Groovy 'assert': How to display the value? - groovy

How do I display a value whether it is true or false in groovy? I'm using Eclipse as my IDE.
assert 4 * ( 2 + 3 ) - 6 == 14 //integers only
And also I don't understand 'assert' too well in Groovy. Is it like an if() statement/boolean in Java?
What role does 'assert' play in Groovy?

An assertion is similar to an if, it verifies the expression you provide: if the expression is true it continues the execution to the next statement (and prints nothing), if the expression is false, it raises an AssertionError.
You can customize the error message providing a message separated by a colon like this:
assert 4 * ( 2 + 3 ) - 5 == 14 : "test failed"
which will print:
java.lang.AssertionError: test failed. Expression: (((4 * (2 + 3)) - 5) == 14)
but I had to change the values of your test, in order to make it fail.
The use of assertions is up to your taste: you can use them to assert something that must be true before going on in your work (see design by contract).
E.g. a function that needs a postive number to work with, could test the fact the argument is positive doing an assertion as first statement:
def someFunction(n) {
assert n > 0 : "someFunction() wants a positive number you provided $n"
...
...function logic...
}

Groovy asserts are now quite impressive! They will actually print out the value of every variable in the statement (which is fantastic for debugging)
for example, it might print something like this if b is 5, a is {it^2} and c is 15:
assert( a(b) == c)
. | | | |
. 25 | != 15
. 5
(Well--something like that--Groovy's would probably look a lot better).
If we could just get this kind of print-out on an exception line...

assert 'asserts' that the result of the expression will be a true

Related

Why along with output it is showing NONE each time? [duplicate]

