Is there a way to specify a layout for children of a PolylineConnection?
I want to add several Labels to a PolylineConnection at ConnectionLocator.MIDDLE without the use of a container figure for the labels.
Both PolylineConnection and Label have EditParts, and the label's model objects are children of the polyline connection's model objects.
Ideally I want to add all label children of a polyline to ConnectionLocator.MIDDLE in a ToolbarLayout...
What you are trying to do is mix two layouts: on the first hand you want to use a ConnectionLocator.MIDDLE to locate the figures, but on the other hand you want to have the figures at this location to have their own layout.
The only solution you have is to create a figure that uses a ToolbarLayout and locate it in the Polyline using the ConnectionLocator
I've found a way to achieve what I wanted:
Very generally, the first child must be added at ConnectionLocator.MIDDLE, and the rest of the children relative to the child before them with the help of RelativeLocator like this (line would be in a loop over all figure children in connection's edit part):
figure.add(childFigure,
new RelativeLocator((IFigure) figureChildren.get(currentIndex - 1),
0.5,
1.7);
I've written a blog post with more details.
Related
I need a solution to resolve the over lapping issue with joint js links.
For example
Image1
to
Image2
I'm implementing a process flow diagram in JointJS where the user can delete elements as well as add new ones, and re-link things in a variety of orderings. The graph is using the auto-layout features of the joint.layout.DirectedGraph library with Dagre to re-organize the graph each time something is deleted, added, unlinked or re-linked. One odd issue has cropped up and I'm not sure yet how to handle it.
Say I have a "fork" process with two out ports, one on each side, and a single in port at the top. Depending on the ordering of the elements in the array, the auto layout can sometimes place the child element of the left-hand port to the right of the child element of the right-hand port, so the resulting links are crossed.
Is there some straightforward way to influence the rank ordering in the layout?
I have tried the below soluiton
joint.layout.DirectedGraph.layout(this.graph, {
setLinkVertices: true,
ranker: 'longer-path',
rankDir: 'TB',
dagre: dagre,
rankSep: parseInt(70, 10),
edgeSep: parseInt(30, 10),
marginX: 100,
marginY: 270
});
I just started out with Phaser.
I have a simple sprite in the middle of the screen, and whenever I click the sprite, I emit a particle at the clicked x,y coordinates.
My problem is that the particles are generated behind the sprite. I have tried setting z on the sprite to 1 and the emitter to 1000 without luck.
What am I missing?
var emitter = game.add.emitter(game.world.centerX, game.world.centeryY);
emitter.makeParticles('phaser');
var sprite = game.add.sprite(game.world.centerX, game.world.centerY, 'phaser');
sprite.scale.setTo(2, 2);
sprite.inputEnabled = true;
sprite.events.onInputDown.add(function(sender, pointer){
emitter.emitX = pointer.x;
emitter.emitY = pointer.y;
emitter.emitParticle();
}, this);
http://phaser.io/sandbox/cxBVeHrx
EDIT
My actual code is based on the Phaser-ES6-Boilerplate. Even though BdRs answer solves the issue in the sandbox code, I'm not able to utilize this in my real code.
I have uploaded both the code and a running example. Hopefully someone can tell me where I have screwed things up...
Separate Phaser items don't have a z-order, instead it just depends on the order you create and add them to game. Each new sprite or emitter or group etc. will be displayed on top of all previously added items.
So, simply changing your code to something like this should work.
// first the sprite
var sprite = game.add.sprite(game.world.centerX, game.world.centerY, 'phaser');
sprite.scale.setTo(2, 2);
// then the particles in front of sprite
var emitter = game.add.emitter(game.world.centerX, game.world.centeryY);
emitter.makeParticles('phaser');
// then maybe text in front of particles and sprite
var mytest = game.add.bitmapText(10, 20, 'myfont', 'Level 1', 16);
// etc.
Btw sprites do have a .z value but that only used when it's part of a Phaser.Group, it will then be used as the display z-order but only within that group of sprites.
By default, phaser will not sort objects that get added to any group, it will just render them in the order that they get added. In your case, you can just add the emitter to the group after you add the sprite (the group in this case is the 'game' object).
Of course, having to add objects in the drawing order is not ideal, and if you need to have them sorted dynamically, not possible.
Another way is you can sort objects within a group using the 'sort' function, in which you give it the name of a parameter to sort by, and you sort whenever you need to (in some cases, in the Update callback).
Sorting every frame can be a performance hit though, especially if you have a lot of objects. Another way you could go about this is by adding groups, sorting those groups in draw order (think of them like layers), and then adding objects to those groups in any order. Any group that needs sorting within itself you can sort as well. This way, you can choose to have (for example) a background layer not needing to be sorted but everything added to that layer will be behind every other layer.
Good answers from everybody, but you are missing that every GameObject has a depth property which serves exactly the z-index purpose. This way you do not need to rely on the order of objects creation.
There is also an official
example.
Hope this helps.
i am new to GWT and GWTP and the question sounds stupid.. Can I make an abstract PresenterWidget or similiar?
