I have the following build target set to do my deploys, as mentioned by Hanselman in his Tiny Happy Features #3 and as also noted in many other places as what I consider to be the recommended approach:
msbuild my_web_application.csproj /p:Configuration=Production;
DeployOnBuild=true;
PublishProfile=Production;
VisualStudioVersion=11.0;
AllowUntrustedCertificate=true;
AuthType=NTLM
This does the job, and replaces the deployment step I previously had via invoking ms deploy on the command line:
msdeploy.exe" -source:package="c:\source_to_my_web_application.zip" -dest:auto,my_server_name,includeAcls="False" -verb:sync -disableLink:AppPoolExtension -disableLink:ContentExtension -disableLink:CertificateExtension -setParamFile:"c:\source_to_my_web_application\Package.SetParameters.xml"
The biggest difference I can see in the two methods is that the command line call will only push over the files that have modifications, whereas the msbuild call sends over the entire web application every time.
Is there a way to make the msbuild version do the "sync" behavior, like the direct call to msdeploy did for me?
From what I've been able to establish, syncing from a package (like the one created for this particular MSBuild command) will find differences related to the local working copy it's trying to deploy from.
If I do a fresh checkout, then build and deploy, it'll publish the entire web application.
If I do a clean and rebuild on that working copy, it'll only publish the dlls that got rebuilt.
If I do a build on that, it'll only publish the web.config files that got transformed and some other random dlls that I can't make rhyme or reason out of.
The bottom line, I guess, is that with our CI server setup, it should be assumed that all files will be published to the server, and if it happens to publish fewer than that, it's a bandwidth bonus.
As a side note, I've also encountered random, unreliable 404 errors while doing otherwise normal ms deploy commands. They seem to be intermittent, and can vary between my own workstation, my colleagues, and the CI server so that the MS Deploy service will return a 404 or execute just fine within seconds of each successive call. Solutions I've found for this type of behavior range from restarting Visual Studio to uninstalling and reinstalling various components, and making sure you do it in the right order and only the second Tuesday of the third week of any month ending in "ary"...
The takeaway for me is that this tool is sketchy, and that if you can get a setup to work with any amount of reliability it's a miracle and you should not touch it ever again and pray to the silicon gods that it stays that way.
Related
I have an xamarin mobile app with 3 projects. Shared, Android and iOS.
All 3 build perfectly fine locally but fail on Azure Dev ops pipeline.
iOS and Android only have 2 xmal views that are platform specific. The rest are located in Shared.
For both of the xmal views, all the errors are coming from the code behind cs files complaining that something doesn't exist in the current context. There are around 80 errors like the one below. The errors are identical on both platform builds.
Example error from Droid build:
Droid\Views(Filename).xaml.cs(26,13): error CS0103: The name 'InitializeComponent' does not exist in the current context
This build hasn't run for a while, around 8 months. It used to work fine and none of the views xmal/cs code has changed. I'm assuming a version is now misconfigured somewhere.
Both builds run on VS 2022 pipelines.
Both builds restore okay.
I have tried (Mostly suggestions from similar posts)
Adding restore argurment to the Build step.
Checking name spaces match
Adding a small change (whitespace) to the 2 xmal pages to force a change.
Removing the shared project reference and re-adding it.
I would be grateful for any suggestions or ideas.
Thanks in advance.
In past experience, if something works locally and not on the build server pipeline; this usually points to a discrepancy between both machines, and potentially their versions of given libraries.
If you run the pipeline off of a local machine as well, maybe confirm that all libraries installed on that machine match your local ones (XCode, android-sdk, etc.)
If you run the pipeline off of a hosted machine, it maybe that the hosted images needs to be updated to a newer one to keep up with the project.
I am publishing my node js site to azure using this tutorial - http://blogs.technet.com/b/sams_blog/archive/2014/11/14/azure-websites-deploy-node-js-website-using-visual-studio.aspx
I get the following error, as mentioned in one of the comments on the blog, any idea what this error is about and how do I fix this ? I am able to run my app locally no issues with that.
Error: InvalidParameter
Parameter name: index
P.s : the site is like a very basic "Hello world" kind of site, this is the first time I am using and deploying to azure too.
I created a new project as a "Blank Azure Node.js web application", and replaced the resulting package.json and .js files with what I had before, and it publishes fine now
All was working fine for and suddenly got the error! I pretty sure it something in the project as it's now happening on vs2013 and vs2015 on different computers.
Its something to do with Templates after a lot of searching. For me Azure TFS CI got things working again if possible for you?
I had this issue with some projects but not with others, all created in a similar way. So I went thought every change and every setting I could until eventually i worked it out. I didn't want to give up and just remake them.
Basically its file paths, the first thing you notice is that it errors very quickly compared to a usual publish, the first thing that is triggered is a build but unlike heavy framework languages there not really much to actually build.
Like all builds for VS it pops out a bin folder take not of where this appears. This is the key, you want this to appear in the root of your deployment usually at the same level as the publish profile.
Before I moved my projects to VS, TFS and Azure, I used to use git and used the azure push and deployment as part of git, so I instinctively structured my folders in the similar fashion with src folder and all the extra VS baggage in the a directory higher.
This is where I noticed bin folder, so re-structured my solution and made changes to .njsproj (notepad) and moved to be inline with source code and re-added it yo my solution.
