I'll start with a little background. A small project of mine has been to try to use my Android tablet as an external monitor for my laptop using a VNC client (vnc4server). There are two main options for doing this that I have seen. The simplest is to use xrandr and widen the screen, creating a section just for the tablet. However, this can cause some graphics issues if I understand correctly, although it has the benefit of permitting windows to cross displays. The other option is to run a separate desktop session for the VNC server.
I have chosen to go the route of a second desktop as the session can live and die without significantly affecting my main session and can in theory be tailored specifically to the tablet. A little tool called x2vnc allows me to connect to the VNC server in a similar manner to the more popular Synergy and use it like a n external monitor. I also have the nice little benefit of being able to easily and cleanly switch from landscape to portrait using xrandr.
This brings me to my current issue. So far, I have only been able to reliably use plain x-windows. Although this is entirely functional, I would prefer something more complete. Although xstartup examples have been posted for a variety of window managers, none of these seem to run properly. I suspect all of these are for headless systems. Gnome/Unity are each unforgivably slow and seem to conflict with my existing session. I also feel that these are a little too cluttered for my ten inch tablet. On the other hand, Xmonad simply crashes as soon as I try to open a second window in addition to not updating the graphics properly.
I would like to know anything that will lead me in the direction of a better stable desktop environment. This includes configuration tips and alternate window managers.
I am currently running Ubuntu 12.04 with gnome-xmonad (recently Unity). My xstartup is plain x-window-manager. I have tried any readily available examples for gnome and xmonad that I have been able to find.
Related
I understand that in Linux a windowing system (X11, Wayland etc.) is responsible for rendering applications on the screen. I experimented with X11 but never got past obtaining single windows. I also read about Wayland. My question is, if I want to write an application that grabs whatever is shown on the screen, is there a way to get it on such a low-level (drm, dri, kms) that I am not dependent on the windowing system? What choices do these low-level APIs give me compared to the windowing system?
EDIT: I realized reading this that "One of the features of Wayland is its security design, which helps to guard the user against malicious apps. Apps can no longer see everything on the screen and spy on you. But that also means you cannot run a common application (like shutter or gtk-recordmydesktop) and use it to make a screenshot or a screencast of your desktop".
Background: I look after the Raspberry Pi version of Scratch for the Foundation. Mostly this is a matter of Smalltalk programming, VM developing and some very frustrating moments with shell scripts.
Right now I'm baffled and annoyed by what seems likely to be a unix permissions or related issue when using xrdp to connect to a Pi from any other machine. I know that it's not a problem directly with theSqueak VM since google has revealed quite a few other applications having similar looking issues. Part of my problem is that I don't know enough about this area to really know what to search for to narrow things down.
So, problem description -
The current Scratch system runs on the Squeak Cog VM (see https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm), which amongst other things uses pthreads and needs to set the thread priority. That used to be something that required modifying some config but more recent (Raspbian) kernels have no problem with it.
Except when using xrdp, which is a pain because I mostly work with my Pi via xrdp to my iMac. To handle this I have to prepend a 'sudo -E' which is tolerable for a developer but not really good for general users.
I have a similar problem with a trivial file copying command used in the VM make process as well, and that doesn't use any thread stuff nor priority work, but does require me to sudo make in a terminal window.
As an experiment I tried using tightvnc, to see if anything might work better. After reading the full install instructions (https://www.raspberrypi.org/documentation/remote-access/vnc/) and adding the auto-startup init.d script etc, it seemed like maybe we were in luck because the sudo isn't needed! Hooray! Of course, I was a bit disappointed by the seemingly slower display handling, but never mind.
Sadly this isn't even close to the end of the story. I've recently been working on completing the support for the X composition input window system that allows Japanese and other non-Latin1 type language users to enter characters more easily. It's pretty clever, once you've installed iBus, Anthy, many fonts and done some setup. But, while it works perfectly well on a Pi with a direct display, and fine on an xrdp display (with the sudo to allow Scratch to run in the first place, of course) it simply won't work via vnc with or without a sudo.
Googling shows a large number of other applications having problems in odd ways with the relevant XCreateIC() call (see https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/blob/Cog/platforms/unix/vm-display-X11/sqUnixX11.c line:1659 for our usage) but nothing I can make much connection to vnc for. To add to the annoyance the combo window appears ok for Terminals!
To summarise-
direct display - no problems for either the pthread priority or the compo window
xrdp - needs sudo for pthreads priority but the compo window works ok
vnc - doesn't need sudo for pthread priority but compo window doesn't work.
What I need: help with finding out what causes these problems and maybe even solutions. A way to configure xrdp to not require 'sudo' would be nice.
To my delight a colleague found what appears to be a very effective answer to this; it seems that the /etc/pam.d/common-session file needs a single line adding.
Edit the file and add
session required pam_limits.so
This allows all the applications I have that previously had permission related problems to run under xrdp. Another Scratch user who had a similar issue using PuTTY reports that it solved that issue as well.
I want to make a system which would get input from USB barcode scanner, validate it on remote server and display an answer (text and images).
I would use JavaFX or in-browser JS web application to grab scanner input somehow.
