I want to insert a line into the start of multiple specified type files, which the files are located in current directory or the sub dir.
I know that using
find . -name "*.csv"
can help me to list the files I want to use for inserting.
and using
sed -i '1icolumn1,column2,column3' test.csv
can use to insert one line at the start of file,
but now I do NOT know how to pipe the filenames from "find" command to "sed" command.
Could anybody give me any suggestion?
Or is there any better solution to do this?
BTW, is it work to do this in one line command?
Try using xargs to pass output of find and command line arguments to next command, here sed
find . -type f -name '*.csv' -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '1icolumn1,column2,column3'
Another option would be to use -exec option of find.
find . -type f -name '*.csv' -exec sed -i '1icolumn1,column2,column3' {} \;
Note : It has been observed that xargs is more efficient way and can handle multiple processes using -P option.
This way :
find . -type f -name "*.csv" -exec sed -i '1icolumn1,column2,column3' {} +
-exec do all the magic here. The relevant part of man find :
-exec command ;
Execute command; true if 0 status is returned. All following arguments
to find are taken to be arguments to the command until an argument consisting
of `;' is encountered. The string `{}' is replaced by the current file name
being processed everywhere it occurs in the arguments to the command, not just
in arguments where it is alone, as in some versions of find. Both of
these constructions might need to be escaped (with a `\') or quoted to protect
them from expansion by the shell. See the EXAMPLES section for examples of
the use of the -exec option. The specified command is run once for each
matched file. The command is executed in the starting directory. There
are unavoidable security problems surrounding use of the -exec action;
you should use the -execdir option instead
Related
I use this really useful command :
file *
to get quality/identity of listed files.
But I'd like to list recursively, from a given folder.
In another words, doing something like that :
(command below does not exist)
file * -r
Any trick to do it ?
You can use find for that, using the -exec switch:
find ./ -type f -exec file {} \;
Small explanation:
{} : result of the "find" command, used as an input for the "file" command
\; : terminator of the "find ... -exec ..." command
Another option is to use xargs(1):
find . | xargs file
Sample output:
./.config/xfe: directory
./.config/xfe/xfirc: ASCII text
./.Xauthority: X11 Xauthority data
./line/serialLG1800.py: Python script, ...
If file names contain spaces or other special characters, it is best to use the -print0 option for find and, doing so, also must add -0 option for xargs:
find . -print0 | xargs -0 file
I am figuring out a command to copy files that are modified on a Saturday.
find -type f -printf '%Ta\t%p\n'
This way the line starts with the weekday.
When I combine this with a 'egrep' command using a regular expression (starts with "za") it shows only the files which start with "za".
find -type f -printf '%Ta\t%p\n' | egrep "^(za)"
("za" is a Dutch abbreviation for "zaterdag", which means Saturday,
This works just fine.
Now I want to copy the files with this command:
find -type f -printf '%Ta\t%p\n' -exec cp 'egrep "^(za)" *' /home/richard/test/ \;
Unfortunately it doesn't work.
Any suggestions?
The immediate problem is that -printf and -exec are independent of each other. You want to process the result of -printf to decide whether or not to actually run the -exec part. Also, of course, passing an expression in single quotes simply passes a static string, and does not evaluate the expression in any way.
The immediate fix to the evaluation problem is to use a command substitution instead of single quotes, but the problem that the -printf function's result is not available to the command substitution still remains (and anyway, the command substitution would happen before find runs, not while it runs).
A common workaround would be to pass a shell script snippet to -exec, but that still doesn't expose the -printf function to the -exec part.
find whatever -printf whatever -exec sh -c '
case $something in za*) cp "$1" "$0"; esac' "$DEST_DIR" {} \;
so we have to figure out a different way to pass the $something here.
(The above uses a cheap trick to pass the value of $DEST_DIR into the subshell so we don't have to export it. The first argument to sh -c ... ends up in $0.)
Here is a somewhat roundabout way to accomplish this. We create a format string which can be passed to sh for evaluation. In order to avoid pesky file names, we print the inode numbers of matching files, then pass those to a second instance of find for performing the actual copying.
find \( -false $(find -type f \
-printf 'case %Ta in za*) printf "%%s\\n" "-o -inum %i";; esac\n' |
sh) \) -exec cp -t "$DEST_DIR" \+
Using the inode number means any file name can be processed correctly (including one containing newlines, single or double quotes, etc) but may increase running time significantly, because we need two runs of find. If you have a large directory tree, you will probably want to refactor this for your particular scenario (maybe run only in the current directory, and create a wrapper to run it in every directory you want to examine ... thinking out loud here; not sure it helps actually).
This uses features of GNU find which are not available e.g. in *BSD (including OSX). If you are not on Linux, maybe consider installing the GNU tools.
