Let's say I have a line like this:
pick 22086f5 do something....
I can put my cursor on the "p" in pick and delete word, however the line then looks like:
22086f5 do something....
and I can do a replace on 2 and replace it with an "s", but that's not really what I want. What I want is a simple way to insert 1 character without going into insert mode.
It is probably easiest to just put the cursor on the p and do ces<esc>. If you have the letter s in a buffer, say in buffer a, you could do: de"aP. If you are always replacing the word pick, you could also do dtkrs.
You can use vehdrs to delete all letters without last one and then replace the last one with s. Or if space is not needed then ders will work nicely.
I would also normally use ces<Esc>, but sometimes muscle memory prefers two distinct actions. For these cases, a mapping like the following may be helpful:
:nnoremap <Space> i$<Esc>r
Related
Let's say I have this text:
something "something else"
something here "just another quoted block"
I want to substitute "something else" with "just another quoted block", so I do:
/quot<enter> (to jump to second quoted block searching for the string "quot")
yi" (to yank inner text for current quoted block)
?else<enter> (to jump back to the first quoted block wich contains "else")
vi" (to visually select the quoted block)
p (to paste yanked text)
This works, but I would like to know if the two last steps can be replaced by a single one, to avoid visual mode. I know it's not a huge gain keystroke-wise, but I think that the Vim philosophy would encourage what I'm trying to do, and every time I do this my mind keeps asking for this command. :-P
What I tried so far:
r (replace) replaces just one character
c (change) throws me into Insert mode and does not let me paste the text.
"_di"P
Delete inside quotes to the blackhole register; paste last yanked before cursor.
Or
ci"<Ctrl-R>0<ESC>
Change inside quotes to retrieve last yank; leave insert mode.
With my ReplaceWithRegister plugin, the last two steps would be gri". It also offers grr (replace current / [count] lines); though it only saves a little typing, I find this indispensable.
Key stroke wise, j$yi"k then vi"p is actually probably the fastest. However, if you absolutely must go into insert mode you can j$yi"k then "_ci"<C-r>" or ci"<C-r>0. The :help i_CTRL-R operator allows you to put the contents of a register into insert mode.
I usually try to keep it simple, using what I feel is more intuitive with every day commands:
j
yi"
k
ci"
<ESC>
p
I am trying to use vim properly - to aid me I've mapped my arrow keys to "" so that I am forced to use {hjlk} to move around.
This is causing me a problem when I want to just surround a character with spaces, eg:
"2+3" is better formatted "2 + 3"
Previously I would have put my cursor over the + and typed:
i[space][arrow-right][space][Esc]
That's 5 presses.
To do this without the arrow I seem to need to put the cursor over the + and go:
i[space][Esc]lli[space][Esc]
That's 8 presses.
I can convert the "li" into an "a" which reduces it to 7 presses:
i[space][Esc]la[space][Esc]
Short of writing this into a macro is there a better way of doing it? Is there some magic vim command which will allow me to do it in less than even 5 presses - and some way to generalise it so that I can do it to entire words or symbols, eg if I want to convert 3==4 to 3 == 4?
Personally, I think it makes most sense to destroy what you want to surround, and then repaste it.
c w "" ESC P
Obviously, you can replace both the object and the quotes with whatever you like. To change just one character + to be [space]+[space], you would do
s [space] [space] ESC P
on the +
The first thing that jumps to mind after reading just the title is surround.vim which is an excellent script to do all kinds of useful things along the lines of what you've described.
To solve your specific problem, I would probably position the cursor on the + and:
s[space]+[space][esc]
To change 3==4 into 3 == 4, I might position the cursor on the first =, and:
i[space][esc]ww.
i have been wondering about this as well. i tried with surround.vim, but the naive approach
S<space>
(after making a visual selection) does not work since the space is already taken up as a modifier for adding space to other surrounding character pairs. S<space><cr> adds a ^M in the output. Ss almost works but inserts a space only before.
after asking at tpope/surround.vim on github:
S<space><space>
in visual mode works. alternatively, from normal mode, ysl<space><space> works for a single character
Hah! I've been trying to figure out how to surround a block in spaces for quite a while and I finally found the right combination.
Using surround.vim you say surround selector space space.
So for this specific case I would use visual mode (a good trick for operating on single characters under the cursor BTW) thus: "vs " <- four key presses!
