When i use sed and use braces like this
sed -re 's/top([0-9]+)//g'
I works for this but i have seen sometimes i need to escape the braces and sometimes it works without escaping. why is that
Why does \w don't work with awk
This depends on the -r switch you are using:
-r, --regexp-extended
use extended regular expressions in the script.
With -r the brackets mean a captured group, and to match literal brackets you have to escape them.
Without -r it's vice versa.
Consider:
$ sed -r 's/foo([0-9]*)/\1/' <<<'foo123'
123
$ sed 's/foo([0-9]*)/\1/' <<<'foo123'
sed: -e expression #1, char 17: invalid reference \1 on `s' command's RHS
$ sed 's/([0-9]*)//' <<<'foo(123)'
foo
$ sed 's/foo\([0-9]*\)/\1/' <<<'foo(123)'
(123)
(in the last one the groups matches zero digits)
In the classical regular expressions sed uses, you have to backslash the parentheses to give them the special meaning. If your sed supports -r, it can use "extended" regular expressions, where parentheses have the special meaning without backslashes, backslashing them makes them lose the meaning.
\w should work in awk. What have you tried, what output did you expect and what output did you get?
Related
I need to perform a replacement with sed in linux but it doesn't work.
from [$sonarqubeName] to [$projectName][$branchName]
I tried sed -i 's/[$projectName]/[$projectName][$branchName]/g'
sed -i 's/[$projectName]/[$projectName][$branchName]/g'
The characters [, $, ] have special meaning inside the regular expressions (and some other characters as well, but they are not appearing in your search string). To use them as literal symbols you need to escape them with a backslash in the search expression. Try
sed -i 's/\[\$sonarqubeName\]/[$projectName][$branchName]/g'
I'm wondering whether it is possible to write a 100% reliable sed command to escape any regex metacharacters in an input string so that it can be used in a subsequent sed command. Like this:
#!/bin/bash
# Trying to replace one regex by another in an input file with sed
search="/abc\n\t[a-z]\+\([^ ]\)\{2,3\}\3"
replace="/xyz\n\t[0-9]\+\([^ ]\)\{2,3\}\3"
# Sanitize input
search=$(sed 'script to escape' <<< "$search")
replace=$(sed 'script to escape' <<< "$replace")
# Use it in a sed command
sed "s/$search/$replace/" input
I know that there are better tools to work with fixed strings instead of patterns, for example awk, perl or python. I would just like to prove whether it is possible or not with sed. I would say let's concentrate on basic POSIX regexes to have even more fun! :)
I have tried a lot of things but anytime I could find an input which broke my attempt. I thought keeping it abstract as script to escape would not lead anybody into the wrong direction.
Btw, the discussion came up here. I thought this could be a good place to collect solutions and probably break and/or elaborate them.
Note:
If you're looking for prepackaged functionality based on the techniques discussed in this answer:
bash functions that enable robust escaping even in multi-line substitutions can be found at the bottom of this post (plus a perl solution that uses perl's built-in support for such escaping).
#EdMorton's answer contains a tool (bash script) that robustly performs single-line substitutions.
Ed's answer now has an improved version of the sed command used below, corrected in calestyo's answer, which is needed if you want to escape string literals for potential use with other regex-processing tools, such as awk and perl. In short: for cross-tool use, \ must be escaped as \\ rather than as [\], which means: instead of the
sed 's/[^^]/[&]/g; s/\^/\\^/g' command used below, you must use
sed 's/[^^\]/[&]/g; s/[\^]/\\&/g;'
All snippets below assume bash as the shell (POSIX-compliant reformulations are possible):
SINGLE-line Solutions
Escaping a string literal for use as a regex in sed:
To give credit where credit is due: I found the regex used below in this answer.
Assuming that the search string is a single-line string:
search='abc\n\t[a-z]\+\([^ ]\)\{2,3\}\3' # sample input containing metachars.
searchEscaped=$(sed 's/[^^]/[&]/g; s/\^/\\^/g' <<<"$search") # escape it.
sed -n "s/$searchEscaped/foo/p" <<<"$search" # Echoes 'foo'
Every character except ^ is placed in its own character set [...] expression to treat it as a literal.
Note that ^ is the one char. you cannot represent as [^], because it has special meaning in that location (negation).
Then, ^ chars. are escaped as \^.
