gcc 4.8.1 will not make - linux

I have a new installation of Ubuntu linux and I am trying to update my gcc complier. The latest gcc compiler depends on gmp, mpfr, and mpc, so I downloaded those and placed the source into the gcc 4.8.1 source folder, as instructed.
configure seems to have run just fine. I did not include any options, because none seemed appropriate. I just ran with the defaults.
When I run make, I get the following error:
configure: error: C++ compiler missing or inoperational
make[2]: \*** [configure-stage1-libcpp] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/clay/programming/C++/gcc-4.8.1'
make[1]: \*** [stage1-bubble] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/clay/programming/C++/gcc-4.8.1'
make: \*** [all] Error 2
I am running out of a terminal window as root, and I did a make distclean and tried a second time, but no dice. I know it can find both gcc and cc because it says so in the make output.
Any ideas?

You need a C++ compiler to build GCC. On Ubuntu, the C++ compiler is in the package g++, separate from gcc (which is a C compiler, not a C++ compiler), so be sure to:
sudo apt-get install g++

first you should ensure a C++ compiler to build on your machine
yum install gcc-c++

Related

How to solve "cstring: No such file or directory" when compiling gcc from source?

I am trying to compile a gcc from source since I cannot use yum, apt-get and so forth. My steps are simple:
-I download the source GCC (I tried gcc-4.8.4 and gcc-5.3.0) in my pc and I used:
./contrib/download_prerequisites
-After this, I send this my gcc source file to my system using powerPC y Linux.
mkdir objdir
cd objdir
../gcc-4.6.2/configure --prefix=/usr --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,go
make
I have got the next error:
In file included from ../../gcc-4.9.2/gcc/genmddeps.c:19:0:
../../gcc-4.9.2/gcc/system.h:205:20: fatal error: cstring: No such file or directory
# include <cstring>
^
compilation terminated.
make[3]: *** [build/genmddeps.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/root/build/gcc'
make[2]: *** [all-stage1-gcc] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/root/build'
make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/root/build'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Any idea about what it is going wrong?
Best regards
Some advice: first, compile (notably for learning purposes) something simpler than GCC, e.g. GNU make if you never compiled GNU stuff from source code.
Then compile a recent GCC (so 5.3 in january 2016) - building issues would be the same with 4.8, and GCC 5 is better! You need the gcc & libc-dev & g++ & libstdc++-dev for your host machine (the one running your future cross-compiler). I am not sure your --prefix=/usr is a good idea. Consider perhaps a --program-suffix=-mine option (otherwise, your system's /usr/bin/gcc could be overwritten, which you don't want to happen)
You could leave the default --prefix=/usr/local and later add appropriately /usr/local/bin/ into your PATH

Can't build cross compiler

I can't seem to build Rust as a cross-compiler, either on Windows with MSYS2 or on a fresh install of Debian Wheezy. The error is the same for both. I run this configure:
./configure --target=arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf,x86_64-pc-windows-gnu
make works, but then make install fails with:
[...]
prepare: tmp/dist/rustc-1.0.0-dev-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu-image/bin/rustlib/x86_64-pc-windows-gnu/lib/rustdoc-*.dll
prepare: tmp/dist/rustc-1.0.0-dev-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu-image/bin/rustlib/x86_64-pc-windows-gnu/lib/fmt_macros-*.dll
prepare: tmp/dist/rustc-1.0.0-dev-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu-image/bin/rustlib/x86_64-pc-windows-gnu/lib/libmorestack.a
prepare: tmp/dist/rustc-1.0.0-dev-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu-image/bin/rustlib/x86_64-pc-windows-gnu/lib/libcompiler-rt.a
compile: arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/rt/arch/arm/morestack.o
make[1]: arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc: Command not found
/home/Sandro/rust/mk/rt.mk:94: recipe for target 'arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/rt/arch/arm/morestack.o' failed
make[1]: *** [arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/rt/arch/arm/morestack.o] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/Sandro/rust'
/home/Sandro/rust/mk/install.mk:22: recipe for target 'install' failed
make: *** [install] Error 2
Everything builds fine if I don't specify a cross architecture. Am I missing some special configure flag to make this work?
The error message says that make did not find the arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc binary, which is supposed to be a C compiler producing ARM code. That means that you probably don't have any ARM C cross-compilation toolchain installed.
I know Ubuntu has packages for cross compilers (gcc-arm-linux-gnueabihf in 14.04) so Debian may have the same packages. You can also find fully packaged ARM C cross-compilers for Windows and Linux on the Linaro website. If you are building for the Rapsberry Pi, you can also find toolchains to build for Raspbian and Archlinux on https://github.com/raspberrypi/tools.
Here is an example under Linux with a Linaro toolchain (should be distribution-agnostic for the host)
$ wget http://releases.linaro.org/14.11/components/toolchain/binaries/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gcc-linaro-4.9-2014.11-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz
$ tar -xf gcc-linaro-4.9-2014.11-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz
$ export PATH=$PATH:$PWD/gcc-linaro-4.9-2014.11-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf/bin
$ cd <your_configured_rustc_build_directory>
$ make
You can then use the cross compiler with the following line. You can provide the full path to the arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc binary if you don't want to put it in your PATH.
rustc --target=arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf -C linker=arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc hello.rs
If you are using Cargo, you can specify the linker to use for each target in the .cargo/config with this option:
[target.arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf]
linker = "arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc"

