I am creating a hook in which i want to add my image in custom jsp.
I have added image inside docroot/images/1.jpg
in jsp i am trying to access it using
<img src="<%=request.getContextPath()%>/images/1.jpg" />
but i am not able to get image.
Additionally when i am trying to print <%=request.getContextPath()%> is only prints "/"
Thanks !!!
Instead of taking images from your war (docroot folder), suggest you to place the images in a Web server so that in future you can easily replace them if you want to change images.
You could use below code in your jsp page to retrieve from Web server,
<div class="yourCSSClass">
<liferay-ui:icon src="/yourWebServerPath/1.jpg" label="" message=""/>
</div>
Another flavour of it,
In your JSP page if you have below code,
<nav class="yourCSSClass"><br/><br/></nav>
Then, in the CSS file that you are importing in your JSP page, use this,
.yourCSSClass{
background: url(yourWebServerPath/1.jpg) no-repeat;
}
P.S : In both the above examples, decide properly the value for yourWebServerPath
Very old question, but still worth answering.
Your hook replaces portal’s JSPs with your owns but that doesn’t mean that the context of the new JSPs is your hook’s one.
What actually happens is that JSPs are replaced at the File System level, and called by other Liferay JSPs and configuration as they were the original one.
The request you have access to, therefore, is the main and original one.
As far as I know, there’s no clean way to get the context path of the hook that is providing an overriding JSPs.
Related
We're using Liferay 7.3 (CE) and are trying to embrace the relatively new feature of "Content Pages" with "Page Fragments". We're able to develop page fragments that already include portlets (named "widgets" in the context of content pages), using the <lfr-widget-WIDGETALIAS> tag. So far, that works.
Now we're trying to prepare page fragments that embed portlets with special portlet configuration applied. For example, we want to prepare a page fragment that just shows an asset publisher portlet configured to list WebContent articles from a pre-defined category. The user should be able to just put that fragment onto the page without having to care about the configuration of the asset publisher portlet.
We did not find any direct way to achieve that -- our first guess that the configuration could be written as attributes or content of the <lfr-widget-...> tag was deterred by a hint in the liferay docs that there are no valid attributes or content to attach to that tag.
Does anybody have an inkling of an idea on how to achieve embedding portlets in page fragments with pre-defined portlet configuration applied? (including out-of-the-box Liferay portlets?)
I figured it out myself.
That one thing that the Fragment Editor does not tell you is that the HTML part of a fragment actually is interpreted as a Freemarker template, with the caveat that only Freemarkers alternative syntax is allowed.
That, in turn, means that Liferays taglibs are available, which means we can use the tag <liferay-portlet:runtime> (ported to freemarker alternative syntax, of course), which does accept a defaultPreferences attribute. Now we can just configure the portlet once, find its portletPreferences XML data in the DB (see table PortletPreferences), remove values we do not want to preconfigure and then just use the resulting preferences XML as a value for the defaultPreferences attribute of the <liferay-portlet:runtime> tag.
Care has to be taken for any IDs (e.g. if you want to preconfigure an AssetCategory filter). Better fetch the corresponding object from the corresponding service and get the ID from that object.
This example provides the HTML part for a page fragment that places an AssetPublisher onto the page, preconfigured to show 12 items (instead of the default 20). (CSS, JS and Configuration of the fragment is the default as given by the Page Fragment editor.)
<div class="fragment-12345">
[#assign assetPublisherPortletPreferences="<portlet-preferences>
<preference>
<name>delta</name>
<value>12</value>
</preference>
</portlet-preferences>" /]
[#liferay_portlet["runtime"]
instanceId="${fragmentEntryLinkNamespace}assets"
portletName="com_liferay_asset_publisher_web_portlet_AssetPublisherPortlet"
defaultPreferences="${assetPublisherPortletPreferences}"
/]
</div>
Thank you for this, #orithena. You saved me a lot of trouble.
