Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
Google Stops offering Google Apps for free.
Are there any alternatives to link your own domain with a good mail server as Gmail?
So registering mail provider with his own domain.
I'm basically looking for alternatives too and so far I can only recommend Zoho Mail:
http://www.zoho.com/mail/
http://www.zoho.com/mail/zohomail-pricing.html
They have a lite version supporting 5 email accounts.
Update: as of 2014-11-18, Zoho's lite version now has 10 email accounts and Zoho has improved quite substantially. They now have mobile apps to access Zoho emails (very important for your technically challenged clients) and also their web interface and overall stability have improved. My recommendation for them is now stronger.
You might also want to check other paid services which are not as expensive as Google Apps:
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/email/compare-plans
http://www.godaddy.com/email/email-hosting.aspx
Unfortunately, I don't think you'll find something as decent and as reliable as Google Apps for a better price but if you're looking for something with less features and you need to pay less for such a service, the above might be your best options.
Cheers.
Depends on your feelings for MS, but http://domains.live.com should do what you want. Though for me I'm OK with paying to stay on Gmail vs Hotmail, personal preference only though :)
Related
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
Few minutes ago 3 DB on one SQLAzure sever disappeared and the management console tell me that there are problems to retrieve information about the databases on specific SQL Server of West Europe region.
In the "Support" section we are not able to send a tecnical question, only billing question.
But this is NOT a QUESTION, this is a SIGNAL !!!! (Microsoft is becoming a wall of gum?)
Any one have any way to inform MS that theirs 99.95% up-time services are off???
Many thanks in advance.
Have nice week-end.
Davide.
If you don't see a "Technical" option in the drop down on the support form you'll likely see below the form something that says "Your Support Plan: Free - billing support only
Your current plan does not include technical support from Microsoft.". This means that you haven't purchased support, which comes with the web incident submittal. It will also have a link to the following page https://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/support/plans/, which describes the support levels.
Sadly, at the free support level there doesn't even seem to be a way to tell them that something seems wrong other than to post to the forums. If you are a MSDN Subscriber there is a link on that same support forum that leads you off to a different form which I believe will start an online chat.
In addition the service dashboard gets updated when issues are discovered and they have information to post. Just because something isn't showing up yet doesn't mean that they aren't aware of an issue.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm launching a startup web site, what i would like to know is how to start with that, i mean is better to use invitations first of all?
Then how to send invitations and to who?
How can i plan invitations? Which are best practices?
Does anyone is passed from this step with his own site?
Any experience on here?
thanks
Whether you create a beta version of the site first is completely up to you.
It really depends what type of website you're planning to make. Beta's are obviously a good way to gain feedback on your website and its functionality before releasing to everyone. Thus, allowing you to make improvements/fix bugs before everyone uses the site.
In terms of actually getting users for the beta, it's very much a case of marketing your website and its existence well (through social media, advertising etc.), and then providing some kind of 'sign up for the beta' page. You could then close registration for the beta once you have enough users, and devise some method of gaining feedback from users.
I haven't personally created a beta myself, but if I was to do it, I would do the above.
Hope that's of some help.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
We are using this server for almost a year now.
Last forum post seen in November, 2011.
Last server version released 28/03/12.
Just wondering if anyone knows whats happening inside the company?
Should we expect something or should we start looking for alternatives?
I did what you did not do: using email to ask the question to the people able to answer.
And they replied that:
the forum was closed because they could not cope with the amount of accounts created daily to publish junk
the next version will be the most important ever made for G-Wan, with new features like a caching reverse proxy and an elastic load-balancer as well as system replacements like a wait-free memory allocator.
With regard to such developments, a 3-month period without publishing releases sounds reasonable.
More reasonable than assuming that such an 'inactivity period' means that "the project is dead".
Would you say that for other Web servers like Apache which have much larger release cycles?
You should always be expecting something from G-WAN. It's a great piece of software. Here's the other thing too: G-WAN was expertly engineered. That doesn't mean that there are no bugs in it, or that features can't be implemented, but G-WAN is incredibly tight.
It has lean code, it does what it supposed to do, very well, and it is built for the developer to add in the functionality that hasn't been put in there yet.
That's the beauty of it, or one facet of the beauty.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I need a lightweight issue tracker for a new project, with about 5 people on the project. Any recommendation? I read the two other threads on that topic, but it didn't seem satisfactory. I don't need to integrate with git. I just need something super simple, and very, very easy to setup, like a scrum board in the computer (other teams here have physical scream boards). I'm about to roll out an Excel spreadsheet in a shared directory on my Linux box...
I recommend a github account. Make a repo there and track issues using the native github issues that come with each git repository. Then use www.huboard.com to add an extremely lightweight agile/kanban view of your issues. It's easy to set up, but works well. Very simple and lightweight, and you can customize your kanban board view in huboard easily.
If you have a .edu email address github is free, and if not you can get an account that supports five commiters for only $7/month. Well worth it for the awesome infrastrucure.
Jira is nice, but it costs a little bit of money. If you're cash-strapped, you may want to consider Trac. It provides a lot of the same functionality as Jira, but there is no cost associated with it. However, if you decide you want to use a plugin to specifically track your project using Scrum and Kanban, then for your team size Jira/Greenhopper will be much less expensive than the Trac/Agilo combination. Additionally, the Jira University has a number of online-courses on how to use Jira and the Greenhopper plugin that is very inexpensive.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 11 years ago.
Improve this question
Can anyone recommend any cloud based alternatives too SharePoint? I have seen a couple good ones on sites like www.sharepointalternative.com and www.topsharepointalternatives.com but does anyone have experience of ones they have used before?
We are a small company of 16 people but are looking to expand to around 30 by the end of the year and so should be easily scalable. We would need to be able to easily share and edit files and have a version control.
It also has to work as an internal and external portal as we want to share with clients as well as internally.
Check out http://www.alfresco.com/. We tried it, but it was not a good solution for us since we have hundreds of users and our groups needed many sub-sites with their own permissions.
google apps for sure!
http://www.ilovefreesoftware.com/09/articles/sharepoint-vs-google-apps.html
It's free up until 20 users I believe. So you can easily try it out without extra costs and than pay a little if you expand enough
CMSWire has a great list of Sharepoint Alternatives. Glasscubes seems to be the most viable alternative for what you are looking for, however I have zero experience with it.