tideSDK + less.js + SVG font-face - svg

I just started trying out the TideSDK to deploy a website to .exe and .app, which for the most part is fantastic.
The problem that I'm currently coming across is that all my CSS styles are written in .less styles utilizing the less.js framework. Inside of here, I have custom font-faces declared, and when deployed to a standard web browser, they apply fine to all the elements that use them.
When deployed through Tide, it doesn't seem to stick unless I take all my styling out of .less style sheets and put them back into regular .CSS files, which leads me to believe that there is some sort of compile time change that Tide is using internally when deployed the actual view of the application.
I have no idea how to go about fixing this. As a note, I'm not getting any
[Error] Error finding
errors from the Tide console, which leads me to believe that the .svg's are being found, just not applied.
UPDATE:
It seems I was using wrong syntax in the src: url('...'), so the CSS in the .less file was actually failing silently. I'm getting a pretty strange [Error] Error finding... file for the .svg now. The URL that is inside this line of CSS is being prepended by app: 3 times.

After several hours of looking at this problem, I eventually have figured it out. Couple of things to note when you are using the combination of these frameworks:
less.js spits out really odd path directories when using
src: url('...');
As a solution for this, you can use the import directive that is available to you in less and put the #font-face declarations inside of that .css style sheet. By importing a plain .css style sheet, you are telling less.js to treat it as regular .css, and the muxed url that gets spit out won't happen.
#import "../css/style.css";
After putting the import directive and confirming that the SVG was indeed being generated under Resources - Fonts in the Chrome inspector, I proceeded to take a look at the SVG file itself to determine if there was something wrong in the CSS naming conventions for the SVG file. According to this answer, and the blog post within it, your SVG name should be using:
font-family
value in the naming scheme from the SVG meta data
src: url('YourSVGFont.svg#Silkscreen') format('svg');
when in fact, you should be using the font id, at least that was the solution in my case:
src: url('YourSVGFont.svg#slkscrb') format('svg');
This is the image embedded in the blog post so that you can see what I'm talking about, and see where in the SVG meta data these two names are placed.

Related

Why does TYPO3 remove values of style="" attributes during SVG rendering?

On my TYPO3 v10 website I have some SVG icons in use, no problem.
I also have a few more complex SVG Figures (created with Inkscape), that I want to include in TYPO3 website. Of course I can upload the .svg files to the fileadmin/ folder, and link to them with the Text+Image (or Text+Media) Content Elements.
In the Backend, TYPO3 generates some fine png-thumbnails for preview. So far so good.
The file can be downloaded directly, from its fileadmin/images ... location.
However, inside web pages, my SVGs are not displayed as they should.
A lot of styling information gets removed from the SVG and I don't know where.
Here is a screenshot of the original vs corrupted image (as displayed in the TYPO3 frontend).
Here is a graphical diff that shows the difference between the figures.
It turns out that at some time during the rendering process, TYPO3 removes the values from the style="...." SVG attributes. See reddish boxes.
All my more complex SVGs look like the one on the right when embedded in TYPO3.
Here is the SVG if you want to try yourself: image on SVGshare.com
On the right, many style attributes have been set to style="".
but why?
It's Firefox, not TYPO3, who removes the style="..." attribute values. This seems to be a longstanding Firefox Issue, solved.
See Bugzilla Issue 1262842: [CSP] Blocks the use of style attributes inside SVG without generating console errors.
Look for "triply confusing" in the first comment.
Inline CSS styles can be a security Problem, and therefore Firefox has a Content-Security-Policy (CSP) in place, in order to correct this.
An explainer for the mitigation strategies, written jointly by professional Security Engineers is given in this Google Doc and in Gihub Repo (Content Security Policy), Issue 45, Further granularity of unsafe-inline styles.
Script inline attributes are a difficult subject to approach when it
comes to CSP, they have the same amount of power as any other script
element but they don’t have ways to be whitelisted, for example, by a
nonce or hash. This means that the actual content of the attribute is
mostly the only deciding factor.
I don't understand everything mentioned in these docs and discussions. Inline-style Elements seem to be vulnerable to XSS attacks, and then attacker can put CSS url() in there for instance.
Quick-and-dirty solution
Use Inkscape and save as "optimized SVG", and check the option "Convert CSS Attributes to XML attributes". See attached screenshot of the Inkscape Dialog (Linux).
This solution was proposed by a web-developer from the GIMP devteam.
TYPO3 9 introduced an SVG Sanitizer, which automatically modifies SVG files during "fileadmin upload time", meaning it removes any <style ...> elements from the uploaded SVG file.
In TYPO3 10 and later versions, this SVG Sanitizer is by default automatically set up via Symfony dependency injection via core's Services.yaml.
You can remove the SVG Sanitizer via your own site extension's Services.yaml, e.g. for your myextension/Configuration/Services.yaml:
services:
_defaults:
autowire: true
autoconfigure: true
public: false
# ...
# remove TYPO3's default-autowired SvgSanitizer, which tampers with filadmin uploaded SVGs (e.g. removes necessary <style> information)'
TYPO3\CMS\Core\Resource\Security\SvgEventListener: ~
The tilde (~) removes/overwrites the definition previously set up by core's Services.yaml ( https://symfony.com/doc/current/service_container/service_decoration.html ).
This seems to be a problem of your individual TYPO3 installation. I've just tested your SVG image in a brand new TYPO3 v10 installation and the image is rendered properly in backend and frontend.
Maybe you have some 3rd party extensions installed who postprocess the HTML output of TYPO3, e.g EXT:sourceopt or EXT:scriptmerger.

