I'm using the Db property in a ServiceStack service to access my database but every now and then I get the following error from IIS:
Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.
Stack Trace:
[InvalidOperationException: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.]
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection) +6371713
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory) +6372046
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() +300
ServiceStack.OrmLite.OrmLiteConnection.Open() +44
ServiceStack.OrmLite.OrmLiteConnectionFactory.OpenDbConnection() +132
ServiceStack.ServiceInterface.Service.get_Db() +68
I have set the ReuseScope in the Configure method to ReuseScope.None which should close the connection on a per request basis I believe? What am I doing wrong here?
public override void Configure(Container container)
{
JsConfig.EmitCamelCaseNames = true;
//Register all your dependencies
ConfigureDb(container);
//Set MVC to use the same Funq IOC as ServiceStack
ControllerBuilder.Current.SetControllerFactory(new FunqControllerFactory(container));
}
ConfigureDb:
private static void ConfigureDb(Container container)
{
var connectionString = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["AppDb"].ConnectionString;
container.Register<IDbConnectionFactory>(c =>
new OrmLiteConnectionFactory(connectionString, SqlServerDialect.Provider))
.ReusedWithin(ReuseScope.None);
using (var db = container.Resolve<IDbConnectionFactory>().Open())
{
// Do database seed/initialisation
}
}
Edit
After more diagnosis, it seems to happen when I refresh the page several times when I call this service method:
public Warranty Get(Warranty request)
{
var warranty = new Warranty();
if (request.Id != default(int))
{
warranty = Db.Id<Warranty>(request.Id);
warranty.WarrantyOrder = ResolveService<WarrantyOrderService>().Get(new WarrantyOrder { WarrantyId = warranty.Id });
warranty.WarrantyStatus = ResolveService<WarrantyStatusService>().Get(new WarrantyStatus { Id = warranty.StatusId });
warranty.WarrantyNotes = ResolveService<WarrantyNoteService>().Get(new WarrantyNotes { WarrantyId = warranty.Id });
warranty.WarrantyDialogues = ResolveService<WarrantyDialogueService>().Get(new WarrantyDialogues { WarrantyId = warranty.Id });
warranty.WarrantyCredit = ResolveService<WarrantyCreditService>().Get(new WarrantyCredit { WarrantyId = warranty.Id });
warranty.WarrantyPhotos = ResolveService<WarrantyPhotoService>().Get(new WarrantyPhotos { WarrantyReference = warranty.WarrantyReference });
warranty.WarrantyReport = ResolveService<WarrantyReportService>().Get(new WarrantyReport { WarrantyId = warranty.Id });
}
return warranty;
}
I have changed ConfigureDb as per #mythz answer below:
private static void ConfigureDb(Container container)
{
var connectionString = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["AppDb"].ConnectionString;
container.Register<IDbConnectionFactory>(c => new OrmLiteConnectionFactory(connectionString, SqlServerDialect.Provider));
}
The service needs to call out other services to populate the other objects on my Warranty object, I'm not sure on how to improve this?
The IDbConnectionFactory like all connection managers is a thread-safe factory to create DB Connections, i.e. it's not a DB connection itself. It is supposed to be registered as a singleton.
By default ServiceStack's IOC (Funq) registers as a Singleton by default, so the correct registration is just:
container.Register<IDbConnectionFactory>(c =>
new OrmLiteConnectionFactory(connectionString, SqlServerDialect.Provider));
Resolving Services
As ServiceStack Services have the potential to utilize managed resources, they should be used within a using statement whenever they're resolved from another service, so that they're appropriately disposed of, e.g:
using var orders = ResolveService<WarrantyOrderService>();
using var status = ResolveService<WarrantyStatusService>();
var warranty = new Warranty {
WarrantyOrder = orders.Get(new WarrantyOrder { WarrantyId = warranty.Id }),
WarrantyStatus = status.Get(new WarrantyStatus {
WarrantyId = warranty.StatusId }),
//etc
}
return warranty;
Related
I am looking into how the app insights work with different types of dependencies. I have a question on using the AppInsights ASP Net Core sdk with Messaging Service Bus sdk.
How can I capture messages to service bus while sending or receiving using this sdk in dependency? I understand that this is not something we would like to log all the time and I will make it configurable.