Note that you cannot just escape every char by putting a \ in front of it because that can turn a literal char into a metachar, e.g. \< and \b are word boundaries in some tools, \n is a newline, \{ is the start of a RE interval like \{1,3\}, etc.
The approach is robust, but not efficient.
The robustness comes from not trying to anticipate all special regex characters - which will vary across regex dialects - but to focus on only 2 features shared by all regex dialects:
the ability to specify literal characters inside a character set.
the ability to escape a literal ^ as \^
Escaping a string literal for use as the replacement string in sed's s/// command:
The replacement string in a sed s/// command is not a regex, but it recognizes placeholders that refer to either the entire string matched by the regex (&) or specific capture-group results by index (\1, \2, ...), so these must be escaped, along with the (customary) regex delimiter, /.
Assuming that the replacement string is a single-line string:
replace='Laurel & Hardy; PS\2' # sample input containing metachars.
replaceEscaped=$(sed 's/[&/\]/\\&/g' <<<"$replace") # escape it
sed -n "s/.*/$replaceEscaped/p" <<<"foo" # Echoes $replace as-is
MULTI-line Solutions
Escaping a MULTI-LINE string literal for use as a regex in sed:
Note: This only makes sense if multiple input lines (possibly ALL) have been read before attempting to match.
Since tools such as sed and awk operate on a single line at a time by default, extra steps are needed to make them read more than one line at a time.
# Define sample multi-line literal.
search='/abc\n\t[a-z]\+\([^ ]\)\{2,3\}\3
/def\n\t[A-Z]\+\([^ ]\)\{3,4\}\4'
# Escape it.
searchEscaped=$(sed -e 's/[^^]/[&]/g; s/\^/\\^/g; $!a\'$'\n''\\n' <<<"$search" | tr -d '\n') #'
# Use in a Sed command that reads ALL input lines up front.
# If ok, echoes 'foo'
sed -n -e ':a' -e '$!{N;ba' -e '}' -e "s/$searchEscaped/foo/p" <<<"$search"
The newlines in multi-line input strings must be translated to '\n' strings, which is how newlines are encoded in a regex.
$!a\'$'\n''\\n' appends string '\n' to every output line but the last (the last newline is ignored, because it was added by <<<)
tr -d '\n then removes all actual newlines from the string (sed adds one whenever it prints its pattern space), effectively replacing all newlines in the input with '\n' strings.
-e ':a' -e '$!{N;ba' -e '}' is the POSIX-compliant form of a sed idiom that reads all input lines a loop, therefore leaving subsequent commands to operate on all input lines at once.
If you're using GNU sed (only), you can use its -z option to simplify reading all input lines at once:
sed -z "s/$searchEscaped/foo/" <<<"$search"
Escaping a MULTI-LINE string literal for use as the replacement string in sed's s/// command:
# Define sample multi-line literal.
replace='Laurel & Hardy; PS\2
Masters\1 & Johnson\2'
# Escape it for use as a Sed replacement string.
IFS= read -d '' -r < <(sed -e ':a' -e '$!{N;ba' -e '}' -e 's/[&/\]/\\&/g; s/\n/\\&/g' <<<"$replace")
replaceEscaped=${REPLY%$'\n'}
# If ok, outputs $replace as is.
sed -n "s/\(.*\) \(.*\)/$replaceEscaped/p" <<<"foo bar"
Newlines in the input string must be retained as actual newlines, but \-escaped.
-e ':a' -e '$!{N;ba' -e '}' is the POSIX-compliant form of a sed idiom that reads all input lines a loop.
's/[&/\]/\\&/g escapes all &, \ and / instances, as in the single-line solution.
s/\n/\\&/g' then \-prefixes all actual newlines.
IFS= read -d '' -r is used to read the sed command's output as is (to avoid the automatic removal of trailing newlines that a command substitution ($(...)) would perform).
${REPLY%$'\n'} then removes a single trailing newline, which the <<< has implicitly appended to the input.
bash functions based on the above (for sed):
quoteRe() quotes (escapes) for use in a regex
quoteSubst() quotes for use in the substitution string of a s/// call.
both handle multi-line input correctly
Note that because sed reads a single line at at time by default, use of quoteRe() with multi-line strings only makes sense in sed commands that explicitly read multiple (or all) lines at once.
