Searching online for oauth yields various platforms and how to sign in, etc but has no resources on how to provide oauth access myself.
How would I go about building a platform allowing 3rd party access? Are there any tutorials?
Eventually I want to make a passport plugin if that helps in suggestions.
You could use these:
OAuthorize, which is a suite of middleware for implementing an OAuth 1.0a server.
OAuth2orize for OAuth 2.0.
Related
I have an OpenID Connect provider built with IdentityServer4 and ASP.NET Identity, running on let's say: login.example.com.
I have a SPA application running on let's say spa.example.com, that already uses my OpenID Connect provider to authenticate users through login.example.com and authorize them to access the SPA.
I have a mobile app (native on both platforms) that is using a custom authentication system at the moment.
I thought it would be nice to get rid of the custom auth system, and instead allow my users to log-in with the same account they use on the SPA, by using my OpenID provider.
So I started by looking on the OpenID connect website and also re-reading the RFC6749, after a few google searches I realized that was a common problem and I found RFC8252 (OAuth2 for Native clients), also Client Dynamic Registration (RFC7591) and PKCE (RFC7636).
I scratched my head about the fact that it was no longer possible to store any kind of "secret" on the client/third-party (the native apps) as it could become compromised.
I disscussed the topic with some co-workers and we came out with the following set-up:
Associate a domain let's say app.example.com to my mobile app by using Apple Universal Links and Android App Links.
Use an AuthenticationCode flow for both clients and enforce them to use PKCE.
Use a redirect_uri on the app associated domain say: https://app.example.com/openid
Make the user always consent to log-in into the application after log-in, because neither iOS or Android would bring back the application by doing an automatic redirect, it has to be the user who manually clicks the universal/app link every time.
I used AppAuth library on both apps and everything is working just fine right now on test, but I'm wondering:
Do you think this is a secure way to prevent that anyone with the right skills could impersonate my apps or by any other means get unauthorized access to my APIs? What is the current best practice on achieving this?
Is there any way to avoid having the user to always "consent" (having them to actually tap the universal/app link).
I also noted that Facebook uses their application as a kind of authorization server itself, so when I tap "sing-in with facebook" on an application I get to a facebook page that asks me if I would like to" launch the application to perform log-in". I would like to know how can I achieve something like this, to allow my users login to the SPA on a phone by using my application if installed, as facebook does with theirs.
I thought it would be nice to get rid of the custom auth system, and instead allow my users to log-in with the same account they use on the SPA, by using my OpenID provider.
This is what OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect provides you. The ability to use single user identity among different services. So this is the correct approach .!
it was no longer possible to store any kind of "secret" on the client/third-party (the native apps) as it could become compromised
Correct. From OAuth 2.0 specification perspective, these are called public clients. They are not recommended to have client secrets associated to them. Instead, authorization code, application ID and Redirect URL is used to validate token request in identity provider. This makes authorization code a valuable secret.!
Associate a domain let's say app.example.com to my mobile app by using Apple Universal Links and Android App Links.
Not a mobile expert. But yes, custom URL domains are the way to handle redirect for OAuth and OpenID Connect.
Also usage of PKCE is the correct approach. Hence redirect occur in the browser (user agent) there can be malicious parties which can obtain the authorization code. PKCE avoid this by introducing a secret that will not get exposed to user agent (browser). Secret is only used in token request (direct HTTP communication) thus is secure.
Q1
Using authorization code flow with PKCE is a standard best practice recommended by OAuth specifications. This is valid for OpenID Connect as well (hence it's built on OAuth 2.0)
One thing to note is that, if you believe PKCE secret can be exploited, then it literally means device is compromised. Think about extracting secret from OS memory. that means system is compromised (virus/ keylogger or what ever we call them). In such case end user and your application has more things to be worried about.
Also, I believe this is for a business application. If that's the case your clients will definitely have security best practice guide for their devices. For example installation of virus guards and restrictions of application installation. To prevent attacks mentioned above, we will have to rely on such security establishments. OAuth 2.0 alone is not secure .! Thats's why there are best practice guides(RFC68129) and policies.
Q2
Not clear on this. Consent page is presented from Identity Provider. So it will be a configuration of that system.
Q3
Well, Identity Provider can maintain a SSO session in the browser. Login page is present on that browser. So most of the time, if app uses the same browser, users should be able to use SPA without a login.
The threat here comes from someone actually installing a malicious app on their device that could indeed impersonate your app. PKCE prevents another app from intercepting legitimate sign in requests initiated from your app so the standard approach is about as safe as you can make it. Forcing the user to sign in/consent every time should help a bit to make them take note of what is going on.
From a UX PoV I think it makes a lot of sense to minimize the occasions when the browser-based sign in flow is used. I'd leverage the security features of the platform (e.g. secure enclave on iOS) and keep a refresh token in there once the user has signed in interactively and then they can sign in using their PIN, finger print or face etc.
