The company I work for have inherited a Joomla site and I have no experience of Joomla, so I'm hoping that someone could let myself know if the following is possible.
When searching on the Joomla site, the client is expecting certain pages for certain search terms to appear at the top of the search results.
Is it possible to promote certain pages to the top of the search results depending on the search term?
Appreciate any support with this.
UPDATE
Testing locally I have updated the SQL query in /plugins/search/content.php to get close to the results that I am after.
SELECT
a.title AS title,
a.metadesc,
a.metakey,
a.created AS created,
CONCAT(a.introtext, a.fulltext) AS text,
CONCAT_WS( "/", u.title, b.title ) AS section,
CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(a.alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(":", a.id, a.alias) ELSE a.id END as slug,
CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(b.alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(":", b.id, b.alias) ELSE b.id END as catslug, u.id AS sectionid, "2" AS browsernav
FROM jos_content AS a
INNER JOIN jos_categories AS b ON b.id=a.catid
INNER JOIN jos_sections AS u ON u.id = a.sectionid
WHERE
((a.title LIKE '%carbohydrate%' OR a.introtext LIKE '%carbohydrate%' OR a.fulltext LIKE '%carbohydrate%' OR a.metakey LIKE '%carbohydrate%' OR a.metadesc LIKE '%carbohydrate%'))
AND a.state = 1
AND u.published = 1
AND b.published = 1
AND a.access <= 0
AND b.access <= 0
AND u.access <= 0
AND ( a.publish_up = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_up <= '2013-02-18 14:55:51' )
AND ( a.publish_down = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_down >= '2013-02-18 14:55:51' )
GROUP BY a.id
ORDER BY
(NOT(a.title LIKE '%carbohydrate%'))
, (NOT(a.introtext LIKE '%carbohydrate%'))
, (NOT(a.fulltext LIKE '%carbohydrate%'))
, (NOT(a.metakey LIKE '%carbohydrate%'))
, (NOT(a.metadesc LIKE '%carbohydrate%'))
I would now like to have this as a custom plugin instead of over-writing any core plugins. I have followed the tutorial at http://docs.joomla.org/Creating_a_search_plugin but how do I set the site to use the custom plugin instead of the default search plugin?
Assuming you're using Joomla 2.5 (Although this might be the same for previous versions) you'll need to find the menu item within the 'Menu Manager' that displays the search results.
Within this menu item are some options under the 'Basic Options' tab. These include ordering search results by Newest First, Oldest First, Popularity, Alphabetical and by Category.
If the "fixed articles" are always the same, just override the search result template and add the articles in the template override.
Just copy all the files you find in
/components/com_search/views/search/tmpl
into
/templates/your_template/com_search/search
then edit default_results.php and place your fixed results there
Related
I am trying to get documents of given type with assigned category. This is my code:
var inCategoryDocuments = DocumentHelper.GetDocuments("XYZ.MyType").InCategories("CategoryCodeName");
It's result with this query:
SELECT * FROM View_CMS_Tree_Joined AS V WITH (NOLOCK, NOEXPAND) INNER JOIN xyz_MyType AS C WITH (NOLOCK) ON [V].[DocumentForeignKeyValue] = [C].[MyTypeID] AND V.ClassName = N'xyz.MyType' LEFT OUTER JOIN COM_SKU AS S WITH (NOLOCK) ON [V].[NodeSKUID] = [S].[SKUID] WHERE ([DocumentCulture] = N'en-EN' AND 0 = 1)
It looks like this API method (.InCategories()) doing nothing or I am missing something?
Kentico v11.0.26
Is this category assigned to specific site? If so, it wouldn't work, because in your query you didn't specify the site from which you want get documents.
You can simply add
.OnCurrentSite()
to your DataQuery, it will look like this
var inCategoryDocuments = DocumentHelper.GetDocuments("XYZ.MyType").OnCurrentSite().InCategories("CategoryCodeName");
It will retrieve the documents from the current website based on domain.
