UPDATE:
I moved my question to ask ubuntu community, but can not delete it from here... if you have an awenser, please share it on ubuntu community not here... Thanks
i want to make an change on a file but i cant do that because i have not correct permissions:
➜ ls -l pycharm64.vmoptions
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 427 Dec 28 18:33 pycharm64.vmoptions
i tried to change permisions by these two command:
sudo chmod a+w pycharm64.vmoptions
and
sudo chown user:user pycharm64.vmoptions
but in i get an erro both time:
Read-only file system
how can i make an change on my file? (honestly i dont care about the owner and groups of the file... i just want to change my file anyway)
P.S: my OS is UBUNTU
You can change a file on read only by setting the "immutable property"
chattr +i [fileName]
If you want to revert it just change the "+" for a "-"
chattr -i [fileName]
Your filesystem could be mounted as read only. You have to change first before you can write anything to it. Changing file permissions also requires writing on the filesystem.
You may be able to mount it as read write with command like:
sudo mount -o remount,rw /dev/foo /mount/destination/dir
In this command you spesify that you want to remount the filesystem with different options, adding the readwrite, rw capability.
If you successd in changing the filesystem to read write, then you should be able to change to file permissions with the commands you tried earlier.
You can`t edit it directly (I'm not sure about Windows).
You should edit custom settings file instead:
Manually
nano ~/.config/JetBrains/PyCharm2022.3/pycharm64.vmoptions
or from IDE -- https://intellij-support.jetbrains.com/hc/en-us/articles/206544869.
I'm running zsh on a Raspberry Pi 2 (Raspbian Jessie). zsh compinit is complaining about the /tmp directory being insecure. So, I checked the permissions on the directory:
$ compaudit
There are insecure directories:
/tmp
$ ls -ld /tmp
drwxrwxrwt 13 root root 16384 Apr 10 11:17 /tmp
Apparently anyone can do anything in the /tmp directory. Which makes sense, given it's purpose. So I tried the suggestions on this stackoverflow question. I also tried similar suggestions on other sites. Specifiacally, it suggests turning off group write permissions on that directory. Because of how the permissions looked according to ls -ld, I had to turn off the 'all' write permissions as well. So:
$ sudo su
% chmod g-w /tmp
% chmod a-w /tmp
% exit
$ compaudit
# nothing shows up, zsh is happy
This shut zsh up. However, other programs started to break. For example, gnome-terminal would crash whenever I typed the letter 'l'. Because of this, I had to turn the write permissions back on, and just run compinit -u in my .zshrc.
What I want to know: is there any better way to fix this? I'm not sure that it's a great idea to let compinit use an insecure directory. My dotfiles repo is hosted here, and the file where I now run compinit -u is here.
First, the original permissions on /tmp were correct. Make sure you've restored them correctly: ls -ld /tmp must start with drwxrwxrwt. You can use sudo chmod 1777 /tmp to set the correct permissions. /tmp is supposed to be writable by everyone, and any other permissions is highly likely to break stuff.
compaudit complains about directories in fpath, so one of the directories in your fpath is of the form /tmp/… (not necessarily /tmp itself). Check how fpath is being set. Normally the directories in fpath should be only subdirectories of the zsh installation directory, and places in your home directory. A subdirectory of /tmp wouldn't get in there without something unusual on your part.
If you can't find out where the stray directory is added to fpath, run zsh -x 2>zsh-x.log, and look for fpath in the trace file zsh-x.log.
It can be safe to use a directory under /tmp, but only if you created it securely. The permissions on /tmp allow anybody to create files, but users can only remove or rename their own files (that's what the t at the end of the permissions means). So if a directory is created safely (e.g. with mktemp -d), it's safe to use it in fpath. compaudit isn't sophisticated enough to recognize this case, and in any case it wouldn't have enough information since whether the directory is safe depends on how it was created.
I have set up a rsync server -> /etc/rsyncd.conf
max connection = 5
log file = /var/log/rsync.log
[web]
path = /srv/www/html
read only = false
list = yes
hosts allow = 127.0.0.1
uid = nobody
gid = nobody
[root#localhost www]# ls -l /srv/www/html/
-rwxrwxrwx. 1 amit amit 8 Apr 28 10:37 index.html
If I do
$rsync 127.0.0.1::
$web
then it correctly shows the module name
but if I do
$rsync 127.0.0.1::web
#ERROR: chroot failed
rsync error: error starting client-server protocol (code 5) at main.c(1503) [receiver=3.0.6]
I dont know why? I am testing working of rsync first on localhost as it failed rsync remotely.
The solution is
In /etc/rsyncd.conf on server add
use chroot = false
I have no clue why its true by default. Got to the solution by luck while browsing rsync documentation. Hope this saves time for others.
Cheers
I faced the same issue and noticed the path I was giving in the rsyncd.conf at the server end was wrong.
Actual path was
path=/usr/share/tomcat/webapps/folder
but I was giving
path=/usr/share/tomcat6/webapps/folder
when I corrected the path is worked. So ensure that your path is correct, has right ownership and permissions.
