I'm writing a little nodeJS based email server. I have a Request object, and in it there's one static variable that stores all the users and is defined like so:
Request.publicMemory = new Object();
Request.publicMemory.users = new Object();
Request.prototype.getPublicMemory = function() {
return (Request.publicMemory);
};
I store User objects in it:
function User(params) {
this.mails = new Array();
this.sent = new Array();
var details = new Object();
details.username = params.username;
details.password = params.password
return;
}
As you can see there's also a static function that returns it.
Now, I can add uesrs and that change is actually made, but when I change anything in Request.publicMemory.usesrs[someuser] the change is always local to the function, and does not take effect in other places. Here's an example of how I do it:
function addMail(request) {
var users = request.getPublicMemory().users;
var to = request.parameters['to'];
users[to].mails.push(mail);
}
I've never used a static variable in nodeJS before, and I'm quite new to it so this might be silly, but I still can't solve it. Any ideas?
Thanks!
Related
I am tryin to get some info from PeopleManager.getMyProperties() function.
I get the object,some values are null.when i check it from User Profile from Management,I can see the value. How can i fix this one ?
There is my working code to get object.
Note : I want to access Custom Property from User Profile which I created before.
I can see the property in the object but value is not coming.
Thank You All..
$(document).ready(function(){
SP.SOD.executeOrDelayUntilScriptLoaded(loadUserData, 'SP.UserProfiles.js');
});
var userProfileProperties;
function loadUserData(){
//Get Current Context
var clientContext = new SP.ClientContext.get_current();
//Get Instance of People Manager Class
var peopleManager = new SP.UserProfiles.PeopleManager(clientContext);
//Get properties of the current user
userProfileProperties = peopleManager.getMyProperties();
clientContext.load(userProfileProperties);
//Execute the Query.
clientContext.executeQueryAsync(onSuccess, onFail);
}
function onSuccess() {
console.log(userProfileProperties)
}
function onFail(sender, args) {
console.log("Error: " + args.get_message());
}
Try the below code and let me know. It works fine for me. I have passed the user name instead of My account. So that you can pass any user account here.
function getUserProperties(userName) {
var clientContext = new SP.ClientContext.get_current();
var peopleManager = new SP.UserProfiles.PeopleManager(clientContext);
var profilePropertyNames = ["FirstName", "LastName", "CustomProperty"]; //Have to load all the needed properties here
var targetUser = userName.trim();
var userProfilePropertiesForUser = new SP.UserProfiles.UserProfilePropertiesForUser(clientContext, targetUser, profilePropertyNames);
userProfileProperties = peopleManager.getUserProfilePropertiesFor(userProfilePropertiesForUser);
clientContext.load(userProfilePropertiesForUser);
clientContext.executeQueryAsync(onSuccess, onFail);
}
function onSuccess() {
// userProfileProperties result index is same as the properties loaded above
var firstName=userProfileProperties[0];
var lastName=userProfileProperties[1];
var customprop=userProfileProperties[2];
}
Mark it as answer if it helps.
I forget to write the solution,sorry for that one.
I tried the code which written by #NaveenPrasath. It is giving a lot of fields but it didn't return "Custom Prop Field".
Working code is shown below.
function getUserProperties(targetUser) {
var clientContext = new SP.ClientContext.get_current();
var peopleManager = new SP.UserProfiles.PeopleManager(clientContext);
personProperties = peopleManager.getPropertiesFor(targetUser);
clientContext.load(personProperties);
clientContext.executeQueryAsync(onRequestSuccess, onRequestFail);
}
function onRequestSuccess() {
var fullName = personProperties.get_userProfileProperties()['CustomPropField'];
}
Sorry, wasn't sure what exactly to search for as I'm sure this has been answered before but here goes. I have a webchat server using nodejs, I made a player class, but if I push the player class to the players array that contains all the users and update the player class such as player.id, the changes do not appear in the players array. How can I solve this?
var User = require('./User.js');
var wsID = 1; // should be random just for this example
var USERS = {};
USERS[wsID] = {
socket: "",
clientDetails: {
username: "",
isGuest: ""
}
}
user = new User();
user.setUsername("test");
USERS[wsID].username = user.getUsername; // works perfectly
user.setUsername("updatedit"); // fails to update array
console.log(USERS[wsID].username); // returns test and not updatedit...
class file:
var wsId,
socket,
username,
isGuest;
function User() {
}
User.prototype.getUsername = function(){
return this.username;
}
User.prototype.setUsername = function(name){
this.username = name;
}
module.exports = User;
You are missing the reference when you do this:
USERS[wsID].username = user.getUsername;
That's because you are cloning the current value of the property into another object. One way to solve this would be to change you code so you carry the instance "user" inside your "clientDetails" so it keeps updated:
user = new User();
user.setUsername("test");
USERS[wsID].clientDetails = user; // carry the entire instance
user.setUsername("updatedit");
console.log(USERS[wsID].clientDetails.username); // should return "updatedit"
I'm playing with util.inherits method from node.js and can't seem to get the desired behavior.
var util = require("util");
function A() {
this.name = 'old';
}
A.prototype.log = function(){
console.log('my old name is: '+ this.name);
};
function B(){
A.call(this);
this.name = 'new';
}
util.inherits(B, A);
B.prototype.log = function(){
B.super_.prototype.log();
console.log('my new name is: ' + this.name);
}
var b = new B();
b.log();
The result is:
my old name is: undefined
my new name is: new
However what I would like is:
my old name is: new
my new name is: new
What am I missing?
