Is it possible to specify which functions should be folded by vim automatically.
In Netbeans, there is something like
// <editor-fold defaultstate="collapsed" desc="user-description">
...any code...
// </editor-fold>
Do you know about something similar I can use in vim?
When I close the vim I want folded functions to be folded again if I open the file again.
This is actually a little different than what you're asking, because it doesn't deal with semantic folding, which NetBeans and other IDEs do. However, storing a set of folds is normally done using the :mkview command, and you can automate this command and the :loadview command to make it transparent to you. The details are in this Vim wiki page. I use one of the simpler versions in my vimrc, rather than the plugin, but both should work for what you need.
Related
I installed Latex-Suite for Vim, and I like it very much, but I'd like to be able to customize the environment mappings that came by default, and add new ones. For example I want to edit the equation environment that appears typing EEQ and move around some elements, like the \label{} command. How can I do this? I've been scanning everything inside my /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/ftplugin but I can't find a way to do it (or I just don't understand what those files are).
You want to check out the documentation on Macro Customisation, specifically the Tex_Env_{name} bit.
In short, if you want your theorem snippet to look like
\begin{theorem}
<++>
\end{theorem}<++>
then you want a line like
let g:Tex_Env_theorem = "\\begin{theorem}\<CR><++>\<CR>\\end{theorem}"
in your vimrc.
Note the backslashes to escape carriage-return, and double-backslash for normal backslashes.
The <F5> functionality (press F5 after typing an environment name, i.e. figure<F5>) should work out of the box, but you may need to refresh the three-letter code. This is more hassle than it needs to be, but something like
autocmd BufNewFile,BufRead *.tex call IMAP('EFI', g:Tex_Env_figure,'tex')
will do the job.
The answer to the question you asked comes with a caveat, which is that Latex-Suite is an enormous amount of code that is very hard and annoying to modify, and which does not play nicely with other plugins. This falls into Latex-Suite's philosophy that it's the only plugin you need for editing latex within vim.
That said, you want to look in /path/to/ftplugin/latex-suite/envmacros.vim. Searching for EEQ will lead you on the path to understanding the set of calls that latex-suite performs. I would like to reiterate that many functions are deeply intertwined.
On the other hand, there is a very easy way to have very easily customizable environments, which are snippets. See the UltiSnips page for a good example of how this works. These are designed for customization and extremely easy to write.
I've just recently started to use the folding functionality of vim and it's very helpful for the languages that it works really well for.
My issue lies in the way vim comments out the fold markers in scilab code. It defaults to
/*{{{*/ and /*}}}*/
which works great in languages like C, but is not actually a comment in scilab. I get a multiplication error when i try to run the code.
I've tried adding
autocmd FileType scilab set fmr=//{{{,//}}}
to my .vimrc file which doesn't quite do what I'd like. It results in
/*//{{{*/ and /*//}}}*/
which are still not comments. The code "folds" fine but becomes unusable. I could set up a macro to replace every instance of "/*" with "//", but that could have unintended consequences when applied globally to a file.
So the question is: how can i setup vim fold markers comments for scilab files such that it will not render the file unusable?
You do not add the comments to 'foldmarker' itself, there's the 'commentstring' option that influences how Vim surrounds the fold markers (when creating folds with zf). Try setting
:setlocal commentstring=//%s
for your scilab filetype. (Put the command in ~/.vim/after/ftplugin/scilab.vim to make it permanent.)
It sounds to me like vim doesn't understand how SciLab comments work. I'm not sure if vim comes with SciLab syntax logic these days, is syntax highlighted correctly in your SciLab files? If not, you can get the syntax file from here.
Is there a particular reason you want to use marks? They aren't actually needed. If you don't want vim to auto-fold by syntax or indentation level, you can still manually define folds with
:set foldmethod=manual
That lets you select a chunk of text in visual mode and make it into a fold with 'zf'. No marks required.
More info on various vim folding techniques here.
Sorry in advance for the newbie question. I've been trying to use vim for keeping a personal wiki, but I can't quite seem to decide on a good plugin. Vimwiki is great, and I really like the way it does checkboxes and uses the enter key to follow links. Notes.vim is simpler but I like it a lot better: it dynamically makes names of notes into links like Tomboy Notes, makes pretty bullet points, and has a search function built in. I can't get vimwiki to use files with no extension, but notes.vim does that automatically.
