How to exclude 0 from MIN formula Excel - excel

i need to know how can i exclude 0 from rows and get the MIN Value.
But also i need to exlude the F1 Cell.
Ex:
A B C D E F
1 0 18 20 0 150 = 18
but if i do this In excel with =MIN(A1,B1,C1,D1,E1) return 0.
Any help is appreciated.

Try this formula
=SMALL((A1,C1,E1),INDEX(FREQUENCY((A1,C1,E1),0),1)+1)
Both SMALL and FREQUENCY functions accept "unions" as arguments, i.e. single cell references separated by commas and enclosed in brackets like (A1,C1,E1).
So the formula uses FREQUENCY and INDEX to find the number of zeroes in a range and if you add 1 to that you get the k value such that the kth smallest is always the minimum value excluding zero.
I'm assuming you don't have negative numbers.....

Enter the following into the result cell and then press Ctrl & Shift while pushing ENTER:
=MIN(If(A1:E1>0,A1:E1))

Not entirely sure what you want here, but if you want to discount blank cells in the range and pass over zeros then this would do it; if a little contrived:
=MIN(IF(A1:E1=0,MAX(A1:E1),A1:E1))
With Ctrl+Shift+Enter as an array.
What I'm doing here is replacing zeros with the maximum value in the list.

if all your value are positive, you can do -max(-n)

Solutions listed did not exactly work for me. The closest was Chief Wiggum - I wanted to add a comment on his answer but lack the reputation to do so. So I post as separate answer:
=MIN(IF(A1:E1>0;A1:E1))
Then instead of pressing ENTER, press CTRL+SHIFT+ENTER and watch Excel add { and } to respectively the beginning and the end of the formula (to activate the formula on array).
The comma "," and "If" statement as proposed by Chief Wiggum did not work on Excel Home and Student 2013. Need a semicolon ";" as well as full cap "IF" did the trick. Small syntax difference but took me 1.5 hour to figure out why I was getting an error and #VALUE.

Throwing my hat in the ring:
1) First we execute the NOT function on a set of integers,
evaluating non-zeros to 0 and zeros to 1
2) Then we search for the MAX in our original set of integers
3) Then we multiply each number in the set generated in step 1 by the MAX found in step 2, setting ones as 0 and zeros as MAX
4) Then we add the set generated in step 3 to our original set
5) Lastly we look for the MIN in the set generated in step 4
{=MIN((NOT(A1:A5000)* MAX(A1:A5000))+ A1:A5000)}
If you know the rough range of numbers, you can replace the MAX(RANGE) with a constant. This speeds things up slightly, still not enough to compete with the faster functions.
Also did a quick test run on data set of 5000 integers with formula being executed 5000 times.
{=SMALL(A1:A5000,COUNTIF(A1:A5000,0)+1)}
1.700859 Seconds Elapsed |
5,301,902 Ticks Elapsed
{=SMALL(A1:A5000,INDEX(FREQUENCY(A1:A5000,0),1)+1)}
1.935807 Seconds Elapsed |
6,034,279 Ticks Elapsed
{=MIN((NOT(A1:A5000)* MAX(A1:A5000))+ A1:A5000)}
3.127774 Seconds Elapsed |
9,749,865 Ticks Elapsed
{=MIN(If(A1:A5000>0,A1:A5000))}
3.287850 Seconds Elapsed |
10,248,852 Ticks Elapsed
{"=MIN(((A1:A5000=0)* MAX(A1:A5000))+ A1:A5000)"}
3.328824 Seconds Elapsed |
10,376,576 Ticks Elapsed
{=MIN(IF(A1:A5000=0,MAX(A1:A5000),A1:A5000))}
3.394730 Seconds Elapsed |
10,582,017 Ticks Elapsed

min() fuction exlude BOOLEAN and STRING values.
if you replace your zeroes with "" (empty string) - min() function will do its job as you like!

In Microsoft 365 you can use the new function MINIFS
=MINIFS(A1:E1;A1:E1;">0")
gives 1
=MINIFS(A1:E1;A1:E1;">1")
gives 18
*replace ; with , if using english version

All you have to do is to delete the "0" in the cells that contain just that and try again. That should work.