Thanks
You can create your own sender and implement the desired logic inside the SendMessageAsync method:
public class TelemetryEnabledServiceBusSender : ServiceBusSender
{
private readonly TelemetryClient telemetryClient;
internal TelemetryEnabledServiceBusSender(ServiceBusClient client, string topic, TelemetryClient telemetryClient) : base(client, topic)
{
this.telemetryClient = telemetryClient;
}
public override async Task SendMessageAsync(ServiceBusMessage message, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
{
telemetryClient.TrackTrace(message.Body.ToString());
await base.SendMessageAsync(message, cancellationToken);
}
}
use it like this:
var serviceBusSender = new TelemetryEnabledServiceBusSender(serviceBusClient, serviceBusData.Topic, telemetryClient);
await serviceBusSender.SendMessageAsync(message);
Logging processed messages is even simpler and can be done using the ServiceBusProcessor
serviceBusProcessor.ProcessMessageAsync += ProcessMessageAsync;
...
private async Task ProcessMessageAsync(ProcessMessageEventArgs arg)
{
telemetryClient.TrackTrace(arg.Message.Body.ToString());
...
}
Adding my approach as an answer here as it is too long to comment.
var telemetry = new DependencyTelemetry(
"Azure Service Bus",
_serviceBusClient.FullyQualifiedNamespace,
"ServiceBusReceiver.Receive",
string.Empty
);
using var operation =
_telemetryClient.StartOperation(telemetry);
try
{
var receivedMessage = await _serviceBusReceiver.ReceiveMessageAsync();
if (receivedMessage?.Body is not null)
{
message = receivedMessage.Body.ToString();
telemetry.Data = message;
// do something
}
telemetry.Success = true;
//Consider set telemetry duration
}
catch (Exception e)
{
// log exception
_telemetryClient.TrackException(e);
telemetry.Success = false;
throw;
}
finally
{
_telemetryClient.TrackTrace("Done");
_telemetryClient.StopOperation(operation);
}
Thanks to #Peter Bons
I have built a Blazor Server App with Azure AD authentication. This server app access a web api written in net core and sends the JWT token to that api. Everything is working, data is gathered, page is displayed accordingly.
The problem is: after some time, when user interacts with some menu option in UI, nothing else is returned from webapi. After some tests I found out that the token has expired, then when it is sent to web api, it is not working. But the AuthenticationState remains same, like it is authenticated and valid irrespective the token is expired.
Thus, I have been trying some suggestions like : Client side Blazor authentication token expired on server side. Actually it is the closest solution I got.
But the problem is that, after implemented a CustomAuthenticationStateProvider class, even after injected it, the default AuthenticationStateProvider of the app remains like ServerAuthenticationStateProvider and not the CustomAuthenticationStateProvider I have implemented. This is part of my code:
public class CustomAuthenticationStateProvider : AuthenticationStateProvider
{
private readonly IConfiguration _configuration;
private readonly ITokenAcquisition _tokenAcquisition;
public CustomAuthenticationStateProvider(IConfiguration configuration, ITokenAcquisition tokenAcquisition)
{
_configuration = configuration;
_tokenAcquisition = tokenAcquisition;
}
public override async Task<AuthenticationState> GetAuthenticationStateAsync()
{
var apiScope = _configuration["DownloadApiStream:Scope"];
var anonymousState = new AuthenticationState(new ClaimsPrincipal(new ClaimsIdentity()));
string savedToken = string.Empty;
try
{
savedToken = await _tokenAcquisition.GetAccessTokenForUserAsync(new[] { apiScope });
}
catch (MsalUiRequiredException)
{
savedToken = string.Empty;
}
catch (Exception)
{
savedToken = string.Empty;
}
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(savedToken))
{
return anonymousState;
}
var claims = ParseClaimsFromJwt(savedToken).ToList();
var expiry = claims.Where(claim => claim.Type.Equals("exp")).FirstOrDefault();
if (expiry == null)
return anonymousState;
// The exp field is in Unix time
var datetime = DateTimeOffset.FromUnixTimeSeconds(long.Parse(expiry.Value));
if (datetime.UtcDateTime <= DateTime.UtcNow)
return anonymousState;
return new AuthenticationState(new ClaimsPrincipal(new ClaimsIdentity(claims, "jwt")));
}
public void NotifyExpiredToken()
{
var anonymousUser = new ClaimsPrincipal(new ClaimsIdentity());
var authState = Task.FromResult(new AuthenticationState(anonymousUser));
