I have an interface iExportColumn and a class ExportColumn implementing the interfce. ExportColumnCollection class should be generic for all the classes that implements IExportColumn interface.
public interface IExportColumn
{
string Header { get; set; }
string ColumnName { get; set; }
}
public class ExportColumn : IExportColumn
{
public ExportColumn(){}
public string Header { get; set; }
public string ColumnName { get; set; }
}
public class ExportColumnCollection<T> where T: IExportColumn
{
private List<T> cols;
public ExportColumnCollection (List<T> c)
{
cols = c;
}
public T Columninfo (string colname)
{
}
.....
}
I am getting run time error saying could not load type ExportColumnCollection.
I am looking for something to achieve somthing like
List<IExportColumn> = new List<ExportColumn>();
I have two classes implementing the interfaces IExportColumn and I need to hold a GenericCollection to handle List
The proper usage for your class would be:
List<IExportColumn> list= new List<IExportColumn>();
// you may add to the collection any class which implements IExportColumn
list.Add(new ExportColumn1() { ColumnName = "Id" });
list.Add(new ExportColumn2() { ColumnName = "Value" });
ExportColumnCollection<IExportColumn> collection = new
ExportColumnCollection<IExportColumn>(list);
var colInfo = collection.ColumnInfo("Id");
Related
My example:
class BoxVM {
int BoxId {get;set;}
List<ItemVM> Items {get;set;}
}
class Box {
int BoxId {get;set;}
List<Item> Items {get;set;}
}
With mapping config:
CreateMap<BoxVM, Box>();
CreateMap<ItemVM, Item>().ConvertUsing<ItemTypeConverter>();
When converting BoxVM will Items, the ItemTypeConverter is not called. Leaving an empty Items collection in Box.
The BoxId is being mapped correctly.
Am I missing a step?
Looks like it does work.
using System.Collections.Generic;
using AutoMapper;
[TestClass]
public class UnitTest1
{
[TestMethod]
public void TestMethod1()
{
Mapper.Initialize(cfg =>
{
cfg.CreateMap<BoxVM, Box>();
cfg.CreateMap<ItemVM, Item>().ConvertUsing<ItemTypeConverter>();
});
Mapper.AssertConfigurationIsValid();
var boxVm = new BoxVM()
{
Value1 = "5",
Items = new List<ItemVM> { new ItemVM { Name = "Item1" } }
};
var result = Mapper.Map<BoxVM, Box>(boxVm);
Assert.AreEqual(1, result.Items.Count);
}
}
public class Box
{
public string Value1 { get; set; }
public List<Item> Items { get; set; }
}
public class Item
{
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class BoxVM
{
public string Value1 { get; set; }
public List<ItemVM> Items { get; set; }
}
public class ItemVM
{
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class ItemTypeConverter : ITypeConverter<ItemVM, Item>
{
public Item Convert(ItemVM source, Item destination, ResolutionContext context)
{
return new Item { Name = source.Name };
}
}
I have this Party class which contains an object data type coming from a service. It can contain two different member types for the Item property.
public class Party
{
public string DMVID {get; set;}
public object Item { get; set; }
}
and this DTO
public class PartyDTO
{
public string DMVID {get; set;}
public BusinessDTO BusinessItem { get; set; }
public IndividualDTO IndividualItem { get; set; }
}
How can I map the output of the Item to BusinessItem or IndividualItem.
I know this one would not work. Mapper.CreateMap<Party, PartyDTO>();
I don't know if conditional mapping can solve this or a resolver like this one.
Hey maybe this will help you out! I tested it, but i am using AutoMapper just for two days!
Allright here are your noted classes!!!
public class Party
{
public string DMVID { get; set; }
public object Item { get; set; }
}
public class PartyDTO
{
public string DMVID { get; set; }
public BuisnessDTO BusinessItem { get; set; }
public IndividualDTO IndividualItem { get; set; }
}
public class BuisnessDTO
{
public int Number
{
get;
set;
}
}
public class IndividualDTO
{
public string Message
{
get;
set;
}
}
and here your is the MapperConfiguration for this current scenario!
// Edit There was no need here for some conditions
AutoMapper.Mapper.CreateMap<Party, PartyDTO>()
.ForMember(dto => dto.BusinessItem, map =>
map.MapFrom(party => party.Item as BuisnessDTO);
)
.ForMember(dto => dto.IndividualItem, map =>
map.MapFrom(party => party.Item as IndividualDTO);
);
// And this is another way to achive the mapping in this scenario
AutoMapper.Mapper.CreateMap<PartyDTO, Party>()
.ForMember(party => party.Item, map => map.MapFrom( dto => (dto.BusinessItem != null) ? (dto.BusinessItem as object) : (dto.IndividualItem as object)));
And i created this sample for it!
