Let me explain better. What is gonna happen if I run a command in Linux and before it's done and you could enter another command I close the terminal. Would it still do the command or not?
Generally, you must expect that closing your terminal will hangup your command. But fear not! Linux has a solution for that too!
To ensure that your command completes, use the nohup argument first. Simply place it before whatever you are trying to do:
nohup ./some_program
nohup ./do_a_thing -frx -file input_file.txt
nohup grep "something" giant_list_of_files/* > temp_file.txt
The nohup command stands for "no hangup" and it will ensure that the command you execute continues to run, even if you close your terminal.
It depends on the process and your environment (job control shell options, VNC, etc). But typically, no. The process will get a "hangup" signal (message) from the operating system, and upon receiving that, will quit.
The nohup command, for example, arranges for processes to ignore the hangup signal from the OS. There are many ways to achieve the same result.
I would say it will abort att the status you are in just before the session close.
If you want to be sure to complete the job, you will need to use the nohup command.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nohup
Read about nohups and daemons (-d)...
A good link is [link]What's the difference between nohup and a daemon?
Worth look at screen command, Screen command offers the ability to detach a long running process (or program, or shell-script) from a session and then attach it back at a later time.
Related
I have this command in my shell script that runs forever- it wouldn't finish unless I do ctrl-c. I have been trying to look up how to send ctrl-c signal to script and all the answers have been some sort of kill $! or kill$$ or such. My problem is that the command never finishes, so it never goes on to the next command like my "kill" commands or anything else. I have to manually hit the ctrl-C in my terminal for it to even execute kill $!. I'm sure there is a way to work around this but I am not sure what. Thanks in advance!
There are several approaches to this problem. The simplest (but not most robust) is (perhaps) to simply run your long running command in the background:
#!/bin/sh
long-running-command & # run in the background
sleep 5 # sleep for a bit
kill %1 # send SIGTERM to the command if it's still running
I'd like to start an extensive IDL process which will be run on a linux based server.
Given a normal a procedure like this:
open PuTTy
move to right directory
compile IDL scripts (1 main script executing 2 others)
run main script.
Now I would like to do that in the background. After some Google research I found out that it is adivisable to use the nohup-command. But I don't know what this command should look like including my scripts....
Thanks for your help.
nohup command can be used to run any job in background which you run in foreground.
The syntax for it is :
nohup your_script &
You can use the fg to bring this job to foreground.
To detach your current process you can use two solutions:
nohup
Run:
nohup ./process </dev/null &>log.txt &
disown to detach the process from your pseudo-TTY, so that when you exit, the process doesn't terminate.
screen
With nohup you lose all control over the process and all you can do is to kill it. It might be a better idea to use screen which lets you gain access to the detached "TTY" again:
Run screen; screen will spawn a new shell.
Run ./process normally
Now hit Ctrl+A and then D - you will get back to your parent shell
You can logout now
After you login again, you can view the task again with screen -r
I am a system administrator and I have been asked to run a linux script to clean the system.
The command is this:
perl script.pl > output.log &
so this command is ending with a & sign, is there any special significance of it?
I have basic knowledge of shell but I have never seen this before.
The & makes the command run in the background.
From man bash:
If a command is terminated by the control operator &, the shell
executes the command in the background in a subshell. The shell does
not wait for the command to finish, and
the return status is 0.
When not told otherwise commands take over the foreground. You only have one "foreground" process running in a single shell session. The & symbol instructs commands to run in a background process and immediately returns to the command line for additional commands.
sh my_script.sh &
A background process will not stay alive after the shell session is closed. SIGHUP terminates all running processes. By default anyway. If your command is long-running or runs indefinitely (ie: microservice) you need to pr-pend it with nohup so it remains running after you disconnect from the session:
nohup sh my_script.sh &
EDIT: There does appear to be a gray area regarding the closing of background processes when & is used. Just be aware that the shell may close your process depending on your OS and local configurations (particularly on CENTOS/RHEL):
https://serverfault.com/a/117157.
In addition, you can use the "&" sign to run many processes through one (1) ssh connections in order to to keep minimum number of terminals. For example, I have one process that listens for messages in order to extract files, the second process listens for messages in order to upload files: Using the "&" I can run both services in one terminal, through single ssh connection to my server.
These processes running through the "&" will also "stay alive" after ssh session is closed. Pretty neat and useful if the ssh connection to the server is interrupted and no terminal multiplexer (screen, tmux, byobu) was used.
I don’t know for sure but I’m reading a book right now and what I am getting is that a program need to handle its signal ( as when I press CTRL-C). Now a program can use SIG_IGN to ignore all signals or SIG_DFL to restore the default action.
Now if you do $ command & then this process running as background process simply ignores all signals that will occur. For foreground processes these signals are not ignored.
If you have a command which executes and doesn't return status 0(control of prompt) quickly.
