expressjs middleware next function vs response objects next function - node.js

I recently noticed an undocumented next function on the expressjs response object.
Is that function the same as next in the middleware function(req, res, next) ?
Is its use discouraged because it is undocumented?

Yes, it is the same function as can be seen here in the source code.
Yes, I would say it's use is discouraged because it is undocumented and also unnecessary since each middleware function will get next passed in as the 3rd argument.

Related

asynchronic calls in node.js

I have a basic misunderstanding regarding asynchronic calls using express and middlewares and i would really appreciate some help understanding it.
Suppose we have this code:
var express = require('express')
var cookieParser = require('cookie-parser')
var app = require('express')
var router = express.Router()
app.use(function timeLog (req, res, next) {
req.requestTime = Date.now()
next()
})
app .use(express.json());
app .use(express.urlencoded());
app.use(cookieParser())
router.post('/hello', function (req, res) {
//write async to file
res.send('bye')
})
Now, when the client calls this endpoint "hello":
are the middlewares which defined in App-level called asynchronicaly? I understood that they do(because they are called "Callbacks" in the documentation... so basically before reaching the router: parsing cookies, parsing json to req.body and adding req.requestTime will run asynchronicaly and then will be routed to '/hello' end point.
after routing, is the callback will run asynchronicaly? if yes, then how in this case the request is not left hanging? i see that the response is being terminated inside a body of a callback... how this make any sense? :(
would somebody please explain to me this flow?
I will try to explain how I understood "async calls" through this code above: lets say alot of users trying to get this end point. all these calls added to the call stack, then because of these callbacks are async, then they are moved to event Queue/table and will be handled after the call stack will be "empty". if this is the case, how the first user will ever get a response? the requestTime done async, parsing the json done async and when reaching the router, the callback is done async.... so when the first user will ever get a repsone if all these async calls located inside the event Queue/table and they will be handled only after the callstack is empty? what am i missing here?
Thanks.
The middleware doesn't appear to be asynchronous of its own. In other words, as you said in your comment on another answer, it is not forcing each layer in the expressjs "stack" of middleware/handlers into a separate frame in the JavaScript event queue.
If you trace the next() function in a .use(), there are a couple of setImmediates fairly early on to handle "exit router" or "no more layers," but then you get into a while loop on a stack of handlers. This is happening at around this point in the code.
So if all your middleware was similar to this section, all middleware etc would happen in the same frame within the event queue:
app.use(function(req, res, next){
console.log('synchronous layer');
next();
});
Whereas a step like this next one would put the next into a separate frame in the event queue, and potentially allow the process to handle other frames that may be queued up.
app.use(function(req, res, next){
setImmediate(()=> {
console.log('setImmediate puts this next() into a separate frame in the event queue');
next();
});
});
I can't imagine this would normally be a problem. Most things that would happen in middleware that might take some time (a database call etc) are very likely all going to be happening asynchronously (in a way that puts the next into a new frame in the event queue). But it is something worth considering when you're adding middleware...
All those middleware are using the continuation passing style. So basically they COULD run asynchonous. But they don't have to. It depends on, whether those middlewares are doing some IO. You could take a look into the code to check how the functions behave exactly, but at least, this does not matter. Just keep in mind, that they COULD run asynchronous.

What's the point of calling next() after res.send() in Resitfy?

I am familiar with Express but new to Restify. Restify's document has many examples calling next() after res.send() as below:
server.get('/echo/:name', function (req, res, next) {
res.send(req.params);
return next();
});
This looks like a recommended pattern by some Restify experts as well:
The consequences of not calling next() in restify
What's the real use case of doing this? After you call res.send(), is there anything a handler next in the chain can do?
After I did some more research, I think I found an answer.
Only practical use case of calling next() after res.send() is when you want to install 'post-render' type middlewares to catch all transactions after route handers finish their job.
In other cases, it simply adds unnecessary overhead for every and each request because it scans the rest of routes to find a next match.
Most middlewares are 'pre-render' type, which don't need next() call anyway. Even for post-render type middlewares, depending on voluntary calls of next() is simply too risky. You'd rather want to use more error-proof method like https://github.com/jshttp/on-finished instead.
Calling next() after res.send() is a bad practice causing unnecessary overhead in most cases. It should be used only when it is absolutely needed and you know what you are doing.

Can't find the official documentation for the next() method

I see it is used in various ways: next(), next('route'), next(error)...
Where can I find the official documentation for the next() method?
I don't find any documentation summing up it's use cases on the express api docs...
UPDATE:
From what I coroborated, next works like this:
next() : sends req to the next middleware function of the current route
next('route'): sends req to next matching route
and less obvious...
next(anythingElse) sends req to the next error handling middleware, where err will be equal to anythingElse
You can view the "callback" argument under app.use() at http://expressjs.com/en/4x/api.html#app.use
There are also middleware callback function examples as well (http://expressjs.com/en/4x/api.html#middleware-callback-function-examples)
You are looking at the wrong page in the express documentation. The next callback is just to initiate/continue the request-response cycle. The actual guide is located under "Using middleware" title of Guides section on the Expressjs website.
Middleware functions are functions that have access to the request
object (req), the response object (res), and the next middleware
function in the application’s request-response cycle. The next
middleware function is commonly denoted by a variable named next.
Middleware functions can perform the following tasks:
Execute any code.
Make changes to the request and the response objects.
End the request-response cycle.
Call the next middleware function in the stack.
If the current middleware function does not end the request-response
cycle, it must call next() to pass control to the next middleware
function. Otherwise, the request will be left hanging.

