Related
I have to run a local shell script (windows/Linux) on a remote machine.
I have SSH configured on both machine A and B. My script is on machine A which will run some of my code on a remote machine, machine B.
The local and remote computers can be either Windows or Unix based system.
Is there a way to run do this using plink/ssh?
If Machine A is a Windows box, you can use Plink (part of PuTTY) with the -m parameter, and it will execute the local script on the remote server.
plink root#MachineB -m local_script.sh
If Machine A is a Unix-based system, you can use:
ssh root#MachineB 'bash -s' < local_script.sh
You shouldn't have to copy the script to the remote server to run it.
This is an old question, and Jason's answer works fine, but I would like to add this:
ssh user#host <<'ENDSSH'
#commands to run on remote host
ENDSSH
This can also be used with su and commands which require user input. (note the ' escaped heredoc)
Since this answer keeps getting bits of traffic, I would add even more info to this wonderful use of heredoc:
You can nest commands with this syntax, and that's the only way nesting seems to work (in a sane way)
ssh user#host <<'ENDSSH'
#commands to run on remote host
ssh user#host2 <<'END2'
# Another bunch of commands on another host
wall <<'ENDWALL'
Error: Out of cheese
ENDWALL
ftp ftp.example.com <<'ENDFTP'
test
test
ls
ENDFTP
END2
ENDSSH
You can actually have a conversation with some services like telnet, ftp, etc. But remember that heredoc just sends the stdin as text, it doesn't wait for response between lines
I just found out that you can indent the insides with tabs if you use <<-END!
ssh user#host <<-'ENDSSH'
#commands to run on remote host
ssh user#host2 <<-'END2'
# Another bunch of commands on another host
wall <<-'ENDWALL'
Error: Out of cheese
ENDWALL
ftp ftp.example.com <<-'ENDFTP'
test
test
ls
ENDFTP
END2
ENDSSH
(I think this should work)
Also see
http://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/here-docs.html
Also, don't forget to escape variables if you want to pick them up from the destination host.
This has caught me out in the past.
For example:
user#host> ssh user2#host2 "echo \$HOME"
prints out /home/user2
while
user#host> ssh user2#host2 "echo $HOME"
prints out /home/user
Another example:
user#host> ssh user2#host2 "echo hello world | awk '{print \$1}'"
prints out "hello" correctly.
This is an extension to YarekT's answer to combine inline remote commands with passing ENV variables from the local machine to the remote host so you can parameterize your scripts on the remote side:
ssh user#host ARG1=$ARG1 ARG2=$ARG2 'bash -s' <<'ENDSSH'
# commands to run on remote host
echo $ARG1 $ARG2
ENDSSH
I found this exceptionally helpful by keeping it all in one script so it's very readable and maintainable.
Why this works. ssh supports the following syntax:
ssh user#host remote_command
In bash we can specify environment variables to define prior to running a command on a single line like so:
ENV_VAR_1='value1' ENV_VAR_2='value2' bash -c 'echo $ENV_VAR_1 $ENV_VAR_2'
That makes it easy to define variables prior to running a command. In this case echo is our command we're running. Everything before echo defines environment variables.
So we combine those two features and YarekT's answer to get:
ssh user#host ARG1=$ARG1 ARG2=$ARG2 'bash -s' <<'ENDSSH'...
In this case we are setting ARG1 and ARG2 to local values. Sending everything after user#host as the remote_command. When the remote machine executes the command ARG1 and ARG2 are set the local values, thanks to local command line evaluation, which defines environment variables on the remote server, then executes the bash -s command using those variables. Voila.
<hostA_shell_prompt>$ ssh user#hostB "ls -la"
That will prompt you for password, unless you have copied your hostA user's public key to the authorized_keys file on the home of user .ssh's directory. That will allow for passwordless authentication (if accepted as an auth method on the ssh server's configuration)
I've started using Fabric for more sophisticated operations. Fabric requires Python and a couple of other dependencies, but only on the client machine. The server need only be a ssh server. I find this tool to be much more powerful than shell scripts handed off to SSH, and well worth the trouble of getting set up (particularly if you enjoy programming in Python). Fabric handles running scripts on multiple hosts (or hosts of certain roles), helps facilitate idempotent operations (such as adding a line to a config script, but not if it's already there), and allows construction of more complex logic (such as the Python language can provide).
cat ./script.sh | ssh <user>#<host>
chmod +x script.sh
ssh -i key-file root#111.222.3.444 < ./script.sh
Try running ssh user#remote sh ./script.unx.
Assuming you mean you want to do this automatically from a "local" machine, without manually logging into the "remote" machine, you should look into a TCL extension known as Expect, it is designed precisely for this sort of situation. I've also provided a link to a script for logging-in/interacting via SSH.
https://www.nist.gov/services-resources/software/expect
http://bash.cyberciti.biz/security/expect-ssh-login-script/
ssh user#hostname ". ~/.bashrc;/cd path-to-file/;. filename.sh"
highly recommended to source the environment file(.bashrc/.bashprofile/.profile). before running something in remote host because target and source hosts environment variables may be deffer.
