I am trying to add a page (homepage) in an orchard recipe that contains an image in HTML. However, the full URL of the image is dependent upon the deployment.
How can I use the base URL of the site in the recipe?
So far I've got this:
<Data>
<Page Id="/alias=" Status="Published">
<BodyPart Text="<p><img alt="" src="~/Media/Default/Page/Homepage.png" width="100%" /></p>" />
<CommonPart Owner="/User.UserName=admin" />
<AutoroutePart Alias="/" CustomPattern="/" UseCustomPattern="true" />
<TitlePart Title="Home" />
</Page>
</Data>
But the normal ~ doesn't resolve to the base url.
Ideas?
Recipes don't support tokens or dynamic values, but that would definitely be a nice feature.
For now you will either have to implement such functionality yourself, or you could leave the url as is (starting with the tilde), and implement an IHtmlFilter that will actually process relative values at runtime.
Related
Our site have Google Custom Search set up. Instructions from Google have been followed, including downloading the CSE.xml file and adding “a new attribute enable_nocontent_tag="true" to the CustomSearchEngine tag”. The rest of the CSE file is left to default. The Search engine keywords field have been left empty. The “nocontent” class have been added to the menu and the underlying menu items which exists on all pages. The page have been running with the “nocontent” class on the menu for 2 weeks.
The problem is that if the searchterm occurs in the menu it will then appear in the results.
This is an example of our menu html:
<header class="nocontent page-head">
<nav class="main-nav-section">
<ul>
<li class="nocontent">
###
</li>
</ul>
</nav>
</header>
When we go to Google Search Console under the menu item “Crawl” and use Fetch as Google, then the html comes up as expected with the “nocontent” class on the menu.
This is our cse.xml file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<CustomSearchEngine id="###" creator="###" language="da" encoding="UTF-8" enable_suggest="true" enable_nocontent_tag="true">
<Title>###</Title>
<Description>###</Description>
<Context>
<BackgroundLabels>
<Label name="_cse_hinwieyku6m" mode="FILTER" />
<Label name="_cse_exclude_hinwieyku6m" mode="ELIMINATE" />
</BackgroundLabels>
</Context>
<LookAndFeel nonprofit="false" element_layout="1" theme="7" custom_theme="true" text_font="Arial, sans-serif" url_length="full" element_branding="show" enable_cse_thumbnail="true" promotion_url_length="full" ads_layout="1">
<Logo />
<Colors url="#008000" background="#FFFFFF" border="#FFFFFF" title="#0000CC" text="#000000" visited="#0000CC" title_hover="#0000CC" title_active="#0000CC" />
<Promotions title_color="#0000CC" title_visited_color="#0000CC" url_color="#008000" background_color="#FFFFFF" border_color="#336699" snippet_color="#000000" title_hover_color="#0000CC" title_active_color="#0000CC" />
<SearchControls input_border_color="#D9D9D9" button_border_color="#666666" button_background_color="#CECECE" tab_border_color="#E9E9E9" tab_background_color="#E9E9E9" tab_selected_border_color="#FF9900" tab_selected_background_color="#FFFFFF" />
<Results border_color="#FFFFFF" border_hover_color="#FFFFFF" background_color="#FFFFFF" background_hover_color="#FFFFFF" ads_background_color="#fff7f5" ads_border_color="#FFFFFF" />
</LookAndFeel>
<AdSense />
<EnterpriseAccount />
<ImageSearchSettings enable="false" />
<autocomplete_settings />
<sort_by_keys label="Relevance" key="" />
<sort_by_keys label="Date" key="date" />
<cse_advance_settings enable_speech="true" />
</CustomSearchEngine>
Note: I'm assuming that your question is the following statement:
The problem is that if the searchterm occurs in the menu it will then appear in the results.
I think you might be misinterpreting the purpose of the nocontent class. The documentation says:
When Google Custom Search sees this tag, we'll ignore any keywords it contains and won't take them into account when calculating ranking for your Custom Search engine.
At the end of that document is also the following section:
Using nocontent won't impact your site's performance in Google Web Search, or our crawling of your site, in any way. We'll continue to follow any links in tagged content; we just won't use keywords to calculate ranking for your Custom Search engine.
So, the purpose of nocontent is not to prevent the included content from appearing in your CSE results but just to prevent any keywords in the included content from influencing the ranking of the results.
