I am deploying Orchard to Azure cloud services (webrole) without any code changes to the official stable release. However, when I navigate to that freshly deployed Orchard cloud service (webrole), I see a YSOD with Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.WindowsAzure.ServiceRuntime, Version=1.7.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
As a work around, if I enable Local Copy=True (i.e. modify source), then this specific YSOD goes but is replaced by another one for msshrtmi). But more importantly, I'm able to deploy the pre-built downloaded Orchard Azure (1.7, prebuilt off same GIT src tag), without issues, so I'd rather fix the root issue than go down a rabbit hole of workarounds and drift further from the official sources.
How I'm running into this issue:
Download source from GIT (http://orchard.codeplex.com/SourceControl/latest, I used commit 5e0c26f73cf5, )
Run ClickToBuildAzurePackage.cmd script
Edit buildazure\Stage\ServiceConfiguration.cscfg to put in connection string's to point to the real Azure storage account (vs Local Storage).
Deploy both the files in buildazure\Stage to Azure via the windowsazure.com portal
Navigate to site (eg: http://OrchardTest.cloudapp.net)
Enjoy the yellow-screen-of-death :(
Our local build system:
Windows 8, x64
VS2012.3
Azure SDK 1.7, 1.8, 2.0
Question:
Has anyone deployed to Azure successfully? Any ideas how to resolve this issue?
There should never be a need to CopyLocal True on the Azure Service Runtime. That is automatically included in the package, defined by your Cloud Services project (In this case, Orchard.Azure.CloudService). And actually, I could imagine that CopyLocal True might cause issues if the bin contains a different version of the Service Runtime than the Azure package was built under.
Orchard Azure uses the Azure 2.0 libraries. It shows that you have the 2.0 SDK installed because you can compile the Orchard.Azure.CloudService project to make a package. Cloud Service projects have different a project guid for each version of the Azure tools, so without the v2.0 SDK, it would be an unknown project type. However, with your Orchard website picking up ServiceRuntime v1.7, it seems that something is amiss with your local environment, as it should still identify with v2.0.
When you open Orchard.Azure.sln, check the Properties on the Microsoft.WindowsAzure.ServiceRuntime reference within the Orchard.Azure.Web project. What is the version that Visual Studio lists on that reference? It should be 2.0.0. If it does not, my best recommendation would be to reinstall the 2.0 Libraries.
The deployment steps as you have defined work just fine with no YSOD. I successfully tried it just before writing this; it did not reproduce your issue.
Related
We build our web app with Azure DevOps pipelines and deploy into Azure with an Azure DevOps release. I think today netcore got updated to netcore 3.1.4 on our build agent. But now our Azure DevOps deployment fails, because the netcore 3.1.4 runtime is not yet installed on our app service in Azure.
The error message we are getting:
Could not find 'aspnetcorev2_inprocess.dll'. Exception message:
It was not possible to find any compatible framework version
The framework 'Microsoft.AspNetCore.App', version '3.1.4' was not found.
- The following frameworks were found:
2.2.8 at [D:\Program Files\dotnet\shared\Microsoft.AspNetCore.App]
3.0.3 at [D:\Program Files\dotnet\shared\Microsoft.AspNetCore.App]
3.1.1 at [D:\Program Files\dotnet\shared\Microsoft.AspNetCore.App]
3.1.3 at [D:\Program Files\dotnet\shared\Microsoft.AspNetCore.App]
You can resolve the problem by installing the specified framework and/or SDK.
This makes sense and can happen, but what is the best way to go about fixing this?
I could fix my build to a specific netcore version. But I don't like this, because we do want to keep updating to newer versions, but we don't want a version that is not available in Azure app service.
Am I correct in thinking that we would have to install our services self contained, because otherwise we could get into this issue more often when Azure DevOps is faster with installing patches than Azure?
Or is there a way to force update Azure app service to the new netcore 3.1.4 security patch which would be ideal I think?
I just need some guidance in what is the best approach to fix this issue?
Or is there a way to force update Azure app service to the new netcore 3.1.4 security patch which would be ideal I think?
AFAIK, there is no such a way to force update Azure app service to the new netcore 3.1.4.
We could keep track on the latest releases on the https://aspnetcoreon.azurewebsites.net/, but we could not update it at this moment.
To resolve this issue, we recommend that you publish your app as self-contained produces an application, which includes the .NET Core runtime and libraries, and your application and its dependencies. Users of the application can run it on a machine that doesn't have the .NET Core runtime installed.
Publishing your app as self-contained produces a platform-specific executable. The output publishing folder contains all components of the app, including the .NET Core libraries and target runtime. The app is isolated from other .NET Core apps and doesn't use a locally installed shared runtime. The user of your app isn't required to download and install .NET Core.
You could check this document .NET Core application publishing overview for some more details.
Hope this helps.
If you want version of netcore to be automatically updated as an updated version is available, building our service as self-container seems like a good option: no need to have anything installed on the machine running (ie the version on Azure DevOps and Azure Web App don't have to match).
The main downside of this approach is that the build is going to less deterministic: running your build twice with on the same commit might create different binaries depending on what is currently install on the build agent. if you want to know more, here is an interesting post arguing about why deterministic build is important.
To keep the build determinitic, you can use the Use .Net Core task at the beginning of the build (that will make sure that the desired version of the dotnet sdk is on the agent). You could also add a global.json in your repository to lock for both the build on your dev box and in Azure Dev Ops.
This is a common topic of discussion, and you can find a lot of blogs advocating one or another side.
There were big discussions started when Microsoft released LTS net core 3.1 and it took some time before Azure start supporting the 3.1 runtime as well.