IMO method .InCategory shouldn't take care about site or it should be parametrized.
You need to include the using statement for it to work because those methods are extensions.
using CMS.DocumentEngine;
I'm attempting to export data from an older Orchard db and am having problems finding which table the content of a blog post is stored. I've tried using a number of different 'Search all columns' spocs to search all tables and columns but am not finding text from the post itself.
If I have a blog post where the opening sentence is:
This sentence contains a unique word.
I would have expected at least one of the various 'Search all columns' examples to have turned up a table/column. But so far, none have.
thx
Orchard store data based on two tables, ContentItemRecord and ContentItemVersionRecord, which store meta data for content items like BlogPost, and these content items built from multiple parts, each part has it's table and the relation between the item and it's parts is based on Id (if not draftable) or ContentItemRecord_Id (if draftable) columns
if we take BlogPost type as example, which built from TitlePart, BodyPart, AutoroutePart and CommonPart, and you want to select all the data of post (id = 90), then you can find it's title in TitlePartRecord table (ContentItemRecord_Id = 90), and the body text of it in BodyPartRecord table with same relation as title part record, and the route part in AutorouteRecord table with same relation, and the common meta data in CommonPartRecord (Id = 90).
This is the way to extract data from Orchard database, hope this will help you.
Tnx to #mdameer...
and the related query of madmeer's answer is this:
SELECT * FROM dbo.default_Title_TitlePartRecord
inner join dbo.default_Orchard_Framework_ContentItemRecord on
dbo.default_Title_TitlePartRecord.ContentItemRecord_id=dbo.default_Orchard_Framework_ContentItemRecord.Id
inner join dbo.default_Common_BodyPartRecord on
dbo.default_Common_BodyPartRecord.ContentItemRecord_id=dbo.default_Orchard_Framework_ContentItemRecord.Id
where dbo.default_Title_TitlePartRecord.ContentItemRecord_id=90
and this is the rightsolution
Just in case it may be useful for others, the following is the actual SQL query used to migrate an Orchard instance to Umbraco. It is derived from the excellent answers by mdameerand and Iman Salehi:
SELECT t.Title, f.Data, b.Text FROM dbo.Title_TitlePartRecord t
inner join dbo.Orchard_Framework_ContentItemRecord f on
t.ContentItemRecord_id=f.Id
inner join dbo.Common_BodyPartRecord b on
b.ContentItemRecord_id=f.Id
AND b.Id = (
SELECT MAX(m2.Id)
FROM dbo.Common_BodyPartRecord m2
WHERE m2.ContentItemRecord_id = f.Id
)
AND t.Id = (
SELECT MAX(m2.Id)
FROM dbo.Title_TitlePartRecord m2
WHERE m2.ContentItemRecord_id = f.Id
)
Consultant sent me this code example, here is something he expects to get
SELECT m1~vbeln_im m1~vbelp_im m1~mblnr smbln
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE lt_mseg
FROM mseg AS m1
INNER JOIN mseg AS m2 ON m1~mblnr = m2~smbln
AND m1~mjahr = m2~sjahr
AND m1~zeile = m2~smblp
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN lt_vbfa
WHERE
AND m2~bwart = '102'
AND 0 = ( select SUM( ( CASE
when SHKZG = 'S' THEN 1
when SHKZG = 'H' THEN -1
else 0
END ) *MENGE ) MENGE
into lt_mseg-summ
from mseg
where
VBELN_IM = m1~vbeln_im
and VBELP_IM = m1~vbelp_im
).
The problem is I don't see how that should work in current syntax. I think about deriving internal select and using it as condition to main one, but is there a proper way to write this nested construction?
As i get it, if nested statement = 0, then main query executes. The problem here is the case inside nested statement. Is it even possible in ABAP? And in my opinion this check could be used outside from main SQL query.
