I have been trying desperately to delete an item from the database but have so far been unable to get it to work. The error message I see is this one:
"The operation failed: The relationship could not be changed because one or more of the foreign-key properties is non-nullable."
I am using EF4.1, with EDMX (Database first) and POCO objects. I have a repository for each type and a general repository that implements the base methods.
The specific problem is when I want to delete an item. Deleting the children is not a problem - everything works perfectly - the problem is when I come to delete the entity itself.
Consider the following model. I have an entity "Foo" which has a 1 to many relationship with "Bar". I call the following method in my repository:
public override void Delete(Models.Foo entity)
{
//Load the child items...
base.Context.Entry(entity).Collection(x => x.Bars).Load();
//Bar
BarRepository barRep = new BarRepository();
foreach (var item in entity.Bars)
{
var obj = barRep.GetById(item.ID);
barRep.Delete(obj);
}
barRep.Save();
//First attempt
//base.Delete(entity);
//base.Save();
//Have to resort to some SQL
base.ExecuteSqlCommand(string.Format("delete from Foo where ID = {0}", entity.ID));
}
The GenericRepository "Delete" method is:
public virtual void Delete(T entity)
{
_entities.Set<T>().Remove(entity);
}
The GenericRepository "Save" method is simply:
public virtual void Save()
{
_entities.SaveChanges();
}
What I would like to get to work is this:
//First attempt
//base.Delete(entity);
//base.Save();
But unfortunately the only way (currently) for me to delete the item is to run some SQL which just calls _entities.Database.ExecuteSqlCommand(SQL).
I've read a lot of things but nothing seems to work. I would really appreciate some help in trying to understand what is going on.
Thanks,
Jose
Related
Developer's version of Acumatica 2020R1 is installed locally. Data for sample tenant MyTenant from training for I-300 were loaded, and WSDL connection established.
DefaultSoapClient is created fine.
However, attempts to export any data by using Getlist cause errors:
using (Default.DefaultSoapClient soapClient =
new Default.DefaultSoapClient())
{
//Sign in to Acumatica ERP
soapClient.Login
(
"Admin",
"*",
"MyTenant",
"Yogifon",
null
);
try
{
//Retrieving the list of customers with contacts
//InitialDataRetrieval.RetrieveListOfCustomers(soapClient);
//Retrieving the list of stock items modified within the past day
// RetrievalOfDelta.ExportStockItems(soapClient);
RetrievalOfDelta.ExportItemClass(soapClient);
}
public static void ExportItemClass(DefaultSoapClient soapClient)
{
Console.WriteLine("Retrieving the list of item classes...");
ItemClass ItemClassToBeFound = new ItemClass
{
ReturnBehavior = ReturnBehavior.All,
};
Entity[] ItemClasses = soapClient.GetList(ItemClassToBeFound);
string lcItemType = "", lcValuationMethod = "";
int lnCustomFieldsCount;
using (StreamWriter file = new StreamWriter("ItemClass.csv"))
{
//Write the values for each item
foreach (ItemClass loItemClass in ItemClasses)
{
file.WriteLine(loItemClass.Note);
}
}
The Acumatica instance was modified by adding a custom field to Stock Items using DAC, and by adding several Attributes to Customer and Stock Items.
Interesting enough, this code used to work until something broke it.
What is wrong here?
Thank you.
Alexander
In the request you have the following line: ReturnBehavior = ReturnBehavior.All
That means that you try to retrieve all linked/detail entities of the object. Unfortunately, some object are not optimized enough to not affect query performance in GetList scenarios.
So, you have to options:
Replace ReturnBehavior=All by explicitly specifying linked/detail entities that you want to retrieve and not include Attributes into the list.
Retrieve StockItem with attributes one by one using Get operation instead of GetList.
P.S. The problem with attributes will most likely be fixed in the next version of API endpoint.
Edit:
Code sample for Get:
public static void ExportItemClass(DefaultSoapClient soapClient)
{
Console.WriteLine("Retrieving the list of item classes...");
ItemClass ItemClassToBeFound = new ItemClass
{
ReturnBehavior = ReturnBehavior.Default //retrieve only default fields (without attributes and other linked/detailed entities)
};
Entity[] ItemClasses = soapClient.GetList(ItemClassToBeFound);
foreach(var entity in ItemClasses)
{
ItemClass itemClass= entity as ItemClass;
ItemClass.ReturnBehavior=ReturnBehavior.All;
// retrieve each ItemClass with all the details/linked entities individually
ItemClass retrievedItemCLass = soapClient.Get(itemClass);
}
I have this this method for save and update student but whenever I save student into database and hit getAllStudent it dosen't get back the last student I already have saved ?
ANy help?