Technically speaking this a bug within VS as it allows to create the project and specify different locations which is all fine unless you want to build and publish locally.
Once you get your head around what is going on you should be able to solve this problem easily and not make the same mistake in the future. If anyone is still confused comment and ill grab some screen shots.
I have a solution in Visual Studio Team Services that has 2 Web Applications (specifically one project for WebAPI services and another for the actual site using MVC).
I'm trying to set up continuous delivery to Azure but all the information that I can find seems to assume that you only have a single Web Application within your solution (which seems a little unrealistic for all but the simplest of projects!).
The out of box continuous delivery process seems to just pick and deploy the first Web Application it finds (which isn't necessarily the same project each time!)
I've tried specifying the Deployment Settings file, but that seems to affect the destination rather than the project being deployed since again, it seems to just "pick" a project to deploy, and each time it deploys every single compiled assembly plus all dependencies rather than just the binaries and dependencies of the project actually being deployed, which can cause issues with MVC finding duplicate controller matches for a given name (this can of course be fixed by specifying the namespace of the controllers within the route configuration, but that seems less than ideal, and still doesn't fix the entire problem).
Ideally I'd like to find a way to deploy both projects with a single build, but as a temporary solution I'd be happy with 2 builds that are both triggered by a check-in of the single solution, that each reliably deploy 1 of the 2 Web Applications.
Does anyone know if this is possible? I guess I could write my own custom build template, but I'm hoping there is an easier answer (not least because I can't imagine that this isn't a problem being faced by other people!)
I did find this question TFSPreview.com and Azure continuous deployment for multiple solutions in TFS but since that's quite old and is specifically talking about AzureWebRoleProjects rather than Web Applications being deployed to the newer Azure Websites feature, I'm hoping that there is a more positive answer?
This is possible with multiple build configurations. In addition to Debug and Release you could specify two more, one for each app.
You can find these in Visual Studio at Build -> Configuration Manager. And then in the configurations specify only one of them to be built. Then running MSBuild with that configuration will output only one WebDeploy package.
Before we used TFS, we were building our packages locally using visual studio. There was a lot of projects organized into solutions. When we wanted to build the package, we simply located the ccproj project, right click on it and hit “package”.
There is couple of specific in our solution:
We use web roles with multiple web sites and virtual applications and we have them as project dependencies in VS2012 solution
We use config transformations for both web and worker roles. Worker roles transforms was achieved by adding transform target manually to the project file.
We have some additional class library projects – their outputs needs to go in a subfolder of the worker role along with correct configuration files, it is kind of plug-in architecture. We used some xcopy commands to include these non-referenced libraries in our worker roles.
Everything worked smoothly when building in VS 2012 locally.
When migrated to TFS we quickly learned that we won’t be able to replicate the same build process on build server
It turned out that TFS is not preserving solutions structure, more
details here:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/tfsbuild/thread/9ac815c8-5961-4670-a6d0-660a9b66da9c
The project dependency that was solving multiple web sites and
virtual applications in a single role did not work on build server,
probably because of different output directory. We had to add some
hacks in our ccproj and csproj files to get these published and
correctly included in the resulting package.
xcopy commands failed because of different directory structures on
TFS build sever.
We had to force run cspack on TFS build server by explicitly adding
/t:Publish parameter to msbuild command line.
Config transforms for worker roles did not worked, we had to force to
occur using another hacks in the ccproj and csporj files.
There was more issues but those are too detailed. I would keep it on
high level just to illustrate the whole issue. The build somehow
works now, but we have now a lot of hacks in place now.
I have two questions:
Is it possible to configure TFS build server to have exact same
behavior as the local build in VS2012?
Is there any official solution for building azure packages with multiple web sites and virtual applications in a single web role?
I haven't yet tried this on a TFS build server, but the approach outlined in my blog at http://michaelcollier.wordpress.com/2013/01/14/multiple-sites-in-a-web-role/ has been working well. The "trick" is basically to modify the .ccproj file to tap into the CoreBuildDependsOn target, adding logic that will execute MSBuild against the secondary sites. This should also allow config transforms to work.
I've got a TFS build set up to build and deploy a web application. I'm passing in the MSDeploy parameters via the TFS build definition's MSBuild arguments. First time round this is working fine. When someone accesses the web app, one of the controls (Microsoft charting control) generates a couple of files in an empty directory I've added to the solution.
When I go to rebuild (or continuous integration is triggered) the next build will usually fail because it can't delete one of the generated files. When I try and manually delete the file it tells me that IIS worker process is using it and it can't be deleted.
Now to get the build building I'd have to manually restart IIS every time, which is not desirable with CI in mind. I've taken a look through Microsoft.Web.Publishing.Tasks.dll and there's nothing there to restart IIS using MSDeploy.
At the moment I'm thinking that adding stubs of the temporary files in the solution might be a resolution (maybe MSDeploy will be able to close the process if the file is a permanent part of the deployment) or I could do some unpleasantness with Exec in the solution file to get an IIS reset.
It's probably a long shot but has anyone come up against this and found a nice solution?
You could use MSBuild Extension Pack to stop the application pool automatically before deployment. There are several tasks in the MSBuild.ExtensionPack.Web namespace to manage IIS, such as stopping and starting an application pool, deleting an application, etc.