This is likely an SELinux issue, it needs to know that the folder can be used by the rsync daemon. Let's consider an example, to rsync the following folder: /home/myuser/ftp
The following commands need to be run to set the correct SELinux context:
semanage fcontext -a -t rsync_data_t '/home/myuser(/.*)?'
restorecon -Rv '/home/myuser'
setsebool -P rsync_client on
Strangely enough, I noticed the parent folder must be labelled, hence why the labelling is done on /home/myuser instead of /home/myuser/ftp. Restricting to the ftp subfolder is simply done in the rsync daemon configuration.
You can check the SELinux labelling by running:
ls -Z /home/myuser
An interesting article about why combining chroot and SELinux is a good idea: http://blog.siphos.be/2012/04/why-both-chroot-and-selinux/
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
I have the following setup to periodically rsync files from server A to server B. Server B has the rsync daemon running with the following configuration:
read only = false
use chroot = false
max connections = 4
syslog facility = local5
log file = /var/adm/rsyncd.log
munge symlinks = false
secrets file = /etc/rsyncd.secrets
numeric ids = false
transfer logging = true
log format = %h %o %f %l %b
[BACKUP]
path = /path/to/archive
auth users = someuser
From server A I am issuing the following command:
rsync -adzPvO --delete --password-file=/path/to/pwd/file/pwd.dat /dir/to/be/backedup/ someuser#192.168.100.100::BACKUP
BACKUP directory is fully read/write/execute to everyone. When I run the rsync command from server A, I see:
afile.txt
989 100% 2.60kB/s 0:00:00 (xfer#78, to-check=0/79)
for each and everyfile in the directory I wish to backup. It fails when I get to writing tmp files:
rsync: mkstemp "/.afile.txt.PZQvTe" (in BACKUP) failed: Permission denied (13)
Hours of googling later and I still can't resolve what seems to be a very simple permission issue. Advice? Thanks in advance.
Additional Information
I just noticed the following occurs at the beginning of the process:
rsync: failed to set permissions on "/." (in BACKUP): Permission denied (13)
Is it trying to set permission on "/"?
Edit
I am logged in as the user - someuser. My destination directory has full read/write/execute permission for everyone, including it's contents. In addition, the destination directory is owned by someuser and in someuser's group.
Follow up
I've found using SSH solves this
Make sure the user you're rsync'd into on the remote machine has write access to the contents of the folder AND the folder itself, as rsync tried to update the modification time on the folder itself.
Even though you got this working, I recently had a similar encounter and no SO or Google searching was of any help as they all dealt with basic permission issues wheres the solution below is somewhat of an off setting that you wouldn't even think to check in most situations.
One thing to check for with permission denied that I recently found having issues with rsync myself where permissions were exactly the same on both servers including the owner and group but rsync transfers worked one way on one server but not the other way.
It turned out the server with problems that I was getting permission denied from had SELinux enabled which in turn overrides POSIX permissions on files/folders. So even though the folder in question could have been 777 with root running, the command SELinux was enabled and would in turn overwrite those permissions which produced a "permission denied"-error from rsync.
You can run the command getenforce to see if SELinux is enabled on the machine.
In my situation I ended up just disabling SELINUX completely because it wasn't needed and already disabled on the server that was working fine and just caused problems being enabled. To disable, open /etc/selinux/config and set SELINUX=disabled. To temporarily disable you can run the command setenforce 0 which will set SELinux into a permissive state rather then enforcing state which causes it to print warnings instead of enforcing.
Rsync daemon by default uses nobody/nogroup for all modules if it is running under root user. So you either need to define params uid and gid to the user you want, or set them to root/root.
I encountered the same problem and solved it by chown the user of the destination folder. The current user does not have the permission to read, write and execute the destination folder files. Try adding the permission by chmod a+rwx <folder/file name>.
This might not suit everyone since it does not preserve the original file permissions but in my case it was not important and it solved the problem for me. rsync has an option --chmod:
--chmod This option tells rsync to apply one or more comma-separated lqchmodrq strings to the permission of the files in the transfer. The
resulting value is treated as though it was the permissions that the
sending side supplied for the file, which means that this option can
seem to have no effect on existing files if --perms is not enabled.
This forces the permissions to be what you want on all files/directories. For example:
rsync -av --chmod=Du+rwx SRC DST
would add Read, Write and Execute for the user to all transferred directories.
I had a similar issue, but in my case it was because storage has only SFTP, without ssh or rsync daemons on it. I could not change anything, bcs this server was provided by my customer.
rsync could not change the date and time for the file, some other utilites (like csync) showed me other errors: "Unable to create temporary file Clock skew detected".
If you have access to the storage-server - just install openssh-server or launch rsync as a daemon here.
In my case - I could not do this and solution was: lftp.
lftp's usage for syncronization is below:
lftp -c "open -u login,password sftp://sft.domain.tld/; mirror -c --verbose=9 -e -R -L /srs/folder /rem/folder"
/src/folder - is the folder on my PC, /rem/folder - is sftp://sft.domain.tld/rem/folder.
you may find mans by the link lftp.yar.ru/lftp-man.html
Windows: Check permissions of destination folders. Take ownership if you must to give rights to the account running the rsync service.