What you can do is a shell expansion. Something like
cp $(find -type f -printf '%Ta\t%p\n' | egrep "^(za)") $DEST_DIR
Assuming that the result of your find and grep is just the filenames (and full paths, at that), this will copy all the files that match your criteria to whatever you set $DEST_DIR to.
EDIT As mentioned in the comments, this won't work if your filenames contain spaces. If that's the case, you can do something like this:
find -type f -printf '%Ta\t%p\n' | egrep "^(za)" | while read file; do cp "$file" $DEST_DIR; done
I am running -> "find . -name '*.txt'" command and getting list of files.
I am getting below mention output:
./bsd/contrib/amd/ldap-id.txt
./bsd/contrib/expat/tests/benchmark/README.txt
./bsd/contrib/expat/tests/README.txt
./bsd/lib/libc/softfloat/README.txt
and so on,
Out of these files how can i run grep command and read contents and filter only those files which have certain keyword? for e.g. "version" in it.
xargs is a great way to accomplish this, and its already been covered.
The -exec option of find is also useful for this. It will perform a command over all files returned from find.
To invoke grep as few times as possible, passing multiple filenames to each call:
find . -name '*.txt' -exec grep -H 'foo' {} +
Alternately, to invoke grep exactly once for each file found:
find . -name '*.txt' -exec grep -H 'foo' {} ';'
In either case, {} is like a placeholder for the values from find; if your shell is zsh, it may be necessary to escape it, as in '{}'.
There are several ways to accomplish this.
If there are non-.txt files which might usefully contain the keyword:
grep -r KEYWORD *
This uses the recursive directory search option of grep.
To search only .txt files:
find . -name '*.txt' -exec grep KEYWORD {} \;
or
find . -name '*.txt' -exec grep KEYWORD {} +
or
find . -execdir grep KEYWORD {}
The first runs grep for each matching file. The second runs grep much fewer times, accumulating many matched files before invoking grep. The third form runsgrep` once in every directory.
There is usually a function built into find for that, but to be portable across platforms, I typically use xargs. Say you want to find all the xml files in or below the current directly and get a list of each occurrence of 'foo', you can do this:
find ./ -type f -name '*.xml' -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 grep -H foo
It should be self-explanatory except for the -print0, which separates filenames with NULs rather than newlines, and the -0, which tells xargs to use those NULs rather than interpreting spaces and quotes as syntax (which can confuse it if filenames contain either).
I would like to pass the output list of elements of a command as a parameter of another command. I have found some other pages:
How to display the output of a Linux command on stdout and also pipe it to another command?
Use output of bash command (with pipe) as a parameter for another command
but they seem to be more complex.
I just would like to copy a file to every result of a call to the Linux find command.
What is wrong here?:
find . -name myFile 2>&1 | cp /home/myuser/myFile $1
Thanks
This is what you want:
find . -name myFile -exec cp /home/myuser/myFile {} ';'
A breakdown / explanation of this:
find: invoking the find command
.: start search from current working directory.
Since no depth flags are specified, this will search recursively for all subfolders
-name myFile: find files with the explicit name myFile
-exec: for the search results, perform additional commands with them
cp /home/myuser/myFile {}: copies /home/myuser/myFile to overwrite each result returned by find to ; think of {} as where each search result goes.
';': used to separate different commands to be run after find
There are a couple of ways to solve this, depending on whether you need to worry about files with spaces or other special characters in their names.
If none of the filenames have spaces or special characters (they consist only of letters, numbers, dashes, and underscores), then the following is a simple solution that will work. You can use $(command) to execute a command, and substitute the results into the arguments of another command. The shell will split the result on spaces, tabs, or newlines, and for assign each value to $f in turn, and run the command on each value.
for f in $(find . -name myFile)
do
cp something $f
done
If you do have spaces or tabs, you could use find's -exec option. You pass -exec command args, putting {} where you want the filename to be substituted, and ending the arguments with a ;. You need to quote the {} and ; so that the shell doesn't interpret them.
find . -name myFile -exec cp something "{}" \;
Sometimes -exec is not sufficient. For example, in this question, they wanted to use Bash parameter expansion to compute the filename. In order to do that, you need to pass -exec bash -c 'your command', but then you will run into quoting problems with the {} substitution. To solve this, you can use -print0 from find to print the results delimited with null characters (which are invalid in filenames), and pipe it to a while read loop that splits parameters on nulls:
find . -name myFile -print0 | (while read -d $'\0' f; do
cp something "$f"
done)
The pipe will send the output of one program to the input of another. cp does not read from its input stream at the terminal, it merely uses the arguments on the command line.