What does the return statement do? How should it be used in Python?
How does return differ from print?
See also
Often, people try to use print in a loop inside a function in order to see multiple values, and want to be able to use the results from outside. They need to be returned, but return exits the function the first time. See How can I use `return` to get back multiple values from a loop? Can I put them in a list?.
Often, beginners will write a function that ultimately prints something rather than returning it, and then also try to print the result, resulting in an unexpected None. See Why is "None" printed after my function's output?.
Occasionally in 3.x, people try to assign the result of print to a name, or use it in another expression, like input(print('prompt:')). In 3.x, print is a function, so this is not a syntax error, but it returns None rather than what was displayed. See Why does the print function return None?.
Occasionally, people write code that tries to print the result from a recursive call, rather than returning it properly. Just as if the function were merely called, this does not work to propagate the value back through the recursion. See Why does my recursive function return None?.
Consider How do I get a result (output) from a function? How can I use the result later? for questions that are simply about how to use return, without considering print.
The print() function writes, i.e., "prints", a string in the console. The return statement causes your function to exit and hand back a value to its caller. The point of functions in general is to take in inputs and return something. The return statement is used when a function is ready to return a value to its caller.
For example, here's a function utilizing both print() and return:
def foo():
print("hello from inside of foo")
return 1
Now you can run code that calls foo, like so:
if __name__ == '__main__':
print("going to call foo")
x = foo()
print("called foo")
print("foo returned " + str(x))
If you run this as a script (e.g. a .py file) as opposed to in the Python interpreter, you will get the following output:
going to call foo
hello from inside foo
called foo
foo returned 1
I hope this makes it clearer. The interpreter writes return values to the console so I can see why somebody could be confused.
Here's another example from the interpreter that demonstrates that:
>>> def foo():
... print("hello within foo")
... return 1
...
>>> foo()
hello within foo
1
>>> def bar():
... return 10 * foo()
...
>>> bar()
hello within foo
10
You can see that when foo() is called from bar(), 1 isn't written to the console. Instead it is used to calculate the value returned from bar().
print() is a function that causes a side effect (it writes a string in the console), but execution resumes with the next statement. return causes the function to stop executing and hand a value back to whatever called it.
Think of the print statement as causing a side-effect, it makes your function write some text out to the user, but it can't be used by another function.
I'll attempt to explain this better with some examples, and a couple definitions from Wikipedia.
Here is the definition of a function from Wikipedia
A function, in mathematics, associates one quantity, the argument of the function, also known as the input, with another quantity, the value of the function, also known as the output..
Think about that for a second. What does it mean when you say the function has a value?
What it means is that you can actually substitute the value of a function with a normal value! (Assuming the two values are the same type of value)
Why would you want that you ask?
What about other functions that may accept the same type of value as an input?
def square(n):
return n * n
def add_one(n):
return n + 1
print square(12)
# square(12) is the same as writing 144
print add_one(square(12))
print add_one(144)
#These both have the same output
There is a fancy mathematical term for functions that only depend on their inputs to produce their outputs: Referential Transparency. Again, a definition from Wikipedia.
Referential transparency and referential opaqueness are properties of parts of computer programs. An expression is said to be referentially transparent if it can be replaced with its value without changing the behavior of a program
It might be a bit hard to grasp what this means if you're just new to programming, but I think you will get it after some experimentation.
In general though, you can do things like print in a function, and you can also have a return statement at the end.
Just remember that when you use return you are basically saying "A call to this function is the same as writing the value that gets returned"
Python will actually insert a return value for you if you decline to put in your own, it's called "None", and it's a special type that simply means nothing, or null.
I think the dictionary is your best reference here
Return and Print
In short:
return gives something back or replies to the caller of the function while print produces text
In python, we start defining a function with def, and generally - but not necessarily - end the function with return.
Suppose we want a function that adds 2 to the input value x. In mathematics, we might write something like f(x) = x + 2, describing that relationship: the value of the function, evaluated at x, is equal to x + 2.
In Python, it looks like this instead:
def f(x):
return x + 2
That is: we define a function named f, which will be given an x value. When the code runs we figure out x + 2, and return that value. Instead of describing a relationship, we lay out steps that must be taken to calculate the result.
After defining the function, it can be called with whatever argument you like. It doesn't have to be named x in the calling code, and it doesn't even have to be a variable:
print f(2)
>>> 4
We could write the code for the function in some other ways. For example:
def f(x):
y = x + 2
return y
or even
def f(x):
x = x + 2
return x
Again, we are following steps in order - x = x + 2 changes what x refers to (now it means the result from the sum), and that is what gets returned by return x (because that's the value *at the time that the return happens).
return means "output this value from this function".
print means "send this value to (generally) stdout"
In the Python REPL, a function's return value will be output to the screen by default (this isn't the same as printing it). This output only happens at the REPL, not when running code from a .py file. It is the same as the output from any other expression at the REPL.
This is an example of print:
>>> n = "foo\nbar" #just assigning a variable. No output
>>> n #the value is output, but it is in a "raw form"
'foo\nbar'
>>> print(n) #the \n is now a newline
foo
bar
>>>
This is an example of return:
>>> def getN():
... return "foo\nbar"
...
>>> getN() #When this isn't assigned to something, it is just output
'foo\nbar'
>>> n = getN() # assigning a variable to the return value. No output
>>> n #the value is output, but it is in a "raw form"
'foo\nbar'
>>> print(n) #the \n is now a newline
foo
bar
>>>
This answer goes over some of the cases that have not been discussed above.
The return statement allows you to terminate the execution of a function before you reach the end. This causes the flow of execution to immediately return to the caller.
In line number 4:
def ret(n):
if n > 9:
temp = "two digits"
return temp #Line 4
else:
temp = "one digit"
return temp #Line 8
print("return statement")
ret(10)
After the conditional statement gets executed the ret() function gets terminated due to return temp (line 4).
Thus the print("return statement") does not get executed.
Output:
two digits
This code that appears after the conditional statements, or the place the flow of control cannot reach, is the dead code.
Returning Values
In lines number 4 and 8, the return statement is being used to return the value of a temporary variable after the condition has been executed.
To bring out the difference between print and return:
def ret(n):
if n > 9:
print("two digits")
return "two digits"
else :
print("one digit")
return "one digit"
ret(25)
Output:
two digits
'two digits'
Note that return can also be used for control flow. By putting one or more return statements in the middle of a function, we can say: "stop executing this function. We've either got what we wanted or something's gone wrong!"
For example, imagine trying to implement str.find(sub) if we only had str.index(sub) available (index raises a ValueError if the substring isn't found, whereas find returns -1).