Also, using command substitutions ($(...)) to call the functions won't work for strings that have trailing newlines; in that event, use something like IFS= read -d '' -r escapedValue <(quoteSubst "$value")
# SYNOPSIS
# quoteRe <text>
quoteRe() { sed -e 's/[^^]/[&]/g; s/\^/\\^/g; $!a\'$'\n''\\n' <<<"$1" | tr -d '\n'; }
# SYNOPSIS
# quoteSubst <text>
quoteSubst() {
IFS= read -d '' -r < <(sed -e ':a' -e '$!{N;ba' -e '}' -e 's/[&/\]/\\&/g; s/\n/\\&/g' <<<"$1")
printf %s "${REPLY%$'\n'}"
}
Example:
from=$'Cost\(*):\n$3.' # sample input containing metachars.
to='You & I'$'\n''eating A\1 sauce.' # sample replacement string with metachars.
# Should print the unmodified value of $to
sed -e ':a' -e '$!{N;ba' -e '}' -e "s/$(quoteRe "$from")/$(quoteSubst "$to")/" <<<"$from"
Note the use of -e ':a' -e '$!{N;ba' -e '}' to read all input at once, so that the multi-line substitution works.
perl solution:
Perl has built-in support for escaping arbitrary strings for literal use in a regex: the quotemeta() function or its equivalent \Q...\E quoting.
The approach is the same for both single- and multi-line strings; for example:
from=$'Cost\(*):\n$3.' # sample input containing metachars.
to='You owe me $1/$& for'$'\n''eating A\1 sauce.' # sample replacement string w/ metachars.
# Should print the unmodified value of $to.
# Note that the replacement value needs NO escaping.
perl -s -0777 -pe 's/\Q$from\E/$to/' -- -from="$from" -to="$to" <<<"$from"
Note the use of -0777 to read all input at once, so that the multi-line substitution works.
The -s option allows placing -<var>=<val>-style Perl variable definitions following -- after the script, before any filename operands.
Building upon #mklement0's answer in this thread, the following tool will replace any single-line string (as opposed to regexp) with any other single-line string using sed and bash:
$ cat sedstr
#!/bin/bash
old="$1"
new="$2"
file="${3:--}"
escOld=$(sed 's/[^^\\]/[&]/g; s/\^/\\^/g; s/\\/\\\\/g' <<< "$old")
escNew=$(sed 's/[&/\]/\\&/g' <<< "$new")
sed "s/$escOld/$escNew/g" "$file"
To illustrate the need for this tool, consider trying to replace a.*/b{2,}\nc with d&e\1f by calling sed directly:
$ cat file
a.*/b{2,}\nc
axx/bb\nc
$ sed 's/a.*/b{2,}\nc/d&e\1f/' file
sed: -e expression #1, char 16: unknown option to `s'
$ sed 's/a.*\/b{2,}\nc/d&e\1f/' file
sed: -e expression #1, char 23: invalid reference \1 on `s' command's RHS
$ sed 's/a.*\/b{2,}\nc/d&e\\1f/' file
a.*/b{2,}\nc
axx/bb\nc
# .... and so on, peeling the onion ad nauseum until:
$ sed 's/a\.\*\/b{2,}\\nc/d\&e\\1f/' file
d&e\1f
axx/bb\nc
or use the above tool:
$ sedstr 'a.*/b{2,}\nc' 'd&e\1f' file
d&e\1f
axx/bb\nc
The reason this is useful is that it can be easily augmented to use word-delimiters to replace words if necessary, e.g. in GNU sed syntax:
sed "s/\<$escOld\>/$escNew/g" "$file"
whereas the tools that actually operate on strings (e.g. awk's index()) cannot use word-delimiters.
NOTE: the reason to not wrap \ in a bracket expression is that if you were using a tool that accepts [\]] as a literal ] inside a bracket expression (e.g. perl and most awk implementations) to do the actual final substitution (i.e. instead of sed "s/$escOld/$escNew/g") then you couldn't use the approach of:
sed 's/[^^]/[&]/g; s/\^/\\^/g'
to escape \ by enclosing it in [] because then \x would become [\][x] which means \ or ] or [ or x. Instead you'd need:
sed 's/[^^\\]/[&]/g; s/\^/\\^/g; s/\\/\\\\/g'
So while [\] is probably OK for all current sed implementations, we know that \\ will work for all sed, awk, perl, etc. implementations and so use that form of escaping.