What I want to know is: is there an easy way (calling a vimscript file or something?) to combine some features of both of these plugins? I've tried doing some cutting-and-pasting but so far nothing has been working.
I doubt whether tbere is any simple automated way to do it. Both Vimwiki and notes.vim are "filetype" plugins. Generally in Vim any file (or buffer) can be set to just a single filetype.
It would depend on how the ftplugins were written, but it may be possible to apply them both to same buffer by making sure that the buffer is set to both filetypes, sequentially. That is, the buffer can be set to one filetype at a time, but setting it to both one after the other may do part of what you need.
For example, opening a notes.vim file will automatically set the buffer to a notes.vim filetype. Once open you could issue the command :setlocal filetype=vimwiki to change it to a vimwiki buffer. If vimwiki filetype initialization doesn't wipe out crucial notes.vim settings or have conflicting operation then you may then be able to access some functionality from both ftplugins. Not likely to get you very far, but maybe worth a try. Better would be to combine sections of their code into a single ftplugin.
I'm starting to use Linux and Vim at work. I'm started reading vims documentation and creating my own .vimrc file and such.
I'm a web developer working with HTML, XML, CSS, JS, Python, PHP, ZPT, DTML and SQL.
I would like to have an indent feature like this one: for each language/set, a corresponding indent solution.
So, in js, writing function test(){|} would turn in
function test(){
|
}
If php, writing <?php function test(){|}:
<?php
function test(){
|
}
?>
...and such. Writing a function definition in Python, and then creating a for loop sentece, it would automatically create an indent.
I'm starting with autoindent, smartindent, cindent but I'm a little confused about their differences.
How do the indent in vim works? Am I supposed to download plugins for each language? Is the behavior I described possible with already existing plugins you're used to or do I have to create it?
I keep seeing people using Vim and I'm trying to do this as well since the machine I'm using is too limited, but I'm afraid I won't be able to have a decent auto indenting solution in it. And I really think that having to manually indent code all the time (instead of sometimes only) is a waste of time and it's against vim's "MOTTO" I've seen called "productivity".
(I have used autoindenting in a little small project in Visual Studio, and really liked their approach. Is there a plugin for that?)
Vim is usually pretty smart about indenting once you define the correct settings for tab size and the like. (Edit: As Igor mentions in the other answer, be sure to turn on filetype-specific indenting.) It seems that you want vim to automatically insert newlines though, which I don't think it can do without a plugin.
However, I think you may want to look at snipMate, which is a plugin that defines a large number of 'snippets' for different programming languages, and you can also define your own. It's basically a kind of improved tab-completion:
One example:
php<tab>
turns into
<?php
|
?>
With | being your cursor. Some snippets even define multiple cursor-positions which you can switch to with another press of tab.
vim usually comes with a bunch of syntax plugins for different languages. if you want to use those for indenting, you will need:
set autoindent
filetype indent on
you might also need syntax on but i'm not sure if that's needed for indenting. couldn't hurt though...
I found the setup for this based on a blog post:
set autoindent
inoremap {<CR> {<CR>}<Esc>O<Tab>
Having this with snipmate.vim and autoclose.vim is working flawlessly.
I am using several languages, and currently I am obliged to indicate to vim with which of these the spell check must be done. Is there a way to set up vim so that it automatically detects the correct one? I vaguely remember that in a previous version of vim, when the spell check was not integrated, the vimspell script made this possible.
It would be even better if this could apply not only to a file but also to a portion of a file, since I frequently mix several languages in a single file. Of course, I would like to avoid to load several dictionaries simultaneously.
I don't know if there is a way to autodetect it, but if you put vim:spell:spelllang=foo,bar,baz at the bottom of the file, vim will set the spellchecking languages to foo, bar, and baz when the file is opened. Note that you must put at least one space before that text, or vim will think it's part of the file.
Since vim is missing this feature, I found it useful to define shortcuts like these in .vimrc:
command! Nb :set spelllang=nb
command! En :set spelllang=en