Related

Using Formula to determine Shift from Time data (Excel)

I have a column of time data formatted like this: Machine_Usage
I want to make an IF statement that returns 1, 2 or 3 corresponding to first, second or third shift if the times fall between certain values.
I already tried many times but not worked, please help me.
I want to find the right formula/syntax that can solved this problem for length of use of the machine based on the shift.
This is a possible approach, but not an answer because the question needs clarification on how to handle the following situations:
The interval [Start, End] is not within a single shift. According to some input data, it starts in one shift and ends in another one.
When End corresponds to a day after Start. This only can apply for shift 3, but based on the data there is no such scenario
In cell F2 put the following formula (the result is spilled, no need to drag down the formula)
=LET(start, C2:C20, end, D2:D20, lkup, H2:J4, shift, INDEX(lkup,,1),
lkStart, INDEX(lkup,,2), lkEnd, INDEX(lkup,,3),
MAP(start, end, LAMBDA(ss,ee, LET(startI, INT(ss) + lkStart,
endI, INT(ss) + lkEnd,
result, FILTER(shift, (ss >= startI) * (ee < endI), "Shift not found"),
IF(ROWS(result) > 1, "Overlap", result)
)))
)
Here is the output:
As you can see based on the data issue mentioned before no shift was found for any of the rows. Probably after data clean-up or more clarification, the formula should return a more realistic result.
Even the Shift information is represented in hh:mm format (see the previous screenshot). The end date of the last shift corresponds to the next day. Therefore the numeric values associated with the hours are the following:
Shift Start End
1 0.25 0.58
2 0.58 0.92
3 0.92 1.25
The logic of the formula is based on the above settings.

Handling TimeRecording-files in Excel (formatting cells)