Another option, to achieve the same result but with simpler syntax, is to use the built-in freeMarkerPortletPreferences:
[#assign assetPublisherPortletPreferences=freeMarkerPortletPreferences.getPreferences({
"delta": "12",
} /]
I am using AEM 6.2 and trying to create a parsys component in crx, using the code below
However, the height of this parsys, in edit mode, comes as 0px.
Attached are the screenshots.
When I manually change the height to some values eg. 40px, it looks fine.
Note: I am not using any client library for the above page. (no css and js)
Futher, All sample sites like geomatrix etc have parsys showing correctly.
Could anyone guide me with what I am doing wrong?
I think that the problem is outside the component or any of the code shown here.
I think what's happening is that the css style for the div that gives the droptarget placeholder its dimensions is not loading.
That's loaded as part of the AEM authoring client libraries which you should be inheriting from the foundation page component.
Examine your page component's sling:resourceSuperType property. It should point to either wcm/foundation/components/page or wcm/foundation/components/page or inherit from a component that does.
If that is set then you have may have blocked one of the scripts within it, quite possibly head.html.
Include following code in the head section of the page component's rendering script.
<!--/* Include Adobe Dynamic Tag Management libraries for the header
<sly data-sly-include="/libs/cq/cloudserviceconfigs/components/servicelibs/servicelibs.jsp" data-sly-unwrap/>
*/-->
<!--/* Initializes the Experience Manager authoring UI */-->
<sly data-sly-include="/libs/wcm/core/components/init/init.jsp" data-sly-unwrap/>
For resolving your issue, you need to include init.jsp in the first before writing down the parsys code. I mean write like this.
<head>
<sly data-sly-include='/libs/wcm/core/components/init/init.jsp' />
</head>
<body>
<sly data-sly-resource="${'par' #resourceType='foundation/components/parsys'}" />
</body>
I think #l-klement pointed it out correctly that the problem is outside component. When I rename the landingpage.html file to body.html it starts working fine. I think this may be because of different files like head.html etc present at wcm/foundation/components/page which is required to provide proper styling and load certain required client libraries which assigns proper styling to parsys.
If the above is true, my next question would be, How can I have my own head.html, body.html, header.html, footer.html etc files without compromising with the parsys styling?
Is there a way to apply Liferay's built-in javascript minimizing and bundling capability to the javascript I've included in my theme? I have javascript.fast.load=true in portal-ext.properties and Liferay's javascript is getting bundled & minified in everything.jsp as expected. Also, all portlet javascript that is included via a portlet's liferay-portal.xml file is getting minified as expected. However, I've got many javascript files that are included in my theme because they are utilized on every page and I would like them to get minimized and bundled into everything.jsp along with all the Liferay portal javascript. I've tried the approach suggested by this question, but I think this will only work with a hook because the MinifyFilter will look for files to minify & bundle within the context of the portal web app, i.e. <TOMCAT>/webapps/ROOT. Is there a way I can specify a path to files in a different web app (the theme in this case) as the javascript.bundle.dir parameter? In other words, something like javascript.bundle.dir[javascript.jquery.files]=/<theme-path>/js. I've tried many variations and combinations of javascript.bundle.ids, javascript.bundle.dependencies, etc. to no avail. I know I can get around the problem by putting the javascript in a hook or putting it in portlet and embedding it in the theme but I'd really like to just keep the javascript in the theme. Is there a reasonable way to accomplish this?
There doesn't seem to be a good way to include javascript files from the theme with the minified and bundled Liferay javascript. While you can define a javascript bundle in portal-ext.properties that includes your files, you can't order the dependencies the way you need to in order to get everything to work using only configuration. You can configure the "everything" bundle to depend on your custom bundle but that's not very useful. It would be far more useful if you could configure Liferay to use your custom bundle as the new "everything" bundle and tell Liferay that your bundle depends on Liferay's "everything" bundle. However, the actual bundle ids that are included are hard-coded in Liferay's top_js.jspf file. So the only way to get everything to work would be to override Liferay's definition of javascript.everything.files to include both Liferay's files and your custom javascript. This doesn't seem like a very good solution since it tampers with Liferay's list of included javascript which would certainly be a pain when you need to upgrade Liferay. As Olaf suggested, you can minify and bundle the js yourself and just include it in the portal_normal template. That is a very reasonable solution and what I would normally recommend. Unfortunately I was in a situation where my customer was requesting that all the files be bundled in one file and we are not allowed to modify the build process.
