I'd like to update existing production moss2007 website and to do that I want to create this website on my dev environmen (vhd win 2003EE, MOSS 2007 trial version).
I was given:
some stp files which include(aspx pages, javascript files, etc...)
some aspx pages, masterpage, css file
some wsp files
source code for almost all wsp files.
There is no documentation how to install all this stuff and I'm not a sharepoint developer but Asp.net dev in fact.
I set up local dev enviroment (i had no problems when following http://www.pptspaces.com/sharepointreporterblog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=28
) and try to create a website based on given files.
My questions:
Do I need a copy of the database?
I noticed that one of wsp files is not a webpart but a project that contains some web controls and even a master page) - what should I do with it?
I tried to import all stp files. I had to use stsadm, but I can't see them. I can list them using "stsadm -o enumtemplates" - all of them have the same id!
I changed stp->cab->modified the "WebUrl" in the manifest.xml -> created new cab and rename it to stp-> imported to sharepoint but still the same, I can't see them (custom tab is still not visible).
I created a custom site template locally (custom tab appeared with it) and opened its manifest.xml. I noticed that the section contains 17 parameters (manifest.xml files from other stp files 9 parameters only).
I think that my SharePoint (Trial version) works in a different way and that's the problem.
Can it be?
What is the best way to create this site locally?
thx ahead for all answers
if you want to set up development environment containing the same functionality as your production server, you can duplicate your production site collection by:
Copying and attaching production SharePoint content database to your development environment farm
Backuping and restoring it by stsadm tool
By firstly you need to prepare your development environment. If you have any wsp solutions deployed on production farm, deploy it on your development environment.
Then if you prefer first option check this link
If you prefer second option check this link
But if you prefer backup way, you can catch some problems with version difference between production and development revilement, different updates installed, so different assemblies in GAC.
So I advice to use attach database way, it should upgrade attached database if it has different version automatically.
Just google little bit, may be you'll find more complete guide for attaching or restoring site collections. I just give you start point.
Related
Using TFS 2010 and I have a build project consisting of 2 solutions. One is a MVC solution with web pages the other is a solution containing multiple projects. These are various WFC services. I have added the criteria to publish each project in both solutions.
If I build either of them from VS - I get the zip files created.
If I use msbuild from a command prompt and build the WFC solution - I get the zip files.
Same for the MVC.
I then have a build project that builds both solutions, and I have as parameters
/p:DeployOnBuild=true;DeployTarget=Package
When I submit that build - it completes. But in the "_PublishedWebsites" folder I only get a package for the MVC project.
I've tried a LOT of variations but can't get the WFC solution to create the packages for the projects. I even named the pubxml files the same in each WFC project and tried passing that in as another parameter but the same results - MVC is correct; nothing for the WFC.
Even tried changes to Debug|AnyCPU versus Debug|Any CPU (space added).
I am thinking I have some little thing off that is biting me - but I can't find it.
Appreciate any assistance!
The WCF projects need to have been created as Web Applications and not just Websites. The default behavior you want is only available in Web Application.
There is walkthough on how to do the conversion on MSDN (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa983476(v=vs.90).aspx). I tend to modify the documentation to be an in place upgrade by creating a blank web application and copying the project file over the top of the existing location.
You can then open that new project in VS (giving you two views of the same thing) and then adding the hidden files. Once working you can then delete the WebSite project and you will be left with thebWeb Application that will output to _PublishedWebsites.
I know IIS allows the creation of Publish Profiles that can be "imported" into Visual Studio in order to upload a site directly into IIS (since I'm already using it).
But now I have a more specific question regarding the use of these publish profiles in Visual Studio.
I have a solution for a web application that comprises a couple different components that I'd like to keep sepparated in IIS.
Namely, I have the web version, a mobile version and a couple webservices in this project.
What I'm configuring the server to do is have the webservices, mobile and website separated into different sites and use different publish profiles to publish them, each into it's own place.
Since I have all of these components into a single visual studio project, would it be possible to have publish profiles that publish a single component of the project without requiring me to do a "full publish"?
Or is the only solution to have separate projects? (even if they are all in one single VS Solution)
Visual Studio's web publishing feature assumes that projects map to atomic components1. There isn't a way by default to specify how to only publish a subset of the project. Partly this stems from the build system (MSBuild) that the Web Publish Pipeline (WPP) is built over.