Is Next Bad to Use if I Don't Need it?

In express and connect, is it bad to use "next" in middleware if I do not need it? Are there any possible negative outcomes? Assume there is no middleware which will be called after this middleware, and therefore the next will not call anything. I know it is bad for modularity, as if you want to add a callback for another middleware it may be accidentally triggered by the next in this middleware. However, in this case next is bad for modularity anyway, as middleware often interact in unexpected ways.
As an example of an unneeded next, consider the sample MEAN.JS stack, constructed by the guys who originally came up with the stack's name. It seems to have some next callbacks which do not ever get called. Many are in the users controller, including the signin function:
exports.signin = function(req, res, next) {
passport.authenticate('local', function(err, user, info) {
if (err || !user) {
res.status(400).send(info);
} else {
// Remove sensitive data before login
user.password = undefined;
user.salt = undefined;
req.login(user, function(err) {
if (err) {
res.status(400).send(err);
} else {
res.json(user);
}
});
}
})(req, res, next);
};
This function has a next callback defined. This next callback is then used by the passport.authenticate() custom middleware function as a parameter. However, this parameter is never used in the function itself. I have tried taking out the next definition from the function definition, as well as the custom passport middleware, and the route seems to still work. However, perhaps passport uses it in its authenticate() function, and leaving it out did not cause any trouble here but it may cause trouble in some cases.
I was recently looking at passport's tutorials on http://passportjs.org, and I came across a function in the section on custom callbacks on the authenticate page that looks almost exactly like the signin function in MEAN.JS. One difference was that it actually had some next callbacks (for error handling), so the next parameter was actually useful. Is it possible that the MEAN.JS app took a lot of code from passportjs.org's guide and changed it over time, but left in some vestigial remnants that do not do anything but were causing no harm? Or does the next parameter actually do something in passport.authenticate() that is not immediately obvious? Regardless of why this happened, does an extra next parameter in connect middleware cause any bad side effects if it is not used?
When writing middleware, the next parameter is optional. It's purpose is so that the next middleware in the chain will be called. If you want the current middleware to be the last one called for a given request, not executing the next parameter will accomplish that. This is fine for code that you write for yourself, but it's typically better to always execute the next parameter in middleware that may be used elsewhere because you don't know what else they could be adding.
For example, maybe you wanted to add some kind of logging that happens after a request is completed. If your middleware that runs before the logging middleware doesn't execute next, it won't be logged.
http://expressjs.com/api.html#middleware
Not executing next will simply not start the next middleware. There are no other side effects of not executing it other than those caused by not moving to the next middleware (for example, if the response hasn't ended yet, not calling next will result in a timeout.)

Express Framework app.post and app.get

I am fairly new to the express framework. I couldn't find the documentation for application.post() method in the express API reference. Can someone provide a few examples of all the possible parameters I can put in the function? I've read a couple sites with the following example, what does the first parameter mean?
I know the second parameter is the callback function, but what exactly do we put in the first parameter?
app.post('/', function(req, res){
Also, let's say we want the users to post(send data to our server) ID numbers with a certain format([{id:134123, url:www.qwer.com},{id:131211,url:www.asdf.com}]). We then want to extract the ID's and retrieves the data with those ID's from somewhere in our server. How would we write the app.post method that allows us to manipulate the input of an array of objects, so that we only use those object's ID(key) to retrieve the necessary info regardless of other keys in the objects. Given the description of the task, do we have to use app.get() method? If so, how would we write the app.get() function?
Thanks a lot for your inputs.
1. app.get('/', function(req, res){
This is telling express to listen for requests to / and run the function when it sees one.
The first argument is a pattern to match. Sometimes a literal URL fragment like '/' or '/privacy', you can also do substitutions as shown below. You can also match regexes if necessary as described here.
All the internal parts of Express follow the function(req, res, next) pattern. An incoming request starts at the top of the middleware chain (e.g. bodyParser) and gets passed along until something sends a response, or express gets to the end of the chain and 404's.
You usually put your app.router at the bottom of the chain. Once Express gets there it starts matching the request against all the app.get('path'..., app.post('path'... etc, in the order which they were set up.
Variable substitution:
// this would match:
// /questions/18087696/express-framework-app-post-and-app-get
app.get('/questions/:id/:slug', function(req, res, next){
db.fetch(req.params.id, function(err, question){
console.log('Fetched question: '+req.params.slug');
res.locals.question = question;
res.render('question-view');
});
});
next():
If you defined your handling functions as function(req, res, next){} you can call next() to yield, passing the request back into the middleware chain. You might do this for e.g. a catchall route:
app.all('*', function(req, res, next){
if(req.secure !== true) {
res.redirect('https://'+req.host+req.originalUrl);
} else {
next();
};
});
Again, order matters, you'll have to put this above the other routing functions if you want it to run before those.
I haven't POSTed json before but #PeterLyon's solution looks fine to me for that.
TJ annoyingly documents this as app.VERB(path, [callback...], callback in the express docs, so search the express docs for that. I'm not going to copy/paste them here. It's his unfriendly way of saying that app.get, app.post, app.put, etc all have the same function signature, and there are one of these methods for each supported method from HTTP.
To get your posted JSON data, use the bodyParser middleware:
app.post('/yourPath', express.bodyParser(), function (req, res) {
//req.body is your array of objects now:
// [{id:134123, url:'www.qwer.com'},{id:131211,url:'www.asdf.com'}]
});

Resources