What is the best solution for strictly local version control? - visual-studio-2012

I am using Visual Studio 2012 on my home PC and I have been looking for a way to implement version control locally. I use Team Foundation Server at work, and have never used anything else. I am not trying to connect to my work server, I just want version control for my home projects.
I tried Git Tools for Visual Studio, which works ok - but it doesn't support reverting to a previous commit. Every time I've needed to revert, I've had to go to the Git repository website, download that commit, and replace the files on my machine.
Is there anything out there that supports similar version control to TFS?

Git is a good option because it keeps a complete copy of the repository version history locally-- you never need to push changes to an external server. You can read about setting up a local repository here.
Once you have a repository set up and some changes committed, you can use git reset --hard <commit> to reset to that commit. See documentation here. Note that this will wipe out any pending AND committed changes on top of the referenced commit.

Related

Newbie GIT Help - Making a second Repository

I currently work on solutions / projects within a single GIT repository, in Visual Studio. The commits I make are to a local folder on the Visual Studio server, and then I use the command 'git push origin master' (after having changed directory to my local folder / repository) to push commits to a Gitlab in my company's corporate space. The purpose of this is less about using branches and software development (as I am the only person who does any work on this), and more about having a way to rollback changes and keep a master copy off the server.
I now want a fresh copy of this GIT repository, so I can use that as a new baseline for an application migration. I will still continue to work on the existing repository too.
What is the best way to make a copy of the existing repository, that I can treat as a totally separate thing, without accidently messing up my existing config on the server? Should I do the clone from the Gitlab? Or clone locally and then push that up to the new space in my Gitlab? Honestly, I'm a bit confused at this point about the proper model for this stuff.
....................
Sounds like you'd like to fork the project: keep the existing repo and start a new, separate repo based on the old one.
Browse to your project in Gitlab
On the main repo screen, click "fork" in the top right
Select a new/ the same organisation as you'd like
The project is now forked!
From here, you can clone the fork to your local machine in a new folder. These are now separate projects, and code updates can be added, committed and pushed to the separate repos.

SVN-repo out of sync

TLDR; My version of the SVN-repo differs from my teamates. Even though the repo-UUID is identical and we are using the same branch (exactly the same repo-links).
My SVN was working fine before i went home for vacation.
I came back, updated my repo, commit some changes. Everything seemed to work fine. But it turns out that my team cannot see my commits and when updating - my commit seems to be the latest one. Looking through their clients, the revision-numbers i have checked in collide with other commits.
Im using Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS -
svn, version 1.9.7 (r1800392)
I tried removing the repository and checking it out (removing the .svn dir as well) - and when i do, my latest commit is HEAD. (Instead of the real HEAD which has a revision number way higher).
When i browse the repo from the web-browser, my commit is HEAD.
When they browse the very same link - their commit is HEAD.
Restarting computer does nothing. Reinstalling subversion (removing ~/.subversion) did nothing.
We tried checking out the repo using different user - still my commit is HEAD.
If i use my account on different machine, it works fine.
The repo-UUID is the same for me and my colleagues.
Im thinking this might be some kind of cache issue, but what cache is both used for svn and browser?
Additional thoughts:
I am also using a VPN to access the corporate network. Could there be a cache there? But the SVN-traffic is using TLS, what could possibly cache TLS-data?
#Simion pointed out that it might be a good idea to make sure the hostname of the Repo resolves in the same IP.
Turns out that was the problem. The CM-Center had moved the repo to another server (and for unknown reasons kept a copy of the repo on the old server - which caused all this confusion) and the Infra department had changed the IP of the repo hostname.
Flusing my local DNS-cache fixed the problem!

Setup read-only vendor SVN repository as mirror/external within my own repository