Hook Workaround
There is a workaround using a hook that I don't necessarily recommend but it does accomplish the goal of getting all javascript minimized and bundled along with Liferay's javascript. The basic process is to move the javascript from the theme into a hook, configure a new bundle in portal-ext.properties that includes all of your files, then create a jsp hook for top_js.jspf that includes your new bundle instead of the hard-coded javascript.everything.files or javascript.barebones.files bundles. The steps are:
Move your javascript files into a hook project and place them under html/js. This will cause
the files to be copied to the javascript directory under the portal
web app, i.e. <TOMCAT_HOME>/ROOT/html/js. This is where the Liferay
MinifyFilter looks for javascript files to minify & bundle.
Define a javascript bundle in portal-ext.properties that references
all of your javascript files that need to be included in the bundle
created by the MinifyFilter. Your portal-ext.properties file should
look something like this:
minifier.enabled=true
javascript.fast.load=true
javascript.my.js.files =\
jquery.1.11.1,\
my-js-lib.js,\
my-other-js-lib.js
javascript.bundle.ids=\
javascript.barebone.files,\
javascript.everything.files,\
javascript.my.js.files
javascript.bundle.dir[javascript.my.js.files]=/html/js
# our bundle depends on all the files in the "everything" bundle
javascript.bundle.dependencies[javascript.my.js.files]=javascript.everything.files
Create a JSP hook for top_js.jspf. This file is under
<TOMCAT_HOME>/ROOT/html/common/themes. It is the file that includes
either the barebones.jsp or everything.jsp based on whether the user
is authenticated (if the user is authenticated they get
everything.jsp otherwise barebones.jsp is included). Replace the
references to the javascript.everything.files and/or
javascript.barebones.files bundles with a reference to your new
bundle based on your requirements. For example, if you only want to
include your javascript when the user is authenticated you just have
to replace references to javascript.everything.files.
Specifically, you make the following changes:
This line:
<script src="<%= HtmlUtil.escape(PortalUtil.getStaticResourceURL(request, themeDisplay.getCDNDynamicResourcesHost() + themeDisplay.getPathJavaScript() + "/everything.jsp", "minifierBundleId=javascript.everything.files", javaScriptLastModified)) %>" type="text/javascript"></script>
is changed to this:
<script src="<%= HtmlUtil.escape(PortalUtil.getStaticResourceURL(request, themeDisplay.getCDNDynamicResourcesHost() + themeDisplay.getPathJavaScript() + "/everything.jsp", "minifierBundleId=javascript.my.js.files", javaScriptLastModified)) %>" type="text/javascript"></script>
and this line:
javaScriptFiles = JavaScriptBundleUtil.getFileNames(PropsKeys.JAVASCRIPT_EVERYTHING_FILES);
is changed to this:
javaScriptFiles = JavaScriptBundleUtil.getFileNames("javascript.my.js.files");
* Non-Global Hook Caveat *
If you are putting the javascript and top_js.jspf hooks in a project with other hooks and the project is configured to use non-global jsp hooks, i.e. <custom-jsp-global>false</custom-jsp-global> the solution becomes more complicated. This is because setting <custom-jsp-global>true</custom-jsp-global> makes Liferay rename your hook jsp files rather than renaming the portal's jsp files. For example, if custom-jsp-global is set to true, which is the default setting, then when I make a hook for a page called top_js.jspf, the portal will rename the original top_js.jspf file to top_js.portal.jsp and my hook file will be used instead of the original. However, when custom-jsp-global is set to false then the original file stays intact and the jsp hook file is renamed to something that includes the name of the hook like top_js.my-hook.jspf. This is a problem when you're creating a hook for included files such as top_js.jspf because the file that includes top_js.jspf will still reference the old file, not the hook which is named top_js.my-hook.jspf. This means you have to also create a hook for the file that includes your hook. Likewise, if that file is included by another file you have to make hook for that file and so on until you reach the top level page. So, in the example of trying to create a hook for top_js.jspf we have to also do the following:
Create a hook for top_head.jspf and replace the reference to top_js.jspf with a reference to our hook, top_js.my-hook.jspf.