Party firstParty = new Party()
{
DMVID = "something",
Item = new BuisnessDTO()
{
Number = 1
}
};
Party secondParty = new Party()
{
DMVID = "something",
Item = new IndividualDTO()
{
Message = "message"
}
};
PartyDTO dtoWithBuisness = AutoMapper.Mapper.Map<PartyDTO>(firstParty);
PartyDTO dtoWithIndividual = AutoMapper.Mapper.Map < PartyDTO>(secondParty);
Party afterParty = AutoMapper.Mapper.Map<Party>(dtoWithBuisness);
afterParty = AutoMapper.Mapper.Map < Party>(dtoWithIndividual);
Of course there are other possibility, but I think thats exactly what you wanted.
i want register custo generic type like default generic type that register in autoMaper (like List, Array) in AutoMappper.
i have one generic type in project this Code :
class PagedResult<T>
{
public List<T> PageOfResults { get; set; }
public int TotalItems { get; set; }
}
and Dto Class is:
class StudentDto
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
and VM Model is :
class StudentVM
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
and service class:
class MyServie
{
public PagedResult<StudentDto> Swap()
{
var test2 = new PagedResult<StudentDto>();
test2.PageOfResults = new List<StudentDto>();
test2.PageOfResults.Add(new StudentDto() { ID = 10, Name = "Ten" });
test2.TotalItems = 10;
return test2;
}
}
i want use from AutoMapper Object Manager for register PagedResult<> in automapper but i can not do this
var allMappers = MapperRegistry.AllMappers();
MapperRegistry.AllMappers = () => new IObjectMapper[]{
new IdentifiableMapper(),
}.Concat(allMappers);
var service = new MyServie();
PagedResult<StudentDto> pageableStudentDto = service.Swap();
Mapper.CreateMap<StudentDto, StudentVM>();;
PagedResult<StudentVM> vm = Mapper.Map<PagedResult<StudentDto>, PagedResult<StudentVM>>(pageableStudentDto);
and implement of
public class PageOfMapper : IObjectMapper
{
public bool IsMatch(ResolutionContext context)
{
return typeof(PagedResult<>).IsAssignableFrom(context.SourceType.GetGenericTypeDefinition()) &&
typeof(PagedResult<>).IsAssignableFrom(context.DestinationType.GetGenericTypeDefinition());
//return true;
}
public object Map(ResolutionContext context, IMappingEngineRunner mapper)
{
// please help me in this code for map ******************
return null;
}
}
Hello. I have a list that looks like this one:
public class PagedList<T> : List<T>
{
public PagedList(IEnumerable<T> collection) : base(collection)
{ }
public int TotalItems { get; set; }
public int CurrentPage { get; set; }
public int PageSize { get; set; }
//some other properties
}
and used in repository for paging
public PagedList<TEntity> GetPaged(int page)
{
var pagedEntities = some_query;
return pagedEntities.AsPagedList(totalResults, page, pageSize);
}
The same PagedList is also used in asp mvc view models for paging.
Is it possible to map this collections using Automapper with all the properties TotalItems/CurrentPage/... ?
PagedList<DbItem> dbItems = _repository.GetPages(page);
var viewItems = new PagedList<SomeItemView>();
Mapper.Map(dbItems , viewItems);
Tahnk You !
This worked for me. Are you looking for something more generic?
public class DbItem
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class ViewItem
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class PagedList<T>: List<T>
{
public int TotalItems { get; set; }
public int CurrentPage { get; set; }
public int PageSize { get; set; }
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
MapItems();
}
public static void MapItems()
{
Mapper.CreateMap<DbItem, ViewItem>();
Mapper.CreateMap<PagedList<DbItem>, PagedList<ViewItem>>()
.AfterMap((s, d) => Mapper.Map<List<DbItem>, List<ViewItem>>(s, d));
var dbList = new PagedList<DbItem>
{
new DbItem {Id = 1, Name = "a"},
new DbItem {Id = 2, Name = "b"}
};
dbList.TotalItems = 2;
dbList.CurrentPage = 1;
dbList.PageSize = 10;
var viewList = Mapper.Map<PagedList<DbItem>, PagedList<ViewItem>>(dbList);
Console.WriteLine(viewList.TotalItems);
Console.WriteLine(viewList.CurrentPage);
Console.WriteLine(viewList.PageSize);
Console.WriteLine(viewList[0].Id + " " + viewList[0].Name);
Console.WriteLine(viewList[1].Id + " " + viewList[1].Name);
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
What you need is a custom type converter
public class PagedListConverter<TIn, TOut> : ITypeConverter<IPagedList<TIn>, IPagedList<TOut>>
{
public IPagedList<TOut> Convert(AutoMapper.ResolutionContext context)
{
var source = (IPagedList<TIn>)context.SourceValue;
var mapped = Mapper.Map<IList<TOut>>(source);
return new StaticPagedList<TOut>(mapped, source.GetMetaData());
}
}
Usage:
Mapper.CreateMap<IPagedList<Company>, IPagedList<CompanyViewModel>>().ConvertUsing<PagedListConverter<Company, CompanyViewModel>>();
For those who have faced the similar problem recently, and as an update to NoPyGod's answer, you can achieve the general mapping using ITypeConverter. According to the official documentation:
AutoMapper also supports open generic type converters with any number of generic arguments:
var configuration = new MapperConfiguration(cfg =>
cfg.CreateMap(typeof(Source<>), typeof(Destination<>)).ConvertUsing(typeof(Converter<,>)));
The closed type from Source will be the first generic argument, and the closed type of Destination will be the second argument to close Converter<,>.