I use this one to run a shell script on a remote machine (tested on /bin/bash):
ssh deploy#host . /home/deploy/path/to/script.sh
if you wanna execute command like this
temp=`ls -a`
echo $temp
command in `` will cause errors.
below command will solve this problem
ssh user#host '''
temp=`ls -a`
echo $temp
'''
If the script is short and is meant to be embedded inside your script and you are running under bash shell and also bash shell is available on the remote side, you may use declare to transfer local context to remote. Define variables and functions containing the state that will be transferred to the remote. Define a function that will be executed on the remote side. Then inside a here document read by bash -s you can use declare -p to transfer the variable values and use declare -f to transfer function definitions to the remote.
Because declare takes care of the quoting and will be parsed by the remote bash, the variables are properly quoted and functions are properly transferred. You may just write the script locally, usually I do one long function with the work I need to do on the remote side. The context has to be hand-picked, but the following method is "good enough" for any short scripts and is safe - should properly handle all corner cases.
somevar="spaces or other special characters"
somevar2="!##$%^"
another_func() {
mkdir -p "$1"
}
work() {
another_func "$somevar"
touch "$somevar"/"$somevar2"
}
ssh user#server 'bash -s' <<EOT
$(declare -p somevar somevar2) # transfer variables values
$(declare -f work another_func) # transfer function definitions
work # call the function
EOT
The answer here (https://stackoverflow.com/a/2732991/4752883) works great if
you're trying to run a script on a remote linux machine using plink or ssh.
It will work if the script has multiple lines on linux.
**However, if you are trying to run a batch script located on a local
linux/windows machine and your remote machine is Windows, and it consists
of multiple lines using **
plink root#MachineB -m local_script.bat
wont work.
Only the first line of the script will be executed. This is probably a
limitation of plink.
Solution 1:
To run a multiline batch script (especially if it's relatively simple,
consisting of a few lines):
If your original batch script is as follows
cd C:\Users\ipython_user\Desktop
python filename.py
you can combine the lines together using the "&&" separator as follows in your
local_script.bat file:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/8055390/4752883:
cd C:\Users\ipython_user\Desktop && python filename.py
After this change, you can then run the script as pointed out here by
#JasonR.Coombs: https://stackoverflow.com/a/2732991/4752883 with:
`plink root#MachineB -m local_script.bat`
Solution 2:
If your batch script is relatively complicated, it may be better to use a batch
script which encapsulates the plink command as well as follows as pointed out
here by #Martin https://stackoverflow.com/a/32196999/4752883:
rem Open tunnel in the background
start plink.exe -ssh [username]#[hostname] -L 3307:127.0.0.1:3306 -i "[SSH
key]" -N
rem Wait a second to let Plink establish the tunnel
timeout /t 1
rem Run the task using the tunnel
"C:\Program Files\R\R-3.2.1\bin\x64\R.exe" CMD BATCH qidash.R
rem Kill the tunnel
taskkill /im plink.exe
This bash script does ssh into a target remote machine, and run some command in the remote machine, do not forget to install expect before running it (on mac brew install expect )
#!/usr/bin/expect
set username "enterusenamehere"
set password "enterpasswordhere"
set hosts "enteripaddressofhosthere"
spawn ssh $username#$hosts
expect "$username#$hosts's password:"
send -- "$password\n"
expect "$"
send -- "somecommand on target remote machine here\n"
sleep 5
expect "$"
send -- "exit\n"
You can use runoverssh:
sudo apt install runoverssh
runoverssh -s localscript.sh user host1 host2 host3...
-s runs a local script remotely
Useful flags:
-g use a global password for all hosts (single password prompt)
-n use SSH instead of sshpass, useful for public-key authentication
If it's one script it's fine with the above solution.
I would set up Ansible to do the Job. It works in the same way (Ansible uses ssh to execute the scripts on the remote machine for both Unix or Windows).
It will be more structured and maintainable.
It is unclear if the local script uses locally set variables, functions, or aliases.
If it does this should work:
myscript.sh:
#!/bin/bash
myalias $myvar
myfunction $myvar
It uses $myvar, myfunction, and myalias. Let us assume they is set locally and not on the remote machine.
Make a bash function that contains the script:
eval "myfun() { `cat myscript.sh`; }"
Set variable, function, and alias:
myvar=works
alias myalias='echo This alias'
myfunction() { echo This function "$#"; }
And "export" myfun, myfunction, myvar, and myalias to server using env_parallel from GNU Parallel:
env_parallel -S server -N0 --nonall myfun ::: dummy
Extending answer from #cglotr. In order to write inline command use printf, it useful for simple command and it support multiline using char escaping '\n'
example :
printf "cd /to/path/your/remote/machine/log \n tail -n 100 Server.log" | ssh <user>#<host> 'bash -s'
See don't forget to add bash -s
There is another approach ,you can copy your script in your host with scp command then execute it easily .
