This program puzzles me. The goal of this program is to count the number of newlines in a file and output it in command prompt. Learnyounode then runs their own check on the file and sees if their answer matches your answer.
So I start with the answer :
var fs = require('fs');
var filename = process.argv[2];
file = fs.readFileSync(filename);
contents = file.toString();
console.log(contents.split('\n').length - 1);
learnyounode verifies that this program correctly counts the number of new lines. But when I change the program to any of the following, it doesn't print out the same number as learnyounode prints out.
file = fs.readFileSync(C:/Nick/test.txt);
file = fs.readFileSync(test.txt);
Shouldn't nodejs readFileSync be able to input an address and read it correctly?
Lastly, this program is supposed to print out the # of newlines in a program. Why does both the correct program and learnyounode print out the same number that is different from the amount of newlines everytime I run this program?
For example, the number of newlines in test.txt is 3. But running this program prints out a different number everytime, like 45, 15, 2, etc. Yet at the same time, it is verified as a correct program by learnyounode because both their answers match! What is going on?
EDIT:
test.txt looks like this
ok
testing
123
So, I tried your program on my local machine and your program works fine. I am not an expert on learnyounode. I just tried it after your question but I think I understand how it works. As such, here are the answers to your questions:
Shouldn't nodejs readFileSync be able to input an address and read it correctly?
This method from nodejs is working fine. You can try printing the contents of the file and you'll see that there are no problems.
Why does both the correct program and learnyounode print out the same number that is different from the amount of newlines everytime I run this program.
learnyounode is running your program with a different filename as input each time. It verifies the output of your program by running its own copy of correct code against the same file.
But when I change the program to any of the following, it doesn't print out the same number as learnyounode prints out.
That is because at this point, your code is processing a fixed file whereas learnyounode is still processing different files on each iteration.
This tripped me up too. If you read the learnyounode instructions closely they explicitly say...
"The full path to the file to read will be provided as the first command-line argument."
This means they are providing the path to their own file.
When you use process.argv[2], this is passing in the 3rd array item (the learnyounode test txt file) into your script. If you run a console.log(process.argv); you'll see the full array object looks something like this:
[ '/usr/local/bin/node',
'/Users/user/pathstuff/learnyounode/firstio.js',
'/var/folders/41/p2jvc80j26l7nty0sk0zs1z40000gn/T/_learnyounode_1613.txt' ]
The reason the validation numbers begin to mismatch when you substitute your own text file for their is because your file always has 3 lines whereas their unit tests keep passing in different length files via process.argv.
Hope that helps.
when you are using process.argv[2] in learnyounode, the argument is provided by learnyounode automatically, so it prints different number of lines like 45, 15, 2 etc at multiple times verification.
If you remember the second challenge "BABYSTEPS" carefully this was given:
learnyounode will be supplying arguments to your program when you run
learnyounode verify program.js so you don't need to supply them yourself.
That's why different line numbers at program.js verification on multiple times.
there are two different ways.
if you run program like:
node program_name.js
than you need to add path to text file:
node program_name.js text_file.txt
in this case make sure that files are in the same directory.
or you can run it with command:
learnyounode program_name.js
and than default text file will be provided by learnyounode. You can watch content of this text file by using
console.log(buffer)
Problem statement says
The full path to the file to read will be provided as the first
command-line argument.
So you've to pass the path/to/file as an argument.
Remember process.argv
you should use the following method to execute .js files
node program_name.js /path/to/text_file_name
rather than
learnyounode run program_name.js /path/to/text_file_name
on this method, Node.js will run your program with specify files of you enter on the command-line-interface.
wish this answer can help you programming. :)
Related
I'm trying to Create a file and append all the content being calculated into that file, but when I run the script the very last iteration is written inside the file and nothing else.
My code is on pastebin, it's too long, and I feel like you would have to see exactly how the iteration is happening.
Try to summarize it, Go through an array of model numbers, if the model number matches call the function that calculates that MAC_ADDRESS, when done calculating store all the content inside a the file.
I have tried two possible routes and both have failed, giving the same result. There is no error in the code (it runs) but it just doesn't store the content into the file properly there should be 97 different APs and it's storing only 1.
