Does it possible to use simultaneously AMI and BiDir features with jacorb?
Both work for me, but would not work together.
Examples, coming with jacorb demonstrates either BiDir or AMI.
The error that I see is following:
SEVERE: Unexpected error during receiveMessages. Lost a message!
java.lang.NullPointerException
at rg.jacorb.orb.giop.BiDirConnectionClientInterceptor.send_request(BiDirConnectionClientInterceptor.java:125)
at org.jacorb.orb.portableInterceptor.ClientInterceptorIterator.invoke(ClientInterceptorIterator.java:129)
at org.jacorb.orb.portableInterceptor.AbstractInterceptorIterator.iterate(AbstractInterceptorIterator.java:66)
at org.jacorb.orb.portableInterceptor.ClientInterceptorIterator.iterate(ClientInterceptorIterator.java:87)
at org.jacorb.orb.DefaultClientInterceptorHandler.invokeInterceptors(DefaultClientInterceptorHandler.java:328)
at org.jacorb.orb.DefaultClientInterceptorHandler.handle_send_request(DefaultClientInterceptorHandler.java:132)
at org.jacorb.orb.Delegate.servant_preinvoke(Delegate.java:2505)
at org.jacorb.orb.ReplyReceiver.performCallback(ReplyReceiver.java:240)
at org.jacorb.orb.ReplyReceiver.replyReceived(ReplyReceiver.java:183)
at org.jacorb.orb.giop.ClientConnection.replyReceived(ClientConnection.java:355)
at org.jacorb.orb.giop.GIOPConnection.receiveMessagesLoop(GIOPConnection.java:820)
at org.jacorb.orb.giop.GIOPConnection.receiveMessages(GIOPConnection.java:527)
at org.jacorb.orb.giop.MessageReceptor.doWork(MessageReceptor.java:69)
at org.jacorb.util.threadpool.ConsumerTie.run(ConsumerTie.java:60)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724)
please, advise.
UPD: I modified AMI example from jacorb's demo, added BiDir functionality (copied from BiDir example) and now synchronious calls work but ansync (AMI) do not.
They should work together. This does look like a possible issue. Are you using local calls? Can you please provide your test case and submit a ticket on http://www.jacorb.org/bugzilla/
(Please note the official JacORB mailing lists are here : http://www.jacorb.org/contact.html )
Related
today when I try to run my Strapi with some exercises, there was an error showing that inversedBy attribute flight not found target api::airport.airport. However, the command shows Admin UI was built successfully. but I cannot access the Admin panel and do anything with it. It seems that the error is belonging to one of the content, but the entire API is not working. What should I do? Does anyone know how to fix this bug?
enter image description here
Thank you.
Firstly, I tried to run the start command(npm run develop) for several time, it keep reporting same error.
Secondly, I tried to access the administration panel directly, it is apparently that I failed.
Hopes someone can help me to figure out, how can I solve this bug/error.
I had a similar error.
The issue for me related to a problem where the 'key'(i.e. attribute key in JSON) didn't match that was referenced by the model in the mappedBy & inversedBy.
e.g. mappedBy:"f_light" should point to
"f_light":{type:"relation",...) --
At least that was the problem for me
Strapi Docs on how the schema is supposed to look
My issue: Error on attribute a_token in model a-request(api::a-request.a-request): inversedBy attribute a-requests not found target api::a-token.a-token
This occurred because I inversedBy:'a-token' when the attribute key was 'a_token'. Changing them so they matched solved my issue ('a-token' -> 'a_token').
The naming conventions of mappedBy, inversedBy, and the attribute keys MUST use '_' instead of '-' for spaces, otherwise it will fail the naming convention tests.
I use jooq to generate objects against a local database, but when running "for real" later in production the actual databases will have different names. To remedy this I use the <outputSchemaToDefault>true</outputSchemaToDefault> config option (maven).
At the same time, we have multiple databases (schemas), and are using a connection pool to the server like "jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/" (without specifying a database here).
How do I tell jooq which database to use when running queries?
I have tried all config I can think of:
new Settings()
.withRenderSchema(true) // true/false seems to make no difference.