First, copy the script over to Machine B using scp
[user#machineA]$ scp /path/to/script user#machineB:/home/user/path
Then, just run the script
[user#machineA]$ ssh user#machineB "/home/user/path/script"
This will work if you have given executable permission to the script.
I wish to run a script on the remote system and then wish to stay there.
Running following script:-
ssh user#remote logs.sh
This do run the script but after that I am back to my host system. i need to stay on remote one. I tried with..
ssh user#remote logs.sh;bash -l
somehow it solves the problem but still not working exactly as a fresh login as the command:-
ssh user#remote
Or it will be better if i could include something in my script that would open the bash terminal in the same directory where the script was running. Please suggest.
Try this:
ssh -t user#remote 'logs.sh; bash -l'
The quotes are needed to pass both commands to ssh. The -t option forces a pseudo-tty allocation.
Discussion
Consider:
ssh user#remote logs.sh;bash -l
When the shell parses this line, it splits it into two commands. The first is:
ssh user#remote logs.sh
This runs logs.sh on the remote machine. The second command is:
bash -l
This opens a login shell on the local machine.
The quotes were added above to prevent the shell from splitting up the commands this way.
I want to use SSH inside a script, but this script is not going to be executed on my machine.
In my implementation there are two limitations.
I can not work outside shell's standards,therefore i can not use expect because i do not know if it will be available on this machine.
I can not expect that this machine will have public keys for the SSH.
What are the possible options-solutions ?
How can i provide ssh with the requested password with an automated and secure way without adding extra dependencies?
Will it be possible to provide the password inside the script?
Thank you all in advance :)
Install sshpass, then launch the command:
sshpass -p "yourpassword" ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no yourusername#hostname
For security reasons you must avoid providing password on a command line otherwise anyone running ps command can see your password. Better to use sshpass utility like this:
#!/bin/bash
export SSHPASS="your-password"
sshpass -e ssh -oBatchMode=no sshUser#remoteHost
You might be interested in How to run the sftp command with a password from Bash script?
First of all: Don't put secrets in clear text unless you know why it is a safe thing to do (i.e. you have assessed what damage can be done by an attacker knowing the secret).
If you are ok with putting secrets in your script, you could ship an ssh key with it and execute in an ssh-agent shell:
#!/usr/bin/env ssh-agent /usr/bin/env bash
KEYFILE=`mktemp`
cat << EOF > ${KEYFILE}
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
[.......]
EOF
ssh-add ${KEYFILE}
# do your ssh things here...
# Remove the key file.
rm -f ${KEYFILE}
A benefit of using ssh keys is that you can easily use forced commands to limit what the keyholder can do on the server.
A more secure approach would be to let the script run ssh-keygen -f ~/.ssh/my-script-key to create a private key specific for this purpose, but then you would also need a routine for adding the public key to the server.
AFAIK there is no possibility beside from using keys or expect if you are using the command line version ssh. But there are library bindings for the most programming languages like C, python, php, ... . You could write a program in such a language. This way it would be possible to pass the password automatically. But note this is of course a security problem as the password will be stored in plain text in that program
I completely agree with everybody who says this is almost certainly a terrible idea. It is extremely likely to allow others to attack your computers.
USE AT YOUR OWN RISK AFTER EVALUATING THE SECURITY HAZARDS
Answer
Make a program /path/to/saypass which outputs the password, such as
#!/bin/sh
echo 'secret'
Make it executable with
chmod +x /path/to/saypass
Then this is the main command:
SSH_ASKPASS="/path/to/saypass" DISPLAY=anything setsid ssh username#hostname [farcommand]
This
sets the two environment variables SSH_ASKPASS and DISPLAY
and then runs setsid
which then runs ssh without a controlling terminal
which connects to the far hostname
... runs saypass locally to get the password
... tells it to the far server
... and assuming it's correct
which then runs farcommand (if given), or an interactive shell.
I normally test with date or hostname for the optional farcommand.
There are lots of places for this to go wrong.
Explanation
The trick to this is that standard Linux command line ssh has a couple of environment variables you can use to choose a program which gets executed to supply the password.
ssh(1) manual page says:
SSH_ASKPASS If ssh needs a passphrase, it will read the passphrase from the current terminal if it was run from a terminal. If ssh does not have a terminal associated with it but DISPLAY and SSH_ASKPASS are set, it will execute the program specified by SSH_ASKPASS and open an X11 window to read the passphrase.