The difference between the first and second attempt,
1 attempt) I open/create file in the beginning of the script and close at the very end.
2 attempt) I open/create file and close per-iteration.
First Attempt:
https://pastebin.com/jCpLGMCK
#Beginning of code
File = open("All_Possibilities.txt", "a+")
#End of code
File.close()
Second Attempt:
https://pastebin.com/cVrXQaAT
#Per function
File = open("All_Possibilities.txt", "a+")
#per function
File.close()
If I'm not suppose to reference other websites, please let me know and I'll just paste the code in his post.
Rather than close(), please use with:
with open('All_Possibilities.txt', 'a') as file_out:
file_out.write('some text\n')
The documentation explains that you don't need + to append writes to a file.
You may want to add some debugging console print() statements, or use a debugger like pdb, to verify that the write() statement actually ran, and that the variable you were writing actually contained the text you thought it did.
You have several loops that could be a one-liner using readlines().
Please do this:
$ pip install flake8
$ flake8 *.py
That is, please run the flake8 lint utility against your source code,
and follow the advice that it offers you.
In particular, it would be much better to name your identifier file than to name it File.
The initial capital letter means something to humans reading your code -- it is
used when naming classes, rather than local variables. Good luck!
I am creating something along the likes of a text adventure game. I have a .yaml file that is my input. This file looks something like this
node_type:
action
title:
Do some stuff
info:
This does some stuff and things
script:
'print("hello world")
print(ret_val)
foo.bar(True)
ret_val = (foo.bar() == True)
if (thing):
print(thing)
print(ret_val)
'
My end goal is to have my python program run the script portion of the yaml file exactly as if it had been copy pasted into the main code. (I know there are about ten bazillion security reasons I should not be running user input like this, but I am the only one writing these nodes, and the only one using this program so I'm mostly just ignoring this fact...)
Currently my attempt goes like this: I load my yaml file as a dict using pyyaml
node = yaml.safe_load(file.yaml)
Then I'm trying to use exec to run my code and hitting a lot of problems, I can't run if statements, I simply get a syntax error, and I can't get any sort of return value from my code. I've tried this as a work around:
def main()
ret_val = "test";
thing = exec(node['script'], globals(),locals())
print(ret_val)
which when run with the above .yaml file prints
>> hello world
>> test
>> True
>> test
for some reason not actually modifying any of my main variables even though I fed them to exec.
Is there any way for me to work around these issues or is there an all together better way to be doing this?
One way of doing this would be to parse the code out and save it to a .py file, from which it can be imported dynamically, for example by importlib.
You might want to encapsulate parsed code into a function, which you can then easily call to invoke your action. Also, it would make sense to specify some default imports there.
I'm currently working on a project where I search hundreds of files using findstr in the command line. If I find the string which I searched for, I want to proceed with this exact file (and the other ones that include my string).
So in my case:
I searched for the string WRI2016 by using:
H:\KOBINI>findstr "WRI2016" *.ini > %temp%\xx.txt && %temp%\xx.txt
To see what the PC does, I save it in a .txt file as you can see.
So if my file includes WRI2016 I want to extract some facts out of the file. In my case it is NR, Kunde, WebHDAktiv, DigIDAktiv.
But I just can't find a proper way to link both of these functions.
At first I simply printed all of the parameters:
H:\KOBINI>findstr "\<NR Kunde WRI2016 WebHDAktiv DigIDAktiv" *.ini > %temp%\xx.csv && %temp%\xx.csv
I also played around using the if command but that didn't really work out. I'm pretty new to this stuff as you'll see in my following tries to solve this problem:
H:\KOBINI>findstr "\<NR DigIDAktiv WebHDAktiv" set a =*.ini findstr "WRI2016" set b =*.ini if a EQU b > %temp%\xx.txt && %temp%\xx.txt
So all I wanted to achieve with that weird code was: if there is a WRI2016 in the file, give me the remaining parameters. But that didn't work out at all.
I also tried it with using new lines for every command which didn't change a thing.
As I want this to be a .csv in the end I want to add a semicolon between my parameters, any chance how I could do that? I've seen versions using -s";" which didn't do anything for me.