I'm planning to run this application on Raspberry Pi or plain PC.
Is there a way (or a special linux distribution) to ensure that system always loads the same way and starts JavaFX app or opens particular web page in browser?
e.g. no login page, NO update or other popups are shown.
Any other ideas? Thanks
...
Found an interesting solution here, where JavaFX GUI app is started from command line, without X-Server(linux graphical interface) at all.
I have recently done something similar, and it's not too hard. Obviously working on the Pi, you will want to use something like Linux and having limited hardware will mean that you should be minimising what you are running. Due to this, I would recomend that you run a light weight distro. Something like arch (which is what I used) allows you to build only what you want from the ground up without the need to find and compile everything like you do for LFS or Gentoo.
As for booting, the following two wikis will give you the details of starting the Gui without manual login:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Automatic_login_to_virtual_console
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Start_X_at_Login
After that, it is simply a matter of putting the command to launch your program in .xinitrc.
I'm looking for a really really small linux distribution or process of making my own that's sole purpose is to get an air application to launch full screen and stay there; Essentially I'm building a home kitchen computer that runs entirely as an AIR app.
I have looked into using windows xp; and windows xp embedded but they pose so many issues I figured I'd try modern linux.
I have also seen TinyCore Linux which looks interestingly small but not sure what issues that poses in regards to running AIR and "hardware" accelerated display. I've also thought about stripping down an Ubuntu installation but I'm sure somebody must have done this already; google is just failing me right now...
I'm also interested in running an "embedded" version of say android and running the air app on some arm-based hardware again; with just the AIR runtimes only - although this is less preferred as it's more complex.
I'm also hooking this up to a touch screen monitor (not yet arrived) so I'll need to hunt down or write some drivers for translating the touch events into something AIR can understand... (this was my main intention for using windows in that all the drivers will just work).
What I'm after
Minified Linux kernel with JUST the drivers for the box I need
X Display with accelerated graphics support (Doesn't have to be X if AIR can run on a frame buffer?)
Running a Full screen AIR application (simple enough)
Ability to write back to the filesystem (enough support for AIR)
SSH Access for remote control
Samba for updating the filesystem (easier to maintain the system)
Touch screen support (3M Ex III I think...)
Audio support
Don't need
Don't need any window manager or any other GUI tools unless required by AIR
Don't need any toolbars or file managers or anything; The AIR app is the "OS"
Don't need any package managers or repos
Don't need multi user or logging in; everything can just run as an unprivileged account
Don't need to
I don't mind hand crafting the filesystem and configs if that makes it easier; I'm mainly looking for a "filesystem" that is as tiny as possible that I can just plop my AIR app into and write some scripts to get it to start when the X server starts
Thanks,
Chris
Try an embedded Linux build system such as Buildroot. It can build an entire system from source, and be very lightweight. The basic system is less than 1 MB in size.
Ended up going with Tiny Core. Very tiny and quick to boot up. You can also write extensions for it and you don't have a persistent drive which allows you to just switch the thing off without worry that it's going to break something -- exactly what you need in a kitchen :-D.
My current plan is to:
Just set up a working version using Ubuntu as this is mostly supported by Adobe
Slowly strip it back and try and get as little things to start as possible on boot
Try building my own distro/package from source and selecting only the packages I need
Compile my own kernel with nearly everything turned off and just leave on the things I need
Have 4 DVI output. Seems I hopefully will have driver support on this. Details are sketchy online about supporting 4 outputs, but seems possible.
My question is from the Linux group and Virtualbox pros.... Will the seamless method of VirtualBox allow me to use all 3 of my monitors for multiscreen. I'd like to stick with Ubuntu and run Visual C# and other tools from my VirtualBox. Compiz effects are just too amazing to want Aero Glass.
What do you think, will my system be able to use the multiple monitors with VirtualBox and this graphics card? I've googled for hours and am still searching for answers.
Edit:
I tried virtualbox last night. Pretty slick, though I had an error in installing Visual C#NET. However, it wouldn't let you drag between multiple screens??? Is this something the host must resolve, or does the guest session need to have special settings for multiple monitors? Haven't been able to find anything in google supporting multiple monitors with virtualbox.
You should be able to configure your screens just fine. Don't know the exact details for an ATI setup, but you should be able to use Xinerama to create a single large virtual desktop, and then just run VirtualBox (though honestly, I prefer KVM, which runs on modern CPUs which provide native virtualization support) full-screen on one of those monitors. You would then be able to have three screens dedicated to Ubuntu, and the forth dedicated to Windows.
You might want to look into the non-Xinerama method of multiple displays. Each display is then treated as its own screen (so you'd have :0.0, :0.1, :0.2, and :0.3 for your X displays). You cannot move applications between the screens, but you get four independent desktops. I personally find that more useful than the idea of a single stretched desktop over multiple displays; when I used a laptop as my primary system, that's what I did, and when I get a second monitor for my computer, I'll likely return to that means of doing things. You'll have to investigate the specifics for such a setup with ATI, but the X server supports it, so it's just a matter of looking at your ATI driver's documentation to put the pieces together.