Is it possible to have named parameters with default values in groovy? My plan is to make a sort of object factory, which can be called with no arguments at all in order to get an object with default values. Also, I'd need the functionality to explicitly set any of the params for the object. I believe this is possible with Python keyword arguments, for example.
The code I'm attempting with right now is something like below
// Factory method
def createFoo( name='John Doe', age=51, address='High Street 11') {
return new Foo( name, age, address )
}
// Calls
Foo foo1 = createFoo() // Create Foo with default values
Foo foo2 = createFoo( age:21 ) // Create Foo where age param differs from defaut
Foo foo3 = createFoo( name:'Jane', address:'Low Street 11' ) // You get the picture
// + any other combination available
The real app that I'm working on will have a lot more of parameters and thus a lot more combinations needed.
Thanks
UPDATE:
The factory method I'm planning is for testing purposes. Cannot really touch the actual Foo class and especially not it's default values.
#dmahapatro and #codelarks answere below had a good point in using a Map as a param that gave me an idea of a possible solution. I could create a map with the wanted defaults and override the needed values, and pass that to the factory method. This'll probably do the job and I'll go with that, unless I get a hint of a better approach.
My current approach below
defaults = [ name:'john', age:61, address:'High Street']
#ToString(includeFields = true, includeNames = true)
class Foo {
// Can't touch this :)
def name = ''
def age = 0
def address = ''
}
def createFoo( Map params ) {
return new Foo( params )
}
println createFoo( defaults )
println createFoo( defaults << [age:21] )
println createFoo( defaults << [ name:'Jane', address:'Low Street'] )
NOTE: leftShift operation ( << ) modifies the the original map, so in the above example age will be 21 in the last method call as well. In my case, this is not a problem as the defaults map can be created freshly each time in setup method.
Groovy does that for you by default (map constructor). You would not need a factory method. Here is an example
import groovy.transform.ToString
#ToString(includeFields = true, includeNames = true)
class Foo{
String name = "Default Name"
int age = 25
String address = "Default Address"
}
println new Foo()
println new Foo(name: "John Doe")
println new Foo(name: "Max Payne", age: 30)
println new Foo(name: "John Miller", age: 40, address: "Omaha Beach")
//Prints
Foo(name:Default Name, age:25, address:Default Address)
Foo(name:John Doe, age:25, address:Default Address)
Foo(name:Max Payne, age:30, address:Default Address)
Foo(name:John Miller, age:40, address:Omaha Beach)
UPDATE
#codelark's astrology :). In case the class is not accessible to set default values, you can do like
#ToString(includeFields = true, includeNames = true)
class Bar{
String name
int age
String address
}
def createBar(Map map = [:]){
def defaultMap = [name:'John Doe',age:51,address:'High Street 11']
new Bar(defaultMap << map)
}
println createBar()
println createBar(name: "Ethan Hunt")
println createBar(name: "Max Payne", age: 30)
println createBar(name: "John Miller", age: 40, address: "Omaha Beach")
//Prints
Bar(name:John Doe, age:51, address:High Street 11)
Bar(name:Ethan Hunt, age:51, address:High Street 11)
Bar(name:Max Payne, age:30, address:High Street 11)
Bar(name:John Miller, age:40, address:Omaha Beach)
Related
I have the below spock specification and want to update the map from data table. Can some body help achieve this
def "groovy map update"() {
setup: "step1"
Map json = [
user :[
name : 'ABC'
]]
when: "step2"
println ('Before modification:')
println (json)
then: "step3"
json.with {
//user.name = value // this one works
(field) = value // this one does not work
}
println ('After modification:')
println (json)
where:
field | value
'user.name' | 'XYZ'
}
The then section is intended for asserts and not for updates etc. So you have to update the map in the when section and then test the result in the then section. For example like this:
def "groovy map update"() {
setup: 'create json'
Map json = [user: [name: 'ABC']]
when: 'update it'
def target = json
for (node in path - path.last()) {
target = target[node]
}
target[path.last()] = value
then: 'check the assignment'
json.user.name == value
where:
path | value
['user', 'name'] | 'XYZ'
}
One way how to update nested Map value can be by using list of path nodes instead of field notation and then iterate over them to obtain the last Map instance and set the value there:
def target = json
for (node in path - path.last()) {
target = target[node]
}
target[path.last()] = value
The accepted solution is correct, I just want to show an alternative doing the same in a slightly different way, assuming you want to stick with the dotted notation for field in your where: block. I just added two more test cases in order to make sure it works as expected.