NotifyAuthenticationStateChanged(authState);
}
private IEnumerable<Claim> ParseClaimsFromJwt(string jwt)
{
var claims = new List<Claim>();
var payload = jwt.Split('.')[1];
var jsonBytes = ParseBase64WithoutPadding(payload);
var keyValuePairs = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<Dictionary<string, object>>(jsonBytes);
keyValuePairs.TryGetValue(ClaimTypes.Role, out object roles);
if (roles != null)
{
if (roles.ToString().Trim().StartsWith("["))
{
var parsedRoles = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<string[]>(roles.ToString());
foreach (var parsedRole in parsedRoles)
{
claims.Add(new Claim(ClaimTypes.Role, parsedRole));
}
}
else
{
claims.Add(new Claim(ClaimTypes.Role, roles.ToString()));
}
keyValuePairs.Remove(ClaimTypes.Role);
}
claims.AddRange(keyValuePairs.Select(kvp => new Claim(kvp.Key, kvp.Value.ToString())));
return claims;
}
private byte[] ParseBase64WithoutPadding(string base64)
{
switch (base64.Length % 4)
{
case 2: base64 += "=="; break;
case 3: base64 += "="; break;
}
return Convert.FromBase64String(base64);
}
}
This is my Program.cs where I added the services :
builder.Services.AddScoped<CustomAuthenticationStateProvider>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<AuthenticationStateProvider>(provider => provider.GetRequiredService<CustomAuthenticationStateProvider>());
Here in the MainLayou.razor, I inject the service and try to use it :
#inject CustomAuthenticationStateProvider authenticationStateProvider;
protected async override Task OnInitializedAsync()
{
var authState = await authenticationStateProvider.GetAuthenticationStateAsync();
if (authState.User?.Identity == null || !authState.User.Identity.IsAuthenticated)
{
authenticationStateProvider.NotifyExpiredToken();
}
await base.OnInitializedAsync();
}
The problem comes up here, because the authenticationStateProvider is not an instance of the CustomAuthenticationStateProvider , but the instance of ServerAuthenticationStateProvider. It is like AuthenticationStateProvider was not replaced by the custom implementation, therefore I can't use the NotifyAuthenticationStateChanged and inform the CascadingAuthenticationState that it was changed.
If anyone has already been thru this or have any suggestion, it would be appreciated.
Actually I just wanna to change authentication state to not authenticated. So user will be pushed to login again using Azure AD.
Thanks
In windows azure we have hosted two asp.net webapi project as app service. We need to enable distributed transaction here. We initiate transaction inside one api. Then inside that transaction scope we fetch propagation token of that transaction and send it as a header during another api call. The code is something like bellow.
[HttpGet]
[Route("api/Test/Transaction/Commit")]
public async Task<string> Commit()
{
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required, new TransactionOptions
{
IsolationLevel = IsolationLevel.ReadCommitted
},
TransactionScopeAsyncFlowOption.Enabled))
{
// cross app domain call
using (var client = new HttpClient())
{
using (var request = new HttpRequestMessage(HttpMethod.Get, ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["IdentityServerUri"] + "api/Test/Transaction/NoCommit"))
{
// forward transaction token
request.AddTransactionPropagationToken();
var response = await client.SendAsync(request);
response.EnsureSuccessStatusCode();
}
}
this.Repository.Insert(new Currency { Ccy = "x", IsoCode = "XIS", Name = "XYZ", CurrencyId = 9 });
await this.Repository.SaveChangesAsync();
scope.Complete();
return "value";
}
}
public static class HttpRequestMessageExtension
{
public static void AddTransactionPropagationToken(this HttpRequestMessage request)
{
if (Transaction.Current != null)
{
var token = TransactionInterop.GetTransmitterPropagationToken(Transaction.Current);
request.Headers.Add("TransactionToken", Convert.ToBase64String(token));
}
}
}
Inside the api(...api/Test/Transaction/NoCommit) to which we are making the call inside transaction scope, fetch that marshaled propagation token of the transaction from header and using it create instance of that transaction and instantiate TransactionScope using that transaction. Later we use this transaction scope to complete that transaction. We have introduced a action filter to apply this and added that filter to the action which is responsible for that api call. Code for that api and action filter is something like bellow.