.withRenderCatalog(true) // true/false seems to make no difference.
.withRenderMapping(new RenderMapping()
.withDefaultSchema("my_database") // Seems to have no effect.
// The above 3 configs always give me an error saying "no database selected".
// Adding this gives me 'my_database.my_table' does not exist - while it actually does.
.withSchemata(new MappedSchema()
.withInputExpression(Pattern.compile(".*"))
.withOutput("my_database")
));
I have also tried using a database/schema name, as in not configuring outputSchemaToDefault. But then, adding the MappedSchema code above, but that gives me errors with "'my_databasemy_database.my_table' does not exist", which is correct. I have no clue why that code gives me the database/schema name twice?
Edit:
When jooq tells me that the db.table does not exist, if I put a break point in a good place and get the sql from jooq and run exactly that against my database it does work. But jooq fails to run it.
Also, I'm using version 3.15.3 of jooq.
I solved it. Instead of using .withInputExpression(Pattern.compile(".*")), it seems to work with .withInput("").
I'm still not sure why it works, or if this is the "correct" way of solving it. But at least it is a way forward.
No clue why using the pattern, I got the name twice though. But that one I'll leave alone.
I am currently working on a project where i deploy multiple arm templates each deploying a VM and doing few operations on them. I wanted handle quota issues by calling template validation before triggerring the first deployment. So, i created a template which has logic to create required VMs and i am using this template only for validation (to check if quota will not be exceeded).
Since our code already has the ResourceManagementClient, i tried the following code:
Deployment parameters = new Deployment(
new DeploymentProperties(DeploymentMode.Incremental)
{
Template = templateFile,
Parameters = parameterFile,
});
DeploymentsValidateOperation dp = deployments.StartValidate(groupName, "validation", parameters);
But when i try to access the Value from the variable dp, i keep getting the following exception:
Generic Exception System.InvalidOperationException: The operation has
not completed yet. at Azure.Core.ArmOperationHelpers`1.get_Value()
at
Azure.ResourceManager.Resources.DeploymentsValidateOperation.get_Value()
at DeployTemplate.Program.d__3.MoveNext() in
\Program.cs:line 88
I even added a loop after the "StartValidate" to wait till the dp.HasCompleted is set to true. But this seems to run indefinetly. I also tried the "StartValidateAsync" method, which seems to have the same issue.
I wanted to understand if i am using this method correctly? if there is a better way to do the template validations? I could not find any examples on this method`s usage. if possible please share any code snippet where this method is used for my reference.
Note: Currently, Since this is not working, i am testing with Fluent Api way. That seems to be working. But, it requires lot of changes in our code as it creates ambiguity with many classes in "Azure.ResourceManager.Resources" which are already used for other operations.
I found that even though the deployment operations HasCompleted field is not set, when I call dp.GetRawResponse(), it returns the exact errors expected.
I now use this to validate my templates.
I'm starting with BDD (cucumber + capybara + selenium chromedriver) and TDD (rspec) with factory_bot and I'm getting an error on cucumber features - step_definitions.
uninitialized constant User (NameError)
With TDD, everything is ok, the factory bot is working fine. The problem is with the cucumber.
factories.rb
FactoryBot.define do
factory :user_role do
name {"Admin"}
query_name {"admin"}
end
factory :user do
id {1}
first_name {"Mary"}
last_name {"Jane"}
email {"mary_jane#gmail.com"}
password {"123"}
user_role_id {1}
created_at {'1/04/2020'}
end
end
support/env.rb
require 'capybara'
require 'capybara/cucumber'
require 'selenium-webdriver'
require 'factory_bot_rails'
Capybara.register_driver :selenium do |app|
Capybara::Selenium::Driver.new(app, browser: :chrome)
end
Capybara.configure do |config|
config.default_driver = :selenium
end
Capybara.javascript_driver = :chrome
World(FactoryBot::Syntax::Methods)
And the problem is happening here
support/hooks.rb
Before '#admin_login' do
#user = create(:user)
end
step_definitions/admin_login.rb
Given("a registered user with the email {string} with password {string} exists") do |email, password|
#user
end
I don't know why, but I can't access the user using cucumber and factory_bot.