I also have a habit of typing things like argument lists without spaces. With this technique you can just navigate to the second argument using w and say "vws " to visually select a word and surround with spaces.
I prefer visual select mode generally. Also the alternate surround syntax "ysw " excludes the word final comma that is caught by "vw".
You could create a macro with one of the described actions and call it everytime you need it (Like amphetamachine proposed while I was writing) or you could simply search & replace:
:%s/\(\d\)\(+\|-\)\(\d\)/\1 \2 \3/g
You probably have to execute this command two times because it will only find every second occurence of +/-.
EDIT:
This will replace everything without the need to be called twice:
:%s/\d\#<=+\|-\d\#=/ \0 /g
Try positioning your cursor over the '+' and typing this:
q1i[space][right arrow][space][left arrow][esc]q
This will record a quick macro in slot 1 that you can re-use whenever you feel like it, that will surround the character under the cursor with spaces. You can re-call it with #1.
There is also the more versatile one:
q1ea[space][esc]bi[space][right arrow][esc]q
Which will surround the word under the cursor ("==" counts as a word) with spaces when you hit #1.
You could set up a mapping like this (press enter in visual mode to wrap spaces):
:vnoremap <CR> <ESC>`<i<SPACE><ESC>`>la<SPACE><ESC>h
This method allows you to use . to repeat the command at the next +.
Put your cursor over the + and type:
s[SPACE][CTRL-R]"[SPACE][ESC]
I know this is and old thread, but this might be useful to someone. I've found that the map (map it to anything else you want!)
noremap <leader>ss diwi<SPACE><C-R>"<SPACE><ESC>B
works ok both for turning 'a+b' into 'a + b' (when used over the '+' char) and for turning 'a==b' into 'a == b' (when used over either the first or the second '=' sign).
I hope it's useful to someone.
I want to unwrap text in Vim. When I join lines I get an additional space between sentences.
Why is that?
I have a feeling this is what you really want: gJ
From :h gJ:
gJ Join [count] lines, with a minimum of two lines.
Don't insert or remove any spaces. {not in Vi}
This is handy if you've copied something from a terminal and it's pasted it as a big rectangular block into vim, rather than a single line.
I usually use it in visual mode. Hilight stuff, gJ.
Formatting destroys information. There are many different blocks of text which will result in the same one once formatted. Therefore, there's no way to reverse the operation without prior knowledge (i.e. undo).
Unformatted:
Unformatted text could start out as either all one line, or several, yet look the same when formatted.
Unformatted text could start out as either all one line, or several,
yet look the same when formatted.
Formatted:
Unformatted text could start out as
either all one line, or several,
yet look the same when formatted.
If you want your paragraph all on one line, or if you're okay with a little manual fiddling, you can use J to join lines back together. You can use visual mode to apply the J command to several lines at once, perhaps combined with ap or ip to select a paragraph, e.g. vipJ. Again, you'll still lose some information - multiple spaces at line breaks before formatting will end up collapsed to single spaces. (You can actually join without modifying spaces by using gJ instead of J, but you'll already have lost them when you formatted)
If you're bothered by the extra spaces after sentences (lines ending in !, ?, or .), turn off joinspaces: set nojoinspaces
I guess the simple solution to join the lines without spaces between is:
:j!
With ! the join does not insert or delete any spaces. For the whole file, use :%j!.
See: :help :join.
This is the answer that ended up working for me, none of the above worked in my use case.
Essentially, use gJ like multiple others have said, but highlight all of file, so in command mode typing ggVGgJ.
I still got the extra one space after join, if the line we work on does not end with space. Usually this is the desired behaviour. Example
first line without space
second line
after joining with J, become
first line without space second line
Although in some case, we do not wish to apply it,
myInstance->methodA()
->methodB()
And we would want the join to become myInstance->methodA()->methodB() without any space in between!
Here the helpers mapping i use
nmap <leader>jj Jx
<leader> key can be checked with :let mapleader, default to key \ i believe.
so in normal mode, just \jj to perform join without any extra space!
My previous question seems to be a bit ambiguous, I will rephrase it:
I have a file like this:
copythis abc
replacethis1 xyz
qwerty replacethis2
hasfshd replacethis3 fslfs
And so on...
NOTE: replacethis1, replacethis2, replacethis3, ... could be any words
How do I replace "replacethis1","replacethis2","replacethis3",.. word by "copythis" word by using minimum vim commands.