#CachePut(cacheNames="studentCache")
public StudentDTO save (StudentDTO studentDTo)
{
Student student=studentRepository.save().map
return studentMapper.toDto(student);
}
#override
#Transactional
#Cacheable
public Page(StudentDTO>findALL(Pageable p)
{
return studentRepository.findAll(pagebale).map(mapper::toDTO);
}
I understand that I can do clear cache whenever I create or update Student
#CacheEvict(value = "users", allEntries=true)
Student create(Student student) {
userStudent.create(student)
}
But I want to avoid that
Your save is caching singletons, findAll is caching collections. As far as the cache manager is concerned, there are two different things, updating one won't update the other.
I'm trying to store a "Role" object and then get a list of Roles, as shown here:
public class Role
{
public Guid RoleId { get; set; }
public string RoleName { get; set; }
public string RoleDescription { get; set; }
}
//Function store:
private void StoreRole(Role role)
{
using (var docSession = docStore.OpenSession())
{
docSession.Store(role);
docSession.SaveChanges();
}
}
// then it return and a function calls this
public List<Role> GetRoles()
{
using (var docSession = docStore.OpenSession())
{
var Roles = from roles in docSession.Query<Role>() select roles;
return Roles.ToList();
}
}
However, in the GetRoles I am missing the last inserted record/document. If I wait 200ms and then call this function the item is there.
So I am not in sync. ?!
How can I solve this, or alternately how could I know when the result is in the document store for querying?
I've used transactions, but cannot figure this out. Update and delete are just fine, but when inserting I need to delay my 'List' call.
You are treating RavenDB as if it is a relational database, and it isn't. Load and Store are ACID operations in RavenDB, Query is not. Indexes (necessary for queries) are updated asynchronously, and in fact, temporary indexes may have to be built from scratch when you do a session.Query<T>() without a durable index specified. So, if you are trying to query for information you JUST stored, or if you are doing the FIRST query that requires a temporary index to be created, you probably won't get the data you expect.
There are methods of customizing your query to wait for non-stale results but you shouldn't lean on these too much because they're indicative of a bad design - it is better to figure out a better way to do the same thing in a way that embraces eventual consistency, either changing your model (so you get consistency via Load/Store - perhaps you could have one document that defines ALL of the roles in a list?) or by changing the application flow so you don't need to Store and then immediately Query.
An additional way of solving this is to query the index with WaitForNonStaleResultsAsOfLastWrite() turned on inside the save function. That way when the save is completed the index will be updated to at least include the change you just made.
You can read more about this here
I have a business requirement to only send permissioned properties in our response payload. For instance, our response DTO may have several properties, and one of them is SSN. If the user doesn't have permissions to view the SSN then I would never want it to be in the Json response. The second requirement is that we send null values if the client has permissions to view or change the property. Because of the second requirement setting the properties that the user cannot view to null will not work. I have to still return null values.
I have a solution that will work. I create an expandoObject by reflecting through my DTO and add only the properties that I need. This is working in my tests.
I have looked at implementing ITextSerializer. I could use that and wrap my response DTO in another object that would have a list of properties to skip. Then I could roll my own SerializeToString() and SerializeToStream(). I don't really see any other ways at this point. I can't use the JsConfig and make a SerializeFn because the properties to skip would change with each request.
So I think that implementing ITextSerializer is a good option. Are there any good examples of this getting implemented? I would really like to use all the hard work that was already done in the serializer and take advantage of the great performance. I think that in an ideal world I would just need to add a check in the WriteType.WriteProperties() to look and the property is one to write, but that is internal and really, most of them are so I can't really take advantage of them.
If someone has some insight please let me know! Maybe I am making the implementation of ITextSerialzer a lot harder that it really is?
Thanks!
Pull request #359 added the property "ExcludePropertyReference" to the JsConfig and the JsConfigScope. You can now exclude references in scope like I needed to.
I would be hesitant to write my own Serializer. I would try to find solutions that you can plug in into the existing ServiceStack code. That way you will have to worry less about updating dlls and breaking changes.
One potential solution would be decorating your properties with a Custom Attributes that you could reflect upon and obscure the property values. This could be done in the Service before Serialization even happens. This would still include values that they user does not have permission to see but I would argue that if you null those properties out they won't even be serialized by JSON anyways. If you keep all the properties the same they you will keep the benefits of strong typed DTOs.
Here is some hacky code I quickly came up with to demonstrate this. I would move this into a plugin and make the reflection faster with some sort of property caching but I think you will get the idea.
Hit the url twice using the following routes to see it in action.
/test?role
/test?role=Admin (hack to pretend to be an authenticated request)
[System.AttributeUsage(System.AttributeTargets.Property)]
public class SecureProperty : System.Attribute
{
public string Role {get;set;}
public SecureProperty(string role)
{
Role = role;
}
}
[Route("/test")]
public class Test : IReturn
{
public string Name { get; set; }
[SecureProperty("Admin")]
public string SSN { get; set; }
public string SSN2 { get; set; }
public string Role {get;set;}
}
public class TestService : Service
{
public object Get(Test request)
{
// hack to demo roles.
var usersCurrentRole = request.Role;
var props = typeof(Test).GetProperties()
.Where(
prop => ((SecureProperty[])prop
.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(SecureProperty), false))
.Any(att => att.Role != usersCurrentRole)
);
var t = new Test() {
Name = "Joe",
SSN = "123-45-6789",
SSN2 = "123-45-6789" };
foreach(var p in props) {
p.SetValue(t, "xxx-xx-xxxx", null);
}
return t;
}
}
Require().StartHost("http://localhost:8080/",
configurationBuilder: host => { });
I create this demo in ScriptCS. Check it out.