So: you need a program (shell script or any other kind) which will output the password. Then you need to convince ssh to use it:
With SSH_ASKPASS set to /path/to/saypass
With DISPLAY set to something silly
With no controlling terminal (this is what setsid does)
Which you put together in the following sh command:
SSH_ASKPASS="/path/to/saypass" DISPLAY=anything setsid ssh username#hostname [command]
ssh will execute
/path/to/saypass "username#hostname's password:"
Fingerprint check
If the fingerprint is needed, where you'd normally see the message
The authenticity of host '*hostname* (*ipaddress*)' can't be established.
ECDSA key fingerprint is SHA256:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)?
Then ssh will run your command like this:
/path/to/saypass "Please type 'yes' or 'no':"
All-in-one script
The following is a single script for creating, using, and removing a saypass within the main script. Everyone will tell you do not put plaintext passwords in files and also never hardcode a password. They tell you this for good reason: it will cause you a lot of trouble. Use at your own risk.
#!/bin/sh
echo "#!/bin/sh\necho 'secret';rm -f /tmp/saypass.$$" > /tmp/saypass.$$
chmod 775 /tmp/saypass.$$
SSH_ASKPASS="/tmp/saypass.$$" DISPLAY=anything setsid ssh "$#"
SCP
This also works for scp, the copy program on top of ssh:
SSH_ASKPASS=/path/to/saypas DISPLAY=anything setsid scp username#hostname:/path/to/farfile .
Caveat
Really don't use this except in dire, dire, circumstances, such as where you have hundreds of computers and you can't install anything like ssh keys, sshpass even expect.
If you do use it, please don't tell anyone I told you how to do it. It really is terrible.
I don't know what the man page means about "open an X11 window", no such thing happens in my testing.
Tested on
OpenSSH_6.6.1p1 Ubuntu-2ubuntu2, OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014 on Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS,
OpenSSH_7.2p2 Ubuntu-4ubuntu2.1, OpenSSL 1.0.2g 1 Mar 2016 on Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS
OpenSSH_7.6p1 Ubuntu-4ubuntu0.3, OpenSSL 1.0.2n 7 Dec 2017 on Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS
I have two questions:
There are multiple remote linux machines, and I need to write a shell script which will execute the same set of commands in each machine. (Including some sudo operations). How can this be done using shell scripting?
When ssh'ing to the remote machine, how to handle when it prompts for RSA fingerprint authentication.
The remote machines are VMs created on the run and I just have their IPs. So, I cant place a script file beforehand in those machines and execute them from my machine.
There are multiple remote linux machines, and I need to write a shell script which will execute the same set of commands in each machine. (Including some sudo operations). How can this be done using shell scripting?
You can do this with ssh, for example:
#!/bin/bash
USERNAME=someUser
HOSTS="host1 host2 host3"
SCRIPT="pwd; ls"
for HOSTNAME in ${HOSTS} ; do
ssh -l ${USERNAME} ${HOSTNAME} "${SCRIPT}"
done
When ssh'ing to the remote machine, how to handle when it prompts for RSA fingerprint authentication.
You can add the StrictHostKeyChecking=no option to ssh:
ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -l username hostname "pwd; ls"
This will disable the host key check and automatically add the host key to the list of known hosts. If you do not want to have the host added to the known hosts file, add the option -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null.
Note that this disables certain security checks, for example protection against man-in-the-middle attack. It should therefore not be applied in a security sensitive environment.
Install sshpass using, apt-get install sshpass then edit the script and put your linux machines IPs, usernames and password in respective order. After that run that script. Thats it ! This script will install VLC in all systems.
#!/bin/bash
SCRIPT="cd Desktop; pwd; echo -e 'PASSWORD' | sudo -S apt-get install vlc"
HOSTS=("192.168.1.121" "192.168.1.122" "192.168.1.123")
USERNAMES=("username1" "username2" "username3")
PASSWORDS=("password1" "password2" "password3")
for i in ${!HOSTS[*]} ; do
echo ${HOSTS[i]}
SCR=${SCRIPT/PASSWORD/${PASSWORDS[i]}}
sshpass -p ${PASSWORDS[i]} ssh -l ${USERNAMES[i]} ${HOSTS[i]} "${SCR}"
done
This work for me.
Syntax : ssh -i pemfile.pem user_name#ip_address 'command_1 ; command 2; command 3'
#! /bin/bash
echo "########### connecting to server and run commands in sequence ###########"
ssh -i ~/.ssh/ec2_instance.pem ubuntu#ip_address 'touch a.txt; touch b.txt; sudo systemctl status tomcat.service'
There are a number of ways to handle this.
My favorite way is to install http://pamsshagentauth.sourceforge.net/ on the remote systems and also your own public key. (Figure out a way to get these installed on the VM, somehow you got an entire Unix system installed, what's a couple more files?)
With your ssh agent forwarded, you can now log in to every system without a password.
And even better, that pam module will authenticate for sudo with your ssh key pair so you can run with root (or any other user's) rights as needed.