How can I automate my webpack build to auto escape data URIs in SASS and HTML files?

The issue I am facing is that firefox does not support # characters in data URIs. Chrome or Safari are totally fine with this.
Our UI guys have used a lot of inlining of SVGs and these all contain data URIS
for example in scss files:
content: url('data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg ...</svg>');
and in html files:
<img src='data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg width="234px" height="205px"...</svg>'>
And there are 100s of examples like this and none of these work in firefox because they have # character and I get the following error
but when we try %23 in place of that character, the SVGs load correctly.
How can I automate the build so that these get url encoded.
The string replace has to extremely specific and needs to do it only inside img tags in html and url('data:image/svg+xml;utf8 in less files.
This is what I am thinking of doing: find all stroke="# and replace with stroke='%23 and same thing with fill if harder to do with webpack

Enabling Resource Aggregation with Bootstrap 3

I'm using Bootstrap files within my application and I want to enable "Use runtime optimized JavaScript and CSS resources".
the problem I have is once enabled; glyphicons-halflings-regular.eot, glyphicons-halflings-regular.svg and glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff cannot be found:
I know for Bootstrap 2.3 we could use a Theme that loads a .CSS file that changes relative locations as described here http://www.bootstrap4xpages.com/bs4xp/site.nsf/article.xsp?documentId=F435B6DC54486B67C1257B6B002E5A6C&action=openDocument
So, what should I do to handle relative locations with Bootstrap 3?
You have to tweak the path to the web font resoureces in the Bootstrap CSS files.
Delete the part with "../" and replace it with the relative path to the font files within your project structure, e.g.
bootstrap/fonts/...
Then aggregation will load the fonts correctly.
This does not answer your question but if you want to use Bootstrap 3 you'd be MUCH better off using the Boostrap4Xpages project on OpenNTF.org. It will perform better and the resource aggregation will work better. It's easy to install and use but it is a plugin on the sever so that needs to be done. It's not self contained to the NSF. Try and move to this if at all possible.
Regarding the actual question. I'm not sure I know the answer specifically. I do know that using relative links can sometimes be a problem if the browser's URL doesn't have the page.xsp portion. So it works on the page.xsp and NOT the default launch XPage where the URL ends with the database.nsf. What I've done in the past there is set the application to launch to something like "start.xsp" and in that page in beforePageLoad to a redirect to "home.xsp". This forces the browser url to always show the page name and made life a little easier when dealing with adding projects to WebContent.

How to reference layout images in express.js so that they can be found from nested directories?

I've got an express.js app currently using ejs (using jade for newer projects) and I'm trying to solve a problem in a clean and appropriate manner.
I've got a layout.ejs file with my header and footer in it. Most of my site so far has been one layer deep http://innovationbound.com/about or /services or /amy and so on....
I'm beginning to created online courses at http://innovationbound.com/courses/course-name and the issue I'm having is that these course pages can't reference the images the same way. <img src="images/linknedin.png" alt="LinkedIn Icon"> for instance.
From the course-name page it tries <img src="courses/images/LinkedIn.png" alt="LinkedIn Icon"> and obviously can't grab the image there.
Is there a setting in express, or something obvious I'm missing? I hope I don't have to use absolute urls, that just makes developing on the local machine insane.
Just use site root–relative paths. For example <img src="/images/linknedin.png" alt="LinkedIn Icon">. Note the / makes the difference.
There are three types of link paths:
Absolute paths (such as http://www.adobe.com/support/dreamweaver/contents.html).
Document-relative paths (such as dreamweaver/contents.html).
Site root–relative paths (such as /support/dreamweaver/contents.html).
From Adobe.
You might consider it, but you can use "../images/link(n?)edin.png". However, I'd recommend to use absolute path, because images should be stored in /public (in general jade setup) and your path depth could be varied by your route rule.
As a tip, if you lost in relative path of image, right click on broken image and see a URL in properties on web browser. It'll give you a hint of where the image is.