[HttpGet]
[EnlistToDistributedTransactionActionFilter]
[Route("api/Test/Transaction/NoCommit")]
public async Task<string> NoCommit()
{
this.Repository.Insert(new Client
{
Name = "Test",
AllowedOrigin = "*",
Active = true,
ClientGuid = Guid.NewGuid(),
RefreshTokenLifeTime = 0,
ApplicationType = ApplicationTypes.JavaScript,
Secret = "ffff",
Id = "Test"
}
);
await this.Repository.SaveChangesAsync();
return "value";
}
public class EnlistToDistributedTransactionActionFilter : ActionFilterAttribute
{
private const string TransactionId = "TransactionToken";
/// <summary>
/// Retrieve a transaction propagation token, create a transaction scope and promote the current transaction to a distributed transaction.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="actionContext">The action context.</param>
public override void OnActionExecuting(HttpActionContext actionContext)
{
if (actionContext.Request.Headers.Contains(TransactionId))
{
var values = actionContext.Request.Headers.GetValues(TransactionId);
if (values != null && values.Any())
{
byte[] transactionToken = Convert.FromBase64String(values.FirstOrDefault());
var transaction = TransactionInterop.GetTransactionFromTransmitterPropagationToken(transactionToken);
var transactionScope = new TransactionScope(transaction, TransactionScopeAsyncFlowOption.Enabled);
actionContext.Request.Properties.Add(TransactionId, transactionScope);
}
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Rollback or commit transaction.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="actionExecutedContext">The action executed context.</param>
public override void OnActionExecuted(HttpActionExecutedContext actionExecutedContext)
{
if (actionExecutedContext.Request.Properties.Keys.Contains(TransactionId))
{
var transactionScope = actionExecutedContext.Request.Properties[TransactionId] as TransactionScope;
if (transactionScope != null)
{
if (actionExecutedContext.Exception != null)
{
Transaction.Current.Rollback();
}
else
{
transactionScope.Complete();
}
transactionScope.Dispose();
actionExecutedContext.Request.Properties[TransactionId] = null;
}
}
}
}
So if any exception occurs during this call (api/Test/Transaction/Commit) inside that transaction scope (either in firt api or second api) all the database change done by the both api will be rolled back. This is working fine locally. As locally we get support of MSDTC. But in Azure there is no MSDTC support. In azure we get support from Elastic transaction. Because of this when we are trying to fetch propagation token of the transaction from the first server we are getting exception. So when we try to execute bellow code
var transaction = TransactionInterop.GetTransactionFromTransmitterPropagationToken(transactionToken);
We are getting exception with message "Value does not fall within the expected range". This post saying that this method would require promotion to MSDTC by System.Transactions, but for elastic transaction how we will make it work? For elastic transaction we need to marshal transaction into propagation token. How to do this? Looking for the solution.
Elastic Transactions are designed to allow transactions across Azure SQL Database and Azure SQL Managed Instance from a single .net application in Azure.
It is not built for distributing transactions across clients.
"Only client-coordinated transactions from a .NET application are supported"
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-sql/database/elastic-transactions-overview
For the life of me I have been unable to get RPC with RabbitMQ working with temp replyto queues. Below is a simple example derived from this test. I see bunch of exceptions in my output window and the dlq fills up, but the message is never acknowledged.
namespace ConsoleApplication4
{
class Program
{
public static IMessageService CreateMqServer(int retryCount = 1)
{
return new RabbitMqServer { RetryCount = retryCount };
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
using (var mqServer = CreateMqServer())
{
mqServer.RegisterHandler<HelloIntro>(m =>
new HelloIntroResponse { Result = "Hello, {0}!".Fmt(m.GetBody().Name) });
mqServer.Start();
}
Console.WriteLine("ConsoleAppplication4");
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
}
namespace ConsoleApplication5
{
class Program
{
public static IMessageService CreateMqServer(int retryCount = 1)
{
return new RabbitMqServer { RetryCount = retryCount };
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
using (var mqServer = CreateMqServer())
{
using (var mqClient = mqServer.CreateMessageQueueClient())
{
var replyToMq = mqClient.GetTempQueueName();
mqClient.Publish(new Message<HelloIntro>(new HelloIntro { Name = "World" })
{
ReplyTo = replyToMq
});
