I would like to create a database based on the following reasoning:
I want to assign to each contact I have some tags for his abilities, for example, so there will be a column called "abilities". So I was thinking about creating a list of possible abilities (probably on a second sheet), lets say "play football", "cook", "ride a bike" and define that "Mike" can "play football.
For this to be useful I would also like to know how it is possible to be able to filter my contacts by ticking on the list of abilities I am looking for.
There are a couple of ways to tackle this.
1) Make a table that has contacts and abilities all together. This means that you will repeat the contact info if a person has multiple abilities. Each row will be the unique combination of contact + ability. If you want to limit the options for ability to specific choices, create your list of abilities and use data validation to create a drop-down list of these values in your abilities column.
2) Make 3 tables: 1-Contact, 2-Abilities, 3-Map of Contacts to Abilities (each row contains the unique identifier for a contact and the unique identifier for an ability). I'm not sure if you really intend to make a database or just something in Excel that works. If you can use PowerPivot, that would be a good solution without needing another application to create your db. Bring your 3 tables into PowerPivot. Create a relationship between table 3 and table 1. Create a relationship between table 3 and table 2.
Related
I am currently trying to display some manager/employee names based on business unit.
Each Business Unit could have multiple managers and multiple employees.
My question is can VLookup or any other method return a drop down list to select a certain manager/employee based on the Business unit selected?
Please see image below to see the layout and expected output.
I am hoping to use 3 drop down menus which when the business unit is selected to be able to auto populate first employee and manager in the list but also be able to have drop down menu for both to select other employees/managers etc.
Thank you.
screenshots
screenshots
screenshots
Please find my Excel-sheet in which I modulated a possible solution via the following link (shared on OneDrive):
https://cronos-my.sharepoint.com/:f:/g/personal/oortsja_cronos_be/EuUIF6pW95xGtcA0gQjwtIkB_x4LCc8oWks9VwoVTfrhJA?e=7fO6Dz
To summarize how I got to this solution:
I made different tables based on the data you provided (Business Unit > Manager > Employee). Using Name manager (see example), I gave those tables specific names that relate to their respective Business Unit > Manager > Employee.
Using =INDIRECT(), I reference those tables based on the names I gave them. E.g. table Ireland (Business Unit) contains values "John" and "Keith". Based on that output, using =INDIRECT(), "John" for example references table John (Manager) which contains the value "Mary" (Employee)
Basically, in my solution the key is using =INDIRECT() referencing multiple tables, VLOOKUP doesn't suit your needs in this specific case.
I'm not sure if the title is a proper descriptor of what I'm trying to achieve here, hopefully it's close enough. I'm not a SharePoint expert, but I'm comfortable with creating forms and workflows as necessary to get something like this to work.
Basically, I need to have two separate SharePoint lists that are linked together, but one list needs to have row level security to hide data from other users that shouldn't see it. I need the column that is being linked to be an editable text box though, rather than a simple lookup field.
For example:
List A
Customer (text)
Description (text)
Sales People (person, multiple selections allowed)
Expenses (linked field)
List B
Customer (text)
Expenses (number)
Created by (just a reference that the sales people would actually "create" each row here)
Essentially, multiple people can be assigned to a customer in list a. The "sales people" are assigned by another user who actually creates the item for list a. I need to be able to have the people who are assigned as "sales people" to have a text box where they can enter their expenses, but on an individual basis, that would then be stored in list b with row level permissions to prevent them from seeing each others expenses totals.
List B would be able to show each sales person their full list of expenses across all the customers they are connected to, but not be able to see each others expenses. It's not a problem if the person creating the item for List A ends up with items in List B that are 0, but I need to be able to have the Expense field be an editable text box from a form that allows the sales people to enter their total expenses for that customer.
If I was building a custom application, this wouldn't be difficult to do, but I can't for the life of me figure out how to do this in SharePoint, or if it is even possible.
This is possible, but it will require custom development, using the SharePoint Object Model. Create your two lists and then you can either create a javascript/HTML based solution using libaries like jQuery and SPServices, or you can create a custom web part and use C# to update the lists. There's lot of examples out on the internet on how to do this. Write some code, and bring any problems you have with the code back to StackOverflow.
So I am trying to link an employee metrics pivot chart with an employee project table with one slicer. I want an employee slicer that manipulates all charts but the data is coming from 2 different places (SQL, Sharepoint). When I try to create a relationship based on Employees I get the following error: "The relationship cannot be created because each column contains duplicate values. Select at least one column that only contains unique values."