#Unroll
def "set #field to #value"() {
setup: 'create json'
Map json = [user: [name: 'ABC', address: [street: '21 Main St', zip: '12345', city: 'Hometown']]]
when: 'update it'
def subMap = json
field.split("[.]").each {
if (subMap[it] instanceof Map)
subMap = subMap[it]
else
subMap[it] = value
}
println json
then: 'check the assignment'
json.newField == value ||
json.user.name == value ||
json.user.address.zip == value
where:
field | value
'newField' | 'dummy'
'user.name' | 'XYZ'
'user.address.zip' | '98765'
}
Update: If you want to save a few lines of code you can also use a fold (or reduce or accumulate) operation via inject(..) as described here
#Unroll
def "set #field to #value"() {
setup: 'create json'
Map json = [user: [name: 'ABC', address: [street: '21 Main St', zip: '12345', city: 'Hometown']]]
when: 'update it'
field.split("[.]").inject(json) { subMap, key ->
subMap[key] instanceof Map ? subMap[key] : subMap.put(key, value)
}
println json
then: 'check the assignment'
json.newField == value ||
json.user.name == value ||
json.user.address.zip == value
where:
field | value
'newField' | 'dummy'
'user.name' | 'XYZ'
'user.address.zip' | '98765'
}
Whether you find that readable or not may depend on your familiarity with topics like functional programming in general or map/reduce in particular. The charm here in addition to brevity is that we no longer need a local variable outside of our closure but we just inject (hence the method name) the result of iteration n to iteration n+1.
BTW, as a nice side effect inject(..) as I am using it here returns the previous value of the value you set or overwrite. Just add println in front of field.split("[.]").inject(json) ... in order to see it.
Update 2: Please note that both variants only work if there is no existing field value of type Map in the target field because of the instanceof Map check heuristics in my code. I.e. these two cases would not work:
'user.address' | [street: '23 Test Blvd', zip: '33333', city: 'Somewhere']
'user.address' | '23 Test Blvd, 33333 Somewhere'
This one would work, though, because there is no preexisting value:
'user.alternativeAddress' | [street: '23 Test Blvd', zip: '33333', city: 'Somewhere']
How can I create instance of a namedtuple dynamically? is it possible?
Msg = collections.namedtuple('Msg', 'a b c')
...
mymsg = Msg(a=1,b=2,c=3)
msg_as_dict = mymsg._asdict()
msg_as_dict['recover_name'] = type(mymsg).__name__
How can I create Msg instance back from msg['recover_name'] on runtime?
UPDATE:
How can I get the type of the namedtuple in runtime? meaning, get "Msg" from exists instance.
This will work with no reflection required:
def test_tuple_builder(self):
from collections import namedtuple
name = "Foo"
attribs = "bar baz goo tar taz"
values = [100, "Hello", -1, "World", "1968"]
tpl_cls = namedtuple(name, attribs)
foo = tpl_cls(*values)
self.assertEqual(values[0], foo.bar)
self.assertEqual(values[1], foo.baz)
self.assertEqual(values[2], foo.goo)
self.assertEqual(values[3], foo.tar)
self.assertEqual(values[4], foo.taz)
print("We always use '{baz}, {tar}' as an example.".format(baz=foo.baz, tar=foo.tar))
All tests pass and the output:
We always use 'Hello, World' as an example.
I am new to SoapUi. I am exploring on how multiple request in soapUi is done using groovy script.
below is the example that im trying to do, based on example that i found through "googling"
import com.eviware.soapui.SoapUI;
import com.eviware.soapui.model.testsuite.*;
import com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.testcase.WsdlTestCaseRunner
import java.util.Random
import com.eviware.soapui.model.testsuite.TestRunner.Status
// Define your testCase pointer
//def testcase = testRunner.testCase.testSuite.project.testSuites["TestSuite - User Management REST API"].getTestCaseByName ("Authenticate User")
def counterUser = testRunner.testCase.testSuite.getPropertyValue( "counter" )
int value = counterUser.toInteger()
String tester = ""
30.times {
value = value + 1
tester = "tester " + value.toString()
testRunner.testCase.testSuite.setPropertyValue( "userName", tester )
testRunner.runTestStepByName("POST - createUser - Create a User")
}
testRunner.testCase.testSuite.setPropertyValue( "counter", value.toString() )
I want to create a 30 users which start from Tester1...tester2.....tester30.
Is it possible to do this way? I keep getting an error such as NullPointerException at this line
int value = counterUser.toInteger()
I got what you say.
That is because, initially there is no value for counter which results to null and you are applying toInteger() over it.