We could use a try/except block:
def find(s: str, sub: str) -> int:
try:
return s.index(sub)
except ValueError:
return -1
This is fine, and it works, but it's not very expressive. It's not immediately clear what would cause str.index to raise a ValueError: a reader of this code must understand the workings of str.index in order to understand the logic of find.
Rather than add a doc-string, saying "...unless sub isn't found, in which case return -1", we could make the code document itself, like this:
def find(s: str, sub: str) -> int:
if sub not in s:
return -1
return s.index(sub)
This makes the logic very clear.
The other nice thing about this is that once we get to return s.index(sub) we don't need to wrap it in a try/except because we already know that the substring is present!
See the Code Style section of the Python Guide for more advice on this way of using return.
To put it as simply as possible:
return makes the value (a variable, often) available for use by the caller (for example, to be stored by a function that the function using return is within). Without return, your value or variable wouldn't be available for the caller to store/re-use.
print, by contrast, prints to the screen - but does not make the value or variable available for use by the caller.
Difference between "return" and "print" can also be found in the following example:
RETURN:
def bigger(a, b):
if a > b:
return a
elif a <b:
return b
else:
return a
The above code will give correct results for all inputs.
PRINT:
def bigger(a, b):
if a > b:
print a
elif a <b:
print b
else:
print a
NOTE: This will fail for many test cases.
ERROR:
----
FAILURE: Test case input: 3, 8.
Expected result: 8
FAILURE: Test case input: 4, 3.
Expected result: 4
FAILURE: Test case input: 3, 3.
Expected result: 3
You passed 0 out of 3 test cases
Here is my understanding. (hope it will help someone and it's correct).
def count_number_of(x):
count = 0
for item in x:
if item == "what_you_look_for":
count = count + 1
return count
So this simple piece of code counts number of occurrences of something. The placement of return is significant. It tells your program where do you need the value. So when you print, you send output to the screen. When you return you tell the value to go somewhere. In this case you can see that count = 0 is indented with return - we want the value (count + 1) to replace 0.
If you try to follow logic of the code when you indent the return command further the output will always be 1, because we would never tell the initial count to change.
I hope I got it right.
Oh, and return is always inside a function.
return should be used for recursive functions/methods or you want to use the returned value for later applications in your algorithm.
print should be used when you want to display a meaningful and desired output to the user and you don't want to clutter the screen with intermediate results that the user is not interested in, although they are helpful for debugging your code.
The following code shows how to use return and print properly:
def fact(x):
if x < 2:
return 1
return x * fact(x - 1)
print(fact(5))
This explanation is true for all of the programming languages not just python.
return is part of a function definition, while print outputs text to the standard output (usually the console).
A function is a procedure accepting parameters and returning a value. return is for the latter, while the former is done with def.
Example:
def timestwo(x):
return x*2
Best thing about return function is you can return a value from function but you can do same with print so whats the difference ?
Basically return not about just returning it gives output in object form so that we can save that return value from function to any variable but we can't do with print because its same like stdout/cout in C Programming.
Follow below code for better understanding
CODE
def add(a, b):
print "ADDING %d + %d" % (a, b)
return a + b
def subtract(a, b):
print "SUBTRACTING %d - %d" % (a, b)
return a - b
def multiply(a, b):
print "MULTIPLYING %d * %d" % (a, b)
return a * b
def divide(a, b):
print "DIVIDING %d / %d" % (a, b)
return a / b
print "Let's do some math with just functions!"
age = add(30, 5)
height = subtract(78, 4)
weight = multiply(90, 2)
iq = divide(100, 2)
print "Age: %d, Height: %d, Weight: %d, IQ: %d" % (age, height, weight, iq)
# A puzzle for the extra credit, type it in anyway.
print "Here is a puzzle."
what = add(age, subtract(height, multiply(weight, divide(iq, 2))))
print "That becomes: ", what, "Can you do it by hand?"
We are now doing our own math functions for add, subtract, multiply, and divide. The important thing to notice is the last line where we say return a + b (in add). What this does is the following:
Our function is called with two arguments: a and b.
We print out what our function is doing, in this case "ADDING."
Then we tell Python to do something kind of backward: we return the addition of a + b. You might say this as, "I add a and b then return them."
Python adds the two numbers. Then when the function ends, any line that runs it will be able to assign this a + b result to a variable.
The simple truth is that print and return have nothing to do with each other. print is used to display things in the terminal (for command-line programs).1 return is used to get a result back when you call a function, so that you can use it in the next step of the program's logic.
Many beginners are confused when they try out code at Python's interpreter prompt2, like
>>> def example():
... return 1
...
>>> example()
1
The value was displayed; doesn't this mean that return displays things? No. If you try the same code in a .py file, you can see for yourself that running the script doesn't cause the 1 to display.
This shouldn't actually be confusing, because it works the same way as any other expression:
>>> 1 + 1
2
This displays at the interactive prompt, but not if we make a script that just says 1 + 1 and try running it.
Again: if you need something to display as part of your script, print it. If you need to use it in the next step of the calculation, return it.
The secret is that the interactive prompt is causing the result to be displayed, not the code. It's a separate step that the prompt does for you, so that you can see how the code works a step at a time, for testing purposes.
Now, let's see what happens with print:
>>> def example():
... return 'test'
...
>>> print(example())
test
The result will display, whether we have this in an interactive prompt or in a script. print is explicitly used to display the value - and as we can see, it displays differently. The interactive prompt uses what is called the repr of the value that was returned from example, while print uses the str of the value.
In practical terms: print shows us what the value looks like, in text form (for a string, that just means the contents of the string as-is). The interactive prompt shows us what the value is - typically, by writing something that looks like the source code we would use to create it.3
But wait - print is a function, right? (In 3.x, anyway). So it returned a value, right? Isn't the interpreter prompt supposed to display that in its separate step? What happened?
There is one more trick: print returns the special value None, which the interpreter prompt will ignore. We can test this by using some expressions that evaluate to None:
>>> None
>>> [None][0]
>>> def example():
... pass # see footnote 4
...
>>> example()
>>>
In each case, there is no separate line at all for output, not even a blank line - the interpreter prompt just goes back to the prompt.
1 It can also be used to write into files, although this is a less common idea and normally it will be clearer to use the .write method.
2 This is sometimes called the REPL, which stands for "read-eval-print loop".
3 This isn't always practical, or even possible - especially once we start defining our own classes. The firm rule is that repr will lean on the .__repr__ method of the object to do the dirty work; similarly, str leans on .__str__.
4 Functions in Python implicitly return None if they don't explicitly return a value.
Return statement -- will return some values according your function.
def example(n):
if n == 5:
return true
else:
return false
if you call above function and you pass number 5 then it will return true else it will return false.
Printing function -- it will print content that you have given to the print function or with in print function bracket.
def example(n):
if n == 5:
print("number is equal")
else:
print("number is not equal")