You can find some more discussion on this topic in the Google Custom Search support forums, for example in this thread.
P.S. There is a different product, the Google Search Appliance, which does support excluding content from indexing via googleoff/googleon tags.
I'm trying to leverage Import/Export module to import taxonomies and taxonomy terms like so
<Orchard>
<Data>
<Taxonomy Id="/Identifier=Product-Categories" Status="Published">
<AutoroutePart Alias="eshop/categories" UseCustomPattern="false" />
<IdentityPart Identifier="Product-Categories" />
<TitlePart Title="Product Categories" />
<TaxonomyPart TermTypeName="ProductCategoriesTerm" />
</Taxonomy>
<ProductCategoriesTerm Id="/Identifier=Category-1" Status="Published">
<AutoroutePart UseCustomPattern="false" />
<IdentityPart Identifier="Category-1" />
<TitlePart Title="Test category" />
<TermPart Count="0" Selectable="true" Weight="1" TaxonomyId="/Identifier=Product-Categories" Path="" />
</ProductCategoriesTerm>
</Data>
</Orchard>
ProductCategoriesTerm when created through dashboard has default pattern
{Content.Container.Path}/{Content.Slug} ### my-taxonomy/my-term/sub-term
but importing terms makes them to use just {Content.Slug} ... How do I instruct AutoroutePart to use the default pattern? Tried UseCustomPattern="false" or exclude AutoroutePart with no effect it's just test-category instead of eshop/categories/test-category and won't regenerate even if if I set AutouroutePart to automatically regenerate when editing content and disable custom patterns and it won't revert to default pattern even if I try to publish it through dashboard.
Also it's mandatory to include "Count" for the TermPart when importing, does it affect anything? Sounds like something that should be dynamic and relevant only with export.
When importing taxonomy terms (and I guess any other part that has a container) it's necessary to specify Container for the common part. Without it Container for the part is null and therefore can't resolve {Content.Container.Path} in the alias pattern.
<CommonPart Container="/Identifier=Product-Categories" />
Or if it's nested term then Container is the parent term.
I have added a content type in my custom orchard recipe but when I try to create an instance of that content type within the recipe nothing happens.
Declaration:
<Metadata>
<Types>
<Speedbump ContentTypeSettings.Creatable="True" ContentTypeSettings.Draftable="True" TypeIndexing.Indexes="Search">
<TitlePart />
<BodyPart />
<CommonPart />
</Speedbump>
</Types>
<Parts>
<BodyPart BodyPartSettings.FlavorDefault="html" />
</Parts>
</Metadata>
Creation:
<Command>
Speedbump create /Slug:"valid-url" /Title:"Valid URL" /Path:"valid-url" /Homepage:false /Publish:true /UseWelcomeText:false
</Command>
Any ideas as to why this isn't working? I can go into the site after it is created and my speedbump type is defined and creatable but the instance that should have been created by the recipe doesn't exist. Thank you.
This isn't how you create content items in recipes. You add xml in the <Data> tag like so:
<Data>
<Speedbump Id="" Status="Published">
<BodyPart Text="Hello this needs to be encoded" />
<CommonPart Owner="/User.UserName=admin" CreatedUtc="2014-09-05T16:09:13Z" PublishedUtc="2014-09-05T16:15:43Z" ModifiedUtc="2014-09-05T16:15:43Z" />
<TitlePart Title="My Page" />
</Speedbump>
</Data>
For any custom parts, you will need to implement Import and Export functions in your driver method. Check core modules for good examples
I am facing problem with rewriting urls using pretty-config.xml and I want help. This is what I want.
I want to render the URL as:
http://www.example.com/{productId}
and the page actual URL is:
http://www.example.com/page/product.jsf
In short, I have one page but I want to render it each time as different url based on product id from the backing bean.
Sounds fairly simple. I would use this:
<url-mapping>
<pattern value="/#{productId}" />
<view-id value="/pages/product.jsf" />
</url-mapping>
Just make sure that you generate the correct links in your pages upon rendering.
Is there any way to have a custom recipe add some text and image fields to the page? It looks like part of the recipe handles commands, but I can't find any commands that do this at # http://docs.orchardproject.net/Documentation/Using-the-command-line-interface
Update
Thanks for the response Bertrand, but there are some issues with that.