Sorry, I'm quite new and thought I'd give it a shot.
an example of my .ini files Looks like this:
> Kunde=Markt
> Nr=101381
> [...]
> DigIDAktiv=Ja
> WebHDAktiv=Nein
> Version=WRI2016_U2_P1
some files have a different Version though.
So I only want to know "NR, DigIDAktiv ..." if it's the 2016 Version.
As a result it should be sorted in a CSV, in different columns.
My Folder Looks like this
So I search These files in order to find Version 2016 and then try to extract my Information and put it into a .csv
I have R code as below. Below code resides in a file called 'iot.R'. I am executing it in Linux.
I want to print content of variable 'fileinformation' to a file mentioned by file=fileConn...
I thought that the 3rd line will solve the issue, but it is not giving the required output :(
fileinformation = system(paste("file", filenames[1]))
#print(fileinformation)
cat(print(fileinformation),"\r\n","\r\n", file=fileConn)
When I run the file, i get below result. It prints to my screen, rather than writing to the file :(
> source('iot.R')
CH7Data_20130401T135010.csv: ASCII text, with CRLF line terminators
[1] 0
--------------------update1
I also tried below command, but didnt get the expected rsult
cat(capture.output(fileinformation),"\r\n","\r\n", file=fileConn)
You need to set the intern argument to TRUE in your call to system. For instance:
fileinformation<-system("file cinzia_2.gif",intern=TRUE)
fileinformation
#[1] "cinzia_2.gif: GIF image data, version 89a, 640 x 640"
Of course I tried a file on my pc. Setting intern to TRUE the return value of system becomes the console output of the command. Then, when you call cat, you don't need to enclose fileinformation into print, but a simple cat(fileinformation,"\r\n","\r\n", file=fileConn) will suffice.
Hi Just a comment as I dont have enough rep to comment in the normal way. but cant you use
write.table
to save the output to a file? It may be easier?
I have a perl script that traverses a set of directories and when it hits one of them it blows up with an Invalid Argument and I want to be able to programmatically skip it. I thought I could start by finding out the file type with the file command but it too blows up like this:
$ file /sys/devices/virtual/net/br-ex/speed
/sys/devices/virtual/net/br-ex/speed: ERROR: cannot read `/sys/devices/virtual/net/br-ex/speed' (Invalid argument)
If I print out the mode of the file with the perl or python stat function it tells me 33060 but I'm not sure what all the bits mean and I'm hoping a particular one would tell me not to try to look inside. Any suggestions?
To understand the stats number you got, you need to convert the number to octal (in python oct(...)).
Then you'll see that 33060 interprets to 100444. You're interested only in the last three digits (444). The first digit is file owner permissions, the second is group and the third is everyone else.
You can look at each of the numbers (in your case all are 4) as 3 binary bits in this order:
read-write-execute.
Since in your case owner, group & other has 4, it is translated (for all of them) to 100 (in binary) which means that only the read bit is on for all three - meaning that all three can only read the file.
As far as file permissions go, you should have been successful reading /sys/devices/virtual/net/br-ex/speed.
There are two reasons for the read to fail:
- Either speed is a directory, (directories require execute permissions to read inside).
- Or it's a special file - which can be tested using the -f flag in perl or bash, or using os.path.isfile(...) in python.
Anyhow, you can use the following links to filter files & directories according to their permissions in the 3 languages you mentioned:
ways to test permissions in perl.
ways to test permissions in python.
ways to test permissions in bash.
Not related to this particular case, but I hit the same error when I ran it on a malicious ELF (Linux executable) file. In that case it was because the program headers of the ELF was intentionally corrupted. Looking at the source code for file command, this is clear as it checks the ELF headers and bails out with the same error in case the headers are corrupted:
/*
* Loop through all the program headers.
*/
for ( ; num; num--) {
if (pread(fd, xph_addr, xph_sizeof, off) <
CAST(ssize_t, xph_sizeof)) {
file_badread(ms);
return -1;
}
TLDR; The file command checks not only the magic bytes, but it also performs other checks to validate a file type.