Sinon.js and testing with events and new - node.js

i'm trying to mock a node.js application, but it doesn't work as expected.
I have a node.js Module called GpioPlugin with following method:
function listenEvents(eventId, opts) {
if(!opts.pin) {
throw new Error("option 'pin' is missing");
}
var listenPort = new onOff(opts.pin, 'in', 'both', {persistentWatch: true});
listenPort.watch(function(err, value) {
process.emit(eventId+'', value);
});
}
if(typeof exports !== 'undefined') {
exports.listenEvents = listenEvents;
}
and now i want to write a test using sinon for this method, but i don't know how... What would be the best way to test this?
This tree parts would be fine, if they get tested:
Error (no problem)
generation of onOff (how?)
event with correct params

If it's not already, you're going to want to put onOff into a module so that your test can inject a stub in.
var sinon = require("sinon");
var process = require("process");
var onOffModule = require(PATH_TO_ONOFF); //See note
var gpio = require(PATH_TO_GPIO);
var onOffStub;
var fakeListenPort;
beforeEach(function () {
//Stub the process.emit method
sinon.stub(process, "emit");
//Constructor for a mock object to be returned by calls to our stubbed onOff function
fakeListenPort = {
this.watch = function(callback) {
this.callback = callback; //Expose the callback passed into the watch function
};
};
//Create stub for our onOff;
onOffStub = sinon.stub(onOffModule, "onOff", function () {
return fakeListenPort;
});
});
//Omitted restoring the stubs after each test
describe('the GpioPlugin module', function () {
it('example test', function () {
gpio.listenEvents("evtId", OPTS);
assert(onOffStub.callCount === 1); //Make sure the stub was called
//You can check that it was called with proper arguments here
fakeListenPort.callback(null, "Value"); //Trigger the callback passed to listenPort.watch
assert(process.emit.calledWith("evtId", "Value")); //Check that process.emit was called with the right values
});
});
Note: The exact mechanics of replacing onOff with a stub may vary depending how you require it.
Things get a little more complicated if you require onOff directly, rather than requiring a module that includes onOff. In that case I think you might need to look into something like proxyquire.

Related

Sinon stubs not being used

I have a lambda function which is referencing a module define in another file.
Instead of having to get all the scenarios right in my tests I'd like to just have a stub of that module.
In app.js
var Service = require("./Services/Service");
let service = new Service(event.Environment);
var regulatorResults = await service.GetModifiers(budgeted, irrelevant, variables);
Service is defined as follows:
function Service(environment) {
async function GetModifiers(ids, irrelevant, things) {
//logic happens
}
return { GetModifiers };
}
module.exports = Service;
I've tried many different iterations in my tests but where I feel closest is with this:
var assert = require('assert');
var sinon = require('sinon');
var service = require('../Services/Service');
describe('Calculator', function () {
before(function () {
var service = sinon.createStubInstance(regulatorService);
sinon.stub(service.prototype, "GetModifiers").callsFake(async function(IDs, thing, thing) {
return IDs.map(id=> new { ID: id, Modifier: 1 });
});
});
When I run the actual tests, the results of that service are [], even if I code the stub to return a set value, and if I throw in a console.log, it doesn't get hit ever.
The tests fail with error Error: Trying to stub property 'GetModifiers' of undefined.
Thanks for your help!

Why can't I properly stub the twilio library with sinon?

