Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I have made my own .NSF file from mail85.ntf and i have added my own stuff in this new nsf file. What actually it does is that it calls a java agent when a action button (places near 'send' ) is pressed.Now my question is:
How can I merge this NSF file with the existing mail.nsf file. Such that I can use the feature of my NSF file along with the existing feature of NSF file. Is that possible in lotus notes ?
My goal is to integrate my own NSF file with the existing NSF file without loosing current and new features.
If your "own stuff" involves design changes then you give your DB a template name and refresh the other DB from your DB using DESIGN-REFRESH (not DESIGN-REPLACE). The design changes will then be in both databases.
If your "own stuff" has to do with documents then you can use copy/paste to move the ones you want from one DB to the other. If there a lot of them, then LotusScript NotesDatabase.AllDocument.CopyToDatabase(tragetDB) will move them with less manual action.
/Newbs
If you want to update your version of the mail BUT KEEP your new stuffs:
indicate for each design (of your version of the mail) "prohibit design refresh or replace to modify"
This will allow you to refresh design without loosing your changes.
Please note that if the element is not a new one but a modified one flagging prohibit design... will also disallow the refresh BUT you will have to merge the changes in this element, if in the future, the template changes this element.
NB if you need to do that on many DB (I mean many db have the SAME changes you've done) I suggest copy the new/changed elements in a blank DB. This DB has to be a new master template. Then copy all the elements of this new DB. When pasting in the target mails, Designer will ask if "would you like these (agent/form...) to be automatically updated when ...." simply answer yes the pasted elements will flaged has inheriting from your new template.
hope it's clear
Related
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I would like to create automatic connection between Excel that contains organizational structure data and Visio that creates organizational chart. My goal is to make Visio to reflects all changes in excel file, such as: changing positions, adding or removing employees.
I tried option with linking data to shapes but it is not what I want - it does not reflect changes in structure. It only refreshes data about existing employees.
Additionally, I designed chart in Visio that is readable (organization have over 10k employees). It generated a lot of manual work to make this visually appealing. I would like to have refreshing solution that would not break my existing design - just to replace/add/remove data from excel file.
Is there any existing solution to make this happen? I googled a lot but found nothing what works.
I will be grateful for help. Myabe you had similar problem in your organization?
Visio will not do what you want. The Visio offering is good for what it does but it is a one-size-fits-all solution.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I have an requirement to move employees from one subsidiary to another. However, that field is greyed out. I need to maintain the same employee record as it is integrated to other systems. I do not want to create a new employee record.
Is there a way to do this?
Directly from the NetSuite Help page entitled "Adding an Employee":
After a transaction has posted for the employee, you are not able to change the selected subsidiary on the employee record.
That means if you have any transactions (e.g. paychecks) associated with an employee, you can no longer change its subsidiary.
Subsidiary is not an available field in Employee Mass Updates either, and it is doubtful that a script will be able to change it either.
In general, it is very difficult to change subsidiary on most record types because of the accounting and financial implications. I believe at this point your only option is creating new Employee records and updating the integrated system.
As a general rule, I would create a new employee record in the new subsidiary. This keeps record keeping quite consistent and leaves the history/audit trail.
Simply make the "old" employee record inactive and you should be fine.
Check the employee input form and find out if the subsidiary field is disabled or set to "inline text" - if it is change it to normal then save the form. Once the form is saved them the field should be accessible.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there any way to force Excel 2013 to open files within the same window instance?
I am extremely disappointed that Microsoft is forcing it's users to open multiple instances for every workbook they open. Why on earth would they take away this feature?
This is not making us more productive. Why don't we just start opening a new browser instance every time we visit another website?
I'm constantly opening CSV files throughout the day. I would prefer to have this consolidated to a single instance of excel and the option to drag a tab away from the window when I need a new instance. Microsoft please fix this!
Anyhow, if anyone knows of a hack to work around this I'd like to know.
Thanks in advance!
Apparently, according to Microsoft, this is done by design. They are so excited by this feature that they have even created this blog article to show it off and explain why it's so great.
Unfortunately, there's no way easy or free way to achieve what you want, at least I'm not aware of one.
However, there's a website called "Extend Office" (I have no affiliation with them what-so-ever) that sells various Excel add-ins. One of the add-ins is called Office Tab, which seems to be able to do what you want. There's a trial version for 30 days after which you need to buy. Up to you if you want to go for it or not, I merely point out its existence and I'm in no way endorsing or discouraging it (I've not even tried it!).
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Is it possible to get function or script code from a protected excel document?
If so, how do I go about doing this?
The file is .xls and was likely created in office 2003
for 2007 you can always buy third party software to unlock the VBA Project.
Or, you can do it yourself. I only know the very messy way - rename your file from .xlsm to .zip, and accept windows telling you this may cause bother. Then, go into your new zip, and you will find your .bin file (default name is vbaProject.bin unless the original author changed it). Copy it, and paste it somewhere else to keep the original document intact. Then, open up the bin file in notepad ++ and patiently scour your way through until you find your code. Even if the project is password protected, it will all be in here, but may require a little patience.
It depends on what version excel document it is. The older excel documents (2003) can easily be accessed even if they are encrypted, but encrypted 2007 excel documents are much more difficult to open if you have forgotten the password.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 11 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a custom SharePoint solution which requires several list instances on a particular site (SPWeb). Now some of these lists are generic, for example a 'Pages' document library, wheras others are highly specific custom lists.
My question is which (if any) apsects of customisations should be cleaned up on feature deactivation. My instincts would say that generic lists which may be used by multiple solutions should be left, but the more specific customisations should be cleaned up. Does anyone have any experience of and/or advice on this type of sceanrio?
Its really hard to come up with a strict rule, as it will depend on your specific solution, however I would start with something like this:
On deactivation a feature should remove any artifacts created during feature activation that:
Have not been created by an end user AND that end users could not reasonably expect would remain
Is not required by any other feature, or that causes a failure in the broader solution it supports
Does not prohibit the re-activation of the feature at some later time.
On the project I'm currently working on we created a new exception for preventing the deactivation of features. We found that in many cases the activation of features was a one way street. This was largely because a solution was typically made up of a number of features, and disabling one caused a break down in the entire solution.
Often, a site only existed in order to host the feature, disabling the feature then left no purpose for the site.
Adding on to Daniel...
If another feature depends on this feature, they should be activated & deactivated together through feature dependencies