Like in normal Java extending the "class" and reuse / extend the logic. But not only the class, the whole thing of View and Presenter. I try to explain my initial situation and maybe you have another idea.
The image hopefully helps to explain it. The "Main-Tab" and every other tab consists of a collection of views which have the same base structure and the same logic.
the base structure consists of
border around EVERYTHING
an image (the wwitch)
a title
a textarea
a PresenterWidget which is added to a contentSlot of the parent (the menu left)
and below the base are view specific components like buttons, text or any other widget. So a main part of the view with logic is repeading. If the switch is "toggled" the view is hidden (the textarea and any childs / view specific components) like the lowest view in the picture. Furthermore the PresenterWidget left changes the color.
The logic is working, but now I am searching a proper way to solve this without repeading code and the possibility to add child elements which are hidden as well by toggling the switch. Can I add to a PresenterWidget child widgets and define where there should be added? like: Even if this is possible, it feels a bit inconvenient.
Thanks in advance.
I just want to post the solution:
I have now a simple Composite (KPICommonView) for the switch, title and the description. It got another FlowPanel below the description, where the specific components will be added later. For this the Composite implements "HasWidgets" and overrides the "add(Widget w)"-method which is called by UiBinder if the Widget is added and has child elements.
<own:KPICommonView title="First Header" description="I am a happy description :)" anchorToken="{nameAnchors.getFirst}">
<g:Label>child component</g:Label>
</own:KPICommonView>
I am not sure if I do a PresenterWidget for every segment and every PresenterWidget has one of the KPICommonView added, or if I do one normal Presenter which adds more than one of the CommonViews.
The CommonView furhter creates the PresenterWidget for the menu item on the side. It gets the attributes from the constructor (anchorToken, title) and adds it to the slot (which happens ugly, because the View has hard coded the parent saved to call "addInSlot()". The repeading code for the switch is handled by the KPICommonView.
I've a layer with multiple markers with rather big icons, so they overlap. Via the list on the side of the map users can select a marker and the map will pan (and zoom) to it. But it will still be behind some other makers.
How do I get a individual makers z-index and set it? I would be useful to get the highest used z-index and just add one. (another solution is to add the total number of markers to the z-index)
The markers (or features) are in a myLib.features array. The console doesn't show any z-index type functions.
I can't find a appropriate example or api function for this.
EDIT:
I found this example: http://dev.openlayers.org/examples/ordering.html
I don't really understand it. Somehow the created feature takes the next z-index given by the layer via somekind of symbolizer. I have no idea how to work this static sort into a dynamic one.
Try this:
First of all, make sure you are using a OpenLayers.Layer.Vector layer, not a OpenLayers.Layer.Markers layer. Apparently the Markers layer is old news and all new development is done in the Vector layer. It has more features. (I wasted a pile of time with the Markers layer myself).
Then, each of your markers needs to be a OpenLayers.Feature.Vector object. The constructor takes three arguments, the third of which is called the style. The style is where you set your image attributes, the background shadow, the mouse-over text, and the z-index, which has the property name "graphicZIndex". I think that's what you're looking for.
http://dev.openlayers.org/releases/OpenLayers-2.12/doc/apidocs/files/OpenLayers/Feature/Vector-js.html#OpenLayers.Feature.Vector.OpenLayers.Feature.Vector.style
Add your "markers" (which are Vector's) to your Vector layer with the addFeatures function. And just ignore the "options" argument.
http://dev.openlayers.org/releases/OpenLayers-2.12/doc/apidocs/files/OpenLayers/Layer/Vector-js.html#OpenLayers.Layer.Vector.addFeatures
I found that example page too, and I found it confusing too. It was setting all the markers' styles in the Vector layer's constructor (as default values to be used if the marker style was omitted) instead of the marker's constructor. I think it makes more sense to set the marker style in the marker constructor.
To change the style in real-time, take one of your OpenLayers.Feature.Vector markers, called "marker" and do this. And let's call the Vector Layer "layer".
marker.style.graphicZIndex = 13;
layer.redraw();
I'm using JUNG2 to draw some graphs.
This is the image I get:
http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/205/graphvizkk3312164f020b4.png
I'd like to:
1) change the rendering order (labels should be the last objects to be drawn);
2) add a semi-transparent background to the labels.
3) change background color of the whole image.
Any idea on how to do this?
The JUNG2 documentation is not very extensive on these issues.
Mulone
(1) To do this you'd have to hack the rendering code; I don't believe that we support this at the moment.
UPDATE: I took a closer look. Actually JUNG does support this without hacking the existing libraries; the easiest way is perhaps to subclass BasicRenderer and then override the render() method so that things happen in the order that you want. (I recommend that you render vertices after edges.) Once you do that, you create an instance of your custom Renderer, and call VisualizationViewer.setRenderer(customRenderer).
(2) The labels respect HTML code (i.e., surround your label with <html></html> and then put whatever tags you like in it).
(3) BasicVisualizationServer (and its subclasses, e.g. VisualizationViewer) inherit from JComponent, which defines setBackground(Color).