When creating a site you have the option on the sub folders with in to convert them to an application. Why and when would you ever need to do this and what are the advantages and disadvantages? And what is the difference now that it is an application?
Why and when would you ever need to use an application
When you want to make your websites more robust.
What are the advantages of an application?
You can isolate a website when it's an application - the site has its own Session state and Application state, it is in effect a new standalone application. When the website has a problem it won't impact other websites on the server. The following description might help:
An application belongs to an application pool, which isolates the
application from applications in other application pools on the
server.
This link is really helpful and discusses applications and virtual directories in IIS.
Related
I'm intending to host an online portfolio and I have several node.js projects I'd like to host.
So I'd like to host one project on domain.net/project1 and the other on domain.net/project2
Do I need to use a single nodejs process to do this, or is it possible to have each of my separate nodejs projects running independently?
Is it possible to assign a nodejs process to each subdomain?
A better approach will be to host your NodeJS projects independently and then use the domain(hosted and provided by platform) to Custom Sub-Domain(created by you) pointing to point each of your projects to custom subdomains like project1.mydomain.com. This will provide you the flexibility to deploy your node applications on Heroku, AWS or any other hosting environment.
Thus you get freedom of choosing your own hosting platform and can have as many projects hosted as needed. I have attached an architecture diagram for the same and the link to the original draw.io document. Also please note that this is just a sample, and your design may vary as per your specific requirements
You can refer this Arc diagram for more details.
You can use nginx or apache http for host each project or create a path that contains sub paths for each one.
Here come references:
Apache http
nginx hosting
I'm just starting to learn more about the Node.js paradigm and finding it hard to grasp basic concepts. I'm familiar with front-end tools (HTML, CSS, JS) and have been using PHP with Apache server and mySQL db to deploy websites until now.
It seems to be that node is it's own server, and I would then need a SaaS platform like Heroku, or AWS (I'm not even sure if i'm understanding the purpose of these) if someone could explain the difference?
Is the database managed inside this service?
Is the website being hosted there?
In steps how would you get the node app to be served onto your domain name?
For Scalability purposes I understand how having dedicated big infrastructure can help, but if building a low traffic website with small number of members is there even a point in using node?
normal hosting services cost between $4-20 usd. per month and AWS or Heroku seem to start at a MUCH higher price. Is Node only to be used for large scale scaling business model?
Thank you for any answers or good recent external resources (websites or books) you could point me to.
You could easily host a low traffic website built with node.js absolutely for free on Heroku.
To see how easy that is, just go through the Getting Started With Node.js Heroku tutorial, in which you will do just that.
When you build your website with node.js, your own code that your write is the web server. You have no separate web server to configure and interact with (such as Apache). So what you see (or code...) is exactly what you get.
You will probably want to use a framework such as Express to build your web server functionality in your node.js app.
As for NoSQL databases, the way to do this on Heroku is to use an appropriate "add-on" from the Heroku Elements Marketplace. For example, you could easily add Heroku Redis or MongoLab. These are just some of the NoSQL "Database as a Service" options. That means that the Database is itself hosted somewhere in the cloud, and your app simply interacts with it. You don't need to worry about database maintenance, security upgrades etc. You just need to concentrate on your app's interaction with the DB.
Almost all add-ons in the Heroku Elements Marketplace feature a free-tier, that may suffice for your needs, at least initially. So you might be able to get your low-traffic website (including the DB) up and running completely for free, at least initially.
One thing you will need to understand is how Heroku free dyno hours work.
If you need your website to be continuously available 24/7, you may need to verify your Heroku account with a credit card (even though no charges would be incurred as long as you deploy only 1 free web dyno and are on a free-tier plan of your NoSQL DB as a Service). For further details, see this answer.
You also need to consider whether you can tolerate dyno sleeping in your low-traffic app. If not, you would need to prevent your web app from sleeping, which can also be done completely for free. For tips on how to do that see here.
As for serving your Heroku node.js app website from your own domain name, see here. Note that for this too you will need to verify your Heroku account with a credit card, although this too does not incur any charges.
Node.js is supported by many web hosting already, especially for those who use Plesk or cPanel as their web hosting control panel. Here is guide about how to setup a Node.js website via Plesk control, https://www.bisend.com/blog/how-to-set-up-a-node-js-site-in-plesk. As you said, it's very easy to host your website with a cheap shared web hosting.
For web hosting of an Enterprise application do we need web server or Application server?
When application server can serve all protocols for client requests and responses why web server is introduced ?
Can application server be running in a web server so that Enterprise application can be accessed in WWW ?
Please help, these are my all time hunting doubts Thank You...
You could let your application server be your webserver as well, but you generally shouldn't.
Two reasons come to mind (maybe there are more):
security: Your application server might have additional ports/service endpoints/interfaces etc. which are accessed locally and you don't want to expose them to the Web. (You could achieve results with a suitable firewall, but the webserver adds another layer of protection).
performance: If there is no dedicated web server, your application server has to serve static content (images, static pages etc.) in addition to performing the business logic. Having dedicated web servers helps in distribute the load.
I have a client-server relationship between two apps: a web application and an OCX. What I want to do is communicate the client part of the web application, running on the local PC, with the OCX, also installed in the same PC. The server app (the OCX) is not mine (I can't change its source code) and offers 2 ways of communicating with client apps: through an intermediate file or through a socket. There are lot of restrictions in the PCs where the apps have to be executed (the users, for example, are not administrators of their own PCs) so it's even more difficult than it seems. My doubt is which technology would be better to handle this communication from the cliente app (JavaScript, Java Applets, another OCX, etc.) and which option could be handled easier (file or sockets) by this technologies. And also which would be the security and permissions settings that should be taken into account to make it all work properly. You must know that, in case of using an intermediate file, I must be able to write in specific positions of that file from the web app (I'm not sure if Javascript's FileSystemObject can do this, for example). Thanks in advance.
Working with Sockets is realy easy. I only don't know the security options of sockets. May be you can take a look here: Oracle Sockets
I am currently devising 3 database desktop applications for different users in a manufacturing company (one for the accounting department, sales department, production department). All applications have different functions but they should be able to access the data of the other department to reflect business transactions. What is the best programming language and database to use for this kind project? The three computers are not physically connected so I was thinking of having them to access a remote database. The language I am most familiar with is Java but I am very open to learning others if it would be more beneficial to the company. I was also thinking of having to use Adobe Air as I am adept with web programming but could still run as a desktop app but I can't seem to find sufficient resources of distributed systems using Adobe air. Any ideas would be very much appreciated. Thanks!
Lots of languages will do this just fine, including Java. You're familiar with that so my advice is stick to it with one caveat: depending on your requirements I would seriously suggest examining the possibility of making it a Web app instead. Desktop database apps are somewhat... old-fashioned. More to the point they'll create a bunch of headaches for you such as installation, Swing is annoying and tedious, etc.
As for what database, barring requirements you haven't specified, anything will do so pick something free like MySQL.
So for a desktop Java app I would:
Put the database on a remote server;
Put an application server or Web container on that same server;
Create a Webapp on the app server for handling RPC;
Pick a method of RPC, be it Web services or whatever, and use Spring to implement it;
Create a desktop Java app in Swing and distribute it to clients from the app server via Webstart (JNLP).
If it's a Web app:
Put the database and appserver or Web container on one server;
Pick a Java Web framework and create a bunch of Web pages that do what you want.
In all cases, have it be the same app but just act differently on the user type. This is much better than maintaining three different apps.
Also if you do a Web app, you might want to consider using PHP as it's a fast and proven way of knocking up Web pages and probably sufficient for the kind of internal application that you're doing.