I exported everything for a recipe from a tenant that has 1. added fields, 2. added parts to the Page along with 3. an added List and 4. an added container widget to the Default layer that shows the list.
<Metadata>
<Types>
<Page ContentTypeSettings.Draftable="True" TypeIndexing.Included="true">
<TagsPart />
<LocalizationPart />
<TitlePart/>
<AutoroutePart />
<ContainablePart />
<AmazonProductsPart />
<YouTubeVideosPart />
</Page>
</Types>
<Parts>
<BodyPart BodyPartSettings.FlavorDefault="html" />
<Page ContentPartSettings.Attachable="True">
<Thumbnail.ImageField DisplayName="Thumbnail" ImageFieldSettings.MaxHeight="75" ImageFieldSettings.MaxWidth="75" ImageFieldSettings.Required="False" ImageFieldSettings.AlternateText="True" ImageFieldSettings.ResizeAction="Validate" />
<PageImage.ImageField DisplayName="PageImage" ImageFieldSettings.MaxHeight="250" ImageFieldSettings.MaxWidth="0" ImageFieldSettings.Required="False" ImageFieldSettings.AlternateText="True" ImageFieldSettings.ResizeAction="Resize" />
<PreContent.TextField DisplayName="PreContent" ImageFieldSettings.MaxHeight="0" ImageFieldSettings.MaxWidth="0" ImageFieldSettings.Required="False" ImageFieldSettings.AlternateText="False" ImageFieldSettings.ResizeAction="Validate" TextFieldSettings.Flavor="Html" TextFieldSettings.Required="False" />
<PostContent.TextField DisplayName="PostContent" ImageFieldSettings.MaxHeight="0" ImageFieldSettings.MaxWidth="0" ImageFieldSettings.Required="False" ImageFieldSettings.AlternateText="False" ImageFieldSettings.ResizeAction="Validate" TextFieldSettings.Flavor="Html" TextFieldSettings.Required="False" />
</Page>
</Parts>
</Metadata>
...
<Data>
<List Id="/alias=page-list" Status="Published">
<CommonPart Owner="/User.UserName=admin" CreatedUtc="2012-05-26T22:52:20Z" PublishedUtc="2012-05-26T22:57:37Z" ModifiedUtc="2012-05-26T22:57:37Z" />
<AutoroutePart Alias="page-list" UseCustomPattern="false" />
<AdminMenuPart AdminMenuPosition="2" OnAdminMenu="false" />
<MenuPart MenuText="Page List" MenuPosition="3" OnMainMenu="false" />
<ContainerPart ItemContentType="Page" ItemsShown="true" Paginated="true" PageSize="10" OrderByProperty="CommonPart.CreatedUtc" OrderByDirection="1" />
<TitlePart Title="Page List" />
</List>
<ContainerWidget Id="" Status="Published">
<CommonPart Owner="/User.UserName=admin" Container="/Layer.LayerName=Default" CreatedUtc="2012-05-26T22:55:42Z" PublishedUtc="2012-05-26T22:55:42Z" ModifiedUtc="2012-05-26T22:55:42Z" />
<WidgetPart Title="Page List" Position="1" Zone="AsideFirst" RenderTitle="false" />
<ContainerWidgetPart Container="/alias=page-list" PageSize="5" OrderByProperty="CommonPart.CreatedUtc" OrderByDirection="1" ApplyFilter="false" FilterByProperty="CustomPropertiesPart.CustomOne" FilterByOperator="=" />
</ContainerWidget>
</Data>
I then inject that into a copy of the default recipe with the appropriate modules activated.
When creating a new tenant from that recipe,
All the modules are enabled, good
The list is created, good
The page has the added parts, good
The page does not have the added fields, bad
The container widget does not exist, bad
It looks like the part fields are not added, and the widget was not created.
I did another simple test, and it looks like a bug?
Repro Steps:
Add fields to the page
Add a widget
Export everything
delete the widget
Import the exported xml
Expected: The widget to be back
Actual: the widget is still missing
is the recipe suppose to honor page fields and widgets, did I do something wrong, or is this a bug?
Update
Okay, this has to be a bug. When manually adding the fields, I get this message even though it isn't showing the fields: "A field with the same name already exists."
You don't need a command, this is supported by recipes without that. The easiest way to get an example is to add a field from the admin UI, and then export the metadata and examine the recipe that created.