I cross-compiled a Helloworld executable for ARM. It worked well on my friend's development board, but failed with a " segmentation fault " on my board. The two boards are slightly different in both hardware and software.
My question is, how can I debug in my board? Is it relatively easy to debug such a simple program? Does it indicate that there's nothing wrong with the executable and the problem most probably lies in the filesystem of my board?
Below is the code:
#include <QApplication>
#include <QPushButton>
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
QApplication app(argc, argv);
QPushButton hello("Hello world");
hello.resize(100, 30);
hello.show();
return app.exec();
}
And the executable is generated by the following commands:
qmake -project
qmake
make
most probably gdb is ported to be run on ARM target but in case lack of that or for easy debugging, you should use gdb remote debugging.
http://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Remote-Debugging.html#Remote-Debugging
Gdbserver is the application should be run on target. the following is demonstration howto use it. (copied from wikipedia)
Target settings:
remote$ gdbserver :2345 hello_world
Process hello_world created; pid = 2509
Listening on port 2345
Host settings:
local$ gdb -q hello_world
Reading symbols from /home/user/hello_world...done.
(gdb) target remote 192.168.0.11:2345
Remote debugging using 192.168.0.11:2345
0x002f3850 in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
(gdb) continue
Continuing.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x08048414 in main () at hello_world.c:10
10 printf("x[%d] = %g\n", i, x[i]);
(gdb)
So you mentioned after LD_LIBRARY_PATH your issue was resolved. And before setting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH if your application gives error can not find libQt then it means you do not have Qt, but your application is giving this Seg Fault that mean you have library but not the right one so we can say you have multiple installations of Qt on your filesystem.
The one to which you have pointed now is correctly compiled for your current hardware but the other one is not compiled for your hardware causing the Segfault and this installation is in your library search path.
One possible reason of this seg fault can be determined from below.
Following are some CFLAGS which if not set correctly for any particular hardware, the compiled application / library causes Seg faults at run time.
-march
-mtune
-mfpu
So if your binary / library is compiled with say -march=armv5a and you are running it on ARM9 then it will crash like this.
Also note that not all application uses these flags, usually these flags are optimization flags and are used by base system libraries (i.e Qt, Glib, bison, Gtk etc....).
Even if you write a simple C based hello world application and your glibc is not compiled for your hardware you will get the Seg fault.
Answer from Author:
What caused this "segmentation fault" is exactly the software difference of the board. Specifically, the environmenat variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH was predefined in the failed board. And I added my path by the command
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARAY_PATH:/my/qt/path
Thus the predefined paths caused the problem ( still don't know in what way ).
If I change the command to
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/my/qt/path
the executable works.
As a general rule you shouldn't create objects derived from QObject on the stack as the QMetaObject system manages the life-time of objects with a parent-child relationship, and will therefore risk free()ing memory on the stack.
Related
I have setup Linux Kernel debug environment with VMware Workstation. But When I tried to connect with gdb that connects correctly but I can't set any breakpoint or examine any kernel symbol.
Target Machine (debugee) Ubuntu 18:
I have compiled linux kernel 5.0-0 with the following directives:
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y
# CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_REDUCED is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_SPLIT is not set
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF4=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y
# CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_FORCE_WEAK_PER_CPU is not set
Also my VMX file configuration:
debugStub.listen.guest64 = "TRUE"
debugStub.listen.guest64.remote="TRUE"
After that I transfered vmlinux to debugger machine and use gdb:
bash$ gdb vmlinux
gdb-peda$ target remote 10.251.31.28:8864
Remote debugging using 10.251.31.28:8864
Warning: not running or target is remote
0xffffffff9c623f36 in ?? ()
gdb-peda$ disas sys_open
No symbol "do_sys_open" in current context.
First you need to install kernel-debug-devel, kernel-debuginfo, kernel-debuginfo-common for corresponding kernel version.
