I noticed with release 1.1.0 that modules are not considered siblings of intern anymore. For example, I used to be able to run something like http://localhost/intern/client.html?config=myproject/tests/config but it appears to try to attempt to fetch it from http://localhost/intern/myproject/tests/config.js instead as of previously http://localhost/myproject/tests/config.js.
Is this intentional? Also, I tried to prepend ../myproject/tests/config but it still apears to be fetching it relative to intern.
It looks like you now have to install the intern using npm inside the project that contains the code you are testing. The intern is not a sibling of the tested project(s) anymore, but it is now located in subdirectory node_modules/intern of your tested project.
Related
I just implemented a Jhipster module to provide Maven site generation as well as maven release process within Jhipster.
I implemented mocha tests to verify that files are generated (which pass), but it looks like they aren't generated in a real scaffolded context (if you have any clue on the error, I would be really thankful).
The only way I found to test that module with a scaffolded sample is to publish it in the npm registry in order to be able to select it in module choices radio, but it's not really a good option, as it exposes a non working module on the Jhipster marketplace (I'm really sorry about it).
To test a module locally, do the following:
run npm link in your module directory
generate a project
run npm link generator-jhipster-enterprise-pom in your project
Now when you run yo jhipster-enterprise-pom it will use your local code instead of requiring installation from npmjs.
Looking at your module's code, it looks like you renamed the app folder to server. A yeoman generator runs the code found in the app folder which is why your local test is failing. According to the Writing Your Own Yeoman Generator docs:
The default generator used when you call yo name is the app generator. This must be contained within the app/ directory.
It's currently accessible by running yo jhipster-enterprise-pom:server but I imagine you don't want the :server included in the default command.
I would like to download node module packages (listed in a package.json file, in the present working directory) source code to a node_modules subdirectory of the present working directory, without compiling, or installing those modules. Now I have seen the related question download source from npm without npm install xxx but that question dealt with downloading the source code of individual modules specified to NPM directly (i.e., without using a package.json file). The reason why I want to do this is because I am working on developing an Atom package for the Open Build Service (OBS) of openSUSE and this seems like one of the necessary steps I need to go through in order to achieve this.
The source code is not shipped with the npm distributed code. The best you could do is read the package.json and look for the { repository: url { } } key if it exists and if it's a git repo (which most of them will be) clone it.
However be aware that the source code often requires a build step before it can be used, as in an npm prepublish step defined in the source code. In modern Javascript projects a common example of this is transpiling ES6 code to ES5 code for use in NodeJS and the browser.
I have not made an Atom package but I'm fairly certain you don't need to do any of this.
Is it possible to force an external npm dependency to use a different node.js package that offers the same API but a different implementation?
If you're willing to do that and that module is open source you could fork that on github, change their package.json to include the module you want and use github url for your own package.json like this:
"modulename": "git+https://git#github.com/user/repo.git"
You should be able to download the source of whatever module you would prefer and put that folder within your node_modules folder. From that point you simply require it within your Node.js app like any other NPM module.
I recommend downloading the code for the API you want, creating an src/assets folder, placing it in there, changing the package name in package.json to something not used in npm, then using 'require('newPackageName')' within your code.
If you decide to use some of package.json's capabilities to point towards a specific version (like using "1.4.7" as opposed to "^1.4.7") or if you point to a github address, be careful when you run npm update. It will replace your URL with the latest version in npmjs.org with that specific name. I don't know if it still does this in newer versions of npm, but in the version that works with Node.js 0.12, this is the default behavior.
I can tell you that node shrinkwrap will work, but it will prevent any other packages from being updated as well. No, you cannot just have one shrinkwrapped dependency, it has to be all of them, or npm update won't work.
So I have created a pretty default keystoneJS project and the first error that appeared was that when ran locally the website's default css won't load.
It's looking for site.min.css but in the folder there is only site.scss
After I compiled the scss via sublime text 2 sublimeBuild and renamed the file to site.min.css (from site.css) it ran perfectly but what worries me is why does the default installation have this error.
Where should I change this? Is there an scss builder included so I have to change folder naming or is there some other issue?
My guess is that it has something to do with some step skipped. I remember the keystone installation asked me whether I wanted to use sass so I suppose everything should be ok.
Is the problem because I did not use grunt somehow?
I recall reading somewhere that this grunt tool has to be used instead of node when running a server and I see a Gruntfile in my folder but when installed grunt-cli the grunt just loads and terminates the server right after that.
You don't have to do anything, sass-middleware is included and automatically generates CSS files from your SASS source files when they're requested.
The issue you were experiencing with site.min.css not being found was an error in the yeoman generator, from when the SASS support was added. The LESS middleware automatically compresses generated CSS when a request is made for a file ending in .min.css, but the SASS middleware doesn't do the same, so the request was 404'ing.
The problem with the yeoman generator has been fixed as of version 0.2.9, for existing projects the simple fix is to change your layout file so it refers to site.css instead of site.min.css.
Once you do that the middleware will automatically detect the presence of site.scss and generate an up-to-date version of site.css for you.
I've been using Node.js and npm for a few weeks with great success and have started to question the best practice for installing local modules. I understand the Global vs Local argument, however, my question has more to do with where to place a local install. Let's say that I have a project located at ~/ProjectA/ which is version controlled and worked on by multiple developers. When initially playing with Node.js and npm I wasn't aware of the default local installation paths and just simply installed the necessary modules in a default terminal which resulted in a installation path of ~/node_modules. What this ended up doing is requiring all the other developers working on the project to install the modules on their own machines in order to run the application. Having seen where some of the developers ran npm install I'm still really surprised that it worked on their machines at all (I guess it relates to how Node.js and require() looks for modules), but needless to say, it worked.
Now that the project is getting past the "toying around" stage, I would like to setup the project folder correctly. So, my question is, should the modules be installed at ~/ProjectA/node_modules and therefore be part of the version controlled project files, or should it continue to be located at a developer-machine specific location...or does it not really matter at all?
I'm just looking for a little "best-practice" guidance on this one and what others do when setting up your projects.
I think that the "best practice" here is to keep the dependencies within the project folder.
Almostly all Node projects I've seen so far (I'm a Node developer has about 8 months now) do that.
You don't need to version control the dependencies. That's how I manage my Node projects:
Keep the versions locked in the package.json file, so everyone gets the same working version, or use the npm shrinkwrap command in your project root.
Add the node_modules folder to your VCS ignore file (I use git, so mine is .gitignore)
Be happy, you're done!