Just change:
From:
int value = counterUser.toInteger()
To:
int value = counterUser?.toInteger() ?: 0
I'm trying to create a field mapping to map fields from user-friendly names to member variables in a variety of domain objects. The larger context is that I'm building up an ElasticSearch query based on user-constructed rules stored in a database, but for the sake of MCVE:
class MyClass {
Integer amount = 123
}
target = new MyClass()
println "${target.amount}"
fieldMapping = [
'TUITION' : 'target.amount'
]
fieldName = 'TUITION'
valueSource = '${' + "${fieldMapping[fieldName]}" + '}'
println valueSource
value = Eval.me('valueSource')
The Eval fails. Here's the output:
123
${target.amount}
Caught: groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: valueSource for class: Script1
groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: valueSource for class: Script1
at Script1.run(Script1.groovy:1)
at t.run(t.groovy:17)
What's necessary to evaluate the generated variable name and return the value 123? It seems like the real problem is that it's not recognizing that valueSource has been defined, not the actual expression held in valueSource, but that could be wring, too.
You're almost there, but you need to use a slightly different mechanism: the GroovyShell. You can instantiate a GroovyShell and use it to evaluate a String as a script, returning the result. Here's your example, modified to work properly:
class MyClass {
Integer amount = 123
}
target = new MyClass()
fieldMapping = [
'TUITION' : 'target.amount'
]
fieldName = 'TUITION'
// These are the values made available to the script through the Binding
args = [target: target]
// Create the shell with the binding as a parameter
shell = new GroovyShell(args as Binding)
// Evaluate the "script", which in this case is just the string "target.amount".
// Inside the shell, "target" is available because you added it to the shell's binding.
result = shell.evaluate(fieldMapping[fieldName])
assert result == 123
assert result instanceof Integer
I am new to Groovy and I could not get around this issue. I appreciate any help.
I want to read a file from Groovy. While I am reading the content, for each line I want to substitute the string '${random_id}' and '${entryAuthor}' with different string values.
protected def doPost(String url, URL bodyFile, Map headers = new HashMap() ) {
StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer()
def randomId = getRandomId()
bodyFile.eachLine { line ->
sb.append( line.replace("\u0024\u007Brandom_id\u007D", randomId)
.replace("\u0024\u007BentryAuthor\u007D", entryAuthor) )
sb.append("\n")
}
return doPost(url, sb.toString())
}
But I got the following error:
groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException:
No such property: random_id for class: tests.SimplePostTest
Possible solutions: randomId
at foo.test.framework.FooTest.doPost_closure1(FooTest.groovy:85)
at groovy.lang.Closure.call(Closure.java:411)
at groovy.lang.Closure.call(Closure.java:427)
at foo.test.framework.FooTest.doPost(FooTest.groovy:83)
at foo.test.framework.FooTest.doPost(FooTest.groovy:80)
at tests.SimplePostTest.Post & check Entry ID(SimplePostTest.groovy:42)
Why would it complain about a property, when I am not doing anything? I also tried "\$\{random_id\}", which works in Java String.replace(), but not in Groovy.
You are doing it the hard way. Just evaluate your file's contents with Groovy's SimpleTemplateEngine.
import groovy.text.SimpleTemplateEngine
def text = 'Dear "$firstname $lastname",\nSo nice to meet you in <% print city %>.\nSee you in ${month},\n${signed}'
def binding = ["firstname":"Sam", "lastname":"Pullara", "city":"San Francisco", "month":"December", "signed":"Groovy-Dev"]
def engine = new SimpleTemplateEngine()
template = engine.createTemplate(text).make(binding)
def result = 'Dear "Sam Pullara",\nSo nice to meet you in San Francisco.\nSee you in December,\nGroovy-Dev'
assert result == template.toString()
you better use groovy.text.SimpleTemplateEngine class; check this for more details http://groovy.codehaus.org/Groovy+Templates
The issue here is that Groovy Strings will evaluate "${x}" by substituting the value of 'x', and we don't want that behaviour in this case. The trick is to use single-quotes which denote plain old Java Strings.
Using a data file like this:
${random_id} 1 ${entryAuthor}
${random_id} 2 ${entryAuthor}
${random_id} 3 ${entryAuthor}
Consider this code, which is analogous to the original:
// spoof HTTP POST body
def bodyFile = new File("body.txt").getText()
StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer()
def randomId = "257" // TODO: use getRandomId()
def entryAuthor = "Bruce Eckel"
// use ' here because we don't want Groovy Strings, which would try to
// evaluate e.g. ${random_id}
String randomIdToken = '${random_id}'
String entryAuthorToken = '${entryAuthor}'
bodyFile.eachLine { def line ->
sb.append( line.replace(randomIdToken, randomId)
.replace(entryAuthorToken, entryAuthor) )
sb.append("\n")
}
println sb.toString()
The output is:
257 1 Bruce Eckel
257 2 Bruce Eckel
257 3 Bruce Eckel