Excel's assumptions about cells are confusing the heck out of me. I'm on Office 365 - Excel for Mac, Version 15.28.
I'm TimeRecording on a lot of things, I would like to calculate relations and tendencies on the different things. I've exported my log-files, and have opened it in excel. A simple version looks like this:
In the real sheet, then I have 40+ tasks and 50+ dates. I would like to be able to do some calculations on these data. But Excel doesn't 'know what it is' (time durations) and therefore can't add them up or do anything.
So one question would be, to how to let Excel know, that this is time durations? I tried doing what this question suggests. But when I format the cells as [h]:mm then it gives me this error:
FYI: In the big sheet, then there's so many times, so the total amounts up to something along the lines of 633:33.
I would just like to be able to do simple calculations, such as:
=SUM(B1, C4, D5)
or
=SUM(B1, C4, D5)/COUNT(B1, C4, D5)
And maybe also make some charts and graphs.
Another attempt I've done is to try to get all the cells to have the format hh.mm instead of hh:mm, but this gave me problems. My approach was this:
Convert all the cells to 'Text' to tell Excel: 'Hey... Don't do any auto-converting/guessing here, and don't turn any of the cells into dates or decimal numbers or fricking origami swans!'
After that then I make a simple 'Replace all' of : to .
But after the 'Replace all', then 633:33 turns into 633.36.00 (even though the cell was a 'Text' cell).
And if I then simply double-click on the cell to edit it, then the numbers 'magically' turns from 633.36.00 to 27/01/1900 15.36.00 ... What the hell!? I need a procedure that doesn't require me to go through all my thousands of numbers and edit any of them (or ensure that Excel have turned the numbers into flying unicorns.
EDIT1
Here's an example of the total sheet I'm working on in Google Sheets.
EDIT2
If I format the cells as [h]:mm, then I get an error (see above). But if I format it as [t]:mm, then I don't get an error (thanks to Axel Richter for pointing that out). It may have something to do with the initial language of my Excel-installation (danish).
However... If I then try to sum up a bunch of cell, after doing this formatting to everything, then it sums up to 0:00.
If I format all the cells to Time (well-knowing that it's the wrong format, but hoping that Excel can see it and fix it) - and thereafter trying to sum up a couple of cells, then it sums up to 00.00.00 (even though it wasn't empty cells).
Is it also important, that when I sum up some numbers, that I do it from a General-cell - or does Excel know, that if I start with the =-sign, that it's going to be a calculation (and therefore the cell-format doesn't matter)?
Excel will store date-time values as floating point double values in following form:
1 day = 1
1 hour = 1/24 = 0.0416666666666667
1 minute = 1/24/60 = 0.000694444444444444
So formatted as time all values greater than or equal 0 but lower than 1 will be from 00:00 to 23:59. Values greater than 1 will be dates with 1 = 01/01/1900 00:00:00. But if you are formatting such values as time only using hh:mm for example, then only the time is shown. The date is simply hidden.
For example 1.25 formatted using hh:mm will show 06:00 although it is 1 1/4 day which is 01/01/1900 06:00:00. To see hours from multiple days the format [h]:mm can be used. For example 1.25 formatted using [h]:mm will show 30:00 which is 1 day (24:00) + 1/4 day (06:00).
Although Excel will do this independent of locale settings, the user defined format codes used and the kind of input values which Excel will take as time values are dependent of locale settings.
For example with your locale Danish (Greenland) the format codes are different. See Formatere tal som datoer eller klokkeslæt .
So your format code will be [t]:mm instead of [h]:mm.
And also with your locale Danish (Greenland) the time separator is . instead of :. So values which Excel will take as time values are 123.45 (123 hours, 45 minutes) instead of 123:45.
In your last comment you say: "whereafter it weirdly looked the same, such as: 123:45 and not 123.45". Yes that is because your user defined format [t]:mm contains the time separator : also. But that is different from your locale settings where . is the time separator. While inputting values Excel respects the locale settings and so expects 123.45 as time value for 123 hours and 45 minutes. But after the input Excel applies the cell formatting [t]:mm and so shows 123:45.
