In my project I have created some network calls to the servlets in separate Thread where before that thread starts I show a spinner as wait progress. Until that network Thread finishes the waitprogress is displayed on to the screen and when I receive response from the server I have to explicitly call progress bar's dispose() method to dispose that progress bar. So, This is bit complicated whenever I make calls establishing GPRS connection while network strength goes down there I found sometimes it takes about 2-3 minutes to throw an IO Exception or receive response from server where I dispose waitprogress, show error message and proceed. I dont add any cancel command to waitprogress as network calls are made using separate thread so disposing waitprogress will allow user to make another call where the user is needed to wait until he gets response.
The above scenario is complicated because the user will not be waiting for this long to get response. There must be some way that whenever I call network Thread and show progress bar the user should be able to cancel all the operations including network thread, go back to previous state and make another call if there is no or poor connectivity.
Here, I am using Lwuit.
In NetworkManager class you can add this function and actived at from your class
only if lwuit is at open code in your application , you can add this function:
public void killAll() {
for (int i = 0; i < pending.size(); i++) {
((ConnectionRequest) pending.elementAt(i)).kill();
}
pending.removeAllElements();
for (int i = 0; i < networkThreads.length; i++) {
networkThreads[i].currentRequest.kill();
}
}
after or before this you need call dispose() method.
Related
I want to build a extension that behaves like a timer. It should count down the seconds when activated, but should do nothing with inactive.
The chrome.alarms API is interesting, but does not have enough precision nor granularity. It only fires at most once per minute, and it may fire late. If I want something to execute more often than that, I can't use this API.
Then, the next natural solution is to use a background page and use setTimeout or setInterval in there. However, background pages are persistent, and they take up resources (e.g. memory) even when idle. So they are not ideal.
The best solution seems to be an event page to run the timer. However, the documentation says:
Once it has been loaded, the event page will stay running as long as it is active (for example, calling an extension API or issuing a network request).
[…]
Once the event page has been idle a short time (a few seconds), the runtime.onSuspend event is dispatched. The event page has a few more seconds to handle this event before it is forcibly unloaded.
[…]
If your extension uses window.setTimeout() or window.setInterval(), switch to using the alarms API instead. DOM-based timers won't be honored if the event page shuts down.
Unfortunately, having an active setInterval is not enough to consider an event page active. In fact, from my tests, an interval up to 10 seconds is short enough to keep the event page running, but anything greater than 10 or 15 seconds is too far apart and the event page will get unloaded. I've tested this on my crx-reload-tab project.
I believe what I want is a middle ground:
I want a background page that I can load and unload on demand. (Instead of one that keeps loaded all the time.)
I want an event page that stays persistent in memory for as long as I say; but otherwise could be unloaded. (Instead of one that gets unloaded automatically by the browser.)
Is it possible? How can I do it?
Background pages cannot be unloaded on demand, and Chrome decides Event page lifecycle for you (there is nothing you can do in onSuspend to prevent it).
If your concern is timers, you could try my solution from this answer, which basically splits a timer into shorter timers for a "sparse" busy-wait. That's enough to keep the event page loaded and is a viable solution if you don't need to do that frequently.
In general, there are some things that will keep an event page loaded:
If you're using message passing, be sure to close unused message ports. The event page will not shut down until all message ports are closed.
This can be exploited if you have any other context to keep an open Port to, for example a content script. See Long-lived connections docs for more details.
In practice, if you often or constantly need precise, sub-minute timers, an Event page is a bad solution. Your resource gains from using one might not justify it.
As mentioned in Xan's answer we can abuse messaging. There's nothing wrong about it either in case you want to temporarily prevent the event page from unloading. For example while displaying a progress meter using chrome.notifications API or any other activity based on setTimeout/setInterval that may exceed the default unload timeout which is 5-15 seconds.