For example:
command gedit launches the default editor gedit UI.
commandeclipse launches eclipse IDE.
Such commands keep throwing the logs of activities in the terminal and don't return the command prompt.
Question is, how to run such commands in background so that, we will get back command terminal and we can use terminal for other tasks.
Answer is: by appending & after such command.
user#mymachine:~$ <command> &
Examples:
user#mymachine:~$ edit &
user#mymachine:~$ eclipse &
how can I continously run a script in background without using crontab. The script should run even after I logout and is acceptable if it doesen't start after system reboot.I am new to unix.
There's a couple of ways of doing this but the neatest way is to use screen. This lets you create a session which lives perminently on the machine and you can simply reconnect to to check on the progress of your long running process.
If you don't wish to use screen you can use nohup this allows you to run a task like:
nohup mytask &
Your task will now run in the background and will survive a log off, however there's no way to take control of it again, unlike with screen.
if [ "x$1" != "x--" ]; then
$0 -- 1> /dev/null 2> /dev/null &
exit 0
fi
This is how you can run a script as a daemon. First your script (the father) will create a copy of himself (a child) so it is considerd as a process of the father. Then the father kills itself while the child is still running. Guess what happens when you do such a thing ? The child is attached to the init process. So even if you logout, the script will still run.
You can even start it without the "&" operator because you start the father which is killed a millisecond after.
You can take control over it again like any program running on your computer.
By the way it's not a real "daemon" program, it's just kind of emulation. You can't just start it at the boot (I mean really the BOOT and not the loggin) if you want to start it as you login, quite simple put it in your .xinitrc
The main advantage of this solution is that your script doesn't depend on any other programm such as "nohup" which is really bad I think.
Regards
PS : If you want some informations about what the command above does, just ask me. It's just a "parameter" thing.
As others have mentioned before, you need to use nohup to prevent the process from getting the hangup signal (hence no-h-up).
However, if you start the process in the background to begin with, as
prompt> nohup process &
that has the disadvantage of not allowing you to enter any data that may be required to get the process started off. This may be passwords/credentials or other input the process needs.
If you have that requirement, start it without the "&" at the end, enter your input and then hit Ctrl-Z to put the process to sleep. To send it to the background, type "bg" at the prompt and hit Enter.
prompt> nohup process
Enter password:
(Now press Ctrl-Z)
[1]+ Stopped process
prompt> bg
[1]+ process &
Now even if you log off, the process will continue to run in the background.
Alternatively if you are using bash or zsh, if you didn't start the process with nohup to begin with, and killing it and restarting is not an option then you can use the built-in disown command. First pause and background the process. And then stop hangup signals from reaching it.
prompt> process
Enter password:
(Now press Ctrl-Z)
[1]+ Stopped process
prompt> bg
[1]+ process &
prompt> disown -h
Note: If you've got other background jobs running, you need to provide the jobspec to only disown this specific job.
prompt> disown -h %1
Instead of [1] if you'd seen [2] when you paused and sent the process to the background, you'd say disown -h %2 instead.
As well as starting it in the background, as above, you may need to use 'nohup'. This means it will carry on running, even if you close the terminal.
nohup ./abc.sh &
start it in background using & operator e.g.
./abc.sh & this will continue till (a) the execution is complete or (b) you kill it or (c) system reboots
I'm trying to use a shell script to start a command. I don't care if/when/how/why it finishes. I want the process to start and run, but I want to be able to get back to my shell immediately...
You can just run the script in the background:
$ myscript &
Note that this is different from putting the & inside your script, which probably won't do what you want.
Everyone just forgot disown. So here is a summary:
& puts the job in the background.
Makes it block on attempting to read input, and
Makes the shell not wait for its completion.
disown removes the process from the shell's job control, but it still leaves it connected to the terminal.
One of the results is that the shell won't send it a SIGHUP(If the shell receives a SIGHUP, it also sends a SIGHUP to the process, which normally causes the process to terminate).
And obviously, it can only be applied to background jobs(because you cannot enter it when a foreground job is running).
nohup disconnects the process from the terminal, redirects its output to nohup.out and shields it from SIGHUP.
The process won't receive any sent SIGHUP.
Its completely independent from job control and could in principle be used also for foreground jobs(although that's not very useful).
Usually used with &(as a background job).
nohup cmd
doesn't hangup when you close the terminal. output by default goes to nohup.out
You can combine this with backgrounding,
nohup cmd &
and get rid of the output,
nohup cmd > /dev/null 2>&1 &
you can also disown a command. type cmd, Ctrl-Z, bg, disown
Alternatively, after you got the program running, you can hit Ctrl-Z which stops your program and then type
bg
which puts your last stopped program in the background. (Useful if your started something without '&' and still want it in the backgroung without restarting it)
screen -m -d $command$ starts the command in a detached session. You can use screen -r to attach to the started session. It is a wonderful tool, extremely useful also for remote sessions. Read more at man screen.