You don't need to worry about the host key interaction. If the input is not a terminal then ssh will just limit your ability to forward agents and authenticate with passwords.
You should also look into packages like Capistrano. Definitely look around that site; it has an introduction to remote scripting.
Individual script lines might look something like this:
ssh remote-system-name command arguments ... # so, for exmaple,
ssh target.mycorp.net sudo puppet apply
The accepted answer sshes to machines sequentially. In case you want to ssh to multiple machines and run some long-running commands like scp concurrently on them, run the ssh command as a background process.
#!/bin/bash
username="user"
servers=("srv-001" "srv-002" "srv-002" "srv-003");
script="pwd;"
for s in "${servers[#]}"; do
echo "sshing ${username}#${s} to run ${script}"
(ssh ${username}#${s} ${script})& # Run in background
done
wait # If removed, you can run some other script here
If you are able to write Perl code, then you should consider using Net::OpenSSH::Parallel.
You would be able to describe the actions that have to be run in every host in a declarative manner and the module will take care of all the scary details. Running commands through sudo is also supported.
For this kind of tasks, I repeatedly use Ansible which allows to duplicate coherently bash scripts in several containets or VM. Ansible (more precisely Red Hat) now has an additional web interface AWX which is the open-source edition of their commercial Tower.
Ansible: https://www.ansible.com/
AWX:https://github.com/ansible/awx
Ansible Tower: commercial product, you will probably fist explore the free open-source AWX, rather than the 15days free-trail of Tower
There is are multiple ways to execute the commands or script in the multiple remote Linux machines.
One simple & easiest way is via pssh (parallel ssh program)
pssh: is a program for executing ssh in parallel on a number of hosts. It provides features such as sending input to all of the processes, passing a password to ssh, saving the output to files, and timing out.
Example & Usage:
Connect to host1 and host2, and print "hello, world" from each:
pssh -i -H "host1 host2" echo "hello, world"
Run commands via a script on multiple servers:
pssh -h hosts.txt -P -I<./commands.sh
Usage & run a command without checking or saving host keys:
pssh -h hostname_ip.txt -x '-q -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -o PreferredAuthentications=publickey -o PubkeyAuthentication=yes' -i 'uptime; hostname -f'
If the file hosts.txt has a large number of entries, say 100, then the parallelism option may also be set to 100 to ensure that the commands are run concurrently:
pssh -i -h hosts.txt -p 100 -t 0 sleep 10000
Options:
-I: Read input and sends to each ssh process.
-P: Tells pssh to display output as it arrives.
-h: Reads the host's file.
-H : [user#]host[:port] for single-host.
-i: Display standard output and standard error as each host completes
-x args: Passes extra SSH command-line arguments
-o option: Can be used to give options in the format used in the configuration file.(/etc/ssh/ssh_config) (~/.ssh/config)
-p parallelism: Use the given number as the maximum number of concurrent connections
-q Quiet mode: Causes most warning and diagnostic messages to be suppressed.
-t: Make connections time out after the given number of seconds. 0 means pssh will not timeout any connections
When ssh'ing to the remote machine, how to handle when it prompts for
RSA fingerprint authentication.
Disable the StrictHostKeyChecking to handle the RSA authentication prompt.
-o StrictHostKeyChecking=no
Source: man pssh
This worked for me. I made a function. Put this in your shell script:
sshcmd(){
ssh $1#$2 $3
}
sshcmd USER HOST COMMAND
If you have multiple machines that you want to do the same command on you would repeat that line with a semi colon. For example, if you have two machines you would do this:
sshcmd USER HOST COMMAND ; sshcmd USER HOST COMMAND
Replace USER with the user of the computer. Replace HOST with the name of the computer. Replace COMMAND with the command you want to do on the computer.
Hope this helps!
You can follow this approach :
Connect to remote machine using Expect Script. If your machine doesn't support expect you can download the same. Writing Expect script is very easy (google to get help on this)
Put all the action which needs to be performed on remote server in a shell script.
Invoke remote shell script from expect script once login is successful.
Borderline ServerFault question, but I'm programming some shell scripts, so I'm trying here first :)
Most *nixes have a command that will let you pipe/redirect output to the local clipboard/pasteboard, and retrieve from same. On OS X these commands are
pbcopy, pbpaste
Is there anyway to replicate this functionality while SSHed into another server? That is,
I'm using Computer A.
I open a terminal window
I SSH to Computer B
I run a command on Computer B
The output of Computer B is redirected or automatically copied to Computer A's clipboard.
And yes, I know I could just (shudder) use my mouse to select the text from the command, but I've gotten so used to the workflow of pipping output directly to the clipboard that I want the same for my remote sessions.
Code is useful, but general approaches are appreciated as well.
My favorite way is ssh [remote-machine] "cat log.txt" | xclip -selection c. This is most useful when you don't want to (or can't) ssh from remote to local.