Options you can investigate:
Make your site contents match the structure in your project. Deployments are incremental (if coming from your machine), and you can deploy specific files or folders from the VS Solution Explorer. If you need to republish your binaries, you're still stuck doing a full publish. Publishing individual files/directories is the exception to note 1 above, and only works for content file changes.
If you're up to the challenge, you could dig your way through the WPP targets (it's all MSBuild), and try to find a way to restrict which files are published. Then you could set up separate publish profiles within your project that each only handle a subset of the files.
The easiest way, especially if you're automating this, is probably just to use separate projects for each component. :(
I'm attempting to use Web Deploy to Publish a Web Application.
I want Visual Studio to delete any files that no longer exist, so I've checked the "Remove additional files at destination" setting in my Publishing profile.
However, I want VS to ignore the /Content/uploads folder, as it contains contents that my users have uploaded. Naturally, the contents are different in my development site than they are in the live site.
Unfortunately, I have been unable to discover a way to make Visual Studio ignore this folder when publishing (it wants to delete all of the content, since it doesn't exist in the project).
Does anyone know of a way to exclude specific folders on the target site from being examined by Web Deploy?
I had a similar problem, wanting to keep some files in the deployment package even though they're not part of the project.
Try to create a custom MSBuild target for this, that works for me.
Here is a Getting Started MSBuild reference
Hope this helps.
All the best.
I was unable to find a suitable solution for this issue, so I've created my own:
https://pubsync.codeplex.com/
PubSync enables quick and reliable file syncing for publishing Visual Studio projects.
I have a .browser file that I need to deploy to the following location:
c:\browsers\
as part of a moss .wsp file. Can I do this in the manifest.xml or as part of a feature?
It is not possible. You can use the wsp solution to deploy any File to
Inside 12 Hive Folder Hierarchy
GAC
bin Folder of the Web Application.
Rest of the other location you need to look out for the custom solution. One option I can say is to use a Feature Installed event and keep it a Farm Feature.
What files can we modify so that our solution is still supported by Microsoft?
Is it allowed to customize error pages?
Can we modify the web.config files to use custom HTTPHandlers?
You can certainly edit the web.config file for your sites. The one thing that you should be aware of, however, is that when you start editing files manually on the file system, you will have to remember to manually make those changes across all servers in the farm (assuming a farm exists). In addition to this, when you edit files in the 12 hive, it's important to understand that you will be making a change to all SharePoint sites hosted on the server(s) for which the files were edited.
Personally, if I were going to create a custom error page, I would simply add a <customErrors> section to my web.config. I avoid editing any existing files in the 12 hive, but I have added files (though it's rare).
The customization of the error page is not very easy (or flexible). You can see an example here:
http://blogs.msdn.com/jingmeili/archive/2007/04/08/how-to-create-your-own-custom-404-error-page-and-handle-redirect-in-sharepoint-2007-moss.aspx
The web.config can be changed. I used my own HttpModules in addition to the original ones, but I haven't used custom HttpHandlers. IMO it should work if you don't change the original handler (i.e. if you add your handler for a specific type of file not handled by SP).
do not modify any pre-installed files in the 12 hive (Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\12)... a service pack may update and overwrite any changes.
Anything in the Content Database (Masterpage, Stylesheets list in ~Catalogs) is available to modify (I would add, instead of update, in case a service pack changes anything) as it sits atop the file system, and is instantly available to any members of the web farm (newly added servers).
Any custom features, added to the 12 hive in the features folder, in a custom/non-microsoft folder (that is, inside the 12\feature folder, do not modify any preinstalled files, but feel free to add a folder for your feature and work within).
Custom features can be developed using the Visual Studio Extensions (VSeWSS), currently available for Visual Studio 2005/2008... benefit being that the output is a feature package (.WSP file) which is designed to be portable across SharePoint. Additionally, the .WSP files are just CAB files with a different extension, offering the ability to be explored by simply renaming them.
For site definitions, Microsoft has a good article about what is supported and unsupported. In short, the only change you can make to the out-of-the-box site definitions is changing the entry in the webtemp.xml file to hidden in order to prevent the site definition from appearing in the site template list. This is something many may be interested in doing.
You may also, of course, copy existing definitions and rename them in order to create new ones.
The complete list of supported and unsupported scenarios for working with custom site definitions can be found here:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;898631
Here is the closest I can find to a official response from Microsoft:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc263010.aspx