Currently I am working on opencart site and I would like to integrate opencarts source into my own SVN (https://github.com/opencart/opencart).
The goal is to be able to make my own customizations to core OpenCart files and then, when a new version of open cart is released, integrate there changes into my local version.
I was thinking of source structure as follows:
/trunk/opencart - my custom version of open cart
/vendor/opencart - the current opencart trunk.
The intended workflow would be to pull the latest open cart from their servers, then perform a local merge into my trunk. Currently, I have been struggling to set this up correctly as I am very new to SVN and TortoiseSVN.
My current setup, is Windows7 running TortoiseSVN 1.8.0, Build 24401 - 64 Bit. On my local server I have Ubuntu 13.04 64bit with svn, version 1.7.5 (r1336830).
I managed to setup repository that I can check into and out of, and created an external reference in vendor folder using externals. But I’m struggling to generate the main trunk from this external data. When I try to branch from vendor/opencart to trunk/opencart, it attempts to generated that branch on https://github.com/opencart/opencart rather than my local server. (This rightly fails as the repository is read only).
If I try to perform a merge in SVN on the empty trunk/opencart folder with vendor/opencart I also get problems as there is lack of ancestry in the trunk folder. I've read multiple sources - some say to use my approach, some say I should be using svnsync.
What is the best/simplest approach? Ideally, I would like SVN to pull the latest source, rather than dumping the source into a separate folder.
Re-read about svn:externals in Subversion
Get Subversion URL for this Git repository (SVN can't directly communicate with Git) - it's "Subversion checkout URL" in sidebar, open it in Repo-browser and select needed subtree for you - it can be some branch or trunk, remember full URL to needed subtree (it can be, f.e., https://github.com/opencart/opencart/trunk/upload)
Define, where in your repository you want to mount external repo (let it be /vendor/opencart URL)
Checkout parent of mount-point (or parent of parent for our case, if parent still doesn't exist) into new unrelated to work, Working Copy
Create in WC root new folder (usual, ordinary, standard) vendor
For folder vendor add new svn-propery svn:externals in TSVN's wizard
Commit changes
Check results
PS: you can see (checkout, inspect) at this URL https://subversion.assembla.com/svn/subversion-troubleshoot-b/trunk as sample of simplest use-case for externals (subdirectory lib in trunk is svn:external to another repository subtree)
PPS: At staring point you trunk can be empty, you merge /vendor/opencart in order to get initial vanilla state of code in trunk for your own changes on top of it

"branch/tag" through Tortoise SVN dialog is forbidden

I am facing a problem with TortoiseSVN (my client version is 1.6.16 and the SVNversion is 1.4.6.28521).
The projectA project has the classical architecture, with three folder: trunk, branches and tags.
I have rights to Read and Write from a projectA folders (tags,branches and trunk).
While working in the trunk, there is no issue, everything works fine. The only problem is that when a release time comes (or branching time comes), and I want to create a tag (a branch), I want to use the TortoiseSVN dialog "branch/tag". Then I choose the origin from the trunk or the revision o nthe trunk i need, and choose the "To URL" like "http://..../projectA/tags/v2.0".
After clicking "OK", it will let me know that the access to "http://...../projectA/" is forbidden.
The only solution right now, is to checkout the "projectA/tags" folder to a local folder. Then in this "projectA/tags" folder I will create one new folder with the name of the tag I want to create, and I am able to commit it without any problem.
I don't want to manually create the folder of the tag/branch like this, andwould rather like to use the "branch/tag" feature of TortoiseSVN.
Anyone has an idea about this issue ?
There is a recommendation in Subversion (at least on Windows with TortoiseSVN) to use the same major version as the server. You are allowed to ignore that recommendation, and most of the time, it does not hurt, but here you may have a case where it makes a difference. You should at least check if
the server could be upgraded to 1.6.x XOR
the client (your installation) could be downgraded to 1.4.x
However, your client will ( in the second case ) no longer work with your checkout directories. Branching has changed a lot from version 1.4.x to 1.6.x, so you will face a hard time if you have to use a 1.6.x client with a 1.4.x server.

SVN Setup Of Existing Directory

I have been going through documentation and such and have SVN working, but I want to put it on an existing directory. I imported that directory, so do I rename/delete the non SVN directory and then checkout the SVN to the non SVN directory location? I am just trying to understand how to get it to start posting to our website URL.
If so, is there any way to keep the current non SVN and make it SVN rather than import and overwrite?
Thanks, I am trying to understand SVN, but find a lot of the tutorials and such on the web to be confusing.
Yes, you have it exactly. Once your code has been added to the repository, you can get rid of or rename your original code directory. Then checkout the project from the repository into the same location as your previous code and continue working from there.
UPDATE
To make it so that your website is updated from the repository, you actually need two working directories, and a repository.
Repository: The repository stores the code and changesets, but isn't directly accessible as a file system. Keep a backup!.
Working directory 1: You develop and test your code from a working directory checked out from the repository. Commit changes back to the repository.
Working directory 2: Rename the code directory on your webserver. Checkout a copy of the code to your web server in its place. Technically it is now a working directory, since it contains the .svn metadata directories, though you won't usually make changes here.
Make changes to your code from your development working directory (1) and commit them back to the repository. When you are satisfied that they are working correctly and have been properly tested, on the web server's code copy (2) do svn update (or if you're using Tortoise SVN on the web server, do an update). This will synchronize the server code with the current development version.
Subversion will not automatically push updates to your web server. You will need to pull them in with an update when you need to. It is possible to use what's called a "post-commit hook" to cause Subversion to execute a script when commits are made, and that script could update or export code to your production web server. However, you would need to write the script and it's kind of an advanced usage of Subversion. I would recommend trying out the method I described with a working copy on the web server to get accustomed to the workflow befrore trying anything more complicated.
Addendum If you really want to do this (and I don't really recommend it unless you really test well) a very easy method would be to schedule a cron job that does svn update every couple of hours (or minutes) on your production site.
Don't forget that if you do happen to modify your code directly on the web server, you must commit it back to the repository from there, and do an update on your development working copy.

Resources