In your last comment you say that it confuses you that 17:24 * 24 equals 417:36. But that is exactly what it should.
17:24 is 17 hours and 24 minutes. That multiplied by 24 is 17 hours * 24 = 408 hours and 24 minutes * 24 = 576 minutes. 576 minutes are 9 hours and 36 minutes. So we get (408 hours + 9 hours) and 36 minutes = 417 hours and 36 minutes = 417:36.
I cannot edit the sheet so I copied it. As you can see in column AS and row 43, Google provides 'duration' format. You don't have to manipulate something. Just change the cell format.
In Excel, duration format is [h]:mm. Hit ctrl + 1 at the cell and choose Custom and type [h]:mm at Type and hit enter.
If SO answer is too difficult to follow, try this.
I apologize in advance for how rough this is, but I mostly slapped this code together to fit the task and didn't want to waste time on it. The principles are there though, so at the least it should point you in the direction you need to be heading.
Sub Time_Summarization()
Dim i As Long
Dim j As Long
Dim cell As Range
Dim sHolder As String
Dim vHolder As Variant
Dim arrHolder() As Double
Dim bAdd As Boolean
Dim dHolder_Whole As Double
Dim dHolder_Remainder As Double
Dim sOutput As String
ReDim arrHolder(0 To 2)
' Use a set range. Selection here is just for testing
' Ideally there should be data validation in this loop to ensure that the input
' values are numeric time values.
For Each cell In Selection
' Convert the cell value to a date to permit splitting.
' The value is then split into a 1-d array with 3 positions (H, M, S)
vHolder = Split(CDate(cell.value), ":")
' Loop through the split values from first to last, and trim off the AM/PM.
' If it is a PM date, set the flag to add 12 (13:00:00 gets displayed as 1:00:00 PM)
For j = LBound(vHolder) To UBound(vHolder)
' If PM, set the flag.
If InStr(vHolder(j), "PM") Then bAdd = True
' Remove "AM" and "PM"
vHolder(j) = Replace(vHolder(j), " AM", vbNullString)
vHolder(j) = Replace(vHolder(j), " PM", vbNullString)
' Add the values into the array in the same order.
arrHolder(j) = arrHolder(j) + vHolder(j)
Next
' Add 12 hours if needed
If bAdd Then arrHolder(0) = arrHolder(0) + 12
' Reset the flag for the next loop
bAdd = False
Next
' Step backwards through the array to round up increments of 60.
For i = UBound(arrHolder) To LBound(arrHolder) + 1 Step -1
' This will return the number of times the value goes into 60.
dHolder_Whole = arrHolder(i) \ 60
' This will return the remainder of the value divided by 60.
dHolder_Remainder = arrHolder(i) Mod 60
' Round up seconds to minutes, and minutes to hours.
arrHolder(i - 1) = arrHolder(i - 1) + dHolder_Whole
' Overwrite the remainder
arrHolder(i) = dHolder_Remainder
Next
' Combine the separate values into a string.
sHolder = arrHolder(0) & ":" & arrHolder(1) & ":" & arrHolder(2)
' Just for testing, do with the values whatever you wish.
Debug.Print sHolder
End Sub
Again, this is mostly a model that will work, but will need to be adapted to suit your needs.
Zeth, I downloaded your file and I can make some calculation with your time data. I juss selected all cell with time duration and change the format of cell to "time". Seemingly you should change all cells format, incluiding the empty cells.
If it does not work, find the "More format of numbers" ate the "Numbers" menu. Then, select the option "Hour" and chose the format closest to the format of your data. Also pay attenction to the option "locality" at the bottom of this menu. The option of hour format deppends on the region selected. (Each region in the world have some convenctions about it and Excel reconize much of then.
Formatting the numbers does not change the way Excel does calculations.
So a cell (c3) formatted as time and showing 01:28:00 actually contains 0.061111 because Excel treats time as fractions of a 24 hour day.
When you add up a lot of times and they add up to more than 24 hours the underlying number is more than 1 day so you get number of days before the decimal point and after the decimal point is the fraction of 24 hours remaining. So to convert a duration or time to hours you just multiply it by 24 and format it as a number or general (and the numbers after the decimal point are fractions of an hour). If you just want to format the result as hours and minutes use a format of [h]:mm and do not multiply by 24 - on your system look at Format Cells - Custom to see what the equivalent of [h:mm] is.

