I want to hide a couple of problematic warnings in vim-latex, but I can't seem to work out the syntax.
I currently have:
let g:tex_IgnoredWarnings =
\'Underfull'."\n".
\'Overfull'."\n".
\'specifier changed to'."\n".
\'You have requested'."\n".
\'Missing number, treated as zero.'."\n".
\'There were undefined references'."\n".
\'Citation %.%# undefined'."\n".
\'Double space found.'."\n"
let g:Tex_IgnoreLevel = 8
To me, that looks correct per the documentation, but the "Double Space Found" warning still appears (to clarify, by 'still appears' I mean that it's highlighted on the left of the screen with S>).
Any ideas?
The property you're setting should start with an uppercase letter (g:Tex_IgnoredWarnings as opposed to g:tex_IgnoredWarnings. The way you have it now, vim-latex is using the default value for g:Tex_IgnoredWarnings and not your desired overrides.
Related
I want to write a simple call to assert! like this
assert!(idents.len() == 1, "Multi-part table references not supported");
But this keeps getting formatted to:
assert!(
idents.len() == 1,
"Multi-part table references not supported"
);
But I don't really like this particular formatting behavior; I'd like it to stay on one line. I tried setting the fn_call_width in my rustfmt.toml file to a higher number, but that didn't help. Note that my max_width is still the default value (100).
Does anybody know if there is a config I can set in the rustfmt.toml that can get me the desired behavior?
Ahh, I just realized that changing the width settings, like fn_call_width won't change anything if use_small_heuristics is set to "Default" (which it is by default). I have to either do use_small_heuristics = "Off", or I have to increase my max_width (which rustfmt uses to compute settings like fn_call_width when use_small_heuristics = "Default").
I am trying to remove the underline from the items in my list box when i select it. I tried giving the entire list box the "activestyle=None" but i learned that you need to use the "itemconfigure". What i am lost on is what i should be putting for index. I have my .insert index as 'end' and it works properly but when i do that for the item configure it says its out of range. Here is the code if anyone can assist me here.
taskList = Listbox(setBox, bg="#1B2834",fg="white")
taskList.configure(width=183,height=39, activestyle=None, fg="#4299E9", selectbackground="#061523",
selectforeground="#4299E9")
taskList.itemconfigure('end', activestyle=None)
taskList.insert('end', taskIDnum)
You don't use itemconfigure to set the activestyle attribute. You should use the configure method of the listbox. The documented value to turn off the ring around active item (or underline, depending on platform) is the string "none", not the python value None.
taskList.configure(activestyle="none")
I'm having trouble finding examples/troubleshooting tips online, and am not quite sure that I'm interpreting the documentation correctly. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
I'm connecting to an e-mail server, and want to read the e-mail subjects, and bodies. I first make my connection like so:
import imaplib
c = imaplib.IMAP4_SSL(hostname, port)
c.login(username, password)
foldername = 'INBOX/SSR'
c.select(str.encode(foldername), readonly = True)
today = datetime.date.today().strftime('%d-%b-%Y')
searchcriteria = '(SENTON '{}')'.format(today)
typ, msg_ids = c.search(None, searchcriteria)
msg_ids = [s.decode('ascii') for s in msg_ids]
for idnumber in msg_ids:
print(c.fetch(idnumber, "(BODY.PEEK[HEADER])"))
The code and works and output looks as expected, up until the last line, at which point, I get
imaplib.error: FETCH command error: BAD [b' Command Argument Error. 12']
My line of thought, and subsequent testing examined the following possible issues:
bytes vs. string. I converted input back to bytes, but the error remained constant
improper syntax: I tried other commands, such as BODY, SUBJECT, and ENVELOPE but still got the same message.
I'm not sure how to interpret the error, and don't really know where to start. Referencing https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3501.html from pp. 102+, I noticed that the values are labeled differently, but don't understand what the issue is with my implementation. How should I interpret the error? What is wrong with my syntax?
P.S. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the c.search shouldn't change my directory, yes? As in, by selecting foldername, I "navigate" to the selected folder, but just searching only returns values and shouldn't change my location?
I encountered the same problem while I tried to list or select a new mailbox - BAD [b' Command Argument Error. 12'], in my case, it didn't work with “Sent Box”, but it worked well with “Outbox”, so the space symbol is the point.
So it worked with c.select('"{}"'.format("Sent Box")...
Hope this information could help you.
Your last line is not correct msg_ids = [s.decode('ascii') for s in msg_ids]
msg_ids is a list with bytes string, not with elements of a list - example: [b'123 124 125']
Change the last line into msg_ids = msg_ids[0].split(b' ') and it will work as expected.
As the title says, the height of my tabs is not increasing as it should, my code looks like this:
JTabbedPane jtp = new JTabbedPane();
JLabel iconInTab = new JLabel(new ImageIcon("myImage.png"));
iconInTab.setPreferredSize(new Dimension(100,80)); // is the size of my Image, I've also try to do this using getSize
jtp.addTab(null,new JPanel());
jtp.setTabComponentAt(0,iconInTab);
I've also try this using html but it did not work either:
jtp.addTab("<html><p><p><p></html>",new ImageIcon("myImage.png"),new JPanel());
with the first code the problem is not the change of the size horizontally (the width change correctly), the problem is only on the height, with the second code, if I add multiple lines inside the html code, the text appear incomplete (just show the middle line) (also the width behaves as expected, the problem is the height). . .
why is this happening? or how could I get this done?
Note: S.O.: Mac OS X 10.8.1
Solved!!! The problem was that the default UI over MAC OS X (com.apple.laf.AquaTabbedPaneContrastUI), you only need to change it to the basicTabbedPaneUI (or the one of your preference), in my particular case I need to extend this class (it was a pain in the *, because what I wanted was really complex) to get the look & feel that I was expecting, if you have the same trouble just do this before adding your tabs:
myTabbedPane.setUI(new BasicTabbedPaneUI());
Note: Checking the default UI of your TabbedPane, may solve many different problems.
Is it in anyway possible to increase the number of suggests that your extension may show in the omnibox?
By default it looks like 5 rows is the limit. I've read about a command line switch to change the number of rows (--omnibox-popup-count) but I am really interested in dynamically being able to set this in my extension.
5 rows isn't really enough for the information my extension want to show.
[Update 2018 - thanx version365 & Aaron!]
» Not hardcoded anymore! chrome://flags/#omnibox-ui-max-autocomplete-matches . Credit goes to #version365 answering below: http://stackoverflow.com/a/47806290/234309 « – Aaron Thoma
..[historical] detail: since the removal of --omnibox-popup-count flag (http://codereview.chromium.org/2013008) in May 2010 the number [was] hardcoded:
const size_t AutocompleteResult::kMaxMatches = 6;
a discussion two years later on the chromium-discuss mailing list about the 'Omnibox default configuration' "concluded"
"On lower performing machines generating more result would slow down the result display. The current number look like a good balance."
[which is not a very valid argument, considering the probably infinitesimal overhead retrieving more items than the hard-wired number]
why the heck is there no chromium fork that removes stupid UX limitations like this (or the no tabbar in fullscreen mode)^^
Since there is no more --omnibox-popup-count flag; you can use another flag which is new.
chrome://flags/#omnibox-ui-max-autocomplete-matches lets you select a maximum of 12 rows.
In fact there is no more --omnibox-popup-count flag
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=40083
So I think there is no way to enlarge the omnibox.