So one chart has quantitative items while the table has qualitative items and I want one slicer to manipulate both at the employee level.
I want to see all the data on both charts for the selected employee, and not just single items linked by unique values. I can use unique values, and have created relationships that one slicer can manipulate however I only get one record at a time that way and therefore the slicer has thousands of buttons (one for each record).
I wouldn't think this would be that difficult and I hope it's really not.
Please Help!
M2M relationships in PowerPivot will most likely cause more headaches than solutions unless you are aware of what you are doing. After some thought, I realized that I really do not want an m2m relationship because it would result in junk data for what I wanted. I just wanted to start my answer off acknowledging that I did not achieve an m2m.
So if you want to link SharePoint data to Excel here is what you need to do:
Export SharePoint data as an RSS feed. If this is something others will need to refresh then the rss file will need to be stored on a shared drive.
Add PowerPivot if you have not already done so. In PowerPivot get external data from other sources (rss feed) then add your file. To link data you will need a Unique ID to join tables on.
Ok - so here's the preface. I realize that SharePoint isn't really the best solution for this, and if I have to use SharePoint, then coding this would be preferable. However, my wings are clipped due to IT policy, and they have no time to do this "for me".
I am developing a document control system for an Environmental Management System. The basic concept is that there is a list of 'General Responsibilities', which identifies a regulatory agency, some category info, links to laws, etc... There's a second list 'EMS Responsibilities', which basically just links (via a lookup) a particular site to a general responsibility, to identify which sites have which responsibilities. We have many sites, and most have most responsibilities so it doesn't make sense to combine the two lists and repeat all this stuff 10x. Finally, I have a document library (for simplicty sake I am ignoring the draft/published libraries aspect) which contains the actual documents. These documents should reference an EMS Responsibility, which in turn references a General Responsibility. The categorization from 'General Responsibilities' needs to propagate all the way to the document library.
Currently, I use workflow to automatically copy the secondary lookup columns referencing the 'General Responsibility' to a 'Single Line of Text' column in 'EMS Responsibilities' so that it is available to the lookup in 'EMS Documents'. However, despite the values being present in both responsibility lists, the values do not propagate to my final list.
This workflow-based approach is stupid. The lookup columns are stupid. There's no way to get this to work elegantly using out of the box components. I want to believe that the reason this isn't working is because I am missing something... but I have searched for hours and can't find any more effective relational capabilities.
First of all, any theories as to why the values do not end up in the final list despite referencing a single line of text column that is filled?
Second, is there a better overall approach that doesn't rely so much on workflows copying data back and forth, and these pathetic lookup columns?
Thanks in advance!
Given the requirements you gave above together with your answer to my question I believe you won't need a workflow to link all three items together. I have two options for you:
1st Option:
Create a General Responsibility list. This list should contain at least two columns. The ID and Title column.
Create an EMS Responsibilities list. This list should contain at least three columns. The ID, the Title column and a lookup column linked to the General Responsibility list.
Create a Document Library. Add a lookup column linked to EMS Responsibilities.
Since the lookup list you are using is already linked to General Responsibilities then there is no need to have another column solely dedicated to point to General Responsibilities. If however, you need to have specific columns in your document library so that it explicitly has columns for both General Responsibilities and EMS Responsibilities use option 2 below.
Option 2
Create a General Responsibility list. This list should at least contain the ID and Title column.
Create an EMS Responsibility list. This list should at least contain the ID, lookup column linked to General Responsibility and Title columns.
Create a document library. You should add two lookup columns. One pointing to General Responsibility the other to EMS Responsibility.
(now the fun part starts)
Follow the guide to edit both your NewForm and EditForm aspx in this link so that your lookup dropdowns will be a cascading dropdown. This will make sure that items from EMS dropdown will only be populated once you select a value from the General dropdown.
Let me know if you need any more clarifications.
I have two tables which both include a date field. Currently I have two portals, one for each table (occurrence).
Is it was possible to display the results of both of these in one portal, and sort by the date?
Technically a portal can only display records from one table. If you need to join two tables then you have to do this manually or change the design and use one table instead of two (since you want them in the same portal, then the tables are similar to some degree; maybe this similarity can go into its own table).
Sometimes developers use the so-called virtual table technique: they create a table with, say, a field with the record number and a bunch of calculated fields that pick their values from elsewhere, for example, from prefilled global variables. They create a portal to this table, set up the relationship to display the required number of records, and write the code to fill these variables. This way they can show data that isn't stored in any table, combine tables, etc. But it's an arcane technique, I would recommend it only as the last resort.