Then you can use crash utility to debug kernel, which internally uses gdb
The symbol name you're looking for is sometimes not exactly what you expect it to be. You can use readelf or other similar tools to find the full name of the symbol in the kernel image. These names sometimes differ from the names in the code because of various architecture level differences and their related header and C definitions in kernel code. For example you might be able to disassemble the open() system call by using:
disas __x64_do_sys_open
if you've compiled it for x86-64 architecture.
Also keep in mind that these naming conventions are subject to change in different versions of kernel.
I'm running Linux on spike as described at: http://riscv.org/download.html#tab_linux. With busybox I have a powerful tool to run several usefull tools. The next thing I am trying to achieve, is to run my own program on riscv/Linux. Therefore I wrote a little program:
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void) {
printf("Hello world!\n");
return 0; }
compiled it with riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc and added the binary to the root.img of riscv/Linux. The Problem I now have is, that if I want to execute the program under riscv/Linux threw ./hello, the following message appears on my shell:
-/bin/ash: ./hello: not found
My Question now is (1) what am I doing wrong and (2) is there at all a possibility to run a program on riscv/Linux the way I am trying accomplish it?
My guess is that your hello program is dynamically linked to a runtime library that is missing from your root file system.
You can use 'ldd' to find which dynamic libraries your application is linked with and make sure all of them are present on the root file system or simply compile the hello program statically.
I'm trying to make custom binaries for initrd for x86 system. I took generic precompiled Debian 7 gcc (version 4.7.2-5) and compiled kernel with it. Next step was to make helloworld program instead of init script in initrd to check my development progress. Helloworld program was also compiled with that gcc. When I tried to start my custom system, kernel started with no problem, but helloworld program encountered some errors:
kernel: init[24879] general protection ip:7fd7271585e0 sp:7fff1ef55070 error:0 in init[7fd727142000+20000]
(numbers are not mine, I took similar string from google). Helloworld program:
#include <stdio.h>
int main(){
printf("Helloworld\r\n");
sleep(9999999);
return 0;
}
Compilation:
gcc -static -o init test.c
Earlier I also had stuck with same problem on ARM system (took generic compiler, compiled kernel and some binaries with it and tried to run, kernel runs, but binary - not). Solved it with complete buildroot system, and took buildroot compiler in next projects.
So my question is: what difference between gcc compiled as part of buildroot and generic precompiled gcc?
I know that buildroot compiler is made in several steps, with differenet libs and so on, is this main difference, platform independence?
I don't need a solution, I can take buildroot anytime. I want to know source of my problem, to avoid such problems in future. Thanks.
UPD: Replaced sleep with while(1); and got same situation. My kernel output:
init[1]: general protection ip: 8053682 sp: bf978294 error: 0 in init[8048000+81000]
printk: 14300820 message suppressed.
and repeating every second.
UPD2: I added vdso32-int80.so (original name, like in kernel tree), tested - no luck.
I added ld-linux.so (2 files: ld-2.13.so with symbolic link), tested - same error.
Busybox way allows to run binaries without any of this libraries, tested by me on ARM platform.
Thanks for trying to help me, any other ideas?
I want to debug pthreads on my custom linux distribution but I am missing something. My host is Ubuntu 12.04, my target is an i486 custom embedded Linux built with a crosstool-NG cross compiler toolset, the rest of the OS is made with Buildroot.
I will list the facts:
I can run multi-threaded applications on my target
Google Breakpad fails to create a crash report when I run a multi-threaded application on the target. The exact same application with the exact same build of Breakpad libraries will succeed when I run it on my host.
GDB fails to debug multithreaded applications on my target.
e.g.
$./gdb -n -ex "thread apply all backtrace" ./a.out --pid 716
dlopen failed on 'libthread_db.so.1' - /lib/libthread_db.so.1: undefined symbol: ps_lgetfpregs
GDB will not be able to debug pthreads.
GNU gdb 6.8
I don't think ps_lgetfpregs is a problem because of this.
My crosstool build created the libthread_db.so file, and I put it on the target.
My crosstool build created the gdb for my target, so it should have been linked against the same libraries that I run on the target.
If I run gdb on my host, against my test app, I get a backtrace of each running thread.
