I need to perform a search on several entities with the same string then order the results.
I've heard/read a little about FOSElasticaBundle, would this bundle be able to do it? It seems (to me) to have almost to much features for this purpose and I'm not sure it could run on a shared server (hostgator).
The other solution I can think of at the moment is doing the search "manually" (by using join and union) but I'm wondering where should I put such a function: in an existing controller, a new one, a new bundle or somewhere else?
I'm worried as well that this manual solution could come to a cost, especially on some non-indexable fields.
You would do custom entity repositories. Check out the docs. Basically this extends the default FindAll, FindOneBy, etc.
You would have a function like so:
class MyEntityRepository extends Doctrine\ORM\EntityRepository {
public function findByCustomRule(){
//this is mapped to your entity (automatically adds the select)
$queryBuilder = $this->createQueryBuilder('someAlias');
$queryBuilder->orderBy('...');
//this is mapped to any entity
$queryBuilder = $this->getEntityManager()->createQueryBuilder();
$queryBuilder->select('...');
//result
$result = $queryBuilder->getQuery()->getResult();
}
}
This class is defined in the doctrine mapping and lives inside the Entity folder.. Check the docs out and you should get a basic idea.
Related
Using Room and RxJava3, my DAO interfaces always have methods with different return types (Maybe and Flowable) but with the exact same query. This is how I solve an important issue, which is that whenever I use Flowables, I want an empty list emitted immediately when the table is empty (rather than nothing at all).
Duplicating the query string may introduce bugs if I ever get sloppy and forget to update all of them. Now that I found I can still get syntax highlighting in Android Studio when storing the query, I came up with the following.
String query = "SELECT * FROM MyObject"; // public, as DAO is a public java interface
#Query(query)
Maybe<List<MyObject>> maybeMyObjectList();
#Query(query)
Flowable<List<MyObject>> flowableMyObjectList();
This enables me to do things like flowableMyObjectList().startWith(maybeMyObjectList().defaultIfEmpty(Collections.emptyList())).distinctUntilChanged()
Still, having SQL queries stored in a public string feels like a bad idea, security-wise. On the other hand, I don't think the database schema in my app bundle is supposed to be secret anyway. Can anyone with a better knowledge than mine confirm that it is a bad as it sounds, or better propose a workaround?
Instead of an interface you can use an abstract class, thus you can then have methods with bodies and private variables.
You then have to make the methods abstract.
So you could have:-
#Dao
abstract class TheDao {
private static final String query = "SELECT * FROM MyObject";
#Query(query)
abstract Maybe<List<MyObject>> maybeMyObjectList();
#Query(query)
abstract Flowable<List<MyObject>> flowableMyObjectList();
}
I like the jhipster entity generator.
I often get to change my model and regen all entities.
I wish to keep the generated stuff and override for my needs.
On angular side, it is quite easy to create a new service extending the default entity service to do my stuff.
On java side, it is more complicated.
For example, I override src/main/java/xxx/web/rest/xxxResource.java with src/main/java/xxx/web/rest/xxxOverrideResource.java
I have to comment #RestController in xxxResource.java. I tried to give it a different bundle name from the overrided class but it is not sufficient : #RestController("xxxResource")
In xxxOverrideResource.java, I have to change all #xxxMapping() to different paths
In xxxOverrideResource.java, I have to change all method names
This allow me to keep the CRUD UI and API, and overload it using another MappingPath.
Some code to make it more visual. Here is the generated xxxResource.java
/**
* REST controller for managing WorldCommand.
*/
// Commented to prevent bean dupplicated error.
// #RestController
#RequestMapping("/api")
public class WorldCommandResource {
private final WorldCommandService worldCommandService;
public WorldCommandResource(WorldCommandService worldCommandService) {
this.worldCommandService = worldCommandService;
}
#PutMapping("/world-commands")
#Timed
public ResponseEntity<WorldCommand> updateWorldCommand(#Valid #RequestBody WorldCommand worldCommand)
throws URISyntaxException {
log.debug("REST request to update WorldCommand : {}", worldCommand);
...
}
Here is my overloaded version : xxxOverrideResource.java
/**
* REST controller for managing WorldCommand.