Demo
It creates an iframe in the background page and the iframe connects to the background page. In addition to manifest.json and a background script you'll need to make two additional files bg-iframe.html and bg-iframe.js with the code specified below.
manifest.json excerpt:
"background": {
"scripts": ["bg.js"],
"persistent": false
}
bg.js:
function preventUnload() {
let iframe = document.querySelector('iframe');
if (!iframe) {
iframe = document.createElement('iframe');
document.body.appendChild(iframe).src = 'bg-iframe.html';
}
}
function allowUnload() {
let iframe = document.querySelector('iframe');
if (iframe) iframe.remove();
}
chrome.runtime.onConnect.addListener(() => {});
bg-iframe.html:
<script src="bg-iframe.js"></script>
bg-iframe.js:
chrome.runtime.connect();
Usage example in bg.js:
chrome.runtime.onMessage.addListener((message, sender, sendResponse) => {
if (message === 'start') doSomething();
});
function doSomething() {
preventUnload();
// do something asynchronous that's spread over time
// like for example consecutive setTimeout or setInterval calls
let ticks = 20;
const interval = setInterval(tick, 1000);
function tick() {
// do something
// ................
if (--ticks <= 0) done();
}
function done() {
clearInterval(interval);
allowUnload();
}
}
I use this function:
function _doNotSleep() {
if (isActive) {
setTimeout(() => {
fetch(chrome.runtime.getURL('manifest.json'));
_doNotSleep();
}, 2000);
}
}
But the problem with such approach is that Devtools network tab polluted with this http stub.
I have a lightswitch app which sends an email when a new job is added. I added a sendemail helper class which is called when the record is inserted.
This works however the interface hangs on save waiting for the email to be sent.
I would like to perform this asychronously so that the user can go on and do his thing while the email sends in the background.
I've tried creating a new thread in the inserted part, hoping it would spin off the thread and then return to the user, but it doesn't work, it is still waiting for the thread to finish.
Thread caseemail = new Thread(new ParameterizedThreadStart(newSendmail.generateCaseEmail));
string[] paramsToPass = new String[] { entity.ProjectNumber, entity.CreatedBy, entity.TheProjectClientManagerFixed, entity.ProjectName };
caseemail.Start(paramsToPass);
How should I be doing this?
So in the end this code works, the errors were from problems access dataworkspaces from the other thread, which is obviously not allowed.
I will leave this here as an example of how to spin off a task into the background from lightswitch, leaving the interface responsive while lightswitch goes away and does something else.
I need help how to unfreeze my dialog box. I'm using MFC and I have an infinite loop I want to execute when a button is pressed. However, the dialog box freezes when the infinite loop starts. Now I looked at this thread where someone was having a similar problem.
Unfortunately I tried multithreading but I found out that It can't work for me because I'm using an api that uses OLE automation and I'm getting an unhandled memory exception. I think this is because program uses the serial port and i read somewhere you can only use the handle to the serial port in one thread.
My program is simply to see if someone has dialed in to my modem and wait for them to send me a file, then hangup. Here is my loop.
while(1)
{
//get rid of input buffer
ts->_this->m_pHAScript->haReleaseRemoteInput();
ts-> _this->textBox->SetWindowTextA("thread Commence");
//wait for connected
if(success = ts->_this->m_pHAScript->haWaitForString("CONNECT",timeout))
{
//getFile
if(success = ts->_this->m_pHAScript->haWaitForXfer(5000))
{
//hangup
ts->_this->haTypeText("+++ath\r");
}
}
}
Is there a way to unfreeze the dialog box?
Add this code inside while loop:
MSG msg;
while(PeekMessage(&msg, GetSafeHwnd(), 0, 0, PM_REMOVE))
{
DispatchMessage(&msg);
}
The GUI in Windows relies on a message loop - somewhere in your code, either explicitly or hidden in a framework, there's a loop that checks for a message in a queue and processes it. If anything blocks the code from returning to that loop, the GUI gets frozen.
There are a few ways around this. One was given by David Brabant, essentially duplicating the loop. Another is to start a new "worker" thread that runs the blocking operation independently. If your message loop has a function that it calls when it is idle, i.e. no more messages are in the queue, you can do some processing there; that's not possible in your example however.