In my code, I have:
function handleMessage() {
const twilio = require('twilio')(process.env.TWILIO_ACCOUNT_SID, process.env.TWILIO_AUTH_TOKEN);
let recordings = twilio.recordings(foundConference.RecordingSid);
console.log('recordings', recordings);
return recordings.remove();
}
And in my stub, I have:
const sinon = require('sinon');
const twilio = require('twilio')(process.env.TWILIO_ACCOUNT_SID, process.env.TWILIO_AUTH_TOKEN);
exports.twilioRecordings = () => {
console.log('about to stub', twilio.recordings);
sinon.stub(twilio, 'recordings').returns('here');
console.log('finished stub', twilio.recordings);
return;
};
However, it doesn't actually create a stubbed function. It's still using the original recordings function. What am I doing wrong?
Twilio npm package returns a function which creates a new object on every call, it's not a singleton. So your stubbed twilio instance is scoped to the test only.
Also twilio.recordings (as all other properties though) is defined through the getter function in prototype, so they are read only:
Object.defineProperty(Twilio.prototype,
'recordings', {
get: function() {
return this.api.account.recordings;
}
});
So, stubbing actual twilio instance have no effect. Except if you change the instance's prototype, but I don't think it worth doing for just unit testing.
I'd suggest you to refactor your code to put twilio initialization into separate method:
function getTwilio() {
return require('twilio')(process.env.TWILIO_ACCOUNT_SID, process.env.TWILIO_AUTH_TOKEN);
}
Next your hangleMessage will look like:
function handleMessage() {
const twilio = this.getTwilio();
const recordings = twilio.recordings(...);
...
}
And next, in your test you can stub getTwilio() to return stub:
const twilioStub = {
recordings: sinon.stub(),
remove: sinon.stub()
}
sinon.stub(myAwesomeModule, 'getTwilio').returns(twilioStub);
You also can consider using mock-require package:
const sinon = require('sinon');
const mock = require('mock-require');
mock('twilio', () => ({
recordings: sinon.stub(),
}));
Here is a question about how-to mock dependencies, there might be other helpful libraries to stub required module.
Hope it helps.

How to spyOn NodeJS module singleton with Jasmine

I want to use Jasmine to spyOn a module which exports a method directly:
myModule
module.exports = (arg, arg) => {
//do something...
callAMethod();
//return
}
Jasmine
spyOn(myModule);
// since I don't have any method to use spyOn(myModule, <method>)
I found I could use this:
//describe..
var myModule = require('./myModule');
it...
myModule = jasmine.createSpy().and.callFake(function() {
return false;
}); // <-this should work
functionBeingTested(..args);
expect(myModule).toHaveBeenCalled(); /*I get false, even if
it is actually called
in the functionBeingTested*/
Another solution i found was to spyOn myModule.prototype or set jasmine.createSpy().and.returnValue(false) but I have no success with both either.
How can I use spyOn like I said above?
I've created a simple snippet which mimics the require js
functionality to load the library and call the method.
I've listed three spies each with a different scenario explaining how
to spy
Note:
I've not used the require.js in itself but mimicked its functionality
however
Because the require.js exports the module.exports, we have no
control over the functionality of the require call and hence we might
not be able to install a spy on that method.
Please follow the each it case to for the description.
Hope this helps!
var callAMethod = function() {
return "Hello";
}
var myModule = {};
myModule.exports = function(name, title) {
return callAMethod() + " " + title + "." + name;
}
// Note that this require mimics the actual require.js require methodology, bascially returns the instantiated version of the library to be used.
var require = function() {
return myModule.exports;
}
// some function that uses the require library to load the js and then does something with it.
var testFunc = function() {
var myMod = require('abc');
return myMod("Bruce", "Mr");
}
describe('test mymodule', function() {
// This test fails because though you are mocking the instance here and not the actual call.
it('test that fails', function() {
var myModuleTest = require('abc');
myModuleTest = jasmine.createSpy().and.callFake(function() {
return false;
});
var result = testFunc();
console.log(result);
expect(result).toBe(false);
});
// this test passes since we have hijacked the require attribute itself and then routed its call to return the Boolean true which means that myModule now return the true statement
it('test that passes', function() {
require = jasmine.createSpy().and.callFake(function() {
return function() {
return true;
};
});
var result = testFunc();
console.log(result);
expect(result).toBe(true);
});
//callAMethod method call from module.exports may not tested since its the require js that does this call and you have no hook into it, however you can directly test the method like this
it('test callAMethod', function() {
console.log(myModule.exports("Bruce", "Mr"));
spyOn(myModule, 'exports').and.returnValue("Hello Mr.Wayne!");
var testVal = myModule.exports("Bruce", "Mr");
expect(testVal).toEqual("Hello Mr.Wayne!");
})
});

How can I mock a function/property of a node module exported as a function using sinon?