It should be noted that the regular expression used in some answers above among this and that one:
's/[^^\\]/[&]/g; s/\^/\\^/g; s/\\/\\\\/g'
seems to be wrong:
Doing first s/\^/\\^/g followed by s/\\/\\\\/g is an error, as any ^ escaped first to \^ will then have its \ escaped again.
A better way seems to be: 's/[^\^]/[&]/g; s/[\^]/\\&/g;'.
[^^\\] with sed (BRE/ERE) should be just [^\^] (or [^^\]). \ has no special meaning inside a bracket expression and needs not to be quoted.
Bash parameter expansion can be used to escape a string for use as a Sed replacement string:
# Define a sample multi-line literal. Includes a trailing newline to test corner case
replace='a&b;c\1
d/e
'
# Escape it for use as a Sed replacement string.
: "${replace//\\/\\\\}"
: "${_//&/\\\&}"
: "${_//\//\\\/}"
: "${_//$'\n'/\\$'\n'}"
replaceEscaped=$_
# Output should match "$replace"
sed -n "s/.*/$replaceEscaped/p" <<<''
In bash 5.2+, it can be simplified further:
# Define a sample multi-line literal. Includes a trailing newline to test corner case
replace='a&b;c\1
d/e
'
# Escape it for use as a Sed replacement string.
shopt -s extglob
shopt -s patsub_replacement # An & in the replacement will expand to what matched. bash 5.2+
: "${replace//#(&|\\|\/|$'\n')/\\&}"
replaceEscaped=$_
# Output should match "$replace"
sed -n "s/.*/$replaceEscaped/p" <<<''
Encapsulate it in a bash function:
##
# escape_replacement -v var replacement
#
# Escape special characters in _replacement_ so that it can be
# used as the replacement part in a sed substitute command.
# Store the result in _var_.
escape_replacement() {
if ! [[ $# = 3 && $1 = '-v' ]]; then
echo "escape_replacement: invalid usage" >&2
echo "escape_replacement: usage: escape_replacement -v var replacement" >&2
return 1
fi
local -n var=$2 # nameref (requires Bash 4.3+)
# We use the : command (true builtin) as a dummy command as we
# trigger a sequence of parameter expansions
# We exploit that the $_ variable (last argument to the previous command
# after expansion) contains the result of the previous parameter expansion
: "${3//\\/\\\\}" # Backslash-escape any existing backslashes
: "${_//&/\\\&}" # Backslash-escape &
: "${_//\//\\\/}" # Backslash-escape the delimiter (we assume /)
: "${_//$'\n'/\\$'\n'}" # Backslash-escape newline
var=$_ # Assign to the nameref
# To support Bash older than 4.3, the following can be used instead of nameref
#eval "$2=\$_" # Use eval instead of nameref https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/006
}
# Test the function
# =================
# Define a sample multi-line literal. Include a trailing newline to test corner case
replace='a&b;c\1
d/e
'
escape_replacement -v replaceEscaped "$replace"
# Output should match "$replace"
sed -n "s/.*/$replaceEscaped/p" <<<''
i have a file which contains several instances of \n.
i would like to replace them with actual newlines, but sed doesn't recognize the \n.
i tried
sed -r -e 's/\n/\n/'
sed -r -e 's/\\n/\n/'
sed -r -e 's/[\n]/\n/'
and many other ways of escaping it.
is sed able to recognize a literal \n? if so, how?
is there another program that can read the file interpreting the \n's as real newlines?
Can you please try this
sed -i 's/\\n/\n/g' input_filename
What exactly works depends on your sed implementation. This is poorly specified in POSIX so you see all kinds of behaviors.
The -r option is also not part of the POSIX standard; but your script doesn't use any of the -r features, so let's just take it out. (For what it's worth, it changes the regex dialect supported in the match expression from POSIX "basic" to "extended" regular expressions; some sed variants have an -E option which does the same thing. In brief, things like capturing parentheses and repeating braces are "extended" features.)
On BSD platforms (including MacOS), you will generally want to backslash the literal newline, like this:
sed 's/\\n/\
/g' file
On some other systems, like Linux (also depending on the precise sed version installed -- some distros use GNU sed, others favor something more traditional, still others let you choose) you might be able to use a literal \n in the replacement string to represent an actual newline character; but again, this is nonstandard and thus not portable.