Anybody could help me please?
I think I need to configure something on the cucumber.
What do you think guys?
First of all Luke is correct about this being a setup issue. The error is telling you that the User model cannot be found which probably means Rails is not yet loaded. I can't remember the exact details of how cucumber-rails works but one of the things it does is to make sure that each scenario becomes an extension of a Rails integration test. This ensures that all of the Rails auto-loading has taken place and that these things are available.
Secondly I'd suggest you start simpler and use a step to create your registered user rather than using a tag. Using tags for setup is a Cucumber anti-pattern.
Finally, and more controversially I'd suggest that you don't use factory-bot when cuking. FactoryBot uses a separate configuration to create model objects directly in the datastore. This bypasses any application logic around the creation of these objects, which means the objects created by FactoryBot are going to end up being different from the objects created by your application. In real life object creation involves things like auditing, sending emails, conditional logic etc. etc. To use FactoryBot you either have to duplicate that additional creation logic and behavior or ignore it (both choices are undesirable).
You can create objects for cuking much more effectively (and quicker) by using the following pattern.
Each create method in the Rails controller delegates its work to a service object e.g.
UserController
def create
#user = CreateUserService.new(params).call
end
end
Then have your cukes use a helper module to create things for you. This module will provide tools for your steps to create users, using the above service
module UserStepHelper
def create_user(params)
CreateUserService.new(default_params.merge(params))
end
def default_params
{
...
}
end
end
World UserStepHelper
Given 'there is a registered user' do
#registered_user = create_user
end
and then use that step in the background of your feature e.g.
Background:
Given there is a registered user
And I am an admin
Scenario: Admin can see registered users
When I login and view users
Then I should see a user
Notice the absence of tagging here. Its not desirable or necessary here.
You can see an extension of this approach in a sample application I did for a CukeUp talk in 2013 here https://github.com/diabolo/cuke_up/commits/master. If you follow this commit by commit starting from first commit at the bottom you will get quite a good guide to setting up a rails project with cucumber in just the first 4 or 4 commits. If you follow it through to the end (22 commits) you'll get a basic powerful framework for creating and using model objects when cuking. I realize the project is ancient and that obviously you will have to use modern versions of everything, but the principles still apply, and I use this approach in all my work and having been doing so for at least 10 years.
So if you're using rails, it's probably advised to use cucumber-rails over cucumber. This is probably an issue where your User models have not been auto-loaded in.
Cucumber auto-loads all ruby files underneath features, with env.rb first, it's almost certainly an issue with load order / load location
I have a transacted Camel route with a number of processors
from(Constant.RouteA)
.transacted()
.process(processor1)
.process(processor2)
.process(processor3)
.wireTap(Constant.RouteB)
.wireTap(Constant.RouteC)
.end()
My problem is that I don't want the final part of the route (the wiretaps) to be part of the transaction i.e. I want them to be executed once processor3 has finished and the transaction committed.
Initially I looked at using onCompletion() but it doesn't seem to work together with transacted().
So I found another way which requires using policy() to limit the transaction scope i.e.
from(Constant.RouteA)
.policy("PROPAGATION_REQUIRED")
.process(processor1)
.process(processor2)
.process(processor3)
.end()
.wireTap(Constant.RouteB)
.wireTap(Constant.RouteC)
.end()
The problem is that this solution requires to define the SpringTransactionPolicy in the Spring configuration, but the software I'm working on doesn't use Spring. Transactions are managed by Bitronix and everything works just by using the transacted() method, which as far as I can tell doesn't allow you to limit the scope of a transaction.
Is there a simple way to achieve my goal? Hopefully without bringing Spring into the picture. Thank you!
Try to create two routes. For example:
from(direct:startRoute)
.to(Constant.RouteA)
.wireTap(Constant.RouteB)
.wireTap(Constant.RouteC);
from(Constant.RouteA)
.transacted()
.process(processor1)
.process(processor2)
.process(processor3);
Once route "Constant.RouteA" is finished all changes will committed.