*/
#RestController("WorldCommandOverrideResource")
#RequestMapping("/api")
public class WorldCommandOverrideResource extends WorldCommandResource {
private final WorldCommandOverrideService worldCommandService;
public WorldCommandOverrideResource(WorldCommandOverrideService worldCommandService) {
super(worldCommandService);
log.warn("USING WorldCommandOResource");
this.worldCommandService = worldCommandService;
}
#PutMapping("/world-commands-override")
#Timed
public ResponseEntity<WorldCommand> updateWorldCommandOverride(#Valid #RequestBody WorldCommand worldCommand)
throws URISyntaxException {
throw new RuntimeException("WorldCommand updating not allowed");
}
With the xxxResource overrided, it is easy to override the xxxService and xxxRepository by constructor injection.
I feel like I am over thinking it. As it is not an external component but code from a generator, maybe the aim is to use the tool to write less code and then do the changes you need.
Also, I fear this overriding architecture will prevent me from creating abstract controller if needed.
Do you think keeping the original generated code is a good pratice or I should just make my changes in the generated class and be carefull when regenerating an entity ?
Do you know a better way to override a Spring controller ?
Your approach looks like the side-by-side approach described here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WVpwIUEty0
I often found that the generated REST API is only useful for managing data in a backoffice and I usually write a complete separate API with different endpoints, authorizations and DTOs that is consumed by mobile or end-users. So I don't see much value in overriding REST controllers, after all they are supposed to be quite thin with as little business logic as possible.
You must also consider how long you want to keep this compatibility with generated code. As your app grows in complexity you might want to refactor your code and organize it around feature packages rather than by technical packages (repository, rest controllers, services, ...). For many reasons, sooner or later the way the generated code is setup will get in your way, so I would not put too much effort into this compatibility goal that has no real business value especially when you know that the yearly released major version may break it because of changes in the generator itself or more likely because of changes in underlying frameworks.
I started working with CodedUI few months before to automate a desktop Application(WPF).
Just checking out for the best ways to create a framework for my Application.
As, I have seen in other automation tools, I feel the heart of an automation framework using any tool(UI Based) is the way it's object Repository is created i.e. how well the UI objects are defined. A Cleaner and well defined Object Repository always proves to be very helpful when it comes to updating your tests.
I am trying to discover the best way to store my UIObjects so that in case of any UI changes in my Application, I have to put minimum effort to update my automation test.
Also, If an Object changes in application, updating it only at one place should solve the problem.
This can be any kind of change like :
->change in just a property(This I feel would be very easy to update in automation Test. The best and Easiet way I feel is to simply update the .uitest file(the xml file) if possible.)
->change in hierarchy and position
->entirely new object added
For the 2nd and 3rd changes, updating scripts become a difficult job, esp if the UIObject is being referred at may places, in many TestMethods, or Modules.
Also, I have generally seen that in Test Methods, Variable Declarations are done to create a reference to the UIMap objects and those variables are further used in the TestMethod Code.
So, in this case If the UI of my application changes, I will have to update the variable decalaration in each of the Test Methods. I want to reduce this effort to changing the variable decalaration only at one place. OfCourse, I cannot have all the code inside only one Test Method. One way that came to my mind is as:
Can't I have simply one common place for all these Variable decalarations. We can give a unique and understandable name to each UIObject e.g.: The decalratoions will look like:
UITabPage UITabPage = this.UIMap.UISimWindow.UISelectEquipmentTabList.UITabPage;
WpfRow UIRow = this.UIMap.UISimWindow.UISelectEquipmentTabList.UITabPage.UIEquipmentDetailsTable.UIRow;
WpfText UIEquipmentTagText = this.UIMap.UISimWindow.UISelectEquipmentTabList.UITabPage.UIEquipmentDetailsTable.UIRow.UITagCell.UIEquipmentTagText;
WpfCheckBox UIEquipmentCheckBox = this.UIMap.UISimWindow.UISelectEquipmentTabList.UITabPage.UIEquipmentDetailsTable.UIRow.UICheckBoxCell.UICheckBox;
....
....
and use these variables wherever required. Hence, In case of any chnages also, there will be only one place where you will need to update thse objects.
But for this, These varaibles must be made STATIC. What can be problem with making these Object Variables static?
Please provide your suggestion on this topic. May be what I am thinking is not possible or practical. I just want to choose the best way to start with before I go too far with the automation scripts and realize later that my approach wasn't a good one.
Thanks in Advance,
Shruti
Look into using descriptive programming instead of using the UIMaps.
Make a static class with generic functions to assist. Going to give you some examples of how to set it up.