I need to develop a netty based Client, that accepts messages from a Notification Server, and places these messages as Http Requests to another Server in real time.
I have already coded a working application which does this, but I need to add multi-threading to this.
At this point, I am getting confused on how to handle Netty Channels inside a multi-threaded program, as I am all loaded with the conventional approach of sockets and threads.
When I tried to separate the Netty requesting part into a method, It complains about the Channels not being closed.
Can anyone guide me how to handle this?
I would like to use ExecutionHandler and OrderedMemoryAwareThreadPoolExecutor, but I am really new into this.
Help with some examples would be a real favour at this time.
Thanks in advance.
Just add an ExecutionHandler to the ChannelPipeline. This will make sure that every ChannelUpstreamHandler which is added behind the ExecutionHandler will get executed in an extra thread and so does not block the worker-thread.
Have you looked at the example code on the Netty site? The TelnetServer looks to do what you are talking about. The factory creates new handlers whenever it gets a connection. Threads from the Executors will be used whenever there is a new connection. You could use any thread pool and executor there I suspect:
// Configure the server.
ServerBootstrap bootstrap = new ServerBootstrap(
new NioServerSocketChannelFactory(
Executors.newCachedThreadPool(), << change
Executors.newCachedThreadPool())); << change
// Configure the pipeline factory.
bootstrap.setPipelineFactory(new TelnetServerPipelineFactory());
// Bind and start to accept incoming connections.
bootstrap.bind(new InetSocketAddress(8080));
The TelnetServerHandler then handles the individual results.
#Override
public void messageReceived(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, MessageEvent e) {
// Cast to a String first.
// We know it is a String because we put some codec in TelnetPipelineFactory.
String request = (String) e.getMessage();
// Generate and write a response.
String response;
boolean close = false;
if (request.length() == 0) {
response = "Please type something.\r\n";
When the telnet is ready to close the connection it does this:
ChannelFuture future = e.getChannel().write(response);
if (close) {
future.addListener(ChannelFutureListener.CLOSE);
}
I have a server to which multiple clients can connect to. The client is GUI while the server is command line. The client has several functions (such as connect and login) which, when sent to the server should receive a reply.
Basically I need to run the QTcpSocket functions waitForConnection and waitForReadyRead. However, I need to do this without blocking the UI.
What I thought of doing was the following:
Have a class (Client) implement QThread which does all the waiting. This is created in main.
Client::Client (...)
{
moveToThread (this); // Not too sure what this does
mClient = new QTcpSocket (this);
start();
}
void Client::run (void)
{
exec();
}
void Client::connectToServer (...)
{
mClient->connectToHost (hostname, port);
bool status = mClient->waitForConnected (TIMEOUT);
emit connected (status);
}
void Client::login (...)
{
... Similar to connectToServer ...
}
Then the GUI (for example, ConnectToServerDialog) I run this whenever I am ready to make a connection. I connect the "connected signal" from the thread to the dialog so when I am connected or connection timed out it will emit this signal.
QMetaObject::invokeMethod (mClient, "connectToServer", Qt::QueuedConnection,
Q_ARG (const QString &, hostname), Q_ARG (quint16, port));
I am getting an assert failure with this (Cannot send events to objects owned by a different thread.) Since I am fairly new to Qt I don't know if what I am doing is the correct thing.
Can somebody tell me if what I am doing is a good approach and if so why is my program crashing?
The best thing is never to call methods like waitForBlah() ... forcing the event loop to wait for an undetermined period introduces the possibility of the GUI freezing up during that time. Instead, connect your QTcpSocket's connected() signal to some slot that will update your GUI as appropriate, and let the event loop continue as usual. Do your on-connected stuff inside that slot.
I don't recommend start thread in constructor.
Initialize it like:
Client * client = new Client();
client->moveToThread(client);
client->start();
Or if you don't want to use such solution, add in constructor before start(); line this->moveToThread(this);
upd: sorry, i didn't saw at first time, that you have this string.