You could find a lot of blogs strongly suggesting to deploy your web apps as self-contained (runtime is ~100MB in size) and cut loose the dependency towards Microsoft supporting the latest runtime. While others advocate that the applications should remain as light weight as possible and the runtime should be set in the pipeline. But that is still up on you. I, myself prefer to deploy self-contained apps after my bad experience with net-core 3.1.
There is no established best practice.
In the past , I've run into the same situation, you can fix this by manually setting the value from RunTime Stack drop down. If you manually update the build processes .yml file
RuntimeStack: 'DOTNETCORE|3.1'
I just upgraded my app to use the latest Microsoft.SqlServer.Types package v14 from v13. This resulted in an well-documented runtime error. The reason here would be missing native libraries:
Spatial types and functions are not available for this provider because the assembly 'Microsoft.SqlServer.Types' version 10 or higher could not be found
The Nuget package also contains the native DLLs that were missing, so I could theoretically copy them to my bin folder and load them through my code, but:
I didn't have to do that with my v13 binaries
When I deployed the updated project to Azure, it ran just fine.
My current assumption would be that I got the v13 binaries with my local SQL install, and on Azure, those binaries (both v13 / v14) are preinstalled.
However, when googling a bit about the issue, most developers have the opposite problem of things not working on Azure due to the missing libs, so I wonder whether not going the manual route might be dangerous with regards to Azure deployments. If anybody had some insight here, that would be awesome!
As far as I know, the azure web service install the SQL server SDK version is 9.0 - 13.0. So you need install 14.0 by yourself.
You could find the dll in the kudu console in your web service.
D:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\130\SDK\Assemblies>
To open the kudu you could refer to below steps:
1.Find the Advanced Tools in DEVELOPMENT TOOLS click go.
2.Click dubug console's cmd.
3.Find the path.
Notice: You need firstly type cd.. to locate the root path.
You could find the Microsoft.SqlServer file as below:
Out of nowhere I started getting this error when I try to deploy my project to cloud service (using continuous deployment and hosted build controller.
C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v14.0\Windows Azure Tools\2.5\Microsoft.WindowsAzure.targets (2917): Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.WindowsAzure.Packaging, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
I found this SO question, but it didn't help me.
Also I noticed I didn't even have folder:
C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v14.0\
I only have v10.0, v11.0, v12.0, so I manually created v14.0 and copied folder Windows Azure Tools form v12.0 but it didn't help.
EDIT
I've updated Azure tools to 2.6 but the problem and error message remains the same.
How can I fix this ?
I had the same error occurring today on Visual Studio Online's Host Build Controller. I assume you are using the same thing by your talk of Azure & Continuous Integration.
I noticed that they just released Azure SDK 2.6 support on the build controller in the last day or so. I feel that this may have somehow caused the problem.
I updated my cloud project to use 2.6, checked in, and everything was fine again. Some ccproj details:
<PropertyGroup>
<VisualStudioVersion Condition=" '$(VisualStudioVersion)' == '' ">10.0</VisualStudioVersion>
<CloudExtensionsDir Condition=" '$(CloudExtensionsDir)' == '' ">$(MSBuildExtensionsPath)\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v$(VisualStudioVersion)\Windows Azure Tools\2.6\</CloudExtensionsDir>
</PropertyGroup>
do you updated your Azure SDK for .NET to 2.5.1?
I have experienced this issue before when I updated the Azure SDK for .NET to 2.5.1
Microsoft has just recently release Azure SDK for .NET version 2.6 and I suggest you should try this. I believe this should solve your problem.
"try adding /p:GenerateBuildInfoConfigFile=false to your msbuild arguments in addition to /p:VisualStudioVersion=12.0, that has helped others workaround that same issue."
from here: https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/fc434580-cf81-44eb-9382-cd1b9fc9583a/microsoft-azure-sdk-v26-issue-with-cloud-builds?forum=TFService
Update Azure SDK to version 2.6 and after, update your Azure project's Application.
You can do this within the project's properties, by clicking the button to update Microsoft Azure Tools version from 2.5.1 to 2.6.
Unfortunately, due to issues with Azure's lack of EF 5 spatial support, I need to include the relevant DLL myself: related link
Once I included the SqlServerSpatial.dll I was able to complete successfully deploy by using the Publish tool inside of Visual Studio.
However, when I try to use the Github -> Azure deployment with the relevant DLLs being available in the github repro, the deployment fails with the message:
The process cannot access the file 'C:\DWASFiles\Sites\<my app name>\VirtualDirectory0
\site\wwwroot\bin\SqlServerSpatial.dll' because it is being used by another process.
I'm not really sure how to troubleshoot from here and could use some help. Thanks!
use nuget package manager instead of adding the dll and pushing dlls using git.
PM> Install-Package Microsoft.SqlServer.Types
Ignore the bin folder from git by adding bin/ in .gitignore file
usually adding dlls in source control causing issues and its not a good behavior.
We use TeamCity as our CI server (but I imagine this applies to any build server).
We have not installed the azure SDK on the build server and are able to build the projects which use the SDK using the workaround described here.
I now want the server to produce the packages for deployment to Azure, but when I run an MSBuild task to create the packages (as directed here) I get a strange error
error MSB4057: The target "WatGetTargetFrameworkDirectories" does not exist in the project.
which yields few useful google results.
Do I need to install the SDK? Or is this error related to something else?
WatGetTargetFrameworkDirectories is a target from AzureSDKs .targets file. Looks like your error related to Azure SDK.
Except it could be more subtle error related to not very good msbuild Azure Targets. For our own azure packaging we did need to call 2 targets "Clean;CorePublish", not just "Publish". Maybe this will also help you.
Side note: why you don't want to install AzureSDK on TeamCity BuildAgent? Build agents made exactly for that - to have frameworks you need for build. Also 1.6 and 1.7 AzureSDKs can be installed side-by-side.