If you need a properly portable solution, probably go with Awk or (gasp) Perl.
perl -pe 's/\\n/\n/g' file
In case you don't have access to the manuals, the /g flag says to replace every occurrence on a line; the default behavior of the s/// command is to only replace the first match on every line.
awk seems to handle this fine:
echo "test \n more data" | awk '{sub(/\\n/,"**")}1'
test ** more data
Here you need to escape the \ using \\
$ echo "\n" | sed -e 's/[\\][n]/hello/'
sed works one line at a time, so no \n on 1 line only (it's removed by sed at read time into buffer). You should use N, n or H,h to fill the buffer with more than one line, and then \n appears inside. Be careful, ^ and $ are no more end of line but end of string/buffer because of the \n inside.
\n is recognized in the search pattern, not in the replace pattern. Two ways for using it (sample):
sed s/\(\n\)bla/\1blabla\1/
sed s/\nbla/\
blabla\
/
The first uses a \n already inside as back reference (shorter code in replace pattern);
the second use a real newline.
So basically
sed "N
$ s/\(\n\)/\1/g
"
works (but is a bit useless). I imagine that s/\(\n\)\n/\1/g is more like what you want.
How can I fix this:
abc="a/b/c"; echo porc | sed -r "s/^/$abc/"
sed: -e expression #1, char 7: unknown option to `s'
The substitution of variable $abc is done correctly, but the problem is that $abc contains slashes, which confuse sed. Can I somehow escape these slashes?
Note that sed(1) allows you to use different characters for your s/// delimiters:
$ abc="a/b/c"
$ echo porc | sed -r "s|^|$abc|"
a/b/cporc
$
Of course, if you go this route, you need to make sure that the delimiters you choose aren't used elsewhere in your input.
The GNU manual for sed states that "The / characters may be uniformly replaced by any other single character within any given s command."
Therefore, just use another character instead of /, for example ::
abc="a/b/c"; echo porc | sed -r "s:^:$abc:"
Do not use a character that can be found in your input. We can use : above, since we know that the input (a/b/c/) doesn't contain :.
Be careful of character-escaping.
If using "", Bash will interpret some characters specially, e.g. ` (used for inline execution), ! (used for accessing Bash history), $ (used for accessing variables).
If using '', Bash will take all characters literally, even $.
The two approaches can be combined, depending on whether you need escaping or not, e.g.:
abc="a/b/c"; echo porc | sed 's!^!'"$abc"'!'
You don't have to use / as pattern and replace separator, as others already told you. I'd go with : as it is rather rarely used in paths (it's a separator in PATH environment variable). Stick to one and use shell built-in string replace features to make it bullet-proof, e.g. ${abc//:/\\:} (which means replace all : occurrences with \: in ${abc}) in case of : being the separator.
$ abc="a/b/c"; echo porc | sed -r "s:^:${abc//:/\\:}:"
a/b/cporc
backslash:
abc='a\/b\/c'
space filling....
As for the escaping part of the question I had the same issue and resolved with a double sed that can possibly be optimized.
escaped_abc=$(echo $abc | sed "s/\//\\\AAA\//g" | sed "s/AAA//g")
The triple A is used because otherwise the forward slash following its escaping backslash is never placed in the output, no matter how many backslashes you put in front of it.
is it possible to specify non-capturing groups in sed?
if so, how?
Parentheses in sed have two functions, grouping, and capturing.
So i'm asking about using parentheses to do the grouping, but without capturing. One might say non-capturing grouping parentheses. (non-capturing parantheses and that aren't literal). What are called non-capturing groups. Like i've seen the syntax (?:regex) for non-capturing groups, but it doesn't work in sed.
Linguistic Note- in the UK, the term brackets is used generally, for "round brackets" or "square brackets". In the UK, brackets usually refers to "( )", since "( )" are so common. And in the UK the term parentheses is hardly used. In the USA the term brackets are specifically "[ ]". So to prevent confusion to anybody in the USA, i've not used the words brackets in the question.
Parentheses can be used for grouping alternatives. For example:
sed 's/a\(bc\|de\)f/X/'
says to replace "abcf" or "adef" with "X", but the parentheses also capture. There is not a facility in sed to do such grouping without also capturing. If you have a complex regex that does both alternative grouping and capturing, you will simply have to be careful in selecting the correct capture group in your replacement.
Perhaps you could say more about what it is you're trying to accomplish (what your need for non-capturing groups is) and why you want to avoid capture groups.