So the custom type converter would be:
private class Converter<TSource, TDestination>
: ITypeConverter<PagedList<TSource>, PagedList<TDestination>>
{
public PagedList<TDestination> Convert(
PagedList<TSource> source,
PagedList<TDestination> destination,
ResolutionContext context) =>
new PagedList<TDestination>(
context.Mapper.Map<List<TSource>, List<TDestination>>(source));
/* Additional settings comes here. */
}
And then register it:
this.CreateMap(typeof(PagedList<>), typeof(PagedList<>)).ConvertUsing(typeof(Converter<,>));
After working with AutoMapper I came across ValueInjecter on this site. I am trying it out but I am stuck on what is probably a very simple scenario.
But before I dig into the code sample, does anyone know if ValueInjecter works in a Medium-Trust web environment? (Like Godaddy?)
Ok, onto the code! I have the following models:
public class NameComponent
{
public string First { get; set; }
public string Last { get; set; }
public string MiddleInitial { get; set; }
}
public class Person
{
public NameComponent Name { get; set; }
}
that I want to map to the following DTO:
public class PersonDTO : BaseDTO
{
private string _firstName;
public string FirstName
{
get { return _firstName; }
set { NotifyPropertyChanged(() => FirstName, ref _firstName, value); }
}
private string _middleInitial;
public string MiddleInitial
{
get { return _middleInitial; }
set { NotifyPropertyChanged(() => MiddleInitial, ref _middleInitial, value); }
}
private string _lastName;
public string LastName
{
get { return _lastName; }
set { NotifyPropertyChanged(() => LastName, ref _lastName, value); }
}
}
So when I want to Map from Model to DTO I need a Model.Name.First -> DTO.FirstName
and when going from DTO to Model I need FirstName -> Name.First. From my understanding this is not a simple Flatten/UnFlatten, because the words also reverse themselves, ie: FirstName <--> Name.First. So First and Last names could use the same kind of rule, but what about MiddleInitial? Model.Name.MiddleInitial -> DTO.MiddleInitial.
I see there are some plugins, but none of them seem to do what I would want. Has anyone else come across this scenario?
the basic idea is that I match the Name with the FirstName, I take this as a pivot point, and in the method that usually sets the value to just one (FirstName) property I set it to 3 properties - that's for the FromNameComp
in the ToNameComp i match the same properties but I take the value from 3 and create one and set it
public class SimpleTest
{
[Test]
public void Testit()
{
var p = new Person { Name = new NameComponent { First = "first", Last = "last", MiddleInitial = "midd" } };
var dto = new PersonDTO();
dto.InjectFrom<FromNameComp>(p);
Assert.AreEqual(p.Name.First, dto.FirstName);
Assert.AreEqual(p.Name.Last, dto.LastName);
Assert.AreEqual(p.Name.MiddleInitial, dto.MiddleInitial);
var pp = new Person();
pp.InjectFrom<ToNameComponent>(dto);
Assert.AreEqual(dto.LastName, pp.Name.Last);
Assert.AreEqual(dto.FirstName, pp.Name.First);
Assert.AreEqual(dto.MiddleInitial, pp.Name.MiddleInitial);
}
public class FromNameComp : ConventionInjection
{
protected override bool Match(ConventionInfo c)
{
return c.SourceProp.Name == "Name" && c.SourceProp.Type == typeof(NameComponent)
&& c.TargetProp.Name == "FirstName"
&& c.SourceProp.Value != null;
}
protected override object SetValue(ConventionInfo c)
{
dynamic d = c.Target.Value;
var nc = (NameComponent)c.SourceProp.Value;
//d.FirstName = nc.First; return nc.First does this
d.LastName = nc.Last;
d.MiddleInitial = nc.MiddleInitial;
return nc.First;
}
}
public class ToNameComponent : ConventionInjection
{
protected override bool Match(ConventionInfo c)
{
return c.TargetProp.Name == "Name" && c.TargetProp.Type == typeof(NameComponent)
&& c.SourceProp.Name == "FirstName";
}
protected override object SetValue(ConventionInfo c)
{
dynamic d = c.Source.Value;
var nc = new NameComponent { First = d.FirstName, Last = d.LastName, MiddleInitial = d.MiddleInitial };
return nc;
}
}
public class NameComponent
{
public string First { get; set; }
public string Last { get; set; }
public string MiddleInitial { get; set; }
}
public class Person
{
public NameComponent Name { get; set; }
}
public class PersonDTO
{
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string MiddleInitial { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
}
}
But before I dig into the code sample,
does anyone know if ValueInjecter
works in a Medium-Trust web
environment? (Like Godaddy?)
it doesn't use reflection.emit so it should work