Any suggestions are welcome.
the logic that you were given is part of Native/Open SQL and has some shortcomings that you need to be aware of.
the statement you are showing has to be placed between EXEC SQL and ENDEXEC.
the logic is platform dependent.
there is no syntax checking performed between the EXEC and ENDEXEC
the execution of this bypasses the database buffering process, so its slower
To me, I would investigate a better way to capture the data that performs better outside of open/native sql.
If you want to move forward with this type of logic, below are a couple of links which should be helpful. There is an example select using a nested select with a case statement.
Test Program
Example Logic
This is probably what you need, it works at least since ABAP 750.
SELECT vbeln UP TO 100 ROWS
FROM vbfa
INTO TABLE #DATA(lt_vbfa).
DATA(rt_vbeln) = VALUE range_vbeln_va_tab( FOR GROUPS val OF <line> IN lt_vbfa GROUP BY ( low = <line>-vbeln ) WITHOUT MEMBERS ( sign = 'I' option = 'EQ' low = val-low ) ).
SELECT m1~vbeln_im, m1~vbelp_im, m1~mblnr, m2~smbln
INTO TABLE #DATA(lt_mseg)
FROM mseg AS m1
JOIN mseg AS m2
ON m1~mblnr = m2~smbln
AND m1~mjahr = m2~sjahr
AND m1~zeile = m2~smblp
WHERE m2~bwart = '102'
AND m1~vbeln_im IN ( SELECT vbelv FROM vbfa WHERE vbelv IN #rt_vbeln )
GROUP BY m1~vbeln_im, m1~vbelp_im, m1~mblnr, m2~smbln
HAVING SUM( CASE m1~shkzg WHEN 'H' THEN 1 WHEN 'S' THEN -1 ELSE 0 END * m1~menge ) = 0.
Yes, aggregating and FOR ALL ENTRIES is impossible in one SELECT, but you can trick the system with range and subquery. Also you don't need three joins for summarizing reversed docs, your SUM subquery is redundant here.
If you need to select documents not only by delivery number but also by position this will be more complicated for sure.
I have a site that uses Wayfinder to display the latest 3 entries from an Articles blog. Now, I want to only consider those blog entries that are tagged Highlights.
My original Wayfinder call looks like this, nothing spectacular:
[[!Wayfinder? &startId=`296` &level=`1`
&outerTpl=`emptyTpl`
&innerTpl=``
&rowTpl=`thumbnails_formatter`
&ignoreHidden=`1`
&sortBy=`menuindex`
&sortOrder=`DESC`
&limit=`3`
&cacheResults=`0`
]]
as Articles tags are managed via the articlestags TV, I thought that a &where might do the trick, but with no luck yet:
&where=`[{"articlestags:LIKE":"%Highlights%"}]`
does not yield anything. As a sanity check, I tried [{"pagetitle:LIKE":"%something%"}], which worked. Obviously, the problem is that articlestags is not a column of modx_site_content, but I'm not sure about how to put the subquery.
SELECT contentid
FROM modx_site_tmplvar_contentvalues
WHERE tmplvarid=17
AND value LIKE '%Highlights%'
Gave me the right IDs on the sql prompt, but adding it to the Wayfinder call like this gave an empty result again:
&where=`["id IN (SELECT contentid FROM modx_site_tmplvar_contentvalues WHERE tmplvarid=17 AND value LIKE '%Highlights%')"]`
Any ideas on how to achieve this? I'd like to stay with Wayfinder for consistency, but other solutions are welcome as well.
You can just use pdomenu (part of pdoTools) instead Wayfinder
[[!PdoMenu?
&startId=`296`
&level=`1`
&outerTpl=`emptyTpl`
&innerTpl=``
&rowTpl=`thumbnails_formatter`
&ignoreHidden=`1`
&sortBy=`menuindex`
&sortOrder=`DESC`
&limit=`3`
&cacheResults=`0`
&includeTVs=`articlestags`
&where=`[{"TVarticlestags.value:LIKE":"%filter%"}]`
]]
Take a peek at some of the config files [core/components/wayfinder/configs ] - I have not tried it, but it looks as if you can run your select query right in the config & pass the tmplvarid array to the $where variable.