Edit: on Cygwin ssh [remote-machine] "cat log.txt" > /dev/clipboard.
Edit: A helpful comment from nbren12:
It is almost always possible to setup a reverse ssh connection using SSH port forwarding. Just add RemoteForward 127.0.0.1:2222 127.0.0.1:22 to the server's entry in your local .ssh/config, and then execute ssh -p 2222 127.0.0.1 on the remote machine, which will then redirect the connection to the local machine. – nbren12
I'm resurrecting this thread because I've been looking for the same kind of solution, and I've found one that works for me. It's a minor modification to a suggestion from OSX Daily.
In my case, I use Terminal on my local OSX machine to connect to a linux server via SSH. Like the OP, I wanted to be able to transfer small bits of text from terminal to my local clipboard, using only the keyboard.
The essence of the solution:
commandThatMakesOutput | ssh desktop pbcopy
When run in an ssh session to a remote computer, this command takes the output of commandThatMakesOutput (e.g. ls, pwd) and pipes the output to the clipboard of the local computer (the name or IP of "desktop"). In other words, it uses nested ssh: you're connected to the remote computer via one ssh session, you execute the command there, and the remote computer connects to your desktop via a different ssh session and puts the text to your clipboard.
It requires your desktop to be configured as an ssh server (which I leave to you and google). It's much easier if you've set up ssh keys to facilitate fast ssh usage, preferably using a per-session passphrase, or whatever your security needs require.
Other examples:
ls | ssh desktopIpAddress pbcopy
pwd | ssh desktopIpAddress pbcopy
For convenience, I've created a bash file to shorten the text required after the pipe:
#!/bin/bash
ssh desktop pbcopy
In my case, i'm using a specially named key
I saved it with the file name cb (my mnemonic (ClipBoard). Put the script somewhere in your path, make it executable and voila:
ls | cb
Found a great solution that doesn't require a reverse ssh connection!
You can use xclip on the remote host, along with ssh X11 forwarding & XQuartz on the OSX system.
To set this up:
Install XQuartz (I did this with soloist + pivotal_workstation::xquartz recipe, but you don't have to)
Run XQuartz.app
Open XQuartz Preferences (+,)
Make sure "Enable Syncing" and "Update Pasteboard when CLIPBOARD changes" are checked
ssh -X remote-host "echo 'hello from remote-host' | xclip -selection clipboard"
Reverse tunnel port on ssh server
All the existing solutions either need:
X11 on the client (if you have it, xclip on the server works great) or
the client and server to be in the same network (which is not the case if you're at work trying to access your home computer).
Here's another way to do it, though you'll need to modify how you ssh into your computer.
I've started using this and it's nowhere near as intimidating as it looks so give it a try.
Client (ssh session startup)
ssh username#server.com -R 2000:localhost:2000
(hint: make this a keybinding so you don't have to type it)
Client (another tab)
nc -l 2000 | pbcopy
Note: if you don't have pbcopy then just tee it to a file.
Server (inside SSH session)
cat some_useful_content.txt | nc localhost 2000
Other notes
Actually even if you're in the middle of an ssh session there's a way to start a tunnel but i don’t want to scare people away from what really isn’t as bad as it looks. But I'll add the details later if I see any interest
There are various tools to access X11 selections, including xclip and XSel. Note that X11 traditionally has multiple selections, and most programs have some understanding of both the clipboard and primary selection (which are not the same). Emacs can work with the secondary selection too, but that's rare, and nobody really knows what to do with cut buffers...
$ xclip -help
Usage: xclip [OPTION] [FILE]...
Access an X server selection for reading or writing.
-i, -in read text into X selection from standard input or files
(default)
-o, -out prints the selection to standard out (generally for
piping to a file or program)
-l, -loops number of selection requests to wait for before exiting
-d, -display X display to connect to (eg localhost:0")
-h, -help usage information
-selection selection to access ("primary", "secondary", "clipboard" or "buffer-cut")
-noutf8 don't treat text as utf-8, use old unicode
-version version information
-silent errors only, run in background (default)
-quiet run in foreground, show what's happening
-verbose running commentary
Report bugs to <astrand#lysator.liu.se>
$ xsel -help
Usage: xsel [options]
Manipulate the X selection.
By default the current selection is output and not modified if both
standard input and standard output are terminals (ttys). Otherwise,
the current selection is output if standard output is not a terminal
(tty), and the selection is set from standard input if standard input
is not a terminal (tty). If any input or output options are given then
the program behaves only in the requested mode.
If both input and output is required then the previous selection is
output before being replaced by the contents of standard input.