How do I sum data based on a PART of the headers name?

Say I have columns
/670 - White | /650 - black | /680 - Red | /800 - Whitest
These have data in their rows. Basically, I want to SUM their values together if their headers contain my desired string.
For modularity's sake, I wanted to merely specify to sum /670, /650, and /680 without having to mention the rest of the header text.
So, something like =SUMIF(a1:c1; "/NUM & /NUM & /NUM"; a2:c2)
That doesn't work, and honestly I don't know what i should be looking for.
Additional stuff:
I'm trying to think of the answer myself, is it possible to mention the header text as condition for ifs? Like: if A2="/650 - Black" then proceed to sum the next header. Is this possible?
Possibility it would not involve VBA, a draggable formula would be preferable!
At this point, I may as well request a version which handles the complete header name rather than just a part of it as I believe it to be difficult for formula code alone.
Thanks for having a look!
Let me know if I need to elaborate.
EDIT: In regards to data samples, any positive number will do actually, damn shame stack overflow doesn't support table markdown. Anyway, for example then..:
+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| A | B | C | D | E |
+---+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 1 |/650 - Black |/670 - White |/800 - White |/680 - Red |/650 - Black |
+---+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 2 | 250 | 400 | 100 | 300 | 125 |
+---+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+
I should have clarified:
The number range for these headers would go from /100 - /9999 and no more than that.
EDIT:
Progress so far:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GiJKFcPWzG5bDsNt93eG7WS_M5uuVk9cvkt2VGSbpxY/edit?usp=sharing
Formula:
=SUMPRODUCT((A2:D2*
(MID($A$1:$D$1,2,4)=IF(LEN($H$1)=4,$H$1&"",$H$1&" ")))+(A2:D2*
(MID($A$1:$D$1,2,4)=IF(LEN($I$1)=4,$I$1&"",$I$1&" ")))+(A2:D2*
(MID($A$1:$D$1,2,4)=IF(LEN($J$1)=4,$J$1&"",$J$1&" "))))
Apparently, each MID function is returning false with each F9 calculation.
EDIT EDIT:
Okay! I found my issue, it's the /being read when you ALSO mentioned that it wasn't required. Man, I should stop skimming!
Final Edit:
=SUMPRODUCT((RETURNSUM*
(MID(HEADER,2,4)=IF(LEN(Match5)=4,Match5&"",Match5&" ")))+(RETURNSUM*
(MID(HEADER,2,4)=IF(LEN(Match6)=4,Match6&"",Match6&" ")))+(RETURNSUM*
(MID(HEADER,2,4)=IF(LEN(Match7)=4,Match7&"",Match7&" ")))
The idea is that Header and RETURNSUM will become match criteria like the matches written above, that way it would be easier to punch new criterion into the search table. As of the moment, it doesn't support multiple rows/dragging.
I have knocked up a couple of formulas that will achieve what you are looking for. For ease I have made the search input require the number only as pressing / does not automatically type into the formula bar. I apologise for the length of the answer, I got a little carried away with the explanation.
I have set this up for 3 criteria located in J1, K1 and L1.
Here is the output I achieved:
Formula 1 - SUMPRODUCT():
=SUMPRODUCT((A4:G4*(MID($A$1:$G$1,2,4)=IF(LEN($J$1)=4,$J$1&"",$J$1&" ")))+(A4:G4*(MID($A$1:$G$1,2,4)=IF(LEN($K$1)=4,$K$1&"",$K$1&" ")))+(A4:G4*(MID($A$1:$G$1,2,4)=IF(LEN($L$1)=4,$L$1&"",$L$1&" "))))
Sumproduct(array1,[array2]) behaves as an array formula without needed to be entered as one. Array formulas break down ranges and calculate them cell by cell (in this example we are using single rows so the formula will assess columns seperately).
(A4:G4*(MID($A$1:$G$1,2,4)=IF(LEN($J$1)=4,$J$1&"",$J$1&" ")))
Essentially I have broken the Sumproduct() formula into 3 identical parts - 1 for each search condition. (A4:G4*: Now, as the formula behaves like an array, we will multiply each individual cell by either 1 or 0 and add the results together.
1 is produced when the next part of the formula is true and 0 for when it is false (default numeric values for TRUE/FALSE).
(MID($A$1:$G$1,2,4)=IF(LEN($J$1)=4,$J$1&"",$J$1&" "))
MID(text,start_num,num_chars) is being used here to assess the 4 digits after the "/" and see whether they match with the number in the 3 cells that we are searching from (in this case the first one: J1). Again, as SUMPRODUCT() works very much like an array formula, each cell in the range will be assessed individually.
I have then used the IF(logical_test,[value_if_true],[value_if_false]) to check the length of the number that I am searching. As we are searching for a 4 digit text string, if the number is 4 digits then add nothing ("") to force it to a text string and if it is not (as it will have to be 3 digits) add 1 space to the end (" ") again forcing it to become a text string.
The formula will then perform the calculation like so:
The MID() formula produces the array: {"650 ","670 ","800 ","680 ","977 ","9999","143 "}. This combined with the first search produces {TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE} which when multiplied by A4:G4
(remember 0 for false and 1 for true) produces this array: {250,0,0,0,0,0,0} essentially pulling the desired result ready to be summed together.
Formula 2: =SUM(IF(Array)): [This formula does not work for 3 digit numbers as they will exist within the 4 digit numbers! I have included it for educational purposes only]
=SUM(IF(ISNUMBER(SEARCH($J$1,$A$1:$G$1)),A8:G8),IF(ISNUMBER(SEARCH($K$1,$A$1:$G$1)),A8:G8),IF(ISNUMBER(SEARCH($L$1,$A$1:$G$1)),A8:G8))
The formula will need to be entered as an array (once copy and pasted while still in the formula bar hit CTRL+SHIFT+ENTER)
This formula works in a similar way, SUM() will add together the array values produced where IF(ISNUMBER(SEARCH() columns match the result column.
SEARCH() will return a number when it finds the exact characters in a cell which represents it's position in number of characters. By using ISNUMBER() I am avoiding having to do the whole MID() and IF(LEN()=4,""," ") I used in the previous formula as TRUE/FALSE will be produced when a match is found regardless of it's position or cell formatting.
As previously mentioned, this poses a problem as 999 can be found within 9999 etc.
The resulting array for the first part is: {250,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE} (if you would like to see the array you can highlight that part of the formula and calculate with F9 but be sure to highlight the exact brackets for that part of the formula).
I hope I have explained this well, feel free to ask any questions about stuff that you don't understand. It is good to see people keen to learn and not just fishing for a fast answer. I would be more than happy to help and explain in more depth.
I start this solution with the names in an array, you can read the header names into an array with not too much difficulty.
Sub test()
Dim myArray(1 To 4) As String
myArray(1) = "/670 - White"
myArray(2) = "/650 - black"
myArray(3) = "/680 - Red"
myArray(4) = "/800 - Whitest"
For Each ArrayValue In myArray
'Find position of last character
endposition = InStr(1, ArrayValue, " - ", vbTextCompare)
'Grab the number section from the string, based on starting and ending positions
stringvalue = Mid(ArrayValue, 2, endposition - 2)
'Convert to number
NumberValue = CLng(stringvalue)
'Add to total
Total = Total + NumberValue
Next ArrayValue
'Print total
Debug.Print Total
End Sub
This will print the answer to the debug window.