Include an SVG (hosted on GitHub) in MarkDown

I know that an image can be placed in an MD with the MD syntax of either ![Alt text](/path/to/img.jpg) or ![Alt text](/path/to/img.jpg "Optional title"), but I am having difficulty placing an SVG in MD where the code is hosted on GitHub.
Ultimately using rails3, and changing the model frequently right now, so I am using RailRoady to generate an SVG of the schema diagram of the models. I would like for that SVG to then be placed in the ReadMe.md, and be displayed. When I open the SVG file locally, it does work, so how do I get the browser to render the SVG in the MD file? Given that the code will be dynamic until it is finalized (seemingly never), hosting the SVG in a separate place seems overkill and that I am missing an approach to accomplish this.
The SVG I am trying to include is here on GitHub: https://github.com/specialorange/FDXCM/blob/master/Rails/fdxcm/doc/models_brief.svg
I have tried the following, with an actual image as well to verify the syntax is working, just that the SVG code isn't being rendered:
![Overview][1]
[1]: https://github.com/specialorange/FDXCM/blob/master/doc/controllers_brief.svg "Overview"
<img src="https://raw.github.com/specialorange/FDXCM/master/doc/controllers_brief.svg">
![Alt text](https://raw.github.com/specialorange/FDXCM/master/doc/controllers_brief.svg)
[Google Doc](https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1B95ajItJTAImL2WXISX0fkBLYk3nldea4Vm9eo-VyE4/edit) :
<img src="https://docs.google.com/drawings/pub?id=117XsJ1kDyaY-n8AdPS3_8jTgMyITqaoT3-ah_BSc9YQ&w=960&h=720">
<img src="https://raw.github.com/specialorange/FDXCM/master/doc/controllers_brief.svg">
<img src="https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1B95ajItJTAImL2WXISX0fkBLYk3nldea4Vm9eo-VyE4/edit">
to get the results of:
1: https://github.com/specialorange/FDXCM/blob/master/Rails/fdxcm/doc/controllers_brief.svg "Overview"
Google Doc :
The purpose of raw.github.com is to allow users to view the contents of a file, so for text based files this means (for certain content types) you can get the wrong headers and things break in the browser.
When this question was asked (in 2012) SVGs didn't work. Since then Github has implemented various improvements. Now (at least for SVG), the correct Content-Type headers are sent.
Examples
All of the ways stated below will work.
I copied the SVG image from the question to a repo on github in order to create the examples below
Linking to files using relative paths (Works, but obviously only on github.com / github.io)
Code
![Alt text](./controllers_brief.svg)
<img src="./controllers_brief.svg">
Result
See the working example on github.com.
Linking to RAW files
Code
![Alt text](https://raw.github.com/potherca-blog/StackOverflow/master/question.13808020.include-an-svg-hosted-on-github-in-markdown/controllers_brief.svg)
<img src="https://raw.github.com/potherca-blog/StackOverflow/master/question.13808020.include-an-svg-hosted-on-github-in-markdown/controllers_brief.svg">
Result
Linking to RAW files using ?sanitize=true
Code
![Alt text](https://raw.github.com/potherca-blog/StackOverflow/master/question.13808020.include-an-svg-hosted-on-github-in-markdown/controllers_brief.svg?sanitize=true)
<img src="https://raw.github.com/potherca-blog/StackOverflow/master/question.13808020.include-an-svg-hosted-on-github-in-markdown/controllers_brief.svg?sanitize=true">
Result
Linking to files hosted on github.io
Code
![Alt text](https://potherca-blog.github.io/StackOverflow/question.13808020.include-an-svg-hosted-on-github-in-markdown/controllers_brief.svg)
<img src="https://potherca-blog.github.io/StackOverflow/question.13808020.include-an-svg-hosted-on-github-in-markdown/controllers_brief.svg">
Result
Some comments regarding changes that happened along the way:
Github has implemented a feature which makes it possible for SVG's to be used with the Markdown image syntax. The SVG image will be sanitized and displayed with the correct HTTP header. Certain tags (like <script>) are removed.
To view the sanitized SVG or to achieve this effect from other places (i.e. from markdown files not hosted in repos on http://github.com/) simply append ?sanitize=true to the SVG's raw URL.
As stated by AdamKatz in the comments, using a source other than github.io can introduce potentially privacy and security risks. See the answer by CiroSantilli and the answer by DavidChambers for more details.
The issue to resolve this was opened on Github on October 13th 2015 and was resolved on August 31th 2017
I contacted GitHub to say that github.io-hosted SVGs are no longer displayed in GitHub READMEs. I received this reply:
We have had to disable svg image rendering on GitHub.com due to potential cross site scripting vulnerabilities.
Update 2020: how they made it work while avoiding XSS attacks
GitHub appears to use two security approaches, this is a good article: https://digi.ninja/blog/svg_xss.php see also: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/148507/how-to-prevent-xss-in-svg-file-upload