So this line
<%# include file="/html/common/themes/top_js.jspf" %>
becomes this
<%# include file="/html/common/themes/top_js.my-hook.jspf" %>
The top_head.jspf file is actually included by the theme in
portal_normal.vm using a Velocity variable that is initialized in
init.vm on the following line:
You need to assign $top_head_include to the top_head.my-hook.jspf hook in the theme's init_custom.vm, like this:
#set ($top_head_include = "$dir_include/common/themes/top_head.my-hook.jsp")
Your Theme has access to all of the HTML the portal generates. While you might need one extra file to be loaded (css gets minified for the whole theme anyway), you can easily add all of the (already) minified js files to your theme and include them in your templates/portal-normal.ftl implementation.
It would be as easy as having this section in portal-normal.ftl:
<head>
<title>${the_title} - ${company_name}</title>
<meta content="initial-scale=1.0, width=device-width" name="viewport" />
${theme.include(top_head_include)}
<script src="${javascript_folder}/my-minified-javascript.js"/>
</head>
Note: All but the <script> line is already in the default ftl file. This way you'll end up with two js files being loaded (the barebones or everything, plus your own), but that's not too bad. You can also add the minification to your theme's build process, so that you don't have to maintain the minified code manually.
Another alternative, which I haven't tried, is examining the use of Liferay's javascript minifier (e.g. in webapps/ROOT/html/common/themes/tom_js.jsp) to see how to utilize it to dynamically minify your files.
For completeness reason (maybe it helps someone else) I'm leaving my first answer here, which you couldn't use as you say in the first comment:
There's a section in portal.properties, to be overloaded in portal-ext.properties with this heading:
##
## JavaScript
##
#
# Set a list of JavaScript files that will be loaded automatically in
# /html/common/themes/top_js.jsp.
#
# There are two lists of files specified in the properties
# "javascript.barebone.files" and "javascript.everything.files".
#
# As the name suggests, the barebone list is the minimum list of JavaScript
# files required for most cases. The everything list includes everything
# else not listed in the barebone list.
#
# The two lists of files exist for performance reasons because
# unauthenticated users usually do not utilize all the JavaScript that is
# available. See the property "javascript.barebone.enabled" for more
# information on the logic of when the barebone list is used and when the
# everything list is used and how to customize that logic.
#
# The list of files are also merged and packed for further performance
# improvements. See the property "javascript.fast.load" for more details.
#
e.g. configure javascript.everything.files (the default is below that comment, for brevity I'm not copying that here)
Excuse me if I'm asking silly or easy question, but I just can't figure it out.
So, I have a theme, I want to render only portlets, skipping any journal articles.
Which is the most appropriate way to do it?
In your theme's resources, there is a portlet.vm template available in the _diffs/template directory. This template allows you to override the default presentation of portlets in general (e.g. change the configuration icons, remove the title bar, ...).
However, inside portlet.vm Liferay injects a predefined variable called $portletDisplay. This is an instance of the com.liferay.portal.theme.PortletDisplay class and represents the portlet that is currently printed.
You can use the $portletDisplay.portletName attribute to check for 56, which is the ID for all Web Content Display portlets. So, in short, encapsulate the parent <div> inside portlet.vm with the following condition:
#if($portletDisplay.portletName == '56')
<div class="portlet" ...>
...