Edit:
There is a type of non-capturing brackets ((?:pattern)) that are part of Perl-Compatible Regular Expressions (PCRE). They are not supported in sed (but are when using grep -P).
The answer, is that as of writing, you can't - sed does not support it.
Non-capturing groups have the syntax of (?:a) and are a PCRE syntax.
Sed supports BRE(Basic regular expressions), aka POSIX BRE, and if using GNU sed, there is the option -r that makes it support ERE(extended regular expressions) aka POSIX ERE, but still not PCRE)
Perl will work, for windows or linux
examples here
https://superuser.com/questions/416419/perl-for-matching-with-regular-expressions-in-terminal
e.g. this from cygwin in windows
$ echo -e 'abcd' | perl -0777 -pe 's/(a)(?:b)(c)(d)/\1/s'
a
$ echo -e 'abcd' | perl -0777 -pe 's/(a)(?:b)(c)(d)/\2/s'
c
There is a program albeit for Windows, which can do search and replace on the command line, and does support PCRE. It's called rxrepl. It's not sed of course, but it does search and replace with PCRE support.
C:\blah\rxrepl>echo abc | rxrepl -s "(a)(b)(c)" -r "\1"
a
C:\blah\rxrepl>echo abc | rxrepl -s "(a)(b)(c)" -r "\3"
c
C:\blah\rxrepl>echo abc | rxrepl -s "(a)(b)(?:c)" -r "\3"
Invalid match group requested.
C:\blah\rxrepl>echo abc | rxrepl -s "(a)(?:b)(c)" -r "\2"
c
C:\blah\rxrepl>
The author(not me), mentioned his program in an answer over here https://superuser.com/questions/339118/regex-replace-from-command-line
It has a really good syntax.
The standard thing to use would be perl, or almost any other programming language that people use.
I'll assume you are speaking of the backrefence syntax, which are parentheses ( ) not brackets [ ]
By default, sed will interpret ( ) literally and not attempt to make a backrefence from them. You will need to escape them to make them special as in \( \) It is only when you use the GNU sed -r option will the escaping be reversed. With sed -r, non escaped ( ) will produce backrefences and escaped \( \) will be treated as literal. Examples to follow:
POSIX sed
$ echo "foo(###)bar" | sed 's/foo(.*)bar/####/'
####
$ echo "foo(###)bar" | sed 's/foo(.*)bar/\1/'
sed: -e expression #1, char 16: invalid reference \1 on `s' command's RHS
-bash: echo: write error: Broken pipe
$ echo "foo(###)bar" | sed 's/foo\(.*\)bar/\1/'
(###)
GNU sed -r
$ echo "foo(###)bar" | sed -r 's/foo(.*)bar/####/'
####
$ echo "foo(###)bar" | sed -r 's/foo(.*)bar/\1/'
(###)
$ echo "foo(###)bar" | sed -r 's/foo\(.*\)bar/\1/'
sed: -e expression #1, char 18: invalid reference \1 on `s' command's RHS
-bash: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Update
From the comments:
Group-only, non-capturing parentheses ( ) so you can use something like intervals {n,m} without creating a backreference \1 don't exist. First, intervals are not apart of POSIX sed, you must use the GNU -r extension to enable them. As soon as you enable -r any grouping parentheses will also be capturing for backreference use. Examples:
$ echo "123.456.789" | sed -r 's/([0-9]{3}\.){2}/###/'
###789
$ echo "123.456.789" | sed -r 's/([0-9]{3}\.){2}/###\1/'
###456.789
As said, it is not possible to have non-capturing groups in sed.
It could be obvious but non-capturing groups are not a necessity(unless running into the back reference limit (e.g. \9).).
One can just use the desired capturing ones and ignore the non-desired ones as if they were non-capturing.
So e.g. of the two capturings here \1 and \2 you can ignore the \1 and just use the \2
$ echo blahblahblahc | sed -r "s/(blah){1,10}(.)/\2/"
c
For reference, nested capturing groups are numbered by the position-order of "(".
E.g.,
echo "apple and bananas and monkeys" | sed -r "s/((apple|banana)s?)/\1x/g"
applex and bananasx and monkeys (note: "s" in bananas, first bigger group)
vs
echo "apple and bananas and monkeys" | sed -r "s/((apple|banana)s?)/\2x/g"
applex and bananax and monkeys (note: no "s" in bananas, second smaller group)