Input options
-a, --append Append standard input to the selection
-f, --follow Append to selection as standard input grows
-i, --input Read standard input into the selection
Output options
-o, --output Write the selection to standard output
Action options
-c, --clear Clear the selection
-d, --delete Request that the selection be cleared and that
the application owning it delete its contents
Selection options
-p, --primary Operate on the PRIMARY selection (default)
-s, --secondary Operate on the SECONDARY selection
-b, --clipboard Operate on the CLIPBOARD selection
-k, --keep Do not modify the selections, but make the PRIMARY
and SECONDARY selections persist even after the
programs they were selected in exit.
-x, --exchange Exchange the PRIMARY and SECONDARY selections
X options
--display displayname
Specify the connection to the X server
-t ms, --selectionTimeout ms
Specify the timeout in milliseconds within which the
selection must be retrieved. A value of 0 (zero)
specifies no timeout (default)
Miscellaneous options
-l, --logfile Specify file to log errors to when detached.
-n, --nodetach Do not detach from the controlling terminal. Without
this option, xsel will fork to become a background
process in input, exchange and keep modes.
-h, --help Display this help and exit
-v, --verbose Print informative messages
--version Output version information and exit
Please report bugs to <conrad#vergenet.net>.
In short, you should try xclip -i/xclip -o or xclip -i -sel clip/xclip -o -sel clip or xsel -i/xsel -o or xsel -i -b/xsel -o -b, depending on what you want.
If you use iTerm2 on the Mac, there is an easier way. This functionality is built into iTerm2's Shell Integration capabilities via the it2copy command:
Usage: it2copy
Copies to clipboard from standard input
it2copy filename
Copies to clipboard from file
To make it work, choose iTerm2-->Install Shell Integration menu item while logged into the remote host, to install it to your own account. Once that is done, you'll have access to it2copy, as well as a bunch of other aliased commands that provide cool functionality.
The other solutions here are good workarounds but this one is so painless in comparison.
This is my solution based on SSH reverse tunnel, netcat and xclip.
First create script (eg. clipboard-daemon.sh) on your workstation:
#!/bin/bash
HOST=127.0.0.1
PORT=3333
NUM=`netstat -tlpn 2>/dev/null | grep -c " ${HOST}:${PORT} "`
if [ $NUM -gt 0 ]; then
exit
fi
while [ true ]; do
nc -l ${HOST} ${PORT} | xclip -selection clipboard
done
and start it in background.
./clipboard-daemon.sh&
It will start nc piping output to xclip and respawning process after receiving portion of data
Then start ssh connection to remote host:
ssh user#host -R127.0.0.1:3333:127.0.0.1:3333
While logged in on remote box, try this:
echo "this is test" >/dev/tcp/127.0.0.1/3333
then try paste on your workstation
You can of course write wrapper script that starts clipboard-daemon.sh first and then ssh session. This is how it works for me. Enjoy.
Allow me to add a solution that if I'm not mistaken was not suggested before.
It does not require the client to be exposed to the internet (no reverse connections), nor does it use any xlibs on the server and is implemented completely using ssh's own capabilities (no 3rd party bins)
It involves:
Opening a connection to the remote host, then creating a fifo file on it and waiting on that fifo in parallel (same actual TCP connection for everything).
Anything you echo to that fifo file ends up in your local clipboard.
When the session is done, remove the fifo file on the server and cleanly terminate the connections together.
The solution utilizes ssh's ControlMaster functionality to use just one TCP connection for everything so it will even support hosts that require a password to login and prompt you for it just once.
Edit: as requested, the code itself:
Paste the following into your bashrc and use sshx host to connect.
On the remote machine echo SOMETHING > ~/clip and hopefully, SOMETHING will end up in the local host's clipboard.
You will need the xclip utility on your local host.
_dt_term_socket_ssh() {
ssh -oControlPath=$1 -O exit DUMMY_HOST
}
function sshx {
local t=$(mktemp -u --tmpdir ssh.sock.XXXXXXXXXX)
local f="~/clip"
ssh -f -oControlMaster=yes -oControlPath=$t $# tail\ -f\ /dev/null || return 1
ssh -S$t DUMMY_HOST "bash -c 'if ! [ -p $f ]; then mkfifo $f; fi'" \
|| { _dt_term_socket_ssh $t; return 1; }
(
set -e
set -o pipefail
while [ 1 ]; do
ssh -S$t -tt DUMMY_HOST "cat $f" 2>/dev/null | xclip -selection clipboard
done &
)
ssh -S$t DUMMY_HOST \
|| { _dt_term_socket_ssh $t; return 1; }
ssh -S$t DUMMY_HOST "rm $f"
_dt_term_socket_ssh $t
}
More detailed explanation is on my website:
https://xicod.com/2021/02/09/clipboard-over-ssh.html
The simplest solution of all, if you're on OS X using Terminal and you've been ssh'ing around in a remote server and wish to grab the results of a text file or a log or a csv, simply:
1) Cmd-K to clear the output of the terminal
2) cat <filename> to display the contents of the file
3) Cmd-S to save the Terminal Output
You'll have the manually remove the first line and last line of the file, but this method is a bit simpler than relying on other packages to be installed, "reverse tunnels" and trying to have a static IP, etc.