I'm working on a project which will use SnapChat authentication in my PhoneGap app. I looked around in the SnapChat API documentation, but i couldn’t find anything about this subject.
So my question is, is there any plugin or API available to authenticate through SnapChat in a PhoneGap application? Please help me.
I believe there’s no legal way to authenticate through SnapChat at the moment. They neither expose APIs nor some authentication flow.
At the moment we are building a web shop as a SPA application. All the SKU information is provided by a Web Api 2 service.
Of course the web shop is publicly available to every visitor, and currently there is only one user who can log in to manage the web shop: the administrator.
For the administrator we built in the basic authentication with the bearer token, as a lot of samples on the internet shows us, but now we need every user to log in before they can see any product. Not really what we have in mind for a web shop ;-)
What we would like to implement is that our Web Api is not available to the world but only for our SPA application. Every blog post or tutorial on authorization seems to assume that there is always a user that needs to log in, in our case there is only one user: the administrator.
The AllowAnonymous attribute makes specific API calls available to the world again, so that's also a dead end.
Basically it comes down to preventing any other apps (web or mobile) to fetch the data from our Web Api.
What would be the best and most secure approach to secure our Web Api without having the anonymous visitors of our web shop to log in?
Solution for now: Altough I'm not 100% happy with this solution, it will work for now. We implemented the OAuth Implicit flow with CORS enabled for specific domain.
You should take a look at the OAuth 2.0 client credentials flow. The client in OAuth speak is the application and not the user using the application. This way you can make sure only your SPA app can access the backend API.
The parts that only should allow access to the administrator, you can decorate with the [Authorize(roles = administrator)] attribute, which prevents any other roles from having access.
I think Json Web Token could help you with this. This article has more information about using Json Web Token for granular authorization of your web api.
OAuth 2.0 is inherently insecure, and solely relies upon SSL. It has no encryption, and most of the latest web api gurus are suggesting that it's dead. This again is relative to what you need the security for. If it's for a social SPA where the data isn't financial or medical, for example, and good enough SSL security is ok, then perhaps OpenID or OAuth2 is suitable.
A much better solution is to implement Identity 2.0 for the Web API authentication flow, and then utilize something like Hawk Protocol for HTTP MAC implementation. Check this out : https://github.com/webapibook/hawknet for an example.
For OAuth2 framework and a extensible solution, check out Thinktecture.IdentityServer3 on GitHub
For a lightweight .net 4.5 Web API Tokenization solution, check out Thinktecture.IdentityServer2 on GitHub.
Hope it helps.
I have a web service written in node.js and I have a server that is running MongoDB, my question is, how can I implement OAuth 2.0 when according to RFC 6749 in my case, the resource owner, the resource server and the authorization server are the same? i.e. I want to use OAuth to authenticate and authorize users that are in my own database and not from other resource owners(like facebook or twitter).
This is a pretty broad question -- implementing oauth is quite complex if you're looking to roll your own solution.
If I were you I'd look into using a library like Passport.js or Stormpath to help offload this stuff.
You can find detailed generic information about what developers have to do to implement OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect in Authlete Definitive Guide and Authlete Blog. Although the documents refer to a specific solution (Authlete), the contents will serve as a useful reference for developers who dare to implement their own OAuth 2.0/OpenID Connect servers.
I am completely new to ADFS. I need to access the ADFS server through node.js. I am searching for good reference notes, with implementation. And suggest me which protocol is best for requesting. Video tutorials are also heplful.
I assume what you want is to authenticate users in AD (via ADFS), for your nodejs based web app. I'd recommend looking first at passport.js.
ADFS supports 2 protocols for web sites: WS-Federation or SAML-P. WS-Fed might be simpler. We open sourced the strategy for WS-Fed and SAML that we use in our product. A strategy is essentially a plug-in for passport.
That strategy should give you a good start.
ADFS v3.0 exposes OAuth2. *
You could use Passport.js with OAuth support or Kong with OAuth support.
You could go the ADFS 2016 OpenId Connect route for ease of implementation (passport.js, only a feature request for kong).
If you're going the Azure route, there's one (passport-azure-ad by the Windows Azure team) specifically for that.
It includes OpenID Connect, WS-Federation, and SAML-P authentication and authorization.
Otherwise, versions disallowing etc., I recommend Eugenio Pace's answer.
Then, check these, is a complete solution (not a video tut)
Using Active Directory Federation Services to Authenticate / Authorize Node.js Apps in Windows Azure
http://seroter.wordpress.com/2013/04/22/using-active-directory-federation-services-to-authenticate-authorize-node-js-apps-in-windows-azure/
pretty fresh tut. (2013/04/22)