I suspect the problem with Breakpad is related to the problem with GDB, but I cannot substantiate this. The only commonality is lack of multithreaded debug.
There is some crucial difference between my host and target that stops me from being able to debug pthreads on the target.
Does anyone know what it is?
EDIT:
Denys Dmytriyenko from TI says:
Normally, GDB is not very picky and you can mix and match different
versions of gdb and gdbserver. But, unfortunately, if you need to
debug multi-threaded apps, there are some dependencies for specific
APIs...
For example, this is one of the messages you may see if you didn't
build GDB properly for the thread support:
dlopen failed on 'libthread_db.so.1' - /lib/libthread_db.so.1:
undefined symbol: ps_lgetfpregs GDB will not be able to debug
pthreads.
Note that this error is the same as the one that I get but he doesn't go in to detail about how to build GDB "properly".
and the GDB FAQ says:
(Q) GDB does not see any threads besides the one in which crash occurred;
or SIGTRAP kills my program when I set a breakpoint.
(A) This frequently
happen on Linux, especially on embedded targets. There are two common
causes:
you are using glibc, and you have stripped libpthread.so.0
mismatch between libpthread.so.0 and libthread_db.so.1
GDB itself does
not know how to decode "thread control blocks" maintained by glibc and
considered to be glibc private implementation detail. It uses
libthread_db.so.1 (part of glibc) to help it do so. Therefore,
libthread_db.so.1 and libpthread.so.0 must match in version and
compilation flags. In addition, libthread_db.so.1 requires certain
non-global symbols to be present in libpthread.so.0.
Solution: use
strip --strip-debug libpthread.so.0 instead of strip libpthread.so.0.
I tried a non-stripped libpthread.so.0 but it didn't make a difference. I will investigate any mismatch between pthread and thread_db.
This:
dlopen failed on 'libthread_db.so.1' - /lib/libthread_db.so.1: undefined symbol: ps_lgetfpregs
GDB will not be able to debug pthreads.
means that the libthread_db.so.1 library was not able to find the symbol ps_lgetfpregs in gdb.
Why?
Because I built gdb using Crosstoolg-NG with the "Build a static native gdb" option and this adds the -static option to gcc.
The native gdb is built with the -rdynamic option and this populates the .dynsym symbol table in the ELF file with all symbols, even unused ones. libread_db uses this symbol table to find ps_lgetfpregs from gdb.
But -static strips the .dynsym table from the ELF file.
At this point there are two options:
Don't build a static native gdb if you want to debug threads.
Build a static gdb and a static libthread_db (not tested)
Edit:
By the way, this does not explain why Breakpad in unable to debug multithreaded applications on my target.
Just a though... To use the gdb debugger, you need to compile your code with -g option. For instance, gcc -g -c *.c.
I get the following message in gdb (version 7.1):
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
and the command reverse-step
results with the following error message:
(gdb) reverse-step
Target multi-thread does not support this command
I am debugging a serial code right now, so I definitely do not need multi-threading. Can I turn this off somehow so that I get the latest reverse-debug commands to work? Also, if the code is parallelised with OpenMPI, there will be no need for multi-thread debugging at all, right?
Edit: Is this set as a compilation flag that can be just excluded?
You don't mention which version of GDB you're using, but since a little while, the parameter libthread-db-search-path is available.
(gdb) set libthread-db-search-path /tmp
(gdb) start
Temporary breakpoint 1 at 0x400632: file threads.c, line 14.
warning: Unable to find libthread_db matching inferior's thread library, thread debugging will not be available.
will tell GDB to lookup it's helper library (libthread-db.so) in a directory where it isn't, so multithread debugging won't be enabled!
I'm not sure about OpenMPI parallel applications are multiprocesses (in contrast with OpenMP where they are multithreaded), so it won't change anything for you.
EDIT: Multithread debugging is usually only enabled when libpthread.so or equivalent is loaded by your process (ldd your-process to check if it's linked as a shared library) so if you don't need it, there might be a problem in your compilation script.