Haskell scripts with simple asserts

Many books and tutorials explain language features with small scripts that do asserts. If all the assertions pass, the process has an exit code of 0, and if any one fails, the process has a non-zero exit code. For example, in Python:
assert type(int) == type
assert len(list(x for x in range(3))) == 3
assert {'x': 1}['x'] == 1
and in Lua:
assert(type(7.299E-3) == "number")
assert(#{10, 20, 30} == 3)
assert(utf8.len("cafés") == 5)
In Ruby we can fake it in a nice way:
fail unless 5.send(:abs) == 5
fail unless 5.send('abs') == 5
fail unless 5.abs == 5
But I'm having trouble finding the equivalent in Haskell. When I tried to use error directly, in this script:
main = do
{ 1 == 1 || error "nope"
; 3 == 3 || error "nope"
; 8 == 8 || error "nope"
}
I get the error
error:
• Couldn't match expected type ‘m a0’ with actual type ‘Bool’
• In a stmt of a 'do' block: 1 == 1 || error "nope"
which makes sense given the expected type of main. Now I was able to do what I wanted by writing my own module on the side:
module SimpleAssert (assertAll) where
import Data.List (all)
assertAll assertions =
if all ((==) True) assertions
then return "ok"
else error "Assertion failure"
Then my script is the relatively clean:
import SimpleAssert (assertAll)
main = do
assertAll
[ 1 == 1
, 3 == 3
, 8 == 8
]
However it not as stand-alone as in the other languages (nor does it give me any indication of where the actual assertion failed, but I can live with that). Is there a way in Haskell to do without the external assert function? I do know about unit tests in Haskell, but that too has some "overhead." Perhaps the overhead is fine and proper, and maybe an external function is the right way to go, but I'm interested to know if Haskell supports some kind of lightweight approach to this. Does such a (lightweight) way exist?
Not fully sure if this meets your needs, but one simple option is to use unless:
main = do
unless (1 == 1) (error "nope")
unless (3 == 3) (error "nope")
unless (8 == 8) (error "nope")
and you could of course easily factor out a separate "assert" function from this if you want to.

Does Groovy's ternary conditional operator have a bug in string expressions?

Groovy's ternary condition operator has a very strange behavior in this code:
def f = true
println 'a' + f?'b':'z' + 'c' // b
f = false
println 'a' + f?'b':'z' + 'c' // b
It prints b in both cases and ignores the other two strings without warning! Is that a bug in the Groovy compiler?
If numbers are used, in the place of strings, an error is generated:
def f = true
println 1 + f?2:3 + 3 // Error: Cannot find matching method int#plus(boolean).
Parenthesis fix the problem:
def f = true
println 'a' + (f?'b':'z') + 'c' // abc
println 1 + (f?2:3) + 3 // 6
Can someone explain this behavior?
It's all to do with operator precedence.
Most* languages have a rule of precedence for operators (which ones are taken first when there are multiple options). Groovys order can be found here.
As you can see, + comes in at position 5, but ternary comes in at a lowly 14
This mean that Groovy parses your expression as (added brackets to show):
('a' + f) ? 'b' : ('z' + 'c')
Which when you fill in the variables, becomes
('atrue') ? 'b' : ('zc')
In groovy, any non empty (and non null) String is considered true when taken as a boolean, so the result of the above is b
As you've seen, the answer is to add parentheses to show the parser what you actually want
(* Lisps, Forth and probably more don't 😉)

