As I am playing around with classes in Python, I thought the following might be useful. Given:
class NewClass:
def __init__self():
self.value = 1
new = NewClass()
Is there a way that by calling new, it would return the new.value of 1, rather than the class itself
<__main__.NewClass object at 0x7faa096d38d0>?
I assume it might not be possible and people are against it, but I figured I'd ask anyway.
class NewClass():
def __init__(self):
pass
def Ret(self):
self.value = 1
return self.value
new = NewClass().Ret()
print(new)
Related
I'm trying to understand multiple inheritance in python. I think that "kinda" got it, but I'm missing a few pieces. I know that if I have two clases I can do something like:
class A():
def __init__(self,name):
self.name = name
class B(A):
def __init__(self,name):
A.__init__(self,name)
self.mm = False
self.name = name
b = B("Peter")
My problem is when I have more classes and each class has their own init arguments. At first glance, it makes like no sense to have something like this:
class A():
def __init__(self,name,arg_a1,arg_a2):
self.name = name
class B(A):
def __init__(self,name,arg_b1,arg_b2,arg_a1,arg_a2...):
A.__init__(self,name,arg_a1,arg_a2...)
self.mm = False
self.name = name
class C(B):
def __init__(self,name,arg_c1,arg_c2,arg_b1,arg_b2,arg_a1,arg_a2.........):
B.__init__(self,name,arg_b1,arg_b2,arg_a1,arg_a2...)
self.name = name
So I started to look how to do it in an efficient way and not just hardcode it. Thats when I came across with multiple inheritance and thats when my doubts started to arraise.
If I have 3 classes:
class A():
def __init__(self,name):
self.name = name
class B(A):
def __init__(self,name,*args,**kwargs):
super().__init__(*args,**kwargs)
self.mm = False
self.name = name
class C(B):
def __init__(self,a,j,*args,**kwargs):
super().__init__(*args,**kwargs)
self.a = a
self.j = j
c = C("p",1,5,name="p")
Why this give an error but adding name as an init argument does not?
In this other example, if I add another argument to A init's function the I get TypeError: __init__() got multiple values for argument 'name'.
class A():
def __init__(self,name,lastname):
self.name = name
self.lastname = lastname
class B(A):
def __init__(self,name,*args,**kwargs):
super().__init__(name,*args,**kwargs)
self.mm = False
self.name = name
class C(B):
def __init__(self,a,j,*args,**kwargs):
super().__init__(*args,**kwargs)
self.a = a
self.j = j
c = C("p",1,5,name="p")
So, after all this, several questions comes to my mind.
Why this TypeError is generated?
How can I make inheritance "smart"?
Do I always need to use *args and **kwargs with multiple inheritance?
And all this gets me to the point to the libraries I use daily. Probably some of them use this concetps (I don't know, I'm assuming). What happes when the user puts a kwarg that is not present in any class? How do python "knows" that name goes in class A and not class B or viceversa?
Below, I show a simplified example of a more complicated code, but nonetheless, it fully represents the issue that I have encountered.
Part 1: this works fine, no issues:
class Animal():
def __init__(self, animal_name = "no name given"):
self.set_name(animal_name)
def get_name(self):
return self._animal_name
def set_name(self, animal_name):
self._animal_name = animal_name
class Dog(Animal):
def __init__(self, dog_breed = "no breed", dog_name = "no name given"):
self._dog_breed = dog_breed
super().__init__(dog_name)
def get_breed(self):
print(self._dog_breed)
x = Dog('Greyhound', 'Rich')
Part 2: after introducing getter & setter decorators, the code stops working:
class Animal():
def __init__(self, animal_name = "no name given"):
#THE LINE BELOW SEEMS TO CAUSE AN ISSUE
self.name(animal_name)
#property
def name(self):
return self._animal_name
#name.setter
def name(self, animal_name):
self._animal_name = animal_name
class Dog(Animal):
def __init__(self, dog_breed = "no breed", dog_name = "no name given"):
self._dog_breed = dog_breed
super().__init__(dog_name)
def get_breed(self):
print(self._dog_breed)
x = Dog('Greyhound', 'Rich')
Output: AttributeError: 'Dog' object has no attribute '_animal_name'
When I keep the decorators in Part 2 but change the constructor in the Animal class to:
class Animal():
def __init__(self, animal_name = "no name given"):
self._animal_name=animal_name
It works.
I am just curious why it doesn't work in the example above in Part 2?
Short answer:
The line
self.name(animal_name)
can be split in two parts:
tmp = self.name
tmp(animal_name)
First, self.name calls the getter and the result is treated as a function. The getter uses return self._animal_name and since the setter has never been called, the respective error occurs.
Long answer:
Let's take the following class:
class Animal:
def __init__(self, animal_name):
self.name(animal_name)
#property
def name(self):
return self._animal_name
#name.setter
def name(self, animal_name):
self._animal_name = animal_name
To understand what the line
self.name(animal_name)
actually does, you first need to understand decorators.
The code
#dec
def func(a, b, ...):
[...]
is equivalent to
def func_impl(a, b, ...):
[...]
func = dec(func_impl)
(except that you can not call func_impl directly). See, for example, PEP 318 for more information.
This means that you can write the Animal class from above without using decorators:
class Animal:
def __init__(self, animal_name):
self.name(animal_name)
def get_name(self):
return self._animal_name
name = property(get_name)
def set_name(self, animal_name):
self._animal_name = animal_name
name = name.setter(set_name)
In order to understand this code, you need to understand the builtin property, which is a class. See the python docs for detailed information.