show SVG inside <img tag, which prevents scripts from running, e.g. on READMEs: https://github.com/cirosantilli/test-git-web-interface/tree/8e394cdb012cba4bcf55ebdb89f36872b4c6c12a
use Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'none'; style-src 'unsafe-inline'; sandbox. This prevents the script from running even in raw which contains the raw SVG file: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cirosantilli/test-git-web-interface/8e394cdb012cba4bcf55ebdb89f36872b4c6c12a/svg-foreignObject.svg
You can see the header with curl -vvv. The regular github.com pages also have a content-security-policy, but it is much larger.
Update 2017
A GitHub dev is currently looking into this: https://github.com/github/markup/issues/556#issuecomment-306103203
Update 2014-12: GitHub now renders SVG on blob show, so I don't see any reason why not to render on README renderings:
https://github.com/blog/1902-svg-viewing-diffing
https://github.com/cirosantilli/test/blob/2144a93333be144152e8b0d4144b77b211afce63/svg.svg
Also note that that SVG does have an XSS attempt but it does not run: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cirosantilli/test/2144a93333be144152e8b0d4144b77b211afce63/svg.svg
The billion laugh SVG does make Firefox 44 Freeze, but Chromium 48 is OK: https://github.com/cirosantilli/web-cheat/blob/master/svg-billion-laughs.svg
Petah mentioned that blobs are fine because the SVG is inside an iframe.
Possible rationale for GitHub not serving SVG images
general XML vulnerabilities. E.g. opening a billion laughs exploit just made Firefox crash my system. Firefox bug with exploit attached: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=voting/user.html. Same on Chromium: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=231562
SVG XSS scripting: while most browsers don't run scripts when the SVG is embedded with img, it seems that this is not required by the standards, so maybe GitHub is playing it safe.
Browsers do run it if you open the SVG directly (but it appears that GitHub never shows images directly on the github.com domain) or if it is inline (which are currently completely removed by GitHub), so those cases shouldn't be a security concern. Relevant links:
spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/script.html
interactive SVG demo: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/images/script/script01.svg
The following questions asks about the risks of SVG in general: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/11384/exploits-or-other-security-risks-with-svg-upload
rawgit.com solves this problem nicely. For each request, it retrieves the appropriate document from GitHub and, crucially, serves it with the correct Content-Type header.
Since Jan. 2022, that seems possible (and easy):
Allow to upload .svg files to Markdown
It is now possible to upload .svg files to comments in issues, PRs, discussions, and Markdown files, like READMEs.
You just have to drag and drop the file in the text area.
This will work. Link to your SVG using the following pattern:
https://cdn.rawgit.com/<repo-owner>/<repo>/<branch>/path/to.svg
The downside is hardcoding the owner and repo in the path, meaning the svg will break if either of those are renamed.
I have a working example with an img-tag, but your images won't display.
The difference I see is the content-type.
I checked the github image from your post (the google doc images don't load at all because of connection failures). The image from github is delivered as content-type: text/plain, which won't get rendered as an image by your browser.
The correct content-type value for svg is image/svg+xml. So you have to make sure that svg files set the correct mime type, but that's a server issue.
Try it with http://svg.tutorial.aptico.de/grafik_svg/dummy3.svg and don't forget to specify width and height in the tag.
Just like this worked for me on Github.
![Image Caption](ImageAddressOnGitHub.svg)
or
<img src="ImageAddressOnGitHub.svg">
In addition to regular SVGs, you can also insert animated SVG images in the markdown file like any other format. It can be a good alternative to GIF images.
Use relative links if both your animated SVG and your markdown file are in the same GitHub repository:
![image description](relative/path/in/repository/to/image.svg)
OR
<img src="relative/path/in/repository/to/image.svg" width="128"/>
Example (assuming the image is in assets directory in the repository):
![My animated logo](assets/my-logo.svg)
Result:
Use this site: https://rawgit.com , it works for me as I don't have permission issue with the svg file.
Please pay attention that RawGit is not a service of github, as mentioned in Rawgit FAQ :
RawGit is not associated with GitHub in any way. Please don't contact GitHub asking for help with RawGit
Enter the url of svg you need, such as :
https://github.com/sel-fish/redis-experiments/blob/master/dat/memDistrib-jemalloc-4.0.3.svg
Then, you can get the url bellow which can be used to display:
https://cdn.rawgit.com/sel-fish/redis-experiments/master/dat/memDistrib-jemalloc-4.0.3.svg

Resources