Im using subsonic 2.2
I tried asking this question another way but didnt get the answer i was looking for.
Basically i ususally include validation at page level or in my code behind for my user controls or aspx pages. However i haev seen some small bits of info advising this can be done within partial classes generated from subsonic.
So my question is, where do i put these, are there particular events i add my validation / business logic into such as inserting, or updating. - If so, and validation isnt met, how do i stop the insert or update. And if anyone has a code example of how this looks it would be great to start me off.
Any info greatly appreciated.
First you should create a partial class for you DAL object you want to use.
In my project I have a folder Generated where the generated classes live in and I have another folder Extended.
Let's say you have a Subsonic generated class Product. Create a new file Product.cs in your Extended (or whatever) folder an create a partial class Product and ensure that the namespace matches the subsonic generated classes namespace.
namespace Your.Namespace.DAL
{
public partial class Product
{
}
}
Now you have the ability to extend the product class. The interesting part ist that subsonic offers some methods to override.
namespace Your.Namespace.DAL
{
public partial class Product
{
public override bool Validate()
{
ValidateColumnSettings();
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(this.ProductName))
this.Errors.Add("ProductName cannot be empty");
return Errors.Count == 0;
}
// another way
protected override void BeforeValidate()
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(this.ProductName))
throw new Exception("ProductName cannot be empty");
}
protected override void BeforeInsert()
{
this.ProductUUID = Guid.NewGuid().ToString();
}
protected override void BeforeUpdate()
{
this.Total = this.Net + this.Tax;
}
protected override void AfterCommit()
{
DB.Update<ProductSales>()
.Set(ProductSales.ProductName).EqualTo(this.ProductName)
.Where(ProductSales.ProductId).IsEqualTo(this.ProductId)
.Execute();
}
}
}
In response to Dan's question:
First, have a look here: http://github.com/subsonic/SubSonic-2.0/blob/master/SubSonic/ActiveRecord/ActiveRecord.cs
In this file lives the whole logic I showed in my other post.
Validate: Is called during Save(), if Validate() returns false an exception is thrown.
Get's only called if the Property ValidateWhenSaving (which is a constant so you have to recompile SubSonic to change it) is true (default)
BeforeValidate: Is called during Save() when ValidateWhenSaving is true. Does nothing by default
BeforeInsert: Is called during Save() if the record is new. Does nothing by default.
BeforeUpdate: Is called during Save() if the record is new. Does nothing by default.
AfterCommit: Is called after sucessfully inserting/updating a record. Does nothing by default.
In my Validate() example, I first let the default ValidatColumnSettings() method run, which will add errors like "Maximum String lenght exceeded for column ProductName" if product name is longer than the value defined in the database. Then I add another errorstring if ProductName is empty and return false if the overall error count is bigger than zero.
This will throw an exception during Save() so you can't store the record in the DB.
I would suggest you call Validate() yourself and if it returns false you display the elements of this.Errors at the bottom of the page (the easy way) or (more elegant) you create a Dictionary<string, string> where the key is the columnname and the value is the reason.
private Dictionary<string, string> CustomErrors = new Dictionary<string, string>
protected override bool Validate()
{
this.CustomErrors.Clear();
ValidateColumnSettings();
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(this.ProductName))
this.CustomErrors.Add(this.Columns.ProductName, "cannot be empty");
if (this.UnitPrice < 0)
this.CustomErrors.Add(this.Columns.UnitPrice, "has to be 0 or bigger");
return this.CustomErrors.Count == 0 && Errors.Count == 0;
}
Then if Validate() returns false you can add the reason directly besides/below the right field in your webpage.
If Validate() returns true you can safely call Save() but keep in mind that Save() could throw other errors during persistance like "Dublicate Key ...";
Thanks for the response, but can you confirm this for me as im alittle confused, if your validating the column (ProductName) value within validate() or the beforevalidate() is string empty or NULL, doesnt this mean that the insert / update has already been actioned, as otherwise it wouldnt know that youve tried to insert or update a null value from the UI / aspx fields within the page to the column??
Also, within asp.net insert or updating events we use e.cancel = true to stop the insert update, if beforevalidate failes does it automatically stop the action to insert or update?
If this is the case, isnt it eaiser to add page level validation to stop the insert or update being fired in the first place.
I guess im alittle confused at the lifecyle for these methods and when they come into play