Search result empty wordpress - search

I am trying to search any post by typing a related keyword but every times the result seems to be empty. Here is the link http://apprs.com/ripple/?s=music . I must say there is a post with the keyword i typed. Why isn't the search working. I checked the
search.php and
searchform.php.
Those seems all OK. I don't know what i am missing.
I will be feeling good if i could get any help.

I changed the theme.. Its working now..

Related

TYPO3 v. 11.5.21 Search field is not working properly

as expected, there coming more and more with TYPO3. I'm very in TYPO3 and working with the bootstrap package. Therefore I don't understand loads of stuff.
The task is actually very simple (i guess). I just want to include a search field on in my page with indexed search. I included the extension with the extension manager.
So far so good, the search field is shown and it's able to find content on my page, but when I select one of the search results this page is shown:
Error message
Does anyone understand what happened here?
Many thanks in advance for your hints!
cheers,
expikx

How to implement Regex in Kotlin for a specific condition?

I've tried implementing Regex according to the conditions shown in the image. However it doesnt work. There is no error message,but when I entered the correct details, it doesn't move on to the next page. This is my first time with Regex in kotlin and im not really sure how it works either. Could anyone guide me in the correct direction?

How do I check if certain text exists on a page (puppeteer)

Sorry in advance if I seem kinda clueless, I just started using puppeteer yesterday and I’m inexperienced with this kinda stuff.
I’m trying to check if a certain page (opened with puppeteer) has the phrase “hello” for example, keep in mind that I know the XPath of the text (if it exists). I’ve tried .waitForXPath() but I can’t seem to get it to work. Is there an easier function for this?
(await page.content()).match('hello')
That depends on what you typed into .waitforXPath() method.
I can imagine this can work:
await page.waitForXPath("//*[contains(text(), 'hello')]");
But it might be slow because all texts of all elements will be searched. It's better to narrow down the search to e.g. some elements. Unfortunately you don't provide more specifics, so I can't help you there.

Wikipedia wildcard search not working?

I'm trying to do a wildcard search on Wikipedia but the search is not behaving the way the instructions say it should. Here's the advanced search help page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Advanced_search
As an example, it says this regarding a Wildcard search:
the query *stan will match Kazakhstan or Afghanistan or Stan Kenton.
However, when I attempt to do that search (or even click on the embedded link to that search), I only get
the page *stan does not exist
and it just lists a bunch of "Stan" entries starting with "Stan Laurel filmography."
Why would this feature not work? Am I missing something?
It does work, however because direct matches for "stan" are scored higher than words with it, Kazakhstan is waaaay down in results. You can try slightly narrowing the results with intitle:*stan however this is still bad. However, a quick check with k*stan shows that it works.
Conclusion: user-written help page has a bad example.

Error with GET request URL, is it a URL issue or the returned info?

I'm trying to retrieve some stuff from a server (can't really go into much detail), but I've run into an issue which is solved by commenting out some stuff in a string being used as the place to hit.
The situation is as follows:
The URL I want to hit is
http://example.com/api/statistics/installations?version=1.0&type=prod
I get errors with this (based on the stuff being returned not being as expected), however using this works:
http://example.com/api/statistics/installations
Just without the refining flags of version and type.
Now, I'm new to working alongside servers, so I was wondering if perhaps the first URL is malformed towards the end or something?
Thanks to anyone who answers, even if it's just clarification the URL is correct at least I know where the problem lies afterward.
The URL is fine in that format, the issue was on the other end.

Resources