A little playing around led me to a solution: I needed to include the class name (not table name) when referring to the ID:
&where=`["modResource.id IN (SELECT contentid FROM modx_site_tmplvar_contentvalues WHERE tmplvarid=17 AND value LIKE '%Highlights%')"]`
a small test showed that even a simple
&where=`["id = 123"]`
does not work without modResource..
A look at wayfinder.class.php shows the following line, which seems to be the "culprit":
$c->select($this->modx->getSelectColumns('modResource','modResource'));
This method aliases the selected columns - relevant code is in xpdoobject.class.php. The first parameter is the class name, the second a table alias. The effect is that the query selects id AS modResource.id, and so on.
EDIT: final version of my query:
&where=`["modResource.id IN (
SELECT val.contentid
FROM modx_site_tmplvars AS tv
JOIN modx_site_tmplvar_contentvalues AS val
ON tv.id = val.tmplvarid
WHERE tv.name = 'articlestags' AND (
val.value = 'Highlights'
OR val.value LIKE 'Highlights,%'
OR val.value LIKE '%,Highlights'
OR val.value LIKE '%,Highlights,%'
)
)"]`
I don't claim this query is particularly efficient (I seem to recall that OR conditions are bad). Also, MODx won't work with this one if the newlines aren't stripped out. Still, I prefer to publish the query in its well-formatted form.
I used snippet as a parameter for the includeDocs of wayfinder, In my case it was useful because I was need different resources in menu depend on user browser (mobile or desktop)
[[!Wayfinder?
&startId=`4`
&level=`1`
&includeDocs=`[[!menu_docs?&startId=`4`]]`
&outerTpl=`home_menu_outer`
&rowTpl=`menu_row`
]]
and then menu_docs snippet
<?php
if (empty ($startId))
return;
if (!isMobileDevice())
return;
$query = $modx->newQuery('modResource');
$query->innerJoin('modTemplateVarResource','TemplateVarResources');
$query->where(array(
'TemplateVarResources.tmplvarid' => 3,
'TemplateVarResources.value:LIKE' => 'yes',
'modResource.parent' => $startId,
'modResource.deleted' => 0,
'modResource.published' => 1,
'modResource.hidemenu' => 0
));
$resources = $modx->getCollection('modResource', $query);
$ouput = array();
foreach ($resources as $resource)
$output[] = $resource->get('id');
return implode (',', $output);
I have a list with roughly 5500 items, and I would like to find out the size on disk. Is there some way I can do this? I don't mind running a query in the database, if necessary.
Navigate to http://[myapplication]/[mySitecollection]/_layouts/storman.aspx
This will list the Storage Space Allocation for the site collection.
If you enable a site quota, an option under site settings appears called Storage Space Allocation. When you go to set a quota in the Central Administration, the page will tell you what the current storage used is so you can have an idea before there. Once you get to the Storage Space Allocation report, you can see the total size of a library.
Unfortunately, you can't get this report without turning on a site quota.
I could not get Tim Dobrinski's suggestion to work. This T-SQL query does not deal with everything, but gives a very good idea. Pop it into Excel, then add a column for "Size in MB" and add in a formula.