Linux Kernel Module Programming Guide - Example 2.4

After issuing a make command to compile Example 2.4 from the Linux Kernel Module Programming Guide, I get the following response:
$ make
make -C /lib/modules/3.11.0-12-generic/build M= modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-12-generic'
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-12-generic/arch/x86/Makefile:107: CONFIG_X86_X32 enabled but no binutils support
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-12-generic/arch/x86 /syscalls/syscall_32.tbl', needed by `arch/x86/syscalls/../include/generated /uapi/asm/unistd_32.h'. Stop.
make[1]: *** [archheaders] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-12-generic'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Here's the content of the appropriate makefile:
obj−m += hello−1.o
obj−m += hello−2.o
all:
make −C /lib/modules/$(shell uname −r)/build M=$(PWD) modules
clean:
make −C /lib/modules/$(shell uname −r)/build M=$(PWD) clean
I'd appreciate any help, since I'm a complete noob regarding the topic.
EDIT: After rewriting the makefile, the compilation succeeded for some mysterious reason.
it looks like conflicts in your setup, you can do following things may work..
1)if your installation is 64-bit then check following file
vim /boot/config-3.8.0-19-generic
CONFIG_X86_X32=y then there is problem
it should CONFIG_X86_X32=n
and CONFIG_X86_X64=y
2)other option is install remove your binutils using apt-get remove binutils and then install again using apt-get install binutils
Rewriting the makefile solved the problem
A common cause of CONFIG_X86_X32 enabled but no binutils support is spaces in the compilation directory, but that's clearly not the issue in your case.
I've had CONFIG_X86_X32 enabled but no binutils support in some cases if the kernel source directory belongs to root and you're running as an unprivileged user. Building with sudo make fixed this for me.

Building icu4c fails due to missing findBasename

I try to cross-compiler icu4c 51.1 with Emscripten (clang) via
emconfigure source/configure --host=i386-pc-linux-gnu --prefix=${myprefix} --enable-static --disable-shared --disable-dyload --disable-renaming CXXFLAGS='-DU_USING_ICU_NAMESPACE=0' CPPFLAGS='-DU_DISABLE_RENAMING=1'
emmake make
emmake make install
It compiles most of the sources fine, but fails with
Unpacking ../source/data/in/icudt51l.dat and generating out/tmp/icudata.lst (list of data files)
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../lib:../stubdata:../tools/ctestfw:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH ../bin/icupkg -d ./out/build/icudt51l --list -x \* ../source/data/in/icudt51l.dat -o out/tmp/icudata.lst
run-detectors: warning: unable to exec /usr/bin/lli-2.8: No such file or directory
run-detectors: warning: unable to exec /usr/bin/lli-2.9: No such file or directory
LLVM ERROR: Program used external function 'findBasename' which could not be resolved!
make[1]: *** [out/tmp/icudata.lst] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/andreas/.emscripten-libs/sources/icu4c/51.1/data'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 2
So I am wondering, where it tries to find findBasename and what this data compiling is all about.
EDIT:
The error messages come from icupkg being built with clang, which does not make sense in this case. How can I specifc that the libraries are built with clang, but the tools with another compiler?
Sounds like it wasn't able to find, I'm guessing, ICU tool utilities lib in ../lib - might try running ldd or equivalent on icupkg

Issue trying to build LLVM and clang

I'm trying to build LLVM and clang on my machine (Ubuntu 12.04). I followed the instructions on http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html up to step 6 (build LLVM and clang). When I make, I get a whole load of warnings about potentially incompatibly plugin versions (to do with dragonegg?). But the whole thing fails with these messages:
llvm[2]: Linking Debug+Asserts executable llvm-tblgen
/usr/bin/ld: /home/peter/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/bin/llvm-tblgen: hidden symbol `llvm::Type::~Type()' isn't defined
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [/home/peter/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/bin/llvm-tblgen] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/peter/llvm/build/utils/TableGen'
make[1]: *** [TableGen/.makeall] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/peter/llvm/build/utils'
make: *** [all] Error 1
So any help you could give me would be really helpful.
Thanks
I ended up deleting the llvm folder and checking everything out again, and it worked, so I'm just putting it down to bad timing.
You may want to use the existing LLVM packages, as provided by your distributions.
This askubuntu question about LLVM 3.1 could be relevant.
And you should at least do apt-get build-dep llvm-3.1-dev to ensure all dependencies are available.
You could also ask help on some LLVM related mailing list.

Resources