For example:
public WinWindow parentwin(string ParentControlName)
{
var parentwin = new WinWindow();
parentwin.SearchProperties.Add("Control Name", ParentControlName);
return parentwin;
}
public WinWindow childwin(string ChildWinControlName, string ParentControlName)
{
var childwin = new WinWindow(parentwin(ParentControlName));
childwin.SearchProperties.Add("Control Name", ChildWinControlName);
return childwin;
}
public WinButton button(string ButtonName,string ChildWinControlName, string ParentControlName)
{
var childwin = childwin(ChildWinControlName,ParentControlName);
var button = new WinButton(childwin);
button.SearchProperties.Add("Name", ButtonName);
}
public void ClickButton(string ButtonName,string ChildWinControlName, string ParentControlName)
{
var button = button(ButtonName,ChildWinControlName,ParentControlName);
Mouse.Click(button);
}
public void ChangeFocus(WinWindow NewFocus)
{
var NewFocus = new NewFocus();
NewFocus.SetFocus();
}
public void ChangeFocus(WinWindow NewFocusChild, string c)
{
var a = new NewFocus();
a.SetFocus();
}
ChangeFocus(childwin("WelcomeForm", "MainForm");
ClickButton("&OK", "WelcomeForm", "MainForm");
Is there a way we can use ObjectContext with DbContext's ModelBuilder? We don't want to use POCO because we have customized property code that does not modify entire object in update, but only update modified properties. Also we have lots of serialisation and auditing code that uses EntityObject.
Since poco does create a proxy with EntityObject, we want our classes to be derived from EntityObject. We don't want proxy. We also heavily use CreateSourceQuery. The only problem is EDMX file and its big connection string syntax web.config.
Is there any way I can get rid of EDMX file? It will be useful as we can dynamically compile new class based on reverse engineering database.
I would also like to use DbContext with EntityObject instead of poco.
Internal Logic
Access Modified Properties in Save Changes which is available in ObjectStateEntry and Save them onto Audit with Old and New Values
Most of times we need to only check for Any condition on Navigation Property for example
User.EmailAddresses.CreateSourceQuery()
.Any( x=> x.EmailAddress == givenAddress);
Access Property Attributes, such as XmlIgnore etc, we rely heavily on attributes defined on the properties.
A proxy for a POCO is a dynamically created class which derives from (inherits) a POCO. It adds functionality previously found in EntityObject, namely lazy loading and change tracking, as long as a POCO meets requirements. A POCO or its proxy does not contain an EntityObject as the question suggests, but rather a proxy contains functionality of EntityObject. You cannot (AFAIK) use ModelBuilder with EntityObject derivatives and you cannot get to an underlying EntityObject from a POCO or a proxy, since there isn't one as such.
I don't know what features of ObjectContext does your existing serialisation and auditing code use, but you can get to ObjectContext from a DbContext by casting a DbContext to a IObjectContextAdapter and accessing IObjectContextAdapter.ObjectContext property.
EDIT:
1. Access Modified Properties in Save Changes which is available in ObjectStateEntry and Save them onto Audit with Old and New Values
You can achieve this with POCOs by using DbContext.ChangeTracker. First you call DbContext.ChangeTracker.DetectChanges to detect the changes (if you use proxies this is not needed, but can't hurt) and then you use DbCotnext.Entries.Where(e => e.State != EntityState.Unchanged && e.State != EntityState.Detached) to get DbEntityEntry list of changed entities for auditing. Each DbEntityEntry has OriginalValues and CurrentValues and the actual Entity is in property Entity.
You also have access to ObjectStateEntry, see below.
2. Most of times we need to only check for Any condition on Navigation Property for example:
User.EmailAddresses.CreateSourceQuery().Any( x=> x.EmailAddress == givenAddress);
You can use CreateSourceQuery() with DbContext by utilizing IObjectContextAdapter as described previously. When you have ObjectContext you can get to the source query for a related end like this:
public static class DbContextUtils
{
public static ObjectQuery<TMember> CreateSourceQuery<TEntity, TMember>(this IObjectContextAdapter adapter, TEntity entity, Expression<Func<TEntity, ICollection<TMember>>> memberSelector) where TMember : class
{
var objectStateManager = adapter.ObjectContext.ObjectStateManager;
var objectStateEntry = objectStateManager.GetObjectStateEntry(entity);
var relationshipManager = objectStateManager.GetRelationshipManager(entity);
var entityType = (EntityType)objectStateEntry.EntitySet.ElementType;
var navigationProperty = entityType.NavigationProperties[(memberSelector.Body as MemberExpression).Member.Name];
var relatedEnd = relationshipManager.GetRelatedEnd(navigationProperty.RelationshipType.FullName, navigationProperty.ToEndMember.Name);
return ((EntityCollection<TMember>)relatedEnd).CreateSourceQuery();
}
}
This method uses no dynamic code and is strongly typed since it uses expressions. You use it like this:
myDbContext.CreateSourceQuery(invoice, i => i.details);
There is Campaign Entity and for that, I have CampaignRepository which have this functions
public IList FindAll();
public Campaign FindByCampaignNumber(string number);
But now i want this criterias -:
Find campaigns that are created today.