</div>
#end
I've been searching high and low for a satisfactory answer to this and failed. I hope StackOverflow can deliver for me!
I am using SharePoint Foundation 2010 (my first real attempt to deep dive into SharePoint), with (among other things) a custom web part; the master page for the site uses a CSS file supplied by the client and to which I must adhere. The issue I am having is that SharePoint, by adding several SharePoint specific CSS classes to the web part HTML structure, is conflicting with the client's styling. After some digging, I've found that the ms-WPBody class and its various element selectors are the chief culprits.
I could add !important to everything in the client style sheet, but that is verboten. I could insert some very messy styling into the child content of the web part in an attempt to override the SharePoint styling, which is the course I've been pursuing of late, but it's been getting messy. Or, I could try to remove the class from the web part, which brings me to my question:
How can I remove or otherwise override the CSS class names inserted into the HTML structuring for a SharePoint web part? I don't know enough of the inner workings of SharePoint to know what to hook to make this change, and my google-fu is fail on the subject. CssClass on the ASP.NET web control markup is obviously ignored, probably some holdover inherited from WebControl.
Help me StackOverflow! You're my only hope!
Edit
I apologize for not making it clear before, but I would like to state that I grok CSS and am not looking for help with styling. What I really am looking for is how to remove the CSS class emitted by SharePoint. Can anyone help there? I'm going to remove the CSS tag, since that appears to be confusing people. This question isn't really about CSS, it's about SharePoint.
CSS has to match the html that it is applied to - with generated html like that produced by SharePoint (or standard asp.net webforms for that matter) it is usually far easier to modify the css. If adding important is not an option you can usually do something using more specific selectors - ie a style defined as "table td" will override one for "td" though they actually select all the same elements. You can use this approach to undo any bits of sharepoint styling that are causign issues.
If you really want to change the classes sharepoint puts on the page, use jquery - trying to do that server side is really not something you want to get into on your first sharepoint project.
I'm not sure I follow, but why not wrap your webpart in a container div and then style to your heart's content:
<style type="text/css">
.ms-WPBody {
background-color:red;
}
#myCustomCss p
{
background-color:Blue;
}
</style>
<div class=ms-WPBody>
<div id=MyCustomCSS>
<p>Hello world</p>
</div>
</div>
In 2007, we had to worry about making sure your stylesheet was named last alphabetically so that it was applied correctly. Prefix your css file with z to see if it helps.
Here's a reference article about the issue:
http://singchan.com/2009/12/29/branding-sharepoint-2010-collaboration-sites-part-2-in-a-series/
Here's some typical Web Part HTML:
<div style=""
allowexport="false"
allowdelete="false"
class="ms-WPBody ms-wpContentDivSpace"
width="100%"
id="WebPartctl00_m_g_d0420a1c_44b7_4009_81c9_2bbcf9b325e9"
haspers="false"
webpartid="d0420a1c-44b7-4009-81c9-2bbcf9b325e9">
<div id="ctl00_m_g_d0420a1c_44b7_4009_81c9_2bbcf9b325e9">
Web Part Content goes here...
</div>
</div>
The trick is that the Web Part itself is the inner DIV (and all its children). The outer DIV (the one with the ms-WPBody class) is the WebPartZone. This control is sealed, but you can write an Adapter that will render the WebPartZone however you want. Most of the examples are for table-less rendering, you could write one that maintains the existing structure, but removes the classes.
To me, coding all of that and then registering it in the compat.browser of App_Browsers for the Web Application seems like overkill, so I'd probably go with jQuery (but if you do the Adapter, I'd love see it).
Or just add a Content Editor Web Part and override the CSS style element in the HTML:
<style type="text/css">
.ms-stylebox {
border:o important;
}
</style>
-- Peace!
how are you loading your CSS file? IF you are loading it in part of the head of your master page, or through just setting a custom.css, you can try loading it outside of the head. This should cause it to load after core.css and therefore allow you to override the standard classes as needed.