IMessage<HelloIntroResponse> responseMsg = mqClient.Get<HelloIntroResponse>(replyToMq);
mqClient.Ack(responseMsg);
}
}
Console.WriteLine("ConsoleAppplication5");
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
}
First exception
RabbitMQ.Client.Exceptions.OperationInterruptedException occurred
_HResult=-2146233088
_message=The AMQP operation was interrupted: AMQP close-reason, initiated by Peer, code=405, text="RESOURCE_LOCKED - cannot obtain exclusive access to locked queue 'mq:tmp:10dd20804ee546d6bf5a3512f66143ec' in vhost '/'", classId=50, methodId=20, cause=
HResult=-2146233088
IsTransient=false
Message=The AMQP operation was interrupted: AMQP close-reason, initiated by Peer, code=405, text="RESOURCE_LOCKED - cannot obtain exclusive access to locked queue 'mq:tmp:10dd20804ee546d6bf5a3512f66143ec' in vhost '/'", classId=50, methodId=20, cause=
Source=RabbitMQ.Client
StackTrace:
at RabbitMQ.Client.Impl.SimpleBlockingRpcContinuation.GetReply()
at RabbitMQ.Client.Impl.ModelBase.ModelRpc(MethodBase method, ContentHeaderBase header, Byte[] body)
at RabbitMQ.Client.Framing.Impl.v0_9_1.Model._Private_QueueBind(String queue, String exchange, String routingKey, Boolean nowait, IDictionary`2 arguments)
at RabbitMQ.Client.Impl.ModelBase.QueueBind(String queue, String exchange, String routingKey, IDictionary`2 arguments)
at RabbitMQ.Client.Impl.ModelBase.QueueBind(String queue, String exchange, String routingKey)
at ServiceStack.RabbitMq.RabbitMqExtensions.RegisterQueue(IModel channel, String queueName)
at ServiceStack.RabbitMq.RabbitMqExtensions.RegisterQueueByName(IModel channel, String queueName)
at ServiceStack.RabbitMq.RabbitMqProducer.PublishMessage(String exchange, String routingKey, IBasicProperties basicProperties, Byte[] body)
InnerException:
followed by this one
System.Threading.ThreadInterruptedException occurred
_HResult=-2146233063
_message=Thread was interrupted from a waiting state.
HResult=-2146233063
IsTransient=true
Message=Thread was interrupted from a waiting state.
Source=mscorlib
StackTrace:
at System.Threading.Monitor.ObjWait(Boolean exitContext, Int32 millisecondsTimeout, Object obj)
at System.Threading.Monitor.Wait(Object obj, Int32 millisecondsTimeout, Boolean exitContext)
InnerException:
Then it repeat for a number of times and hangs. This particular post seems to suggest that they were able to achieve some sort of success with ServerStack and RabbitMQ RPC, but before I start changing my code I'd like to know the reason that my code doesn't work.
Thank you,
Stephen
When your client call GetTempQueueName(), it creates an exclusive queue, which cannot be accessed from another connection (i.e. your server).
Therefore I created my own simple mq-client which does not use servicestack's mq client and only depends on rabbitmq's .net-library:
public class MqClient : IDisposable
{
ConnectionFactory factory = new ConnectionFactory()
{
HostName = "192.168.97.201",
UserName = "guest",
Password = "guest",
//VirtualHost = "test",
Port = AmqpTcpEndpoint.UseDefaultPort,
};
private IConnection connection;
private string exchangeName;
public MqClient(string defaultExchange)
{
this.exchangeName = defaultExchange;
this.connection = factory.CreateConnection();
}
public TResponse RpcCall<TResponse>(IReturn<TResponse> reqDto, string exchange = null)
{
using (var channel = connection.CreateModel())
{
string inq_queue_name = string.Format("mq:{0}.inq", reqDto.GetType().Name);
string responseQueueName = channel.QueueDeclare("",false,false,true,null).QueueName;
//string responseQueueName = channel.QueueDeclare().QueueName;
var props = channel.CreateBasicProperties();
props.ReplyTo = responseQueueName;
var message = ServiceStack.Text.JsonSerializer.SerializeToString(reqDto);
channel.BasicPublish(exchange ?? this.exchangeName, inq_queue_name, props, UTF8Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(message));
var consumer = new QueueingBasicConsumer(channel);
channel.BasicConsume(responseQueueName, true, consumer);
var ea = (BasicDeliverEventArgs)consumer.Queue.Dequeue();
//channel.BasicAck(ea.DeliveryTag, false);
string response = UTF8Encoding.UTF8.GetString(ea.Body);
string responseType = ea.BasicProperties.Type;
Console.WriteLine(" [x] New Message of Type '{1}' Received:{2}{0}", response, responseType, Environment.NewLine);
return ServiceStack.Text.JsonSerializer.DeserializeFromString<TResponse>(response);
}
}
~MqClient()
{
this.Dispose();
}
public void Dispose()
{
if (connection != null)
{
this.connection.Dispose();
this.connection = null;
}
}
}
It can be used like that:
using (var mqClient = new MqClient("mx.servicestack"))
{
var pingResponse = mqClient.RpcCall<PingResponse>(new Ping { });
}
Important: You've got to use servicestack version 4.0.32+.