You want to either use xargs with the pipe or find's exec argument instead of pipes.
find . -name myFile 2>&1 | xargs -I {} cp /home/myuser/myFile {}
Note: option -I {} defines {} as the place holder you could alternatively use someother placeholder if it conflicts with command to be executed.
I want to know exactly what {} \; and {} \+ and | xargs ... do. Please clarify these with explanations.
Below 3 commands run and output same result but the first command takes a little time and the format is also little different.
find . -type f -exec file {} \;
find . -type f -exec file {} \+
find . -type f | xargs file
It's because 1st one runs the file command for every file coming from the find command. So, basically it runs as:
file file1.txt
file file2.txt
But latter 2 find with -exec commands run file command once for all files like below:
file file1.txt file2.txt
Then I run the following commands on which first one runs without problem but second one gives error message.
find . -type f -iname '*.cpp' -exec mv {} ./test/ \;
find . -type f -iname '*.cpp' -exec mv {} ./test/ \+ #gives error:find: missing argument to `-exec'
For command with {} \+, it gives me the error message
find: missing argument to `-exec'
why is that? can anyone please explain what am I doing wrong?
The manual page (or the online GNU manual) pretty much explains everything.
find -exec command {} \;
For each result, command {} is executed. All occurences of {} are replaced by the filename. ; is prefixed with a slash to prevent the shell from interpreting it.
find -exec command {} +
Each result is appended to command and executed afterwards. Taking the command length limitations into account, I guess that this command may be executed more times, with the manual page supporting me:
the total number of invocations of the command will be much less than the number of matched files.
Note this quote from the manual page:
The command line is built in much the same way that xargs builds its command lines
That's why no characters are allowed between {} and + except for whitespace. + makes find detect that the arguments should be appended to the command just like xargs.
The solution
Luckily, the GNU implementation of mv can accept the target directory as an argument, with either -t or the longer parameter --target. It's usage will be:
mv -t target file1 file2 ...
Your find command becomes:
find . -type f -iname '*.cpp' -exec mv -t ./test/ {} \+
From the manual page:
-exec command ;
Execute command; true if 0 status is returned. All following arguments to find are taken to be arguments to the command until an argument consisting of `;' is encountered. The string `{}' is replaced by the current file name being processed everywhere it occurs in the arguments to the command, not just in arguments where it is alone, as in some versions of find. Both of these constructions might need to be escaped (with a `\') or quoted to protect them from expansion by the shell. See the EXAMPLES section for examples of the use of the -exec option. The specified command is run once for each matched file. The command is executed in the starting directory. There are unavoidable security problems surrounding use of the -exec action; you should use the -execdir option instead.
-exec command {} +
This variant of the -exec action runs the specified command on the selected files, but the command line is built by appending each selected file name at the end; the total number of invocations of the command will be much less than the number of matched files. The command line is built in much the same way that xargs builds its command lines. Only one instance of `{}' is allowed within the command. The command is executed in the starting directory.
I encountered the same issue on Mac OSX, using a ZSH shell: in this case there is no -t option for mv, so I had to find another solution.
However the following command succeeded:
find .* * -maxdepth 0 -not -path '.git' -not -path '.backup' -exec mv '{}' .backup \;
The secret was to quote the braces. No need for the braces to be at the end of the exec command.
I tested under Ubuntu 14.04 (with BASH and ZSH shells), it works the same.
However, when using the + sign, it seems indeed that it has to be at the end of the exec command.
The standard equivalent of find -iname ... -exec mv -t dest {} + for find implementations that don't support -iname or mv implementations that don't support -t is to use a shell to re-order the arguments:
find . -name '*.[cC][pP][pP]' -type f -exec sh -c '
exec mv "$#" /dest/dir/' sh {} +
By using -name '*.[cC][pP][pP]', we also avoid the reliance on the current locale to decide what's the uppercase version of c or p.
Note that +, contrary to ; is not special in any shell so doesn't need to be quoted (though quoting won't harm, except of course with shells like rc that don't support \ as a quoting operator).
The trailing / in /dest/dir/ is so that mv fails with an error instead of renaming foo.cpp to /dest/dir in the case where only one cpp file was found and /dest/dir didn't exist or wasn't a directory (or symlink to directory).
find . -name "*.mp3" -exec mv --target-directory=/home/d0k/Музика/ {} \+
no, the difference between + and \; should be reversed. + appends the files to the end of the exec command then runs the exec command and \; runs the command for each file.
The problem is find . -type f -iname '*.cpp' -exec mv {} ./test/ \+ should be find . -type f -iname '*.cpp' -exec mv {} ./test/ + no need to escape it or terminate the +
xargs I haven't used in a long time but I think works like +.