One way I can do is by these steps:
delete "replacethis1","replacethis2","replacethis3",.. by using 'dw'
copy "copythis" using 'yw'
move cursor to where "replacethis1" was and do 'p'; move cursor to where "replacethis2" was and do 'p' and so on...
Is there a better way to do this in VIM (using less number of vim commands)?
Since you changed your question, I'd do it this way:
Move to the first "replacethis1" and type cw (change word), then type "copythis" manually.
Move to the next "replacethis", hit . (repeat last operation)
Move to the next "replacethis", hit .,
and so on, and so on.
If "copythis" is a small word, I think this is the best solution.
The digit needs to be included, and there could be more than one instance per line:
:%s/replacethis\d/copythis/g
Given that "replacethis[1-3]" can be arbitrary unrelated words, the quickest/simplest way to do this globally would be:
:%s/replacethis1\|replacethis2\|replacethis3/copythis/g
(Note that you need to use \| to get the pipes to function as "or". Otherwise, vim will look for the literal | character.)
I've been struggling with this for a long time too, I think I just worked out the cleanest way:
Use whichever command is cleanest to put copythis into register r:
/copythis
"rye
Then go to the replacement and replace it with the contents of r:
/replacethis
cw<CTRL-R>r<ESC>
Then you can just n.n.n.n.n.n.n. for the rest of them, or if they're wildly different just go to the beginning of each and hit .
The key is replacing and pasting in one step so you can use . later.
:%s/copythis/replacethis/g
To replace all occurrences of copythis with replacethis. Or you can specify a range of line numbers like:
:8,10 s/copythis/replacethis/g
Note, the /g on the end will tell it to replace all occurrences. If you leave that off it will just do the first one.
create this mapping:
:map z cwcopythis^[
( ^[ is the escape character, you can type it in vim using Ctrl+V Ctrl+[ )
go to each word you want to replace and press z
if u need to do essentially the same action multiple times - swap 1st word of one line with second word of the next line, I say you could record a macro and call it whenever you need to
Have you tried string replacement?
%s/replacethis/copythis
A host of other parameters are possible to fine-tune the replacement. Dive into the Vim help for more details. Some more examples here.
You can remap e.g. the m key in normal mode to delete the word under the cursor and paste the buffer: :nnoremap m "_diwP.
Then you can just copy the desired word, move the cursor anywhere onto the to-be-replaced word and type m.
EDIT: Mapping to m is a bad idea since it is used to mark locations. But you can use e.g. ; anyway.
This question already has answers here:
Closed 10 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
How do I insert a linebreak where the cursor is without entering into insert mode in Vim?
In vim, J joins the next line to the current line. Is there a similar one-key (or relatively short) command to split a line at a given cursor position? I know it be done with a simple macro, but it seems like if the J-command exists there should be a similar function. I've tried searching for it, but can't seem to find an answer.
rEnter while on whitespace will do it. That's two keystrokes.
I don't think that there is a single key command for this. The best you can do with stock vim is probably i Enter Esc.
My solution was to remap the K key since I never use the default action (look up the word under cursor with "man"), and my previous editor used Alt+j and Alt+k to join and split lines, respectively.
:nnoremap K i<CR><Esc>
This rolls those three annoying keystrokes into one.
There's probably a more sophisticated way to also eliminate any trailing whitespace, but I prefer to strip all trailing whitespace on write.
No. I've now read enough answers to conclude that there is no such command.
Easy answer:
Pressing 'Enter' while in insert will do it; but you're right, there oughtta be a key for it in command mode. I've wondered, too.
Since everyone has a favorite workaround, I will share mine. The assumption is that I will do anything to avoid having to reach for the Esc key.
ylprX ... where 'X' is the inserted character, which can even be a newline.
So, 'yl' is yank on char to the right, 'p' = paste the char, 'r' is replace that char; then you just type the new char. That's how much I hate using Escape.
(That was 'l', as in "move right", BTW)
Old thread, but I dont use "K" for the man page lookup or whatever magic it does. So I have this mapping in my .vimrc:
map K i<Enter><Esc>
I figured since "J" is join, "K" can be krack or something. :)
You can split lines if you can create a regular expression for the location to add the split. For example if you want to split the lines at each semicolon, you can use the following substitution:
%s/;/^v^m/g
to great effect
Jed's answer is most useful. I would like to add that I needed the "control-V-alternative", i.e. control-Q:
%s/;/^q^m/g