USE [WSS_Content]
GO
SELECT
[dbo].[Webs].[FullUrl]
,[dbo].[Lists].[tp_Title] AS "ListName"
,[dbo].[Docs].[DirName]
,[dbo].[Docs].[LeafName]
,[dbo].[Docs].[Size]
,[dbo].[Docs].[MetaInfoSize]
,[dbo].[Docs].[Version]
,[dbo].[Docs].[TimeCreated]
,[dbo].[Docs].[TimeLastModified]
,[dbo].[Docs].[MetaInfoTimeLastModified]
,[dbo].[Docs].[CheckoutUserId]
,[dbo].[Docs].[CheckoutDate]
,[dbo].[Docs].[ExtensionForFile]
FROM [WSS_Content].[dbo].[Docs]
INNER JOIN [WSS_Content].[dbo].[Webs] ON [dbo].[Webs].[Id] = [dbo].[Docs].[WebId]
INNER JOIN [WSS_Content].[dbo].[Lists] ON [dbo].[Lists].[tp_ID] = [dbo].[Docs].[ListId]
WHERE [dbo].[Docs].[Size] > 0
AND ([dbo].[Docs].[LeafName] NOT LIKE '%.stp')
AND ([dbo].[Docs].[LeafName] NOT LIKE '%.aspx')
AND ([dbo].[Docs].[LeafName] NOT LIKE '%.xfp')
AND ([dbo].[Docs].[LeafName] NOT LIKE '%.dwp')
AND ([dbo].[Docs].[LeafName] NOT LIKE '%template%')
AND ([dbo].[Docs].[LeafName] NOT LIKE '%.inf')
AND ([dbo].[Docs].[LeafName] NOT LIKE '%.css')
If you save the list in question as a template to the file system, this should give you a rough idea of its size. If you need to do this on a periodic basis this approach is not as useful.
Site Settings -> Storage Metrics
You can see how much each object is consuming, click on Lists to see each individual list
You don't have to set a site quota
Sharepoint 2013
This is taken from SharePoint 2013:
USE [WSS_Content_Intranet]
GO
SELECT
(ISNULL(DocSizes,0) + ISNULL(UserDataSize,0)) As TotalSize,
nLists.tp_ID,
nLists.tp_Title,
nLists.tp_ItemCount,
Webs.FullUrl
FROM
Webs
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT
ALAux.ItemCount as tp_ItemCount,
Lists.tp_Title,
Lists.tp_ID,
Lists.tp_WebID,
ALAux.Modified as tp_Modified,
Lists.tp_ServerTemplate,
Docs.DirName,
Docs.LeafName,
Lists.tp_ImageUrl
FROM
Lists
CROSS APPLY
TVF_AllListsAux_NoLock_ListId(Lists.tp_SiteId, Lists.tp_ID) AS ALAux
INNER JOIN
Docs
ON
Lists.tp_RootFolder = Docs.Id AND
Lists.tp_WebId = Docs.WebId
WHERE
tp_BaseType <> 1 AND
Lists.tp_SiteId = YOUR_SITE_ID
) As nLists
ON
Webs.Id = nLists.tp_WebId
LEFT OUTER JOIN
(
SELECT
(SUM(CAST((ISNULL(Docs.Size,0)) AS BIGINT))) As DocSizes,
Docs.ListId,
Docs.SiteId
FROM
Docs
WHERE
Docs.Type = 0 AND SiteId = YOUR_SITE_ID
GROUP BY
Docs.ListId,Docs.SiteId
) As DocsInList
ON
DocsInList.ListId = nLists.tp_ID
LEFT OUTER JOIN
(
SELECT
(SUM(CAST((ISNULL(tp_Size,0)) AS BIGINT))) As UserDataSize,
tp_ListId
FROM
UserData
GROUP BY
UserData.tp_ListId
) AS UserDataInList
ON
UserDataInList.tp_ListId = DocsInList.ListId
ORDER BY TotalSize DESC
It returns all lists of all webs, summing the size of the items and the attached documents. Document libraries are not included, use this:
SELECT
Lists.tp_Title,
Lists.tp_ID as Id,
SUM(Docs.Size/1024 + Docs.MetaInfoSize/1024)/1024 AS SizeMB,
COUNT(*) as NumberOfFiles
FROM dbo.Docs
INNER JOIN Webs ON Webs.Id = Docs.WebId
INNER JOIN Lists ON Lists.tp_ID = Docs.ListId
WHERE Docs.Size > 0
GROUP BY Lists.tp_Title,Lists.tp_ID