Here's how to achieve what you are looking for:
B.prototype.log = function () {
B.super_.prototype.log.apply(this);
console.log('my new name is: ' + this.name);
};
This ensures the this context is the instance of B instead of being B.super_.prototype I suppose.
I prefer to call method of super through prototype chain instead of constructor chain like following.
var prototype = C.prototype;
prototype.log = function() {
Object.getPrototypeOf(prototype).log.call(this)
// or old style
prototype.__proto__.log.call(this)
}
They are all accessing prototype object of super class, but using prototype chain might be better than constructor.super_.prototype of constructor chain.
because usually I hide protected, private methods in separated files and under a prototype folder. Only public methods are with the constructor function in the same scope. In addition, to make them easy to move around different classes. All of them are named as prototype.method = function() {...}, so most of them can only access the prototype object.
Or it would be appreciated to know any benefit to go through constructor chain? This is why I found this post.
I'm working on an app that reuses some code from a previous solution.
The idea is to show a user all of the lists of a certain type in all the webs in a site collection so that the user can aggregate some data.
static public List<SPListMeta> AllSiteAnnouncementsLists(ClientContext clientContext)
{
var returnList = new List<SPListMeta>();
var per = new BasePermissions();
per.Set(PermissionKind.Open);
if (clientContext.Site.RootWeb.DoesUserHavePermissions(per).Value)
{
var rootWebLists = clientContext.Site.RootWeb.Lists;
returnList.AddRange(from List oList in rootWebLists
where oList.DoesUserHavePermissions(SPBasePermissions.ViewListItems) &&
where oList.BaseTemplate == (int)ListTemplateType.Announcements
select new SPListMeta(oList));
var collWebs =
clientContext.Site.OpenWebById(clientContext.Site.RootWeb.Id).GetSubwebsForCurrentUser(null);
foreach(Web oWeb in collWebs)
{
}
}
return returnList;
}
The critical line that does not work and does not seem to have a replacement is
oList.DoesUserHavePermissions(SPBasePermissions.ViewListItems)
as this has been removed from the CSOM List object
What's the new way to do this?
The new way to check for permissions is:
List.EffectiveBasePermissions.Has(PermissionKind.Open)
I have been working on making a Search using Solrnet which is working the way I want to. But I just would like some advice on the best way to pass my query parameters from my web page into Solrnet.
What I would ideally like to do is pass my query string parameters similar to how this site does it: http://www.watchfinder.co.uk/SearchResults.aspx?q=%3a&f_brand=Rolex&f_bracelets=Steel&f_movements=Automatic.
As you can see from the sites query string it looks like it is being passed into SolrNet directly. Here is I am doing it at the moment (facet query segment):
public class SoftwareSalesSearcher
{
public static SoftwareSalesSearchResults Facet()
{
ISolrOperations solr = SolrOperationsCache.GetSolrOperations(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["SolrUrl"]);
//Iterate through querystring to get the required fields to query Solrnet
List queryCollection = new List();
foreach (string key in HttpContext.Current.Request.QueryString.Keys)
{
queryCollection.Add(new SolrQuery(String.Format("{0}:{1}", key, HttpContext.Current.Request.QueryString[key])));
}
var lessThan25 = new SolrQueryByRange("SoftwareSales", 0m, 25m);
var moreThan25 = new SolrQueryByRange("SoftwareSales", 26m, 50m);
var moreThan50 = new SolrQueryByRange("SoftwareSales", 51m, 75m);
var moreThan75 = new SolrQueryByRange("SoftwareSales", 76m, 100m);
QueryOptions options = new QueryOptions
{
Rows = 0,
Facet = new FacetParameters {
Queries = new[] { new SolrFacetQuery(lessThan25), new SolrFacetQuery(moreThan25), new SolrFacetQuery(moreThan50), new SolrFacetQuery(moreThan75) }
},
FilterQueries = queryCollection.ToArray()
};
var results = solr.Query(SolrQuery.All, options);
var searchResults = new SoftwareSalesSearchResults();
List softwareSalesInformation = new List();
foreach (var facet in results.FacetQueries)
{
if (facet.Value != 0)
{
SoftwareSalesFacetDetail salesItem = new SoftwareSalesFacetDetail();
salesItem.Price = facet.Key;
salesItem.Value = facet.Value;
softwareSalesInformation.Add(salesItem);
}
}
searchResults.Results = softwareSalesInformation;
searchResults.TotalResults = results.NumFound;
searchResults.QueryTime = results.Header.QTime;
return searchResults;
}
}
At the moment I can't seem to see how I can query all my results from my current code by add the following querystring: q=:.
I'm not sure what you mean by "parameters being passed into SolrNet directly". It seems that watchfinder is using some variant of the model binder included in the SolrNet sample app.
Also take a look at the controller in the sample app to see how the SolrNet parameters are built.