Find campaigns that are created in this month
Find top 5 latest campaigns.
Find campaigns that are created in this year.
So for all these campaigns filters,
Do i create separate function for each of them in repository ?
and implement like this way.
Getall campaigns and then filter required campaigns, but i do not want all campaigns. While searching in google i find this solution's
1: http://russelleast.wordpress.com/2008/09/20/implementing-the-repository-and-finder-patterns/
Is there any method i can avoid multiple functions or do i go ahead and create seperate functions for each of this filter ?
Have you considered implementing Specification pattern in your application? Maybe it looks like an overkill, but it may prove useful if your app will have some complex user filter options.
class CampaignSpecification
{
public CampaignSpecification Number(string number);
public CampaignSpecification DateBetween(DateTime from, date to);
public CampaignSpecification Year(DateTime year);
} //I have omitted all the AND/OR stuff it can be easily implemented with any SQL like query language
Here is an example how loading from the repository may look like
var campaignList = CampaignRepository.load(
new CampaignSpec()
.Number("2")
.Year(DateTime.Now);
Also I'd like to add that it depends much on what kind of data access solution you are using, it makes implementing easier when you know what kind of API you will be using(Criteria API, SQL or whatever) so you can tweak your Specification interface to make its implementation simpler.
UPDATE: if you are implementing specifications in .NET using linq and nHibernate please check out http://linqspecs.codeplex.com/
I would go with creating two Specifications: TopCampaignSpec and CampaingCreatedSpec.
var spec = CampaignCreatedSpec.ThisYear();
var campaigns = CampaignsRepository.FindSatisfying(spec);
CampaingCreatedSpec can also be replaced with more generic DateRange class if you need this functionality elsewhere:
var thisYear = DateRange.ThisYear();
var campaigns = CampaignsRepository.FindByDateRange(spec);
I also highly recommend staying away from 'generic' repositories and entities. Please read this
From DDD perspective it does not matter whether data access code is implemented as SQL/HQL/ICriteria or even web service call. This code belongs to repository implementation (data access layer). This is just a sample:
public IList<Campaign> FindByDateRange(CampaignCreatedSpec spec) {
ICriteria c = _nhibernateSession.CreateCriteria(typeof(Campaign));
c.Add(Restrictions.Between("_creationDate", spec.StartDate, spec.EndDate));
return c.List<Campaign>();
}
Here is how I would do this:
class Campaigns{
IEnumerable<Campaign> All(){...}
IEnumerable<Campaign> ByNumber(int number){...}
IEnumerable<Campaign> CreatedToday(){...}
IEnumerable<Campaign> CreatedThisMonth(){...}
IEnumerable<Campaign> CreatedThisYear(){...}
IEnumerable<Campaign> Latest5(){...}
private IQueryable<Campaign> GetSomething(Something something){
//used by public methods to dry out repository
}
}
Reasoning is simple - it matters by what You are interested to look for campaigns (that knowledge is part of Your domain). If we explicitly state functions to reflect that, we will always know it.
Is it appropriate to add all this methods in campaign repository ?
I don't see anything wrong with that.
Arnis i want some code, how u implementing Created today function in domain itself, Are you injecting repository here in this function ? Thanks for your cooperation
I wouldn't implement CreatedToday function in my domain. It would sit in repository and repository implementations should not be concern of domain. If You mean how I would use Campaign repository and if it should be used from domain - no, it should not be used from within of domain. If You mean if I would inject repository inside of repository - You are listening too much of xzibit.
You should be able to do all of the above with the following repository method:
List<Campaign> findCampaigns(Date fromCreationDate, Date toCreationDate, int offset, Integer limit) {
if (fromCreationDate != null) add criteria...
if (toCreationDate != null) add criteria...
if (limit != null) add limit...
}
This is how I do it and it works very well.