I have a service module that is exported as a function. I need to pass a couple of things into it, like a configuration object so it does need to retain this structure. I am trying to stub out a function from the service but can't figure it out. In my app, I have a function that makes an API call that is problematic during testing so I'd like to stub it. (I understand I'd have to write my test differently to handle the async issue)
// myService.js
module.exports = function(config) {
function foo() {
returns 'bar';
}
return {
foo: foo
};
};
// test.js
var config = require('../../config');
var request = require('supertest');
var chai = require('chai');
var expect = chai.expect;
var sinon = require('sinon');
var myService = require('./myService.js')(config);
describe('Simple test', function(done) {
it('should expect "something else", function(done) {
var stub = sinon.stub(myService, 'foo').returns('something else');
request(server) // this object is passed into my test. I'm using Express
.get('/testRoute')
.expect(200)
.expect(function(res) {
expect(res.body).to.equal('something else');
stub.restore();
})
.end(done);
});
});
* /testRoute I set up as a simple GET route that simply returns the value from myService.foo()
The above is not working, and I believe it has to do with the way my service is exporting. If I write the service as below, the stub works fine.
module.exports = {
test: function() {
return 'something';
}
};
But again, I need to be able to pass in information to the module so I would like to keep my modules in the original structure above. Is there a way to stub a function from a module that exports in that manner? I was also looking into proxyquire but not sure if that is the answer.
The reason why your test stub does not work is that the foo function is created every time the module initializer is called. As you discovered, when you have a static method on the module, then you are able to stub.
There are a variety of solutions to this problem-- but the simplest is to expose the method statically.
// myService.js
module.exports = function(config) {
return {
foo: foo
};
};
var foo = module.exports.foo = function foo() {
return 'bar'
}
It's ugly, but works.
What if the foo function has a closure to variables within the service (which is why it lives within the service initializer). Then unfortunately these need to be explicitly passed in.
// myService.js
module.exports = function(config) {
return {
foo: foo
};
};
var foo = module.exports.foo = function(config) {
return function foo() {
return config.bar;
}
}
Now you can safely stub the module.
However, how you are stubbing should be considered unsafe. Only if your test works perfectly does the stub get cleaned up. You should always stub within the before and after (or beforeEach and afterEach) fixtures, such as:
// We are not configuring the module, so the call with config is not needed
var myService = require('./myService.js');
describe('Simple test', function(done) {
beforeEach(function () {
// First example, above
this.myStub = sinon.stub(myService, foo).returns('something else');
// Second example, above
this.myStub = sinon.stub(myService, foo).returns(function () {
returns 'something else';
});
});
afterEach(function () {
this.myStub.restore();
});
it('should expect "something else", function(done) {
request(server) // this object is passed into my test. I'm using Express
.get('/testRoute')
.expect(200)
.expect(function(res) {
expect(res.body).to.equal('something else');
})
.end(done);
});
});
There are other options to be able to stub dependencies using dependency injection. I recommend you look at https://github.com/vkarpov15/wagner-core or my own https://github.com/CaptEmulation/service-builder

Is there any way to mock this function with Jasmine or Sinon?

I'm testing a module, and I want to mock out a a dependency within that module. Let me frame my scenario, if I may:
In my module
myModule.prototype.func = function(callback) {
complexObj.doStuff('foo', function(err) {
callback(err, 'stuff');
});
};
So, I'm trying to basically mock complexObj. It doesn't really matter if I mock the entire object or just the doStuff function in this case. Let's assume that doStuff does something like interact with a web service or the filesystem. complexObj is being injected into myModule by dependency injection. I've been using Jasmine and Sinon to try to mock or stub this object and function, but I've had no luck, so I've resorted to something like this, which seems a little kludgy:
In my spec:
describe('Testing myModule', function() {
it('should do stuff', function() {
ComplexObj.prototype.doStuff = function(arg, callback) {
callback(null); // If no errors, 'doStuff' returns null indicating no errors
};
var complexObj = new ComplexObj();
new myModule(complexObj).func(function(err, results) {
// Set up expectations...
});
});
});
So, as you can see, I'm psuedo-mocking out the doStuff function in the ComplexObj object. Since I'm not concerned about ComplexObj or doStuff function, I'm just invoking the callback with 'null' indicating to func that there were no errors in doStuff. As I mentioned before, I feel there should be a better way to handle this? Suggestions?
With Jasmine, you would do something like this:
var complexObj = {doStuff: null};
spyOn(complexObj, 'doStuff');
new myModule(complexObj).func(function(err, results) {
expect(complexObj.doStuff).toHaveBeenCalledWith(args, callback);
});
Edit: Or you could set up expectations in your mocked doStuff:
var complexObj = {doStuff: null};
spyOn(complexObj, 'doStuff').andCallFake(function(args, callback) {
expect(args).toEqual(/*...*/);
expect(callback).toEqual(/*...*/);
callback();
});
new myModule(complexObj).func(function(err, results) {
expect(complexObj.doStuff).toHaveBeenCalled();
});

Resources