = document.createElement('div');
document.body.appendChild(div);
$(div).css({
position: 'absolute',
left: -1000,
top: -1000,
display: 'none',
margin:0,
padding:0
});
$(div).css("font", fontSize + 'px '+fontName);
data.forEach(function(d) {
$(div).html(d);
maxH = Math.max(maxH, $(div).outerHeight());
maxW = Math.max(maxW, $(div).outerWidth());
});
$(div).remove();
return {maxH: maxH, maxW: maxW};
}
Now I will recursively build an array with an array of strings per level:
var allStrings = [[]];
var childStrings = function(level, n) {
var a = allStrings[level];
a.push(n.name);
if(n.children && n.children.length > 0) {
if(!allStrings[level+1]) {
allStrings[level+1] = [];
}
n.children.forEach(function(d) {
childStrings(level + 1, d);
});
}
};
childStrings(0, root);
And then compute the maximum text length per level.
var maxLevelSizes = [];
allStrings.forEach(function(d, i) {
maxLevelSizes.push(computeMaxTextSize(allStrings[i], '10', 'sans-serif'));
});
Then I compute the total text width for all the levels (adding spacing for the little circle icons and some padding to make it look nice). This will be the radius of the final layout. Note that I will use this same padding amount again later on.
var padding = 25; // Width of the blue circle plus some spacing
var totalRadius = d3.sum(maxLevelSizes, function(d) { return d.maxW + padding});
var diameter = totalRadius * 2; // was 960;
var tree = d3.layout.tree()
.size([360, totalRadius])
.separation(function(a, b) { return (a.parent == b.parent ? 1 : 2) / a.depth; });
Now we can call the layout as usual. There is one last piece: to figure out the radius for the different levels we will need a cumulative sum of the radii of the previous levels. Once we have that we simply assign the new radii to the computed nodes.
// Compute cummulative sums - these will be the ring radii
var newDepths = maxLevelSizes.reduce(function(prev, curr, index) {
prev.push(prev[index] + curr.maxW + padding);
return prev;
},[0]);
var nodes = tree.nodes(root);
// Assign new radius based on depth
nodes.forEach(function(d) {
d.y = newDepths[d.depth];
});
Eh voila! This is maybe not the cleanest solution, and perhaps does not address every concern, but it should get you started. Have fun!