There was an issue with redeclaring an exclusive queue which is no longer being done in this commit.
There's also a new RabbitMqTest project showcasing a simple working Client/Server example communicating via 2 independent Console Applications.
This change is available from v4.0.34+ that's now on MyGet.
The ServiceStack.RabbitMq package RabbitMq.Client NuGet dependency has also been upgraded to v3.4.0.
In a ServiceStack Self-Hosted service, is it possible to gracefully shutdown the service when if pending requests exist?
Use AppHost.Stop()? (derived from AppHostHttpListenerBase)
I don't think there is a built in mechanism for this, though it would be nice to see it. I use my own simplistic Graceful shutdown method.
Essentially I have a static bool, IsShuttingDown flag that is checked prior to starting each request, at the first possible opportunity in the service pipeline. (RawHttpHandlers)
If this flag is set true it means I am not wanting the service to handle any more requests, and will instead send http status 503 Unavailable to the client.
My graceful shutdown method simply sets IsShuttingDown flag and starts a timeout timer of 60 seconds to give any currently processing requests time to complete. After which the service stops calling AppHost.Stop(). (See end of question for how to do it without a timer)
My code is for ServiceStack v3, you may have to modify it slightly to get it to work with v4 if you are using that version.
In your AppHost:
public static bool IsShuttingDown = false;
public override void Configure(Funq.Container container)
{
// Other configuration options ...
// Handle the graceful shutdown response
var gracefulShutdownHandler = new CustomActionHandler((httpReq, httpRes) => {
httpRes.StatusCode = 503;
httpRes.StatusDescription = "Unavailable";
httpRes.Write("Service Unavailable");
httpRes.EndRequest();
});
SetConfig(new EndpointHostConfig {
// Other EndPoint configuration options ...
RawHttpHandlers = { httpReq => IsShuttingDown ? gracefulShutdownHandler : null }
});
}
The CustomActionHandler is just copied from here, it is responsible for handling the request. (A custom action handler is included already in v4 so it wouldn't be needed)
public class CustomActionHandler : IServiceStackHttpHandler, IHttpHandler
{
public Action<IHttpRequest, IHttpResponse> Action { get; set; }
public CustomActionHandler(Action<IHttpRequest, IHttpResponse> action)
{
if (action == null)
throw new Exception("Action was not supplied to ActionHandler");
Action = action;
}
public void ProcessRequest(IHttpRequest httpReq, IHttpResponse httpRes, string operationName)
{
Action(httpReq, httpRes);
}
public void ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)
{
ProcessRequest(context.Request.ToRequest(GetType().Name),
context.Response.ToResponse(),
GetType().Name);
}
public bool IsReusable
{
get { return false; }
}
}
I appreciate that using a timer doesn't guarantee that all requests will have ended in the 60 seconds, but it works for my needs, where most requests are handled in far far less time.
To avoid using a timer (immediate shutdown when all connections closed):
Because there is no access to the underlying connection pool, you would have to keep track of what connections are active.
For this method I would use the PreExecuteServiceFilter and PostExecuteServiceFilter to increment & decrement an active connections counter. I am thinking you would want to use Interlocked.Increment and Interlocked.Decrement to ensure thread safety of your count. I haven't tested this, and there is probably a better way.
In your AppHost:
public static int ConnectionCount;
// Configure Method
// As above but with additional count tracking.
ConnectionCount = 0;
SetConfig(new EndpointHostConfig {
// Other EndPoint configuration options ...
RawHttpHandlers = { httpReq => IsShuttingDown ? gracefulShutdownHandler : null },
// Track active connection count
PreExecuteServiceFilter = () => Interlocked.Increment(ref ConnectionCount),
PostExecuteServiceFilter = (obj, req, res) => {
Interlocked.Decrement(ref ConnectionCount);
// Check if shutting down, and if there are no more connections, stop
if(IsShuttingDown && ConnectionCount==0){
res.EndRequest(); // Ensure last request gets their data before service stops.
this.Stop();
}
},
});
Hope some of this helps anyway.