I had the same issue in case of CentOS 7. I went through lot of articles ,forums but couldnt find out the solution.
The problem was with SElinux. Disabling SElinux at the server end worked.
Check SELinux status at the server end (from where you are pulling data using rysnc)
Commands to check SELinux status and disable it
$getenforce
Enforcing ## this means SElinux is enabled
$setenforce 0
$getenforce
Permissive
Now try running rsync command at the client end ,it worked for me.
All the best!
I have Centos 7 server with rsyncd on board:
/etc/rsyncd.conf
[files]
path = /files
By default selinux blocks access for rsyncd to /files folder
# this sets needed context to my /files folder
sudo semanage fcontext -a -t rsync_data_t '/files(/.*)?'
sudo restorecon -Rv '/files'
# sets needed booleans
sudo setsebool -P rsync_client 1
Disabling selinux is an easy but not a good solution
I had the same issue, so I first SSH into the server to confirm that I able to log in to the server by using the command:
ssh -i /Users/Desktop/mypemfile.pem user#ec2.compute-1.amazonaws.com
Then in New Terminal
I copied a small file to the server by using SCP, to make sure I am able to make a connection:
scp -i /Users/Desktop/mypemfile.pem /Users/Desktop/test.file user#ec2.compute-1.amazonaws.com:/home/user/test/
Then In the same new terminal, I tried running rsync:
rsync -avz -e "ssh -i /Users/Desktop/mypemfile.pem" /Users/Desktop/backup/image.img.gz user#ec2.compute-1.amazonaws.com:
If you're on a Raspberry pi or other Unix systems with sudo you need to tell the remote machine where rsync and sudo programs are located.
I put in the full path to be safe.
Here's my example:
rsync --stats -paogtrh --progress --omit-dir-times --delete --rsync-path='/usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/rsync' /mnt/drive0/ pi#192.168.10.238:/mnt/drive0/
I imagine a common error not currently mentioned above is trying to write to a mount space (e.g., /media/drivename) when the partition isn't mounted. That will produce this error as well.
If it's an encrypted drive set to auto-mount but doesn't, might be an issue of auto-unlocking the encrypted partition before attempting to write to the space where it is supposed to be mounted.
I had the same error while syncing files inside of a Docker container and the destination was a mounted volume (Docker for mac), I run rsync via su-exec <user>. I was able to resolve it by running rsync as root with -og flags (keep owner and group for destination files).
I'm still not sure what caused that issue, the destination permissions were OK (I run chown -R <user> for destination dir before rsync), perhaps somehow related to Docker for Mac slow filesystem.
Take attention on -e ssh and jenkins#localhost: in next example:
rsync -r -e ssh --chown=jenkins:admin --exclude .git --exclude Jenkinsfile --delete ./ jenkins#localhost:/home/admin/web/xxx/public
That helped me
P.S. Today, i realized that when you change (add) jenkins user to some group, permission will apply after slave (agent) restart. And my solution (-e ssh and jenkins#localhost:) need only when you can't restart agent/server.
Yet still another way to get this symptom: I was rsync'ing from a remote machine over ssh to a Linux box with an NTFS-3G (FUSE) filesystem. Originally the filesystem was mounted at boot time and thus owned by root, and I was getting this error message when I did an rsync push from the remote machine. Then, as the user to which the rsync is pushed, I did:
$ sudo umount /shared
$ mount /shared
and the error messages went away.
The group user name for the destination directory and sub directories should be same as per the user.
if the user is 'abc' then the destination directory should be
lrwxrwxrwx 1 abc abc 34 Jul 18 14:05 Destination_directory
command chown abc:abc Destination_directory
Surprisingly nobody have mentioned all powerful SUDO.
Had the same problem and sudo fixed it
run in root access ssh chould solve this problem
or chmod 0777 /dir/to/be/backedup/
or chown username:user /dir/to/be/backedup/
Hi I'm using the shell_exec command from a PHP script:
$output = shell_exec('ls -l');
print_r($output);
Terminal: php test.php
Which results in the directory listing as expected.
Switch to my browser I get no output.
I need to grant privileges to the user 'apache' so that it can execute certain commands, or add the user to a group with such privileges. I know how to add users to groups etc, I was just wondering what the best practice method is of granting such privileges to the apache user.
This took me a while to figure out so it may be of benefit to others.
The problem was that I was trying to give the apache user privileges in /etc/sudoers and SELinux was (quite rightly) denying them.
So I quickly disabled SELinux for httpd and all was working.
This is far from an ideal situation though for a public web server.
As for best practices audit2allow should be used to set permissive operations.
If you execute ls -Z in the desired directory, you will see which the SELinux permissions for that directory.
To allow the httpd/apache daemon to access that directory you can execute (the -R option is for make it recursive):
chcon -Rv --type=httpd_sys_content_t /desired/path
Hope it helps.