How to print statement from asserted method or closure in Groovy

Is it somehow possible to inline statement from closure or method into an assertion so it can be printed when the assertion fails?
If we have simple statement like assert 10 == (20 - 11) then Groovy's power assert prints it nicely like:
assert 10 == (20 - 11)
| |
false 9
However if we extract the statement into a closure like:
def c = { arg -> arg == (20 - 11) }
assert c(10)
then the output will be much less informative:
assert c(10)
|
false
I'm developing custom specific test framework and the use case is to have custom assertions represented as boolean closures or methods and run the assertion from one place.
You were getting such output becuase, closure is returning boolean and assert does look for true.
Approach #1 : If you want change the ouput, then may be you can pass the two arguments to closure instead of one argument as shown below. Of course, you may not want to compare equality with static number in your framework, so the second argument make sense.
def c = { arg1, arg2 -> arg1 == arg2 }
assert c(10, 20-11), 'comparison failed'
Output:
java.lang.AssertionError: Comparison failed. Expression: c.call(10, (20 - 11))
at Script1.run(Script1.groovy:2)
Approach #2: Here changed closure name appropriately, and doing the assertion inside itself. Since its name is assertEqual, it may unlikely misused for other assertions such as >, <.
def assertEqual = { arg1, arg2 -> assert arg1 == arg2, "Comparison failed: ${arg1} vs ${arg2}" }
assertEqual(10, 20-11)
Output:
java.lang.AssertionError: Comparison failed: 10 vs 9. Expression: (arg1 == arg2). Values: arg1 = 10, arg2 = 9
at Script1$_run_closure1.doCall(Script1.groovy:1)
at Script1.run(Script1.groovy:2)
You write more closures in this manner, such as assertGreaterThan assertLessThan for specific operations.
Approach #3: Here you can even pass what should be the error message to the closure.
def assertEqual = { arg1, arg2, message -> assert arg1 == arg2, message(arg1, arg2) }
assertEqual(10, 20-11) {op1, op2 -> "$op1 is not equal to $op2"}
Output:
java.lang.AssertionError: 10 is not equal to 9. Expression: (arg1 == arg2). Values: arg1 = 10, arg2 = 9
at Script1$_run_closure1.doCall(Script1.groovy:1)
at Script1.run(Script1.groovy:2)
Approach #4 Another variant where user can pass operation, and message. You may not only do equal, but also other operations as well. So, changing the closure name to myAssert.
def myAssert = { arg1, arg2, expression -> expression(arg1, arg2) }
//Greater than
myAssert(10, 20-11) {op1, op2 -> assert op1 > op2, "$op1 is not greater than $op2" }
//Less than
myAssert(10, 20-11) {op1, op2 -> assert op1 < op2, "$op1 is not less than $op2" }
//Equal
myAssert(10, 20-11) {op1, op2 -> assert op1 == op2, "$op1 is not equal to $op2" }
Output:
java.lang.AssertionError: 10 is not less than 9. Expression: (op1 < op2). Values: op1 = 10, op2 = 9
at Script1$_run_closure2.doCall(Script1.groovy:2)
at Script1$_run_closure1.doCall(Script1.groovy:1)
at Script1.run(Script1.groovy:2)
If you want to go with simple approach and just use equal assert, then Approach #2 is right one. Of course, you are the better one to choose which one suits better for your need.

Groovy Working with Lists and ranges

I am trying to get myself started with Groovy, I am trying to find out the numbers within 1 to 100 that are divisible by 7.
def numbers=[1..100]
def divisibleBy7 = numbers.findAll {it % 7 == 0 }
divisibleBy7.each{println it}
Can you tell me what I'm doing wrong. The error message from groovy console is not very clear
Exception thrown
groovy.lang.MissingMethodException: No signature of method: groovy.lang.IntRange.mod() is applicable for argument types: (java.lang.Integer) values: [7]
Possible solutions: pop(), min(), max(), add(java.lang.Object), add(java.lang.Object), add(int, java.lang.Object)
at divisibleBy7$_run_closure1.doCall(divisibleBy7.groovy:2)
at divisibleBy7.run(divisibleBy7.groovy:2)
The problem is with [1..100]. The square brackets are the syntax for a list. Therefore, this is a list of IntRange instead of the range itself. What you want is:
def numbers = 1..100
def divisibleBy7 = numbers.findAll {it % 7 == 0 }
divisibleBy7.each{println it}
You can also use parens around ranges.

Resources