Calculating an average while ignoring certain values

Let's say I have a set of numbers e.g. [10,45,3,0,0,0,27] and I want to average every number that isn't a 0. So in this case it would be (10 + 45 + 3 + 27) / 4. How can I do this in excel, given that I will change the 0's to non-0's at some point, so the average will need to be updated?
=AVERAGEIF(Range,"<>"&0)
Just use Excel's =COUNTIF(Range, Criteria) function, e.g. in your case =COUNTIF(A1:A10,**">0"**) to count every value greater than 0 and then divide by the number.
Also this might help: https://www.ablebits.com/office-addins-blog/2014/07/02/excel-countif-examples/

Hours Calculations in Excel 2010

I have an Excel 2010 workbook which contains a cell with the value of, say, 9876:54:32 (manually entered) representing 9876 hours, 54 minutes and 32 seconds of, say, phone talk time.
Then I have a cell with the value of, say, 1000 (manually entered) representing 1000 calls.
I want to divide the values to get the average talk time of 592.615 minutes per call.
I'm doing a regular =A1/B1 and it gives me an error.
* EDITED *
Thanks Brain Webster for correcting my math. I mean 9.876 hours. But the point is that Excel gives me an error, not my manual math. Playing around with it I discovered that Excel is fine with me with values up to 9999:59:59. Once I try with 10000:00:00 and up, it doesn't recognize it as a time value.
I love these seemingly easy riddles, so here is my solution as a formula and as a VBA attempt:
my original:
= (LINKS(A38;FINDEN(":";A38)-1)/24)+ZEITWERT("0"&RECHTS(A38;LÄNGE(A38)-FINDEN(":";A38)+1))
translated:
= (LEFT(A38,FIND(":",A38)-1)/24)+TIMEVALUE("0"&RIGHT(A38,LEN(A38)-FIND(":",A38)+1))
This will get you the right value to a given 10k text of a time duration. You would only have to setup the format of the cell to [h]:mm:ss. Then those values will look the same, but one would be a string and the other a number - and that is a major difference ;)
In vba it looks much more easier, and once defined, you can use it as a worksheetfunction.
Public Function GetDurationValue(ByVal strInput As String) As Double
Dim arrResult As Variant
arrResult = Split(strInput, ":") 'saves you parsing
GetDurationValue = (arrResult(0) / 24) + _
TimeSerial(0, arrResult(1), arrResult(2))
End Function
A38 = "10971:12:14"
=GetDurationValue(A38)
=457.13349537037
You can use LEFT and RIGHT function to retreive parts of the time value and then sum and multiply these values by 60 [minutes] (resp. 3600 [hours]).
Something like this for the hours, minutes, seconds (A1 is the cell with time value):
B1=VALUE(LEFT(A1;FIND(":";A1)))*3600
B2=VALUE(LEFT(A1;FIND(":";A1; FIND(":";A1))))*60
B3=VALUE(LEFT(A1;FIND(":";A1; FIND(":";A1; FIND(":";A1)))))
Now you can sum that:
C1=SUM(B1;B2;B3)
Then divede by calls count (A2 is the cell with the calls count):
D1=C1/A2
Finally format it like time:
E1=TEXT(D1/(24*3600);"d \day\s hh:mm:ss")
BTW: I tried that in Excel 2013 and when I enter 111:22:33 into a cell it automatically converts to a time. So then I can divide it like you try...
It appears that hours > 10000 are not recognised as such by Excel. Therefore we need to introduce an IF() to see whether this is the case and determined the alternative formula for the case where hours >10000
=IF(ISERROR(FIND(":",A2)),A2/B2, <SCRIPT IN CASE OF >10000>)
<SCRIPT IN CASE OF >10000> will now be:
VALUE(LEFT(A2,FIND(":",A2)))/24+VALUE(LEFT(A2,FIND(":",A2, FIND(":",A2))))/(24*60)+VALUE(LEFT(A2,FIND(":",A2, FIND(":",A2,FIND(":",A2)))))*(24*60*60)
combine and enjoy!
Assuming you don't exceed 100,000 hours in A1, and you always display hours, minutes and seconds then this formula should suffice
=IFERROR(A1/B1,(LEFT(A1)*10000/24+RIGHT(A1,10))/B1)
format result cell as [h]:mm:ss to get the result as a time value
With 10971:12:14 in A1 and 1000 in B1 that should give a result of 10:58:16 [or format result cell as [m]:ss to get minutes and seconds like 658:16]
This version will work with any number of hours and with or without seconds
=IFERROR(A1/B1,(LEFT(A1,FIND(":",A1)-1)/24+RIGHT(A1&IF(COUNTIF(A1,":*:"),"",":00"),5)/60)/B1)

Resources