The line name = property(get_name) creates an object of type property. When retrieving the value of the property, get_name is called.
The line name = name.setter(set_name) first calls name.setter(set_name), which creates a copy of the property, and then overwrites name with this copy. When assigning a value to the copy, set_name is called.
All in all, name is an object of type property that uses get_name as getter and set_name as setter.
How does this help?
You need to understand this: name is not a function. It is a property. It is not callable.
The problematic line
self.name(animal_name)
is actually equivalent to
self.get_name()(animal_name)
which this explains the error message: The constructor calls the getter, which tries to use return self._animal_name. But since the setter has not been called, yet, self._animal_name has not been set.
I'm having a problem with multiple inheritance that I can't seem to figure out. Here is a very abstracted minimal example that reproduces my error (my code is much more complex than this).
class Thing(object):
def __init__(self, x=None):
self.x = x
class Mixin(object):
def __init__(self):
self.numbers = [1,2,3]
def children(self):
return [super().__init__(x=num) for num in self.numbers]
class CompositeThing(Mixin, Thing):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
def test(self):
for child in self.children():
print(child.x)
obj = CompositeThing()
obj.test()
Per this, I expect the children() method to return a list of Things built up from self.numbers. Instead, I get TypeError: super(type, obj): obj must be an instance or subtype of type. Incidentally, the same thing happens if I don't call the constructor and allow children to return super() 3 times (i.e., the uninstantiated superclass). Any ideas why this might be happening?
Thanks in advance!
In line 9 of your code, it looks like you are trying to call __init__ of object. I am assuming you meant to have Mixin inherit from Thing.
class Thing(object):
def __init__(self, x=None):
self.x = x
class Mixin(Thing):
def __init__(self):
self.numbers = [1,2,3]
def children(self):
return [super().__init__(x=num) for num in self.numbers] # Now calls Thing.__init__ instead of object.__init__
class CompositeThing(Mixin, Thing):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
def test(self):
for child in self.children():
print(child.x)
obj = CompositeThing()
obj.test()
Actually, I figured it out. There were two problems: (1) super() doesn't work as expected inside comprehensions because comprehensions in Py3 have their own scope - this was causing the TypeError I was experiencing. (2) What I was really trying to do was create a new instance of the parent, rather than calling a method from the parent. I have posted a new question for just the latter problem for clarity.
So I'm working with Linked Lists in python, and the UnitTest our professor gave us calls C = Course(), but asserts the values after. This is what they use to grade, but I can't find a way to call the class then wait for the variables, and apply them to the class without parameters so it doesn't crash. Thoughts? Am I missing something obvious?
Tried to only include the relevant code. If people need full code for clarification or just for kicks/giggles let me know.
import courselist
import course
def load_data(data):
with open(data) as f:
for line in f:
dline = line.strip().split(",")
C = course.Course(dline[0],dline[1],dline[2],dline[3])
course_list = courselist.CourseList()
course_list.insert(C)
return course_list
def main():
data = "data.txt"
full_list = load_data(data)
print(full_list.__str__())
main()
class Course:
def __init__(self, c_num, c_name, c_hour, c_grade):
self.c_num = c_num
self.c_name = c_name
self.c_hour = c_hour
self.c_grade = c_grade
self.next = None
class TestEmptyCourse(unittest.TestCase):
def test_course_creation(self):
# make sure that an empty course is correct
c = Course()
self.assertEqual(c.name(), "")
self.assertEqual(c.number(), 0)
self.assertEqual(c.credit_hr(), 0.0)
self.assertEqual(c.grade(), 0.0)
self.assertEqual(c.next, None)
I was missing something obvious... Hangs head in shame For those interested here's how to fix it. It's always when you ask for help that you get it just in time to look like an idiot haha. Thanks to those to checked it out. If someone has an alternate solution I'll be sure to upvote you
class Course:
def __init__(self, num=0, cname="", c_hr=0.0, cgrade=0.0, next=None):
self.num = num
self.cname = cname
self.c_hr = c_hr
self.cgrade = cgrade
self.next = None
def number(self):
return int(self.num)
def name(self):
return str(self.cname)
def credit_hr(self):
return self.c_hr
def grade(self):
return self.cgrade
def __str__(self):
return f"cs{self.num} {self.cname} Grade:{self.cgrade} Credit Hours: {self.c_hr}"
I am trying to create a classmethod which can be called again and again, however it only works once and stops. Here is the code:
class NewBytes(bytes):
def __init__(self, var):
self.var= var
#classmethod
def rip(cls):
return cls(var[2:])
a = b"12asd5789"
x = NewBytes(a)
print(x, x.rip(), x.rip().rip(), x.rip().rip().rip())
Here is what I got from this:
b'12asd5789' b'asd5789' b'asd5789' b'asd5789'
However, what I want to have is:
b'12asd5789' b'asd5789' b'd5789' b'789'
Thanks in advance.
Probably you don't actually want a class method, since you need access to instance state here.
class NewBytes(bytes):
def __init__(self, x):
self.x = x
def rip(self):
return type(self)(self.x[2:])
My previous answer of using self.x doesnt make sense since this is a class method (too quick to answer). I think this is a case of the XY problem, see the below example of how to use a class method.
class Test(object):
x = "hey there whats up this is a long string"
#classmethod
def TestFunction(cls):
cls.x = cls.x[3:]
print(cls.x)
print(Test().x)
Test().TestFunction()
Test().TestFunction()
Test().TestFunction()
Test().TestFunction()
Test().TestFunction()