This answer develops both upon the chosen answer by adding more security.
That answer discussed the general form
<command that makes output> | \
ssh <user A>#<host A> <command that maps stdin to clipboard>
Where security may be lacking is in the ssh permissions allowing <user B> on host B> to ssh into host A and execute any command.
Of course B to A access may already be gated by an ssh key, and it may even have a password. But another layer of security can restrict the scope of allowable commands that B can execute on A, e.g. so that rm -rf / cannot be called. (This is especially important when the ssh key doesn't have a password.)
Fortunately, ssh has a built-in feature called command restriction or forced command. See ssh.com, or
this serverfault.com question.
The solution below shows the general form solution along with ssh command restriction enforced.
Example Solution with command restriction added
This security enhanced solution follows the general form - the call from the ssh session on host-B is simply:
cat <file> | ssh <user-A>#<host A> to_clipboard
The rest of this shows the setup to get that to work.
Setup of ssh command restriction
Suppose the user account on B is user-B, and B has an ssh key id-clip, that has been created in the usual way (ssh-keygen).
Then in user-A's ssh directory there is a file
/home/user-A/.ssh/authorized_keys
that recognizes the key id-clip and allows ssh connection.
Usually the contents of each line authorized_keys is exactly the public key being authorized, e.g., the contents of id-clip.pub.
However, to enforce command restriction that public key content is prepended (on the same line) by the command to be executed.
In our case:
command="/home/user-A/.ssh/allowed-commands.sh id-clip",no-agent-forwarding,no-port-forwarding,no-user-rc,no-x11-forwarding,no-pty <content of file id-clip.pub>
The designated command "/home/user-A/.ssh/allowed-commands.sh id-clip", and only that designated command, is executed whenever key id-clip is used initiate an ssh connection to host-A - no matter what command is written the ssh command line.
The command indicates a script file allowed-commands.sh, and the contents of that that script file is
#/bin/bash
#
# You can have only one forced command in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys. Use this
# wrapper to allow several commands.
Id=${1}
case "$SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND" in
"to-clipboard")
notify-send "ssh to-clipboard, from ${Id}"
cat | xsel --display :0 -i -b
;;
*)
echo "Access denied"
exit 1
;;
esac
The original call to ssh on machine B was
... | ssh <user-A>#<host A> to_clipboard
The string to-clipboard is passed to allowed-commands.sh by the environment variable SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND.
Addition, we have passed the name of the key, id-clip, from the line in authorized_keyswhich is only accessed by id-clip.
The line
notify-send "ssh to-clipboard, from ${Id}"
is just a popup messagebox to let you know the clipboard is being written - that's probably a good security feature too. (notify-send works on Ubuntu 18.04, maybe not others).
In the line
cat | xsel --display :0 -i -b
the parameter --display :0 is necessary because the process doesn't have it's own X display with a clipboard,
so it must be specificied explicitly. This value :0 happens to work on Ubuntu 18.04 with Wayland window server. On other setups it might not work. For a standard X server this answer might help.
host-A /etc/ssh/sshd_config parameters
Finally a few parameters in /etc/ssh/sshd_config on host A that should be set to ensure permission to connect, and permission to use ssh-key only without password:
PubkeyAuthentication yes
PasswordAuthentication no
ChallengeResponseAuthentication no
AllowUsers user-A
To make the sshd server re-read the config
sudo systemctl restart sshd.service
or
sudo service sshd.service restart
conclusion
It's some effort to set it up, but other functions besides to-clipboard can be constructed in parallel the same framework.
Not a one-liner, but requires no extra ssh.
install netcat if necessary
use termbin: cat ~/some_file.txt | nc termbin.com 9999. This will copy the output to the termbin website and prints the URL to your output.
visit that url from your computer, you get your output
Of course, do not use it for sensitive content.
#rhileighalmgren solution is good, but pbcopy will annoyingly copy last "\n" character, I use "head" to strip out last character to prevent this:
#!/bin/bash
head -c -1 | ssh desktop pbcopy
My full solution is here : http://taylor.woodstitch.com/linux/copy-local-clipboard-remote-ssh-server/
Far Manager Linux port supports synchronizing clipboard between local and remote host. You just open local far2l, do "ssh somehost" inside, run remote far2l in that ssh session and get remote far2l working with your local clipboard.
It supports Linux, *BSD and OS X; I made a special putty build to utilize this functionality from windows also.
For anyone googling their way to this:
The best solution in this day and age seem to be lemonade
Various solutions is also mentioned in the neovim help text for clipboard-tool
If you're working over e.g. a pod in a Kubernetes cluster and not direct SSH, so that there is no way for your to do a file transfer, you could